8
Digital Preservation of Scholarly Journals: A Publisher’s Perspective Adam Chesler Hawai’i Library Association October 24, 2008

Digital Preservation of Scholarly Journals: A Publisher’s Perspective by Adam Chesler

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

2008 Hawaii Library Association Conference at the Grand Wailea, Maui

Citation preview

Page 1: Digital Preservation of Scholarly Journals: A Publisher’s Perspective by Adam Chesler

Digital Preservation of Scholarly Journals: A Publisher’s Perspective

Adam CheslerHawai’i Library AssociationOctober 24, 2008

Page 2: Digital Preservation of Scholarly Journals: A Publisher’s Perspective by Adam Chesler

Why Preserve This Content? Ensure long-term availability of

scholarly record Fulfill obligation to contributors Secure publisher’s patrimony

Contribution to scholarly record Bigger than any organization itself:

content is more important than business models and subscriptions

Page 3: Digital Preservation of Scholarly Journals: A Publisher’s Perspective by Adam Chesler

Who’s Responsible?

Publishers Digital content hosted by providers

Distribution from central host makes sense: interactivity, upgrades to display/search/etc capabilities, linking

Librarians Traditional stewards of published content

Experience dealing with over-arching issues Third Parties – new players

Independence from old business concerns

Global reach In other words, the entire community

Page 4: Digital Preservation of Scholarly Journals: A Publisher’s Perspective by Adam Chesler

What is being preserved?

By Publishers (third parties) Journals

Full text Supplementary information

As available/practical Books (if/as available)

By Libraries (institutional repositories) Theses Lab reports Technical papers Local research

Page 5: Digital Preservation of Scholarly Journals: A Publisher’s Perspective by Adam Chesler

Is Digital Easier to Preserve? Conversion from print to digital enables new

and broader means of preservation Can’t reproduce a Gutenberg Bible, but can easily

save copies of the digital version But…

More gateways means more potential failure points More versions (official and unofficial) means

potential for more confusion Multiple authorized hosts important

Replicates successful print archiving apparatus, while accounting for digital technology/realities

Local loading suits only local users International network with preservation

mission Reliable sources in absence of publisher availability

Page 6: Digital Preservation of Scholarly Journals: A Publisher’s Perspective by Adam Chesler

Some Major Initiatives

Royal Dutch Library LOCKSS Portico CLOCKSS PubMedCentral Institutional repositories

Page 7: Digital Preservation of Scholarly Journals: A Publisher’s Perspective by Adam Chesler

Open Questions

How do we preserve “organic” or interactive content? Which one is the version of record? What happens when format changes ? Rendering software – will content be readable?

Searchable? Findable? Connectable? Costs

Viability of different/multiple initiatives Sharing of expenses – how?

Should we preserve everything? Who’s responsible for out-of-copyright materials? Which version should be saved (author’s,

publisher’s)? Who gets access? And when?

Page 8: Digital Preservation of Scholarly Journals: A Publisher’s Perspective by Adam Chesler

Contact Information

Adam Chesler

Telephone: (571) 243-7537E-Mail: [email protected]