Upload
-
View
187
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
maritime & transport business solutions
Investments in ports in financial turbulent timesMaritime Days, Odessa
MTBS Services and Solutions
05 July 2011 Scope of Works - Portinvest Yuzhny 13www.mtbs.nl maritime & transport business solutions 13
Value & Business StrategyPort Sector Reform
Port PolicyPublic Private Partnerships
Institutional & Regulatory ChangeOrganizational Reform & Alignment
Value Creation & ProtectionFinancial Modeling and AnalysisFeasibilityProject Structuring & PackagingBusiness CaseRisk Valuation, Allocation, Mitigation
Transaction StrategyTransaction ManagementDocumentation & ContractsTendering & negotiated SolutionsFinancial SolutionsLegal Solutions
Financial StructuringProject Finance
Due DiligenceProcurement of Finance
Investment / DivestmentMerger & Acquisition
strategy
finance transactions
valuation
3
MTBS is a global leader in port & maritime advisory services
MTBS’s experience in the Port & Infrastructure Sector MTBS’s Clients in the Port & Infrastructure Sector
Global leader in Port Transaction
MTBS is the global leader in transaction advisory services in the port sector with a high success rate on both sell-side & buy-side transactions
MTBS is independent, flexible and international. MTBS are recognized content-leaders: implementing
international best practice transaction services and products.
Experienced and Qualified Team
MTBS dedicated port team is the largest and most experienced team, certainly when compared with global accounting & strategy consultants.
MTBS’ senior experts have a long corporate history in blue chip organisations such as Deloitte, PWC and Royal Haskoning, Royal Boskalis, Port of Rotterdam, PSA.
MTBS’s team of experts all have deep-rooted experience in Strategy, Business valuation, Transaction and Finance.
International Sector Focus MTBS is an international consulting company with leading maritime sector focus.
4
… with a global track record of port projects…
Ongoing TransactionSuccessful Transaction
Completed Port Project
6
Financial Advisor
Brooklyn-Kiev PortOdessa, Ukraine
Container Terminal Equity Valuation
Deal size US$ 37 million senior loanTotal project cost US$ 130 million
2009
Financial Advisor
Egypt, Cairo
Bid Preparation Dry Bulk Terminal El Dekheila
2006
Deal size confidential
Flag of Country Transaction advisor
Public Water Transport SystemDubaiUAE
Deal Size: US$ 25 million
2007
Financial Advisor
West Africa Container TerminalOnne
Nigeria
Dealsize confidential2004
… with significant recent successful Port Transaction implementations …
7
530 Mt*
150Mt
The Region
Recent key shipping economic developments Recent key political developments
390Mt
* Excluding Russia Far East
Diverse and challenging landscape
8
Mediterranean Port LandscapeIt is a patchwork
• High CAPEX• Highly Competitive (initial cash flows)• Many players• Multiple PPP structures• Range Greenfield - Privatisation• Major trades/ different demands
9
International Operators in the Med
HPH
PSA
DPW
Eurogate
ICTSI
Contship Italia
Mersey Docks
Dragados / Noatum
APM Terminals Evergreen
COSCO
MSC
CMA CGMTCB
Summa
HPC/HHLA
10
Challenges for investors – a snapshot
• Political Risk• Physical war or upraises, also if outside country• Trade war & custom regulations• Change of Contract• Change of Control
• Shipping patterns• Direct calls to Black Sea• Or, on the contrary: fragmented again• Ships deployed/ Bosphorus
• Capacity developments• Large addings of capacity in Marmara and East Med• Overcapacity in Ukraine• Taman development?• Privatisation leading to stronger competition
12
What to do as an investor
• Hinterland Cargo • anchor important (different commodities)
• BOT/ Concession contract• Force Majeure clause• Sovereign guarantees• Flexible concession fee structure• Flexible guarantees• Flexible term
• Financing:• Role for DFIs and ECAs• Sovereign guarantees• PPP Equity?
• CAPEX allocation PPP• Fix vs moveable
• Risk engineering• Safety• Permitting
• Value Engineering:• Phased investment• Combined cargo mix• Offtake/ secured volumes allignment
• Diversification:• Geographically• Cargo mix
• Partnering:• How to secure long term?• Changing structures of power?
13
The bankability Challenge
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21(400,000,000)
(300,000,000)
(200,000,000)
(100,000,000)
-
100,000,000
200,000,000
300,000,000
400,000,000 Cash Flow Diagram
Cumulative FCF Investments Opex Revenues
mio
USD
• This Greenfield port project has a project IRR of 19% and a positive NPV.
• However, the first year of positive Free Cash Flow is in year 6
• The pay-back period is 10 years from initial investment.
• Vale created after the expansion investments in year 15 are not of interest for the lenders!
• So, how bankable is this project for project financing?
14
The Bankability Challengea viable project is not yet a bankable one
Economic & Financial Balance
Financial Viability Bankability
IRR NPV Secu-rities DSCR
• Determined over a period of > 20 years
• Includes future project phases
• Determined over a period of < 20 years
• Depending of project start-up phase
15
Project Bankabilitya viable project is not yet a bankable one
• Debt service• CAPEX aligned with revenues• Value Engineering• Increased need for proper valuation methods and modeling
• Securities• Proper structuring• Proper risk engineering• Quantification (value) of impact of different structures and risk allocations: create value• Safeguarding in the mean time authorities interest to retain discretion over policy• New era of contract engineering
16
Value engineeringAdditional value should be created to make the project bankable
• Commercial understanding is primordial: • Engineering follows commercial reality• Off-take contract versus TSA growth• How to tie in committed cargo
• Value engineering to increase initial bankability while preserving financial and commercial viability (NPV/ IRR), some examples
• Mobilisation costs• Cost of possible later demolishing costs• Costs for eventual later stage of expansion
• Impact of value engineering options on commercial and financial viability and on bankability have to be quantified in a clear valuation model
• Value engineering options need to be translated in a proper structuring of the project, split of obligations and risks, and consecutive contract flow
Commercial aspects
Technical aspects
Value Engineering options:• Securing cargo/ cargo types• Phasing• Construction time
Quantification of options:• Viability (NPV/IRR)• Bankability (DSCR)• Commercial viability (sensitivity)
Translate option in structuring
Translate option in contract flow Va
lue
Cre
atio
n a
nd
Op
tim
isa
tio
n
172nd MED Ports 2014 Exhibition and Conference Marrakech23 & 24 April 2014
Full BOT Medium BOT BOT light Landlord
Viable +/- high risk Yes Yes No
Bankable Uncertain +/- Yes Limited
Market appetite Limited/ uncertain Attractive Highly attractive Only Terminals
Concession term Freehold Long (>50yrs) Shorter Terminal: 25y
BOT• Land• Environmental• Breakwater• Dredging• Port civils• Fleet • Quays
Terminal operators
PA
PA• Land• Environmental
PA• Land• Environmental• Breakwater
BOT• Breakwater• Dredging• Port civils• Fleet• Quays
BOT• Dredging• Port civils• Fleet• Quays
Terminal operators
Terminal operators
BOT Full BOT Medium BOT Light
= BOT
= PA
PA• Land• Environm.• Breakwater• Dredging• Port civils• Fleet • Quays
Terminal operators
Landlord
= TO
Project StructuringDifferent models with different specifications
18
PDMC Model as balanced alternative to BOT
Leadshareholder
Public shareholders
Privateshareholders
DFI’s
Portauthority 1. Master Concession
19
Structured Financing
Potential involvement of DFI’s:• Longer tenors• Longer grace periods• Sculpted repayment schemes• Often regarded as subordinated to commercial lending• Interest similar to commercial banks, unless it is tied or backed by sovereign guarantees• Standby credit facility
Equity
Debt
Lead Partner
Other
International Terminal Operator
Infrastructure Funds, Shipping Lines, etc.
DFI
Commercial Loan
Pool of DFI’s / Multilaterals
Pool of Commercial Banks
35%
65%
20
Creating value and Bankable ProjectsImpact of Value Engineering and Structuring
Value/ viability
Bankability
DSCR ü üSecurities ü
Initial Value Engineering
Value Contracting
21
What to do as an investor
• Hinterland Cargo • anchor important (different commodities)
• BOT/ Concession contract• Force Majeure clause• Sovereign guarantees• Flexible concession fee structure• Flexible guarantees• Flexible term
• Financing:• Role for DFIs and ECAs• Sovereign guarantees• PPP Equity?
• CAPEX allocation PPP• Fix vs moveable
• Risk engineering• Safety• Permitting
• Value Engineering:• Phased investment• Combined cargo mix• Offtake/ secured volumes allignment
• Diversification:• Geographically• Cargo mix
• Partnering:• How to secure long term?• Changing structures of power?
22
Conclusions
• Investors face many challenges investing in East Med and Black Sea:• Political risk• Shipping line patterns• Capacity additions• Improved performance competing port following privatisation
• Unlocking investments institutional:• CAPEX structuring• Concession contract conditions: flexible, guarantees, Force Majeure• Sovereign Guarantees• Structured (DFI) financing
• Business approach• Cargo diversification• Geographical diversification• Partnering• Hinterland anchoring (multiple cargoes)
23
General Conclusions
• Each region has peculiar problems and challenges
• Each country is specific• PPP models• State intervention and Guarantees (financing)• Labour
• Cargo flows not always logic: customs, trade agreements, impediments
• Every deal is tailor-made
• Concessions: Quid Force Majeure? Who takes the risk?
• Role for DFIs?
maritime & transport business solutionsmaritime strategy & finance advisors
| +31 10 2865940| [email protected]| www.mtbs.nl
Wijnhaven 3EP.O. Box 601
3000 AP RotterdamThe Netherlands
White House, Rotterdam
t e w