37

Lennar corporation case study. plus video (2)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

PowerPoint Presentation

Presentation OutlineIntroductionRatio Analysis on LennarComparison of Lennars Performance with IndustryOverview on Joint Venture & LennarThe Impact of Fraud on LennarConclusionINTRODUCTION Video

Lennars Daily Class A Stock Returns around Minkows AllegationReturn on S&P 500 & Lennar From 2006-2008 Lennar & Industry Financial PerformanceLiquidity RatioAsset ManagementAsset TurnoverFinancial leverageInterest Coverage RatioProfitability RatioIndustry Comparison Quick RatioCurrent Ratio

Day Receivable Day Inventory Day PayableAsset TurnoverLong Term Debt to Total AssetLong Term Debt to Total EquityGross Profit Margin RatioReturn on Sales (ROS)Return on AssetsReturn on EquityWhat is a joint venture?A joint venture (JV) is a business agreement in which the parties agree to develop, for a limited time, a new entity and new assets by contributing equity. They exercise control over the enterprise and consequently share revenues, expenses and assets.

Equity Method: It is an accounting method that enables investors in a joint venture to reflect the underlying nature of their investments in the joint venture financial statement. In this method, the investor records the initial investment in the stock at cost and then value is periodically adjusted to reflect the changes in value according to investors share in the companys earnings or loss.

It is used when one investor has significant influence over the other parties which enable him to influence the operating or financial decisions on the jointventure. In such a case, and according to GAAP, influence tends to be more effective as the investors percent of ownership increases. (Controlling interest).What happened?The company was evaluating its investments in the unconsolidated entities for impairment during each reporting period in accordance with APB opinion No. 18. Since a series of operating losses from the unconsolidated entities occurred which maximized the investment risk. The company projected the future cash inflows using 20% discount rate.The company depended on the current market condition

Financial evidences of the fraudThe company considered cumulative distributions (dividends) as return on capital under the operating and investing activities in the consolidated cash flow statement as cash inflows.

The company adjusted the receivables account in its own balance sheet to justify for the cash inflow.

The company deferred the reflection of the earnings from the land sale of the unconsolidated entities by not including it in its equity. Instead, it accounted for those earnings as a reduction of the cost of purchasing the land from the unconsolidated entities to increase its credit facility.

Adjustments on the Consolidated Cash flow statementCash Inflows from operating activities Distribution of earnings from unconsolidated entities $21,069,000

Cash Inflows from investing activities Distributions of capital from unconsolidated entities $87,802.000Lennar financial statement

The Impact of The Fraud on Lennar Current ratioThe Impact of The Fraud on Lennar Quick ratio The Impact of Fraud on Lennar Cash FlowConclusionWe conclude that the strategic purposes of Lennar join venture was to sell specific assets during a limited period of time to leverage himself in order to get access to potential future home sites through limiting the amount of his capital invested in land.

Cash Flow from Investing & Financing Activities