27
Levy and Post, Investments © Pearson Education Limited 2005 Slide 10.1 Investments Chapter 10: The Capital Asset Pricing Model

L Pch10

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: L Pch10

Levy and Post, Investments © Pearson Education Limited 2005

Slide 10.1

Investments

Chapter 10: The Capital Asset Pricing Model

Page 2: L Pch10

Levy and Post, Investments © Pearson Education Limited 2005

Slide 10.2

Two Definitions Explained

• Asset Pricing TheoriesAsset pricing theories try to explain the expected rates of return of assets and why they differ both among each other and over time.

• Equilibrium Rates of ReturnA market is in equilibrium when all investors hold their optimal portfolio and hence there is no reason for further transactions.

Page 3: L Pch10

Levy and Post, Investments © Pearson Education Limited 2005

Slide 10.3

The Basic Question of the CAPM

‘What are the equilibrium rates of return if all investors apply the mean-variance criterion to an identical mean-variance

efficient set?’

Page 4: L Pch10

Levy and Post, Investments © Pearson Education Limited 2005

Slide 10.4

Two Additional Concepts Introduced in the CAPM Framework

• The Risk-free Asset

The rate of return this asset is known with certainty. (Short-term treasury bills often proxy for the risk-free rate)

• The Market Portfolio

Includes all available risky capital at their relative market value.

Page 5: L Pch10

Levy and Post, Investments © Pearson Education Limited 2005

Slide 10.5

Assumptions Behind the CAPM1. The capital market is characterized by perfect

competition.2. All investors choose their portfolio according to the

mean-variance criterion.3. All investors have homogeneous expectations regarding

the future in terms of means, variances and covariances. (This implies investors have the same investment horizon.)

4. Investors can borrow and lend at the risk-free rate.

UNDER THESE ASSUMPTIONS ALL INVESTORS FACE IDENTICAL EFFICIENT FRONTIERS.

Page 6: L Pch10

Levy and Post, Investments © Pearson Education Limited 2005

Slide 10.6

The Opportunity Line: I

Assumptions:

1. Investor can borrow and lend at the risk-free rate.

2. Investor can invest in one risky asset.

Under these assumption the expected return of this portfolio is a linear positive relation of the standard deviation of the risky asset.

Page 7: L Pch10

Levy and Post, Investments © Pearson Education Limited 2005

Slide 10.7 The Opportunity Line: II - Illustration

Exhibit 10.1 Investment opportunities with risk-free assetSource: From Introduction to Investments, 2nd edn, by Levy. © 1999. Reprinted with permission of South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning: www.thomsonrights.com. Fax 800 730-2215.

Page 8: L Pch10

Levy and Post, Investments © Pearson Education Limited 2005

Slide 10.8

The Capital Market Line: I• Opportunity line assumes one available risky

asset. The capital market line (CML) drops this assumption.

• Investors can invest in many risky assets, creating many opportunity lines.

• It can be shown that investors will choose the same portfolio of risky assets, maximizing the slopes of the individual opportunity lines, known as the tangency portfolio.

Page 9: L Pch10

Levy and Post, Investments © Pearson Education Limited 2005

Slide 10.9

The Capital Market Line: II• Since all investors hold the tangency portfolio, this

portfolio equals the market portfolio.• By mixing the market portfolio with borrowing and

lending of the risk-free asset one gets a linear positive line analogous to the opportunity line.

• But, note that the market portfolio is not an individual asset. By mixing it with the risk-free rate, we end up holding a portfolio of risky assets and the risk-free asset.

pM

FM

FpRR

RR

)(

Page 10: L Pch10

Levy and Post, Investments © Pearson Education Limited 2005

Slide 10.10

The Separation Principle

Given the assumptions behind the CAPM, and the resulting CML, one can separate the investment process into two stages:

1. Determining the market portfolioBecause all investors hold the same portfolio, there’s no need to know investors’ individual preferences at this stage.

2. Adjusting the return characteristics by mixing the marketportfolio with the risk-free assetThis stage is based on each investor’s individual preferences.

Page 11: L Pch10

Levy and Post, Investments © Pearson Education Limited 2005

Slide 10.11

Separating Systemic from Nonsystemic Risk

• Under the separation principle all investors hold the market portfolio.

• The relevant risk measure for an individual asset than logically becomes its contribution to the risk of the market portfolio.

• Consequently, investors need to be compensated for bearing systemic risk but not for non-systemic risk.

Page 12: L Pch10

Levy and Post, Investments © Pearson Education Limited 2005

Slide 10.12

Definition of Risk When Investors Hold the Market Portfolio

• Researchers have shown that the best measure of the risk of a security in a large portfolio is the beta ()of the security.

• Beta measures the responsiveness of a security to movements in the market portfolio.

)(

)(2

,

M

Mii R

RRCov

Page 13: L Pch10

Levy and Post, Investments © Pearson Education Limited 2005

Slide 10.13

Aggressive, Neutral and Defensive Assets

• Aggressive Asset

i > 1, asset i has more (systematic) risk than the market.

• Neutral Asset

i 1, asset i has the same (systematic) risk as the market.

• Defensive Asset

i < 1, asset i has less (systematic) risk than the market.

Page 14: L Pch10

Levy and Post, Investments © Pearson Education Limited 2005

Slide 10.14

The Security Market Line: I

Under the assumptions of the CAPM, only compensating investors for bearing systemic risk, the following linear risk-return relation (for both individual assets and portfolios) should hold:

E(Ri) r [E(Rm) – r]i

Expected Rate of Return Risk-Free Rate Risk Premium

Page 15: L Pch10

Levy and Post, Investments © Pearson Education Limited 2005

Slide 10.15 Expected Return on an Individual Security

• This formula is called the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)

)(β FMiFi RRRR

• Assume i = 0, then the expected return is RF.• Assume i = 1, then Mi RR

Expected return on a security

=Risk-

free rate+

Beta of the security

×Market risk

premium

Page 16: L Pch10

Levy and Post, Investments © Pearson Education Limited 2005

Slide 10.16

The Security Market Line: II – The Risk Premium

The risk premium is the expected return investors require above and beyond what can be earned on the risk-free asset:

[E(Rm) – r]i

market risk premium Asset i’s Beta

Page 17: L Pch10

Levy and Post, Investments © Pearson Education Limited 2005

Slide 10.17

The Security Market Line: III – Illustration

Exhibit 3.4 Security line (SML)Source: From Introduction to Investments, 2nd edn, by Levy. © 1999. Reprinted with permission of South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning: www.thomsonrights.com. Fax 800 730-2215.

Page 18: L Pch10

Levy and Post, Investments © Pearson Education Limited 2005

Slide 10.18

Estimating an Asset’s Beta: I – The Characteristic Line

• Besides being an indication of the relative riskiness of an asset, the beta also measures the sensitivity to market movements.

• The regression line describing the relationship between Ri (Return on Asset i) and Rm (Return on Market Portfolio) is called the characteristic line of Asset i.

Page 19: L Pch10

Levy and Post, Investments © Pearson Education Limited 2005

Slide 10.19

Estimating an Asset’s Beta: II – The Characteristic Line

Exhibit 10.4 Examples of the characteristic lineSource: From Introduction to Investments, 2nd edn, by Levy. © 1999. Reprinted with permission of South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning: www.thomsonrights.com. Fax 800 730-2215.

Page 20: L Pch10

Levy and Post, Investments © Pearson Education Limited 2005

Slide 10.20

Estimating an Asset’s Beta: III – The Characteristic Line

The Characteristic Line can be written as:

Ri – r i iRm – r] ei

 

i intercept of the regression line

i slope of the regression line

et firm-specific factor with mean E(ei)=0

and variance 2e,i

Page 21: L Pch10

Levy and Post, Investments © Pearson Education Limited 2005

Slide 10.21

Estimating an Asset’s Beta: IV – The Characteristic Line

Use regression analysis to find the statistically best fit to the relationship between Ri and Rm:

Exhibit 10.8 Estimating the characteristic line for Microsoft

Page 22: L Pch10

Levy and Post, Investments © Pearson Education Limited 2005

Slide 10.22 Estimates of for Selected Stocks

Stock Beta

Bank of America 1.55

Borland International 2.35

Travelers, Inc. 1.65

Du Pont 1.00

Kimberly-Clark Corp. 0.90

Microsoft 1.05

Green Mountain Power 0.55

Homestake Mining 0.20

Oracle, Inc. 0.49

Page 23: L Pch10

Levy and Post, Investments © Pearson Education Limited 2005

Slide 10.23

Theoretical Extensions of the CAPM

1. Zero-beta model.

2. GCAPM.

3. ICAPM.

4. CCAPM.

5. 3M CAPM.

Page 24: L Pch10

Levy and Post, Investments © Pearson Education Limited 2005

Slide 10.24

Empirical Validity of the CAPM

Two tests:

• Check if the underlying assumptions of the CAPM are realistic.

• Empirically test the degree to which the CAPM predicts actual security prices.

Page 25: L Pch10

Levy and Post, Investments © Pearson Education Limited 2005

Slide 10.25

Empirically Testing the Predictions of the CAPM

Often-used method:

Two-Pass Regression Methodology

Step 1: Establish sample data.Step 2: Estimate characteristic lines.Step 3: Estimate the security market line.Step 4: Test predictions of the CAPM.

Page 26: L Pch10

Levy and Post, Investments © Pearson Education Limited 2005

Slide 10.26

CAPM Anomalies

Several phenomena discovered that seem inconsistent with the CAPM:

1. The size effect.

2. The value effect.

3. The momentum effect.

Page 27: L Pch10

Levy and Post, Investments © Pearson Education Limited 2005

Slide 10.27

Methodological Problems in Testing the CAPM

• Benchmark error.

• Time variation of the return distribution.

• Statistical problems with the test methodology.

• Data mining, data snooping and sample selection bias.