View
490
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Energy Usage in South AfricanPermanent Mould (Die Casting)Foundries
Citation preview
1
Energy Usage in South African
Permanent Mould (Die Casting)
Foundries
Carl ReinhardtKJJC Trading cc Trading as
Casting Services
November 2009
2
Disclaimer
• Casting Services has relied substantially upon information provided by the literature and by experts in the field. Casting Services has not made any assessment of the technology and no such assessment is implied by the statements made in this report.
• The other information contained in this course has been compliedfrom information from NADCA, NFTN, contained within Casting Services’ and associates files and database and from local companies and published industry information.
• Every effort has been made to ensure that the information presented and the conclusions reached are realistic and not misleading. However Casting Services makes no warranty as to the accuracy ofthe information contained within this course and will accept no responsibility or liability for any loss incurred by any person or organisation relying on the information in this report
3
Energy Costs Money
• Don’t waste it• Insulation
• Unburnt fuel
• Dross build up
• Wasted heat – often easily “captured” use to
preheat
• Dross and metal loss
4
Energy Cost Money
– Use it well
• Yield
– Casting Yield
– Machining Yield
• Rejects
• Metal Losses
• Don’t overheat your metal
5
Energy Costs Money
– Use the most cost effective
• For your area
• For your furnace type
• For your metal type
6
South African Foundries
• Data
– How much Energy Do we Use?
– Data
– How much does it cost?
– Data
– How much do the different energy types cost?
– Data
7
The DataThe Data must be
relevant
The Data must be
up to date
The Data must be
comparable
The Data must be
meaningful
The Data must be
clearly defined
8
South African Foundries
• Permanent Mould Foundries
– Die casting
• Gravity
– Conventional
– Tilt
– Counter Gravity/pseudo low pressure (tilt with furnace
attached)
• Low Pressure
• High Pressure
– Spin Casting
• Vertical
• Horizontal
9
Gravity Die Casting
High Pressure Die Casting (Cold Chamber)
Counter Gravity
10
South African Foundries• Other types of foundries
– Anything that isn’t a permanent mould foundry
– This data is collected from permanent mould
foundries
– Although there are a number similarities
• Furnaces
• Yields, metal losses, thermal + fuel losses etc
• But the data is specific to and collected from Permanent mould foundries (although a small
number of the foundries also had a sand
department)
11
The Data
• Data Collected from site visits to foundries between July 2009 to September 2009
• Data from 38 Permanent mould Foundries
• Data from another 8 Permanent mould foundries collected in September 2008 (pilot project)
12
Types of Foundries
Data Collected from
• 13 (+8 from Sept 2008) foundries who engage in
• High Pressure Die Casting Hot and or Cold Chamber
• Some of them also do Gravity (one did a little sand)
• Some also Low Pressure
• All non-ferrous– Aluminium and/or
– Brass and/or
– Zinc
13
Types of Foundries
Data Collected from
• Another 15 Foundries who do
– Gravity Casting
– Tilt (and Counter Gravity)
– Some also did Low pressure casting
– All ran
• Aluminium
• Some ran a bit of Zinc as well
14
Types of Foundries
Data Collected from• A further 9 foundries
– Who do • Gravity die casting• Low Pressure die casting• Some also do Sand casting
• And a conti-caster making bearings
• All non-ferrous– Aluminium and/or– Zinc and/or
– Brass
– One Foundry does Aluminium Gravity and Sand casting and sand casting bronze (Gun metal)
15
The Data
• Total GJ (Energy usage of all 38 foundries over 12 month period)
– 447 453 GJ
– This is enough to theoretically melt and superheat 372 878 tons
- These foundries only Melted 15 792tons
• Total Rand paid for this energy (includes kWh, kVA Service charges, Gas etc)
– R 51 707 272 (R115/GJ)
• Average Cost of Energy as a percentage of sales
– 5.46% of Turnover spent on Energy
• Could we save any Energy ? YES
• But holding Costs are not in here
• One foundry has reported a 20% saving in energy usage due to insulation and lids.
16
The DataTotal Energy Consumption
GJ/tonne sold
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
123456789
1011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738
10thM edian
90th
Co
mp
an
y
Energy CostEnerg y cost s as % C ast ing Sales
0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00%
123456789
1011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738
10thM edian
90th
Co
mp
an
y
17
The DataYield
Gravity
0.00% 20.00% 40.00% 60.00% 80.00% 100.00% 120.00%
123456789
1011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738
10thM edian
90th
Co
mp
an
y
Yield
Hot Chamber
0.00% 20.00% 40.00% 60.00% 80.00% 100.00%
123456789
1011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738
10thM edian
90th
Co
mp
an
y
18
The DataYield
Low Pressure
50.00% 55.00% 60.00% 65.00% 70.00% 75.00%
123456789
1011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738
10thM edian
90th
Co
mp
an
y
Yield
Cold Chamber
0.00% 20.00% 40.00% 60.00% 80.00% 100.00%
123456789
1011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738
10thM edian
90th
Co
mp
an
y
19
DrossA l D ro ss Percent age
0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00%
123456789
1011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738
10thM edian
90th
Com
pany
Zn D ross Percent age
0.00% 2.00% 4.00% 6.00% 8.00% 10.00% 12.00%
123456789
1011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738
10thM edian
90thC
om
pany
B rass D ross Percent age
0.00% 2.00% 4.00% 6.00% 8.00% 10.00% 12.00%
123456789
1011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738
10thM edian
90th
Com
pany
20
The Data• Reject Rate
– Over half of the companies did not record their rejects formally.
– Three quarters of them did not record rejects at
casting (thrown back in the “pot”)
– They don’t know how much energy (let alone other
costs) they are wasting due to rejects
– The Reject rates reported (although inaccurate as a
result of above comments)
• Gravity - median 8%
• Hot Chamber – median 7.5%
• Cold Chamber – median 12%
• Low pressure – median 15%
21
Types of Foundries
Data Collected from
Are you still with me?
22
Calculations to GJ
Approximate Calculation factors*
• Electricity – kWh to GJ – kWh x 3600/1000/1000
• Natural Gas – Normally given in GJ (in SA)
• Paraffin – Litres to GJ – Litres x 0.8 x 43.3 /1000
• Coke – kg to GJ – kg x 27 / 1000
• Diesel – Litres to GJ – Litres x 0.85 x 43 / 1000
• LPG – kg to GJ – kg x 46.3 /1000 (density 0.5)
• Other (Heavy oils etc), litres to GJ ≈ Litres x 0.93 x 41.7 / 1000
* Actual values are specific to the fuel suppliers manufacture techniques and other
factors
23
The Costs of Energy in SA
5.053.341.64R/l19512963Oil - HFO to Used Oil
8.136.204.46R/kg376287206LPG
7.405.372.68R/l27019698Diesel
8.238.238.23R/kg222222222Coke
5.555.064.58R/l192175158Parafin
196.36158.37123.15R/GJ196158123Natural Gas
0.99080.84570.2545R/kWh27523470Electricity
90th percentileMedian10th percentile90th percentileAverage10th percentile
R/GJ
Average Unit Cost of Different Energy Types in South Africa [R/GJ]
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Electricity [kWh]
Natural Gas
Parafin(litres)
Coke(kg)
Diesel(litres)
LPG [kg]
Oil - HFO to Used Oil
R/GJ
90th Percentile
Median
10th Percentile
24
Real Cost• According to Energy Workshop in USA August 2009
• Efficiency of Furnaces
• Furnace types for different Fuels– Electricity –
• Resistance – Indirect (ŋ=50%-80%)Direct (Even higher)
• Induction – Coreless / Channel (ŋ=59%-76%)
– Paraffin,Diesel, LPG, Oil, …..
• Reverbatory – Radiant Roof (ŋ=10%-35%)Stack (ŋ=40%-45%) Crucible (ŋ=7%-19%)
– Coke (Coal)
• Crucible (pit furnace) (ŋ≈5%-12%)
• Cupola (ŋ =40%-50%)
25
Real Cost to Heat Metal
• Real Cost – Cost to put energy into metal R/Metal GJ
– Depends on Furnace type – the furnaces
efficiency
– Depends on Energy Cost per Unit
– R / metal GJ = Energy Cost per Unit /ŋfurnace
26
Real Energy Cost to Heat Metal wrt Furnace type
R 1,852R 4,44412%5%Pit furnace
R 444R 55650%40%CupolaCoke
R 683R 1,85419%7%Crucible
R 288R 32445%40%Stack
R 371R 1,29835%10%Reverbatory (Radiant Roof)Oil HFO/Recycled
R 1,511R 4,10219%7%Crucible
R 638R 71845%40%Stack
R 820R 2,87135%10%Reverbatory (Radiant Roof)LPG
R 1,035R 2,80919%7%Crucible
R 437R 49245%40%Stack
R 562R 1,96635%10%Reverbatory (Radiant Roof)Diesel
R 924R 2,50819%7%Crucible
R 390R 43945%40%Stack
R 502R 1,75635%10%Reverbatory (Radiant Roof)Paraffin
R 834R 2,26219%7%Crucible
R 352R 39645%40%Stack
R 452R 1,58435%10%Reverbatory (Radiant Roof)Natural Gas
R 309R 39876%59%Induction
R 294R 47080%50%ResistanceElectric
LowHigh HighLowFurnace TypeEnergy Source
R/Metal GJEfficiency
Electricity Costs for 2008 – Plus 25% for 2009
Plus?? For 2010,11,12
Electricity, Plus 25%- R587 to R367
- R498 to R386
27
Real Energy Cost to Heat Metal wrt Furnace type
470
398
1,584
396
2,262
1,756
439
2,508
1,966
492
2,809
2,871
718
4,102
1,298
324
1,854
556
4,444
294
309
452
352
834
502
390
924
562
437
1,035
820
638
1,511
371
288
683
444
1,852
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000
Electric Resistance
Electric Induction
Natural Gas Reverbatory (Radiant Roof)
Natural Gas Stack
Natural Gas Crucible
Paraffin Reverbatory (Radiant Roof)
Paraffin Stack
Parafinn Crucible
Diesel Reverbatory (Radiant Roof)
Diesel Stack
Diesel Crucible
LPG Reverbatory (Radiant Roof)
LPG Stack
LPG Crucible
Oil Reverbatory (Radiant Roof)
Oil Stack
Oil Crucible
Coke Cupola
Coke Pit furnace
R / Metal GJ
High Cost (low efficiency) Low Cost (High Efficiency)
28
Conclusion
• Use best energy for your area
– Find out how much different energy types cost
in your area
• Use and setup your furnaces efficiently
• Use and setup your production systems efficiently