Upload
karen-martin
View
3.031
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Company
LOGO
Lean Webinar Series:
Lean 101 for Office & Service
November 8, 2010
© 2010 Karen Martin & Associates
Webinar Content
Key Lean principles
Eight office/service wastes
Key metrics for identifying & eliminating
waste
Elements for a typical improvement cycle
Basic Lean tools needed to stabilize
processes
Stages of a Lean transformation
2
© 2010 Karen Martin & Associates
Your Instructor
Early career as a scientist; migrated to
quality & operations design and
management in the mid-80’s.
Launched Karen Martin & Associates in
1993.
Specialize in Lean transformations in non-
manufacturing environments.
Co-author of The Kaizen Event Planner;
co-developer of Metrics-Based Process
Mapping: An Excel-Based Solution.
Instructor in University of California, San
Diego’s Lean Enterprise program.
3
Karen Martin,
Principal
Karen Martin &
Associates
© 2010 Karen Martin & Associates
Processes: The Basics
Process – The steps you take to accomplish
anything.
Four types of non-manufacturing processes:
Service (to a live being or equipment)
Transactional
Analytical
Creative
4
© 2010 Karen Martin & Associates
Processes: The Basics
5
Customer
Makes Request
Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4
Final
Output
Input
Upstream Downstream
Supplier Customer
Supplier
Customer
The History of Lean
6
1929
1910 1950’s 1996
1995 2002
2005
Lean
Leadership
& Culture
2009
Service
Sector
© 2010 Karen Martin & Associates 7
Toyota’s Two Key Tenets
Kaizen - Continuous Improvement.
Relentless waste elimination.
Seek perfection.
Respect for people.
Poorly designed processes are
disrespectful.
Reducing waste reduces stress.
Frontlines are authorized to solve
problems.
Plan
Do
Check
Act
© 2010 Karen Martin & Associates
Achieving Organizational Excellence
Quality
Morale
Safety Delivery
Cost
8
Lean is a business management approach –
not merely a process design technique
Building a Lean Enterprise
© 2010 Karen Martin & Associates
Key Principles
1. Only do what the customer values.
2. Design work so it flows through the system.
3. Make problems visible.
4. Solve problems using disciplined
methodology.
5. The people doing the work know best.
6. Seek perfection; continuously improve.
10
© 2010 Karen Martin & Associates
Key Principles
1. Only do what the customer values.
2. Eliminate all obstacles that prevent work
from flowing through the system.
3. Make problems visible.
4. Solve problems using disciplined
methodology.
5. The people doing the work know best.
6. Seek perfection; continuously improve.
11
© 2010 Karen Martin & Associates
Customer-Defined Value
Value-Adding (VA) - any operation or activity your external customers value and are (or would be) willing to pay for.
Non-Value-Adding (NVA) - any operation or activity that consumes time and/or resources but does not add value to the product (good or service) the customer receives.
Necessary – support processes, regulatory requirements, etc.
Unnecessary – everything else - WASTE
12
Unnecessary Non-valueadding
Necessary non-value-adding
Value-adding
Work Effort as Defined by the
External Customer
© 2010 Karen Martin & Associates
Eight Wastes (Muda)
Overproduction
Inventory
Waiting
Over-Processing
Errors
Motion (people)
Transportation (material/data)
Underutilized
people
14
© 2010 Karen Martin & Associates
Examples of Office/Service Waste
Overproduction
PO’s for waiting to be
ordered
Contracts waiting to be
signed
Radiology reports
waiting to be transcribed
The symptom - WIP
Inventory
Office supplies
Unnecessary hard
copies being stored
Waiting
For meetings to begin
For approvals
For shared equipment
to become available
For the system to
respond
Over-processing
Excessive reporting
Excessive reviews &
approvals
Redundant data entry
15
© 2010 Karen Martin & Associates
Examples of Office/Service Waste (continued)
Errors
Any input that’s not “usuable
as is”
Input that has to be
corrected, missing
information added, or
clarified by a downstream
customer
Motion
Walking to shared
equipment
Walking hard copies to
downstream customers
Transportation
Sending hard copies that could
be electronic
Sending docs overnight that
can go two-day
Underutilization of people (Knowledge, Skills, Aptitude,
Creativity)
Narrow scopes of responsibility
Not properly trained
Not used for designing
improvements
16
© 2010 Karen Martin & Associates
Looking for Stuff: Time is Money
Organization with 1,500 employees Earn average of $22 per hour
Work 250 days per year
Each employee spends an average of 10 minutes per day looking or waiting for equipment or material Individual impact
= 41.7 hours wasted time per year
= Over a week of frustrating, unfulfilling, nonproductive time
Organizational impact = 62,550 hours of nonproductive time
30 FTEs worth of valuable resources doing non-value-adding work
= $1.4 unnecessary direct expense per year (unloaded)
17
18
Excess Office Supplies
1 year supply
6 mos. supply
… Yet they
received daily
deliveries!
$18,732 of inventory; $6,322 of it is
obsolete cartridges
© 2010 Karen Martin & Associates
Shared Equipment Causes
Excess Motion
Distance traveled to printer
Dept A = 92 ft. per trip
Dept B = 696 ft. per trip
120 occurrences / day = 4656 miles/year
Walk pace = 1 mile per hour = 582 days/year of
unproductive, non-value-adding time = 2.2 FTEs
19
© 2010 Karen Martin & Associates
Typical Current State Findings
20
Value Add
Necessary
NVA
Request Delivery
Unnecessary
NVA
© 2010 Karen Martin & Associates
Diagnostic Tools
Value Stream Mapping (macro)
Metrics-Based Process Mapping (micro)
Root Cause Analysis
21
© 2010 Karen Martin & Associates
Value Stream Defined
Value Stream: All of the activities, required to fulfill a customer request from order to delivery (and beyond to cash received).
Customer
22
Value Stream
Process Process Process
Customer
Request
Customer
Receipt
© 2010 Karen Martin & Associates
The Work We Do:
Degrees of Granularity
23
Metrics-
Based
Process
Map
(Tactical)
Value
Stream
Map
(Strategic)
Value Stream
Process
Step Step Step
Process Process
V
a
l
u
e
S
t
r
e
a
m
M
a
p
Current State Value Stream Map
Outpatient Imaging Services
Demand = 15 per day
Customer Demand:
15 patients per Day
(Takt Time 1920 seconds)
8 hours per day
Referring
Physician
% C&A = 65 %
Check-in
Patient
(Admitting)
Cycle Time = 2 mins.
% C&A = 90 %
5
Send
Reports
(Imaging)
Cycle Time = 3 mins.
% C&A = 90 %
6
Hospital
5 mins.
Schedule
Appointment
Cycle Time = 11 mins.
Lead Time = 12 mins.
% C&A = 98 %
6
Pre-register
Patient
Cycle Time = 30 mins.
Lead Time = 990 mins.
% C&A = 100 %
5
CT=Cycle Time
LT=Lead Time
%C&A=% Complete & Accurate
Lead Time = 12 mins.Lead Time = 990 mins.
Prep
Patient
(Tech)
Cycle Time = 10 mins.
% C&A = 100 %
2
Check-in
Patient
(Imaging)
Cycle Time = 1 mins.
% C&A = 98 %
3
Complete
Exam
(Tech)
Cycle Time = 15 mins.
% C&A = 90 %
2
Transmit
Images
(Tech)
Cycle Time = 3 mins.
% C&A = 100 %
2
Read/Dictate
Exam
(Radiologist)
Cycle Time = 15 mins.
% C&A = 95 %
2
Transcribe
Report
(MDI)
Cycle Time = 5 mins.
% C&A = 75 %
6
Review
Draft/Sign
(Radiologist)
Cycle Time = 1 mins.
% C&A = 95 %
2
Reports
(Imaging)
Cycle Time = 1 mins.
% C&A = 99 %
230 mins. 5 mins. 248 mins. 365 mins. 960 mins. 110 mins. 120 mins.45 mins.
E Pay
Excel
ADS
Symposium
Internet
Waiting Room
Management
System
Fax Order
Solutions
PACS
5 mins.
Lead Time = 24 days
Meditech
123
4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Auto Fax 50%
Us Mail 25%
MD Mailbox 25%
Rework Loop
via Fax 25% of
the time
Rolled First Pass
yield = 29%
5 minutes
2 minutes 11520
minutes
1 minutes
45 minutes
10 minutes
30 minutes
15 minutes
5 minutes
3 minutes
248 minutes
15 minutes
365 minutes
5 minutes
960 minutes
1 minutes
110 minutes
1 minutes
120 minutes
3 minutes
L/T = 13464 minutes
VA/T = 11576 minutes
Source Refrigeration & HVAC, Inc.
Current State Value Stream Map
Serv ice Deliv ery
Created February 11, 2009
CONFIDENTIAL
Customer
Receive
customer call
Call Center
PT = 2 mins.
%C&A = 60%
Review &
Post Invoices
Posting Admin
PT = 3 mins.
%C&A = 98%
Batch: 1x/day
0.0833
hours
2 minutes
2 hours
5 minutes
1.5
hours
90 minutes
1.25 hours
75 minutes
2 hours
120 minutes
4 hours
5 minutes
10.7
hours
10 minutes
48
hours
25 minutes
4 hours
3 minutes
10.7
hours
10 minutes
2 hours
4 minutes
480
hours Lead Time = 572 hours
Process Time = 349 minutes
Select &
Dispatch Tech
Dispatcher &
Service
Manager
PT = 5 mins.
%C&A = 60%
Make Repair;
Call to raise
the NTE
Tech
PT = 120 mins.
%C&A = 40%
Complete Call
in GP
Dispatcher
PT = 5 mins.
%C&A = 80%
Review
Service Call
Data
Service
Manager
PT = 10 mins.
%C&A = 50%
Batch: 2x/day
Review Open
Ticket Report
Billing Admin
PT = 25 mins.
%C&A = 75%
Upload time
card
Tech
PT = 0 mins.
%C&A = 70%
Batch: 1x/day
Close call in
Verisae
Account
Manager
(West)
PT = 1 mins.
%C&A = 90%
Batch: 1x/day
Process Time
Cards
Payroll Admin
PT = 10 mins.
%C&A = 90%
Batch: 1x/day
Process A/P
A/P Admin
PT = 15 mins.
%C&A = 85%
Batch: 1x/day
Tech
Assess
Problem
PT = 90 mins.
%C&A = 90%
Tech
Special Order
Part
Tech
Pick up Part
at Parts Store
PT = 75 mins.
%C&A = 95%
Tech
Get Part from
Truck
PT = 0 mins.
120 m.
Great
Plains
Verisae
(Customer)
Review
Invoices;
Close in
Verisae (Pac)
Account
Manager
PT = 10 mins.
%C&A = 85%
Batch: 3-5x per wk
Enter Invoices
into Verisae &
Excel; Mail
Invoices
Billing Admin
PT = 4 mins.
%C&A = 95%
Batch: 1x/week
Excel
Spreadsheet
(Customer)
40%
Receive
Cash; Post
Payment
Collections
75 m. 120 m. 240 m. 640 m. 6 days 240 mins. 640 m. 120 m. 60 days90 m.5 m.
?%
?%
Supplier
%C&A %Complete and Accurate
AR Activity Ratio
FTE Full Time Equivalent
LT Lead Time
PT Process Time
RFPY Rolled First Pass Yield
Acronym Key
Lead Time to invoice = 86.2 hrs
Process Time =5.9 hrs.
NOTE: Business hours
Activity Ratio = 6.8%
RFPY = 1.1%
Lead time to cash = ? days
Equipment Servicing Value Stream
Request to Cash
© 2010 Karen Martin & Associates
Key Metrics: Time
Process time (PT)
The time it takes to actually perform the work, if one is
able to work on it uninterrupted
Includes task-specific doing, talking, and thinking
aka “touch time,” work time, cycle time
Lead time (LT)
The elapsed time from the time work is made available
until it’s completed and passed on to the next person or
department in the chain
aka throughput time, turnaround time, elapsed time
Includes Process Time, not merely waiting time.
26
© 2010 Karen Martin & Associates
Lead Time vs. Process Time
Individual Steps
27
Lead Time
Work
Received
Work passed
to next step
Process Time
© 2010 Karen Martin & Associates
Typical Current State Findings
28
Value Add
Necessary
NVA
Request Delivery
Unnecessary
NVA
Process Time Process Time
Process Time
Total Lead Time
© 2010 Karen Martin & Associates
Summary Metrics: Time
Percent Activity (aka Activity Ratio)
The percentage of time anything is being done
to the work passing through the system (whether
value-adding or non-value-adding)
% Activity = (∑PT ÷ ∑LT) × 100
100 – %Act = % Time Work is Idle
Common current state finding = 1-10%
Could also calculate %VA to determine how
much activity is value-adding (typically lower
than % Activity).
29
© 2010 Karen Martin & Associates
Key Metrics: Quality
%Complete and Accurate (%C&A)
The percentage of incoming work (input) that’s deemed
“usable as is” by the recipient (downstream customer).
% of incoming work where the recipient can perform
task without having to “CAC”:
Correct information or material that was supplied
Add information that should have been supplied
Clarify information that should have or could have been clearer
Measured by the immediate downstream customer and
all subsequent downstream customers.
30
© 2010 Karen Martin & Associates
Summary Metrics: Quality
Rolled First Pass Yield (RFPY)
The percent of value stream output that passes
through the process “clean,” with no “hiccups,”
no rework required.
RFPY = %C&A x %C&A x %C&A…
Common finding = 0-15%
Multiply ALL %C&A’s, even if parallel processes
31
32
Metric Current
State
Future
State*
%
Improvement
Total Lead Time 32.5 hrs
Total Process Time 56 mins
Activity Ratio (PT/LT) 2.9%
Rolled First Pass Yield
(Multiply %C&A’s) 29%
Other**
Other**
Other**
Outpatient Imaging Value Stream
Current State Findings
* Projected until validated
** Other = Metrics for individual blocks, financials, survey or audit results, turnover,
market share, system downtime, inventory turns, hold times, work volume, etc.
Future State Value Stream Map
Outpatient Imaging Services
VSM Champion: Paul Scanner
Created: July 18, 2007
Demand = 15 per day
Referring
Physician
% C&A = 85 %
Send
Reports
(Imaging)
Cycle Time = 3 mins.
% C&A = 90 %
6
Hospital
Schedule appt
Pre-register
Cycle Time = 11 mins.
Lead Time = 45 mins.
% C&A = 98 %
6
CT=Cycle Time
LT=Lead Time
%C&A=% Complete & Accurate
0.0833 hrs.
1 mins.
0.583 hrs.
10 mins.
0.333 hrs.
10 mins.
0.0833 hrs.
2 mins.
2 hrs.
15 mins.
7 hrs.
1 mins.
0.0333 hrs.
1 mins.
0.5 hrs.
3 mins.
LT = 11.3 hrs.
CT = 43 mins.
CT/LT Ratio = 6.32%
Lead Time = 45 mins.Lead Time = 15 days
Prep
Patient
(Tech)
Cycle Time = 10 mins.
% C&A = 100 %
2
Check-in
Patient
(Imaging)
Cycle Time = 1 mins.
% C&A = 98 %
3
Complete
Exam
(Tech)
Cycle Time = 10 mins.
% C&A = 90 %
2
Transmit
Images
(Tech)
Cycle Time = 2 mins.
% C&A = 100 %
2
Read/Dictate
Exam
(Radiologist)
Cycle Time = 15 mins.
% C&A = 95 %
2
Review
Draft/Sign
(Radiologist)
Cycle Time = 1 mins.
% C&A = 95 %
2
Reports
(Imaging)
Cycle Time = 1 mins.
% C&A = 99 %
220 mins. 5 mins. 120 mins. 420 mins. 2 mins. 30 mins.35 mins.
E Pay
Excel
Symposium
Internet
Waiting Room
Management
System
Fax Order
Solutions
PACS
5 mins.
Set-upReduction
Remove Check in
and ReduceSystem Access
Work Balancing
StandardWork
Pull System(Supplies Kanban)
VisualWorkplace
Voice Recognition
Batch Reductions
5S
Co-locate
StandardWork
Work Balance
ContinuousFlow
Value StreamAlignment
Auto Fax 80%
Us Mail 15%
MD Mailbox 5%
Rolled First Pass
yield = 40%
Rework Loop via Fax 10% of the time
Customer Demand:
15 patients per Day
(Takt Time 1920 seconds)
8 hours per day
12
3
45 6 7 8 9 10 11
Risk Reduction
(Joint Commision)
Meditech
34
Metric Current
State
Future
State
%
Improvement
Total Lead Time 32.5 hrs 11.3 hrs 65%
Total Process Time 56 mins 43 mins 23%
Activity Ratio 2.9% 6.3% 117%
Rolled First Pass Yield 29% 40% 38%
Annual turnover 100% 25% 75%
# handoffs 14 11 21%
Outpatient Imaging
Value Stream Improvement Results
Note: Freed capacity (reduced PT) allowed the facility to collect an add’l
$500,000 in revenue without adding equipment or staff.
© 2010 Karen Martin & Associates
Beau Keyte & Drew Locher
35
© 2010 Karen Martin & Associates 36
What is a Metrics-Based Process Map?
A visual process analysis tool, which integrates:
Functional orientation of traditional swim lane
process maps
Key Lean time and quality metrics
Tool which highlights the disconnects / wastes /
delays in a process.
Keeps the improvement focus properly directed
Documents standardized work for more effective
workforce training and process monitoring.
Metrics-Based Process Mapping
Metrics-Based Process Mapping
Resources
Click here to order from Amazon Click here to order from Amazon
Chapter 12
© 2010 Karen Martin & Associates
Root Cause Analysis
39
Peel back the layers of the onion to
avoid jumping to incorrect conclusions
and applying incorrect solutions.
Root Cause Analysis: 4 Key Tools
CauseCause--andand--Effect DiagramEffect Diagram
Machine Measurement Environment
People Material / Info Method
Budgets
Submitted Late
Lack of experience
Time availability
No sense of import
No stnd spread sheet
Email vs. FedEx
No standard work
Input rec’d late
Forecast in other system
Manual vs. PC
System avail.
No milestones
$ vs. units
Weather delays
Dispersed sales force
Changing schedule
Machine Measurement Environment
People Material / Info Method
Budgets
Submitted Late
Lack of experience
Time availability
No sense of import
No stnd spread sheet
Email vs. FedEx
No standard work
Input rec’d late
Forecast in other system
Manual vs. PC
System avail.
No milestones
$ vs. units
Weather delays
Dispersed sales force
Changing schedule
5 Why’s
Why?
Why?
Why?
Why?
Why?
Check Sheets Quantify Occurrences
|Equipment failure
|||||||||||||Changing customer
requirements w/ no
adjustment to expected
delivery
||||||||||Order entry error
|||Staffing/absenteeism
|||||Quality issue requiring
rework
|||||||Material shortage
Tally Reason
|Equipment failure
|||||||||||||Changing customer
requirements w/ no
adjustment to expected
delivery
||||||||||Order entry error
|||Staffing/absenteeism
|||||Quality issue requiring
rework
|||||||Material shortage
Tally Reason
Future State Design Considerations
Improve quality
Eliminate steps / handoffs
Combine steps
Create parallel paths
Alter task sequencing and/or timing
Implement pull
Reduce / eliminate batches
Create an organized, visual workplace
Reduce interruptions, setup and changeover
Eliminate motion & transportation
Standardize & error-proof work
Eliminate unnecessary approvals / authorizations
Stop performing non-value adding (NVA) tasks
Co-locate functions based on flow; create cells (teams of cross-functional staff)
Balance work to meet takt time requirements
41
Building a Lean Enterprise
Process
Stabilization
Tools
Building a Lean Enterprise
Flow-
Enhancing
Tools
PACE Prioritization Matrix
High Low Anticipated Benefit
Ease o
f Im
ple
men
tati
on
Dif
fic
ult
E
as
y
20
7
5 13
4 23
1
22 8 9
2
10
16
11
6
12
14 19
15
17
3 21
18
Value Stream
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
2 Improve quality of referral KE Sean O'Ryan
3, 4Reduce lead time beween schedulingand
preregistration stepsPROJ
Dianne
Prichard
5, 6Eliminate the need for two patient check-
insKE
Michael
O'Shea
6 Eliminate bottleneck in waiting area KEDianne
Prichard
9Eliminate lead time associated with
transcription stepPROJ Sam Parks
10 Eliminate batched reading KE Sam Parks
7Reduce inventory costs, regulatory risk
and storage needsKE
Michael
O'Shea
12 Reduce delay in report delivery PROJ Martha Allen
12 Reduce delay in report delivery KE Martha Allen
Implement voice recognition technology
Reduce setup required
Cross-train and colocate work teams
Implement additional fax ports
Collect copays in Imaging
Balance work / level demand
5S CT supplies area; implement kanban
Value Stream Mapping Facilitator
Increase percentage of physicians
receiving electronic delivery (rather than
hard copy)
Approvals
Executive Sponsor Value Stream Champion
Signature:
Date: Date: Date:
Signature: Signature:
Block
#Goal / Objective Improvement Activity
Implement standard work for referral
process
Type OwnerImplementation Schedule (weeks) Date
Complete
Date Created
11/21/2007
Allen Ward
Sally McKinsey
Dave Parks 12/13/2007
10/18/2007 1/10/2008
Future State Implementation Plan
Executive Sponsor
Value Stream Champion
Value Stream Mapping Facilitator
Implementation Plan Review Dates
11/1/2007
Outpatient Imaging
Create an Action Plan: Who, What, When, Where, and How?
Type: KE = Kaizen Event; PROJ = Project; JDI = Just do it
46
Kaizen Events & Projects
Plan Do
Check Act
Macro
PDCA • Test improvements
• Refine & finalize improvements
• Implement improvements
• Train workforce
• Design & develop improvements
• Document & analyze the current state
• Design future state
• Brainstorm & prioritize solutions
Plan Do
Check Act
© 2010 Karen Martin & Associates
The Improvement Process
47
Plan
Do
Check
Act
• Gain a deep
understanding about
the current state
• Create hypothesis
• At least 50% of the
total improvement
cycle
• Brainstorm
solutions
• Create mini-
experiments to
test theories
• Select & finalize
countermeasures
• IMPLEMENT • Measure results
• Design improved
approach if further
improvement is
needed
• Adjust
process as
needed
• Prepare for
next round of
improvement
© 2010 Karen Martin & Associates
Where do you begin?
48
Issue Approach
A complex problem linked to annual
business goals is identified.
• A3
• May need do use VSM to understand
the current state.
Better performance is needed across a
value stream.
• Value Stream Mapping to create the
improvement strategy.
• Kaizen Events, projects, and just-do-
its to implement improvements.
• Metrics-based process mapping may
be needed to identify waste and
document new standard work.
Small, localized problems within a
department.
• Just-do-its or mini-projects
• Metrics-Based Process Mapping may
be needed to identify waste and
document new standard work.
Building a C.I. Culture
49
Heavy support from
seasoned improvement
professionals
Light support from
seasoned improvement
professionals
Support needed only for
audits, bandwidth gaps,
continued learning
Years 1 & 2 Small percentage of staff
engaged – project-based
Years 3 & 4 More staff engagement –
reduced need for formal
Kaizen Events
Years 5 & Beyond Company-wide engagement –
everywhere, all the time
“Settling In” Stage
• Demonstrating learned
competencies
• Process owners manage
performance
• Becoming more proactive
“Life is Good” Stage
• Daily kaizen is the norm
• “Action now” dominates
• Most processes are
stabilized with minimal waste
and output variation
“Disruption” Stage
• Sensei-dominated
• Much mentoring & learning
• Heavy use of Kaizen Events
• Many issues to be resolved
© 2010 Karen Martin & Associates
Capability Development Needs
Frontlines
Problem-solving skills - PDCA & root cause analysis (RCA)
Basic lean principles & tools
Middle management
Problem-solving skills & tools (PDCA, RCA & A3)
More advanced lean philosophy, principles & tools
Process monitoring and sustainability
50
© 2010 Karen Martin & Associates
Senior leadership
Problem-solving skills (PDCA, RCA, A3 & Hoshin Kanri)
Highly advanced lean philosophy, principles & tools
Setting organization-wide clear improvement strategies
Delegating tactical details to the people who do the work
Establishing an improvement culture
Lean accounting, lean product development, etc.
The psychology of change
The effort involved in making improvement
Improvement professionals
Full complement of improvement skills & Lean tools
The psychology of change
Converting results into financial terms
Selling results; building improvement momentum
51
Capability Development Needs (continued)
52
7770 Regents Road #635
San Diego, CA 92122
858.677.6799
For Further Questions
Free webinars and monthly newsletter:
www.ksmartin.com/subscribe
Connect with us: