Upload
vaxelrod
View
1.577
Download
6
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Open innovation through external and internal organizational networks.
Citation preview
Innovative organisations are evolving
new management models to
capitalise on the exponential power
of computer-enabled people networks
that create value through connecting
intelligence in and beyond their
traditional boundaries. ‘Open source’
software development, using many
minds to develop code, is a popular
benchmark for having generated a
variety of ‘open’ methods.
This masterclass discusses
several approaches to opening wide
organisational doors to tap external
talent for specific needs using what we
call ‘broadcasting innovation’. Each
organisation cited adopted an open
design depicted in Figure one. We close
with specific recommendations on how
to begin a broadcast innovation approach
to meet your organisation’s needs.
Part two will describe how
organisations are creatively using
prediction markets to enhance innovation
and business forecasting.
Deep roots of connected network valueWriting in a Forbes special report on
Networks1, Robert Metcalfe, renowned
computer industry pioneer and inventor
of the Ethernet protocol and Metcalfe’s
Law, noted that a quarter-billion Ethernet
switch ports (wall sockets) were installed
in 2006. It is now more than three decades
since Metcalfe’s Ethernet card solved
his 1973 challenge of how to connect
multiple personal computers in a Xerox
PARC laboratory to allow file sharing.
Card cost has declined from $1,000 a piece
to about $5 and become standard in most
personal computers.
Everyday individuals experience the
impact of reduced connection cost as
they confront overflowing email boxes
with messages from around the globe
and 24/7 time stamps. Their Internet
access provides an over-abundant array of
information sources from which to find
answers for every business question.
Technicians installing Ethernet cable
and wall sockets to enable computers and
people to connect and share information
are visible. Not so apparent but more
significant is how that connectedness
By Jenny Ambrozek and Victoria Axelrod
Broadcasting Innovation: organising to connect intelligenceThis approach reaches beyond the walls of internal networks and ‘crowd sources’ or ‘broadcasts’ research needs to external sources such as commercial, academic and not-for-profit institutions.
Masterclass | Part one
22 Masterclass www.ikmagazine.com
impacts organisations. As open source
software thought leader Simon Wardley
explains: “Ubiquitous and distributed
networks have created low cost
commoditised communication which has
allowed for greater collaboration.”
While individual employees struggle
to sift what is valuable from information
streams, their organisations are
challenged to implement more dynamic
and effective management models to
leverage the complex intersections
of people networks to compete in
a connected world. Broadcasting
innovation is one such approach.
Broadcasting innovationWhat is broadcasting innovation? Why do
it? And how does it work? A close look
at InnoCentive (www.innocentive.com)
provides answers.
In 2001 pharmaceuticals company
Eli Lilly realised the limits to their internal
research and development capability
and decided on a bold initiative. They
would reach beyond the walls of their
internal laboratories and ‘crowd source’
or broadcast their research needs.
InnoCentive, a new Eli Lilly division,
operates as a marketplace by connecting
commercial, academic, and nonprofit
organisations that post challenges
spanning a wide spectrum of industries
and disciplines to solvers.
The solver who submits the solution
best meeting the seeker’s challenge
requirements receives a cash award ranging
from $5,000 to $1,000,000. Challenges
span the physical, computer and life
sciences, engineering/design, chemistry,
math and business/entrepreneurship.
One hundred twenty-five thousand plus
engineers, scientists, inventors, business
people, and research organisations in more
than 175 countries are reached.
While InnoCentive started as an
initiative to extend Eli Lilly’s own research
capabilities by reaching outside its own
laboratories, it now serves as a design
for other companies to do likewise.
Stories abound of InnoCentive network
members solving problems that have
eluded inhouse researchers.
Scott Pegau, Oil Spill Recovery
Institute, Cordova, Alaska describes their
experience posting a challenge regarding
how to get oil to flow in a barge. Twenty-
seven responses were received, four of
which were useful solutions reflecting the
range of experience solvers brought. A
winning prize was awarded. Scott Pegau’s
closing observation that you slap your
head and ask: “Why didn’t we think of
this? We’re glad we asked somebody
else,” reflects the potential power opening
innovation offers.
Research findings into the dynamics
of problem resolution through
InnoCentive reveal why broadcasting
research and development problems
makes business sense with a range of
innovation marketplaces emerging to
support the process. Investigating 166
discrete scientific problems from the
research laboratories of 26 companies
between June 2001 to January 2005
Harvard Business School researcher
Lakhani and colleagues found this open
approach resulted in “a 29.5 per cent
resolution rate for scientific problems
unsolved by R & D laboratories of well
known science-driven firms.”2
The researchers also shed light on why
accessing a larger pool of external talent
works and on other factors in problem
resolution. Success was associated with the
ability to “attract specialised scientists with
diverse scientific interests.” In addition,
“successful solvers created solutions to
problems that were on the boundary
or outside of their fields of expertise.”
Openness worked to “trigger the transfer
and transformation of knowledge from
one scientific field to another. Efficiencies
were gained as solver drew on information
from previously developed solutions.”3
Given InnoCentive’s high profile
success as an open idea marketplace, the
rise of other specific industry focused
open innovation marketplaces is no
surprise. Yet2com brings technology
buyers and sellers together to maximise
investment returns. Eureka Medical
links medical professionals and talented
independent inventors with medical
device and health care product ideas to
innovation seeking companies. Topcoder
allows custom software developers to
compete for opportunities.
Executive to executive networksInnovation marketplaces like InnoCentive
are one emerging management model for
transforming innovation in organisations.
Others are realising the benefits of
facilitated human networks to tap
expertise among their stakeholders,
especially partners and customers.
Avaya, a $4bn Fortune 500 company
formed as a spin off from Lucent in 2000
designs, builds, deploys and manages voice
based applications including call centers
for other major corporations worldwide.
In a highly competitive and rapidly
changing industry, Avaya found they were
unable to meet the sophisticated needs of
their customers through their traditional
sales force.
Their response to the challenge was
creating Avaya’s Customer Councils
to support executive to executive
relationships to generate partnered
solutions. Mark Bonchek with Tapestry
Networks (that coined the term the
‘power to convene’) designed the
networks. Now CEO of the Truman
Company, Bonchek says for a twenty-first
century CEO or senior leader, the power
to convene is job one - in particular,
recognising the power to convene those
who have both a stake in the challenge
and the knowledge to contribute.
Senior executives have a unique
capability to draw peers together to
address challenges to their industries that
one alone might not be able to do, or
to form new networks where none had
existed in the past to benefit all. It is a
new network which Sean Maloney, EVP
and chief sales and marketing officer of
Intel, created demonstrating the power to
convene. Starting in 2002, Maloney began
an arduous task of bringing together
the industry players to lay the basis for
WiMAX, what will soon eclipse WiFi.
Each of the key players he convened
over five years, including Intel, has a
unique business stake in seeing WiMAX
come to fruition.
23www.ikmagazine.com Masterclass
“Intel was looking for something
that would prompt consumers to buy
new computers running its chips. Sprint
needed an edge to set it apart from
larger rivals Verizon and AT&T. Mobile
handset maker Nokia wanted to expand
into providing communications services.
And Samsung Group wanted to get into
the networking equipment business. The
interests of these four companies resulted
in a pooling of patents and money to
create the WiMAX phenomenon.”4
Large global brand enterprises are not
alone in adopting executive-to-executive
networks to tap the best talent and
expertise to address business problems.
The Bordeaux Energy Colloquium
was created specifically to assemble the
voices of various industry constituents
in dialogues regarding the deregulated
marketplace. Hosted annually, the
Colloquium addresses the current issues
and obstacles facing the creation of
competitive energy markets by tapping
expertise on both side of the Atlantic.
As an invitation-only organisation,
invitations are sent to high-level
representatives of each sector involved in
deregulating the energy market including
utilities, grid operators, generators,
industrials, financers, regulators, legal
experts and environmental specialists.
The Colloquium operates in the spirit
of “action research.” It offers industry
experts an opportunity to step back
from day to day issues and focus on the
changing dynamics of the deregulating
energy market place. Kimberly Samaha,
director, explains the mindset changes
required and network value:
“Embracing a new paradigm shift in
the energy industry towards sustainability
requires fundamental realignments of
business philosophies and practices.
Reaching into the diversity of global
energy executives allows the Bordeaux
Energy Colloquium to harness the
power of social networks in what we
call our Energy Plexus. In essence,
executives nominate other executives to
join us in projects and discussions in our
on-line communities and at our annual
Colloquiums. This intersection of people
and purposeful action enables us to have
a collective and powerful voice in shaping
the creation of our energy future.”
Truman Company’s Mark Bonchek
outlines the essentials for creating
effective executive-to-executive networks
beginning with structure that is “critical
to a successful network or community on
multiple levels because they establish the
conditions for trust, candor, collaboration
and action.”
Elements include:
1. Criteria for determining who is in the
network;
2. The set of formal obligations among
the participants;
3. Informal norms of behaviour that
help generate a sense of identity and
culture within the network;
4. Explicit purpose for the network with
mutual accountabilities.
Distributed leadership mindset Leaders seeking innovative management
models must look beyond the well-lit
cases. Two recent books Mobilizing Minds
by Lowell Bryan and Claudia Joyce5 and
Gary Hamel’s The Future of Management,6
reinforce the need to connect the
intelligence of highly talented creative
individuals where value and competitive
advantage will be created in the future.
Enabling human networks has already
provided enormous ‘profit per employee’
gains for the most successful companies,
yet innovative management is not yet in
the DNA of most companies. Strategy
is still a top down process, and as
Hamel points out, “the top can hold the
organisations capacity to change hostage
to their own personal willingness to
adapt and change.”7
Neither Hamel nor Bryan takes on
the issues of wealth redistribution which
needs to occur if we are to adopt their
performance metric – return on capital
(ROC) or profit per employee (PPE).
Compensation and reward are two of
the last sacred cows of the twentieth
century that must be addressed to achieve
innovative management and adoption of
peer-to-peer networks.
Organising for open innovationOpen innovation marketplaces and
stakeholder networks reveal the benefits of
sharing business problems for successful
resolution. They also indicate the common
elements needed to successfully implement
these new models for connecting
intelligence in organisations. Throwing
open organisational doors does not
24 Masterclass www.ikmagazine.com
Networks
OpenInnovation
Control
Collaboration Process & Tools
Hierarchy
Open Innovation Increases As Direct Control Decreases
bablabl bla
bablabl bla
bablabl bla
bablabl bla
bablabl bla
bablabl bla
bablabl bla
bablabl bla
bablabl bla
bablabl bla
bablabl bla
bablabl bla
bablabl bla
bablabl bla
Figure 1: Open innovation increases as direct control decreases.
Masterclass 25
happen overnight, but it does require
leaders who recognise the value of
tapping external and divergent views.
Figure one indicates that organisations
whose cultures have high control needs
are less likely to embrace open or
broadcast innovation approaches.
Creating value through connection and opennessLook no further than Procter &
Gamble’s Connect and Develop initiative
for evidence of the potential value
and what it takes to operate broadcast
innovation. It is a human networks
ecosystem inspired by new CEO A.G.
Lafley’s 2000 challenge to reinvent
P&G’s business innovation model and
achieve 50 percent of innovations from
outside the organisation.
Connect and Develop leverages an
internal team of globally distributed
technology entrepreneurs weaving links
between potential outside solution
providers (suppliers and researchers)
to the development needs within
P&G business units. It includes
collaboratively working with suppliers
and co-creating new technologies and
products. It taps external networks
including NineSigma, and YourEncore
for solutions to specific challenges
and uses Yet2Com as an intellectual
property exchange.
Larry Huston, managing director,
4iNNO, then vice president of Innovation,
describes the positive business impact of
reaching beyond P&G’s internal research
and development facilities for innovation:
“Using this programme, along with
improvements in product cost, design and
marketing, R&D productivity increased
by nearly 60 percent. Innovation success
rate more than doubled while the cost of
innovation fell.”
Starting PointsWhether your initiative to connect
intelligence and broadcast innovation
uses an ideas marketplace, executive-to-
executive network, or other initiatives as
elements in an innovation ecosystem, pay
close attention to the following:
1. Business Driver – Begin with a clearly
understood business issue or challenge
tied to strategic direction with high-
level executive support.
2. Success and Measurements Defined –
Be clear on what success will look like
in the organisation and the metrics
gathering to demonstrate.
3. Structure – Define the process
through which open innovation
will be conducted.
4. Ground Rules – Ensure consensus
on agreed collaboration protocols
to enable trusted exchange among
participants.
5. Co-Create – Admit that all the
answers do not lie within the
established organisation and solutions
can emerge through collaboration and
sharing.
6. Diversity – Engage diverse talent and
experiences, especially from fields far
from the traditional disciplines for
addressing a particular issue.
7. Incentives – Adopt relevant rewards
and understand the potential of
non-monetary incentives such
as recognition and satisfaction
from success.
8. Architect Participation – Ensure the
best minds are engaged, paid attention
and respected to ensure ongoing
active involvement.
9. Idea Circulation – Include an
infrastructure that supports
dynamically capturing and sharing
insights and knowledge created
through collaboration to serve as
business fuel.
Openness, sharing, and actively engaging
outsiders in problem solving requires
significant mindset and practice changes
for traditional organisations. Leaders have
a sanctioned right to convene. However,
a growing body of experience indicates
an impact of the interactive Web is
potentially empowering each individual,
in every enterprise, with the power to
convene. A connected world leaves
organisations no option but to explore
open models or be left behind.
For Part 2, see the February issue
of Inside Knowledge. For additional
information contact Jenny Ambrozek at
Jenny Ambrozek is founder of SageNet LLC, US,
a consulting practice. Victoria Axelrod is a recognised
leader in organisational strategy and implementation.
Sources1. Metcalfe, Robert, “It’s All in Your Head”
Forbes Special Report, May 7, 2007,
http://www.forbes.com/free_
forbes/2007/0507/052.html
2. Lakhani, Karim R., Lars Bo Jeppesen,
Peter A. Lohse, and Jill A. Panetta,
“The Value of Openness in Scientific
Problem Solving,” Harvard Business
School Working Paper, No. 07-050, 2007,
http://www.hbs.edu/research/facpubs/
workingpapers/papers0607.html#07-050.
3. Id.
4. Edwards, Cliff and Moon Ihlwan, ìThe
Road To WiMAX,î Business Week,
September 3, 2007.
http://www.businessweek.com/
magazine/content/07_36/b4048401.
htm?chan=search
5. Bryan, Lowell and Joyce, Claudia,
Moblizing Minds: Creating Wealth From
Talent in the 21st Century Organization,
McGrawñHill, New York, 2007.
6. Hamel, Gary and Breen, Bill, ìThe Future
of Management,î Harvard Business
School Press, 2007.
7. Id.
“This intersection of people and purposeful action enables us to have a collective and powerful voice in
shaping the creation of our energy future.”
www.ikmagazine.com