View
551
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Report Summary--Managed Markets Account Management: Assessing the Performance of Account Executives. Contact me to view the full report.
Citation preview
BEST PRACTICES,®
LLCCopyright © Best Practices®, LLC
Managed Markets Account Management Assessing the Performance of Account Executives
BEST PRACTICES,®
LLCCopyright © Best Practices®, LLC 1
Project Overview 2Participants and Experience 4-5Participant Overview 6Key Insights 10Detailed Study Findings 14Organizational Fit/Structure/Reporting Relationships 15Acct Management Changes Trends Next 3 Years 23Staffing Benchmarks & Program Trends, 25Time Allocations 33Activities & Measurements 35Pitfalls and Challenges 45Appendix 46
Additional QuotesAbout Best Practices 51
Table of ContentsPage
BEST PRACTICES,®
LLCCopyright © Best Practices®, LLC 2
Project Methodology and Study Objectives
Research was conducted through survey and interviewsKey study objectives
Identify common practices in measuring Managed Markets
account executive performance
Gain insight into the principles of effective measurement of this
function
Determine what specific measures are used to drive successful
activity in Managed Markets account management
Thirty-two participants made up the Total Benchmark Class (TBC), sixteen of which represented companies in the Large Pharma Segment (LPS).
BEST PRACTICES,®
LLCCopyright © Best Practices®, LLC 3
List of Participating Companies
Abbott LaboratoriesAllerganAstraZenecaBayer AGBoehringer IngelheimEli Lilly and Co.GenentechJohnson & JohnsonMerck & Co.Novo NordiskPfizerRocheSanofi-AventisSchering-PloughWyeth
AbraxisApria HealthcareBausch and LombCelgeneEMD SeronoHoneywellIDSKing PharmaceuticalsLaboratorios Deramtologicos DarierLundbeckQ-Med Scandinavia Sciele PharmaSkilaSmith & NephewTher-Rx CorporationValeant
Large Pharma Other Participants
BEST PRACTICES,®
LLCCopyright © Best Practices®, LLC 4
Participants’ Experience with Managed Markets Accounts
Total Benchmark Class
22%
38%
41%
Large Pharma Segment
25%
38%
38%0-5 Years6-10 YearsOver 10 Years
Q. How many years of experience do you have in dealing directly with managed markets accounts?
n=32 n=16
More than 75 percent of participants reported having more than six years of experience dealing directly with Managed Markets accounts.
BEST PRACTICES,®
LLCCopyright © Best Practices®, LLC 5
Products with which Managed Markets Account Executives Are Involved
Number in the Market- Total Benchmark Class
35%
39%
26%
1-5 Products
6-10 Products
More than 10Products
Number in the Pipeline- Large Pharma Segment
38%
56%
6%Number in the Market- Large Pharma Segment
19%
38%
44%
Number in the Pipeline- Total Benchmark Class
47%
47%
7%
1-2 Products
3-4 Products
More than 4Products
Q. How many products, in the market or in the pipeline, are your Managed Markets account executives involved with?
n=30n=31
n=16 n=16
Most respondents reported having six or more products in the market, plus three or more in the pipeline, with which Managed Markets account executives are currently involved. LPS companies tended to have slightly more of these products, especially in the market.
BEST PRACTICES,®
LLCCopyright © Best Practices®, LLC 6
Structure and Organizational Alignment
Separating Managed Markets from Sales provides a clearer focus on objectives and easier measurement of results
Coordination and cooperation between these separate groups can be harder
The rationale for having national and regional account executives report to the same individual (in either organization) is similar: coordination
“When groups have separate reporting structures for national and regional accounts, they don't get the level of collaboration, and our customer base is more intertwined than ever before in terms of the relationships between customer segments.” – Executive Vice President, Top 50 Pharma
Maintaining separate groups with responsibility for Managed Markets strategy and/or marketing often brings to bear the perspectives of the brands and therapeutic areas
BEST PRACTICES,®
LLCCopyright © Best Practices®, LLC 7
Optimal Methods and Measures for Assessing the Value of Managed Markets Account Management
Formulary status, sales, and share (50%):Share movementPenetration of productsFormulary accessFormulary penetrationSales pull-throughUnit demand
Profitability and financial results (55%):Profit goalsProfitable growthProfitable accessFinancial performanceContract performance and profitabilityROI of contracts achieved
Performance against objectives (27%):Clear MBOsBusiness plan executionAppraisal every quarter for agreed parametersStrategic objective accomplishments
Other (32%):Competency measures# of effective quality/health initiatives ledCustomer input Markets comparisons
Open-ended data revealed four main categories of optimal methods/measures for assessing Managed Markets account management (some respondents made multiple comments).
32%
27%
55%
50%
0% 20% 40% 60%
Other
Performanceagainst objectives
Profitability andfinancial results
Formulary status,sales, and share
Q. What do you think are the optimal methods and measures for assessing the value of Managed Markets account management?
n=22
BEST PRACTICES,®
LLCCopyright © Best Practices®, LLC 8
Managed Markets Account Management Organizational Alignment
Total Benchmark Class
34%
56%
9%
Large Pharma Segment
38%
63%
0%
Part of anintegrated salesdepartment
Centralized inanotherdepartment orfunctionAll Other
Q. Which of the following statements best describes how Managed Markets account management is organized in your company?
n=32 n=16
[All Other = “distributed among various product/brand managers” and “central function for all customer segments”]
The majority of respondents reported that Managed Markets account management is centralized in another department or function rather than integrated into a sales department.
BEST PRACTICES,®
LLCCopyright © Best Practices®, LLC 9
Challenges and Pitfalls in Measuring and Managing Managed Markets Account Executive Performance
Measurement and compensation (46%):Aligning comp to attainment and salesDecreased profits not always measuredEnsuring that IC plan is seen as fairNo direct control of sales force activityIndirect impact on product performanceLag time/long time frame for resultsMeasuring access without understanding impactAbility to get quality data
Organization and alignment (31%):Activity takes precedence over resultsCertain geographies more conduciveLack of ownership of accountabilityIntegration with global marketing plansInteraction between sales and MM
Other (27%):State mandates/restrictionsEconomic environment volatilityCalling beyond pharmacy/focusing on qualityTraining and convincing sales channels
Open-ended data revealed three main categories of challenges and pitfalls in managing Managed Markets account executive performance (some respondents made multiple comments).
27%
31%
46%
0% 20% 40%
Other
Organization andalignment
Measurement andcompensation
Q. What are the biggest challenges and pitfalls in measuring and motivating Managed Markets account executive performance?
n=26
BEST PRACTICES,®
LLCCopyright © Best Practices®, LLC 10
Best Practices, LLC is a research and consulting firm that conducts work based on the simple yet profound principle that organizations can chart a course to superior economic performance by studying the best business
practices, operating tactics and winning strategies of world-class companies.
Best Practices, LLC6350 Quadrangle Drive, Suite 200, Chapel Hill, NC 27517
About Best Practices, LLC