Upload
trevor-crow
View
72
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
This difference is typically why many funds investing large amounts of money in a company prefer it to be a Delaware corporation. These investment funds want to protect their ability to control whether a merger occurs and do not want common shareholders to have the ability to block a merger.
Citation preview
http://biz taxbuz z .com/reason-venture-capital- firms-prefer-delaware-corporations/ May 21, 2013
One Reason Why Venture Capital Firms Prefer DelawareCorporations | BizTaxBuzz by Trevor Crow
17thMayOne Reason Why Venture Capital FirmsPrefer Delaware CorporationsPosted by Trevor Crow
There are various structures to use when selling a company. Most privately held companies aresold through a sale of its assets or a t riangular merger, where the purchaser forms a subsidiarythat then merges into the target company. State law and a company’s const ituent documents(i.e., art icles of incorporat ion and bylaws) control the requirements for a merger and for the sale ofsubstant ially all of a company’s assets. In this post, I out line a comparison of the vot ingrequirements under Delaware law and Colorado law for a merger.
Delaware
Under Delaware corporate law, a merger requires approval of a majority of the outstanding stockent it led to vote, unless there are addit ional approvals required under the company’s Cert if icate ofIncorporat ion (e.g. super-majority approval or approval f rom each series of stock). Further, theacquiring company may require other approval, like a super-majority approval, to limit the numberof stockholders that may exercise dissenter’s rights.
Colorado
Under Colorado corporate law, a merger requires the approval of a majority of the outstandingshares of each class of the corporat ion, unless (i) the board of directors requires a greater vote(ii) addit ional approvals are required under the company’s Art icles of Incorporat ion or Bylawsadopted by the shareholders (e.g. super-majority approval) or (iii) the acquiring company requiresother approval, like a super-majority approval, to limit the number of stockholders that mayexercise dissenter’s rights. In pract ice, this usually means that a majority of the preferredshareholders must approve of the merger and a majority of the common shareholders mustapprove the merger.
One of the biggest dif ferences between Colorado law and Delaware law is that a majority of eachclass of shares must approve a merger under Colorado law whereas a majority of the totaloutstanding shares must approve a merger under Delaware law. To illustrate, assume that aColorado company has 50 common shares and 50 preferred shares for a total of 100 sharesoutstanding. If all 50 of the preferred shares and 20 of the common shares are voted in favor ofthe merger, the merger st ill fails because a majority of the common shares did not vote to approve
the merger. Under Delaware law, this same example reaches a dif ferent result . The merger wouldbe approved under Delaware law because a majority of the outstanding shares voted to approvethe merger (i.e. 70 out of 100).
Bottom Line. This dif ference is typically why many funds invest ing large amounts of money in acompany prefer it to be a Delaware corporat ion. These investment funds want to protect theirability to control whether a merger occurs and do not want common shareholders to have theability to block a merger.