11
HOW SOON IS NOW? THEORIZING TEMPORALITY IN IS RESEARCH Niamh O Riordan, Kieran Conboy and Thomas Acton National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland [email protected] www.niamhoriordan.com ie.linkedin.com/in/niamhoriordan/ International Conference on Information Systems, MILAN 2013 1 This research is supported by the Irish Social Sciences Platform (ISSP), funded under the Programme for Research in Third Level Institutions, administered by the HEA and co- funded under the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), and also supported in part by Science Foundation Ireland grant 10/CE/I1855 to Lero

How soon is now? Theorizing temporality for IS research

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Time is an inherent quality of human life and the temporal nature of our being in this world has fundamentally shaped our knowledge and understanding of it: the concept of time pervades everyday language: “time is of the essence”; “timing is everything”; and “a stitch in time saves nine”. Thus, many disciplines are concerned with Time – physics of course, and also history, philosophy, psychology, computer science, communication studies and media. Nevertheless, our understanding of it is fundamentally limited because our consciousness moves along it . The goal of this paper is to develop a conceptualization of time that can be used to investigate the impact of temporality on the design, development, adoption and use of Information Systems and to trace the societal and business impact of that association.

Citation preview

Page 1: How soon is now? Theorizing temporality for IS research

1

HOW SOON IS NOW? THEORIZING TEMPORALITY IN IS RESEARCH

Niamh O Riordan, Kieran Conboy and Thomas Acton

National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland

[email protected]

ie.linkedin.com/in/niamhoriordan/

International Conference on Information Systems, MILAN 2013

This research is supported by the Irish Social Sciences Platform (ISSP), funded under the Programme for Research in Third Level Institutions, administered by the HEA and co- funded under the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), and also supported in part by Science Foundation Ireland grant 10/CE/I1855 to Lero

Page 2: How soon is now? Theorizing temporality for IS research

2

International Conference on Information Systems MILAN 2013

Agenda

• Motivations• Shortcomings • Research approach • Theoretical framework • Future directions and recommendations

This research is supported by the Irish Social Sciences Platform (ISSP), funded under the Programme for Research in Third Level Institutions, administered by the HEA and co- funded under the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), and also supported in part by Science Foundation Ireland grant 10/CE/I1855 to Lero

Page 3: How soon is now? Theorizing temporality for IS research

3

Motivations• Time is a fundamental business performance indicator • Firms operate in a high velocity business environment • Organizations frequently overlook the hidden costs associated

with increased speed, e.g. time pressure– impairs decision-making (Marsden et al., 2002; Failla and Bagnara, 1992)– alters risk evaluation (Kahneman, 2011; Das and Teng, 2001), – causes stress (Maule and Svenson, 1993)– inhibits creativity and motivation (Amabile et al., 2002)– reduces software quality (Austin, 2001)– negatively affects business negotiations (De Dreu, 2003)

• There is a need to better understand how Information Systems can be used to develop richer visualizations of time and time-use in firms that go beyond the simplistic notion of linear time

International Conference on Information Systems MILAN 2013

This research is supported by the Irish Social Sciences Platform (ISSP), funded under the Programme for Research in Third Level Institutions, administered by the HEA and co- funded under the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), and also supported in part by Science Foundation Ireland grant 10/CE/I1855 to Lero

Page 4: How soon is now? Theorizing temporality for IS research

4

Shortcomings• Limited understanding of organizational temporality (Orlikowski and Yates,

2002; Saunders, 2007)

• Lack of cumulative tradition in organizational temporality research (Nandhakumar, 2002)

• Myopic measures of time resulting in failure to fully evaluate the temporal effects of new technologies in organizations (Lee and Liebenau, 2000)

• Lack of research on the temporal dynamics of associations between constructs and decisions about when and how frequently to measure variables are left to chance (Mitchell and James, 2001)

International Conference on Information Systems MILAN 2013

This research is supported by the Irish Social Sciences Platform (ISSP), funded under the Programme for Research in Third Level Institutions, administered by the HEA and co- funded under the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), and also supported in part by Science Foundation Ireland grant 10/CE/I1855 to Lero

Page 5: How soon is now? Theorizing temporality for IS research

5

Approach• Approach to literature review

– Systematic literature review (cf. Fink, 2010)– Webster and Watson (2002)– bXTM Usage-Based Services

• Approach to theory building– Dubin (1978)

1.Identify temporal attributes, variables or dimensions already used 2.Systematically classify and arrange each concept 3.Ideational trial and error

International Conference on Information Systems MILAN 2013

This research is supported by the Irish Social Sciences Platform (ISSP), funded under the Programme for Research in Third Level Institutions, administered by the HEA and co- funded under the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), and also supported in part by Science Foundation Ireland grant 10/CE/I1855 to Lero

Page 6: How soon is now? Theorizing temporality for IS research

6

Conceptual FrameworkInternational Conference on Information Systems MILAN 2013

This research is supported by the Irish Social Sciences Platform (ISSP), funded under the Programme for Research in Third Level Institutions, administered by the HEA and co- funded under the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), and also supported in part by Science Foundation Ireland grant 10/CE/I1855 to Lero

Page 7: How soon is now? Theorizing temporality for IS research

7

§1 Planning Time• Planning Time concerns those activities within the firm that

pertain to the allocation of the firm’s resources

– Planning style affects the degree of temporal freedom available in the firm, the amount of forethought that precedes events, the temporal distance between planning and execution and the generosity of time allocations

– Temporal coordination concerns the extent to which events are synchronized in a firm. On the one hand, it is necessary to consider the flexibility or adaptability of temporal planning. On the other hand, it is necessary to consider the precision or exactitude of planning time

International Conference on Information Systems MILAN 2013

This research is supported by the Irish Social Sciences Platform (ISSP), funded under the Programme for Research in Third Level Institutions, administered by the HEA and co- funded under the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), and also supported in part by Science Foundation Ireland grant 10/CE/I1855 to Lero

Page 8: How soon is now? Theorizing temporality for IS research

8

§2 Using Time• Using time refers to the manner in which time is enacted or

performed within the organization

– Time-use style affects the manner in which time is ‘consumed’ in firms. Improvisatory, monochronic, and polychronic styles of time use have been identified in the literature. It is also important to examine pace.

– Temporal position describes the location of a particular event in time. This has traditionally been done rather narrowly but broader conceptualizations are possible. We distinguish between absolute and relative temporal positioning

International Conference on Information Systems MILAN 2013

This research is supported by the Irish Social Sciences Platform (ISSP), funded under the Programme for Research in Third Level Institutions, administered by the HEA and co- funded under the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), and also supported in part by Science Foundation Ireland grant 10/CE/I1855 to Lero

Page 9: How soon is now? Theorizing temporality for IS research

9

§3 Relating to Time• Relating to Time refer to individuals’ understanding and

experience of time and deadlines

– Planning schemata refer to the conceptualizations of time that are held by individuals in terms of planning time (e.g. linear versus iterative conceptualizations of time)

– Time use schemata refer to the conceptualizations of time that are held by individuals in terms of using time (e.g. temporal signification, temporal awareness, temporal preference)

International Conference on Information Systems MILAN 2013

This research is supported by the Irish Social Sciences Platform (ISSP), funded under the Programme for Research in Third Level Institutions, administered by the HEA and co- funded under the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), and also supported in part by Science Foundation Ireland grant 10/CE/I1855 to Lero

Page 10: How soon is now? Theorizing temporality for IS research

10

Future directions & recommendations

International Conference on Information Systems MILAN 2013

This research is supported by the Irish Social Sciences Platform (ISSP), funded under the Programme for Research in Third Level Institutions, administered by the HEA and co- funded under the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), and also supported in part by Science Foundation Ireland grant 10/CE/I1855 to Lero

• Model refinement and validation

• Development of suitable measures

• Additional theory building on OT

• Opportunities to investigate– The impact of IS/IT on OT– Opportunities to enhance time performance in firms using IS/IT– Investigate the relationship between OT and other organizational variables

Page 11: How soon is now? Theorizing temporality for IS research

International Conference on Information Systems MILAN 2013

11

Full paper available at http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2013/proceedings/BreakthroughIdeas/7/ or from

Niamh O RiordanNational University of Ireland Galway

[email protected] ie.linkedin.com/in/niamhoriordan/

Thank You

This research is supported by the Irish Social Sciences Platform (ISSP), funded under the Programme for Research in Third Level Institutions, administered by the HEA and co- funded under the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), and also supported in part by Science Foundation Ireland grant 10/CE/I1855 to Lero