Upload
elemica
View
295
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Explanation
• This year is the 15th anniversary of Elemica and we have been presenting case studies to our clients since our first conferences in 2001/2. Which I attended and presented at as Air Products.
• We want to touch on a few of the ones from the last 5 years, since the Elemica merger with RubberNetwork to show how
– The programs have very similar goals and that these are being (or have been) achieved
– Our clients increasingly are demanding more from their programs – The Elemica Professional Services team and Product Management
group are matching those demands
Agenda / Speakers
• Four stories
– GoodYear – 2010 and 2013 – AkzoNobel – 2010 and 2012 – Rhodia (Solvay) – 2010 – BASF – 2014 – Dow Agrochemicals – 2015 (sneak preview)
• Speakers
– Simon Hardy – Senior Solutions Architect, Business Process Solutions
– Dick Veer – Principal Consultant – Functional Delivery
Defined benefits across the various steps in the process
4
Presented by Simon Hardy in Manchester, UK,
2004
eProcurement Lifecycle for Chemical Companies
5
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012 Raw Materials
Automated through Elemica (Invoice US
Only)
Large Partners Automated via legacy
Point-2-Point EDI
MRO / Catalogues Automated through
ccChemplorer / Traderanger
Punchout / Roundtrip High volume “trader”
websites
Large Partners Converted to Elemica because
of enhanced business rules
Raw Materials European Invoicing
with specific business rules
MRO / Catalogues Increasingly catalogues
managed in ERP’s and more companies managing Punchout
processes.
Invoicing Matching and enhanced Cross Referencing
Invoice Matching Across all regions
Presented by Simon Hardy in Frankfurt, DE,
2010
Purchase to Pay Program 7
► The overall objective of the P2P program is to design, build and implement by the end of 2013, the global standard P2P process for the whole of AkzoNobel including the supporting systems and organizations in order to:
1. Deliver high quality information supporting our businesses and global functions in achieving AN midterm plan;
2. deliver transactional efficiency benefits;
3. ensure compliance to the functional policies and procedures.
► This will be done by building on the existing P2P related initiatives
Objective of the P2P program
8
Rhodia / NA EDI Project
! In 2008 Rhodia expanded our global SAP system to North America " They had in place an EDI infrastructure which included old EDI software and a connection to a VAN " They had resources who were full time involved with managing the connections, tracing errors, managing
mapping, producing copy documents etc
! The decision was made to move this traffic through Elemica for the following reasons: " They had in place an EDI infrastructure which included old EDI software and a connection to a VAN " To cut complexity on the incoming messaging to Rhodia, and limit translation to the ChemXml Standards. " To limit the need to manage maps " To move the maintenance to the automated and semi-automated industry solutions that Elemica maintain " To allow for the resources to move onto value added tasks
! Outcome: " Resources working on Worldwide solutions not dedicated to zone or countries. " Resources focused on added-value tasks such managing expansion of partner connectivity. " Better Costs control through :
" Global Business Processes / Global SOA Architecture " WW Contract with Elemica " Ease the on-boarding of new partners. Elemica offering various connectivity options to Rhodia partners.
Elemica’s Services During Rhodia NA Migration to SAP
� M. BURDELIS � Elemica and Rhodia � 2010/09/03
Goodyear EMEA VMOI Project Indicators, Reporting & Results
• Some of the project objectives and KPI’s:
• By end of implementation at minimum 75% of spend under VMOI
• Agreed Commercial terms in order to go live
• Implemented spend through standard process
• Maximize number of products live
• Achieved Working Capital Optimization
Objectives, Key Performance Indicators & Consistent monitoring
Reporting on commercial progress by contract status:
Note: All data is fictive using as example € 1 billion spend
North America (2011)
India (2015)
Ini6al Projects 2002 to 2004
South America (2012)
UK (2014)
Other EU Plants (2011)
Akzo Nobel
Global Standardised Processes -‐ VMI -‐ Buy-‐to-‐Sell -‐ O2I -‐ Produc6on Order
Elemica Project Team -‐ Centralised Program Manager -‐ Regional Teams
Invoice Status & Payment Advice
• Invoice Status & Payment Advice • What it is
– Suppliers now have access to the status of any invoice with their Buyer, including those not sent through Elemica
• Why it matters – Buyer
• Fewer supplier inquiries • Reduction in Buyer AP admin effort • Fewer duplicate invoices
– Supplier • Visibility into the payment clock • Management by exception • Fix discrepancies and prior to due date to reduce DSO
For many organizations, 20 percent or more of invoices contain some sort of exception, and these invoices can take a lot of time to resolve. In a study from The Accounts Payable Network (TAPN), the average resolution time for problem invoices was seven to ten days for 40 percent of companies and more than ten days for 20 percent.
New / Enhanced func6onality provided by BASF to their Raw
Material Suppliers
BASF VIP roll-out
Supported by new tools for the project teams; -‐ Mass Onboarding visualiza6on -‐ Click through contracts for suppliers -‐ QuickLink 2.0 Dashboard