Upload
mark-carlson
View
3.787
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Academic Presentation. Trans + references. Overview of a BPM Implementation at a fictitious company.
Citation preview
SaveWithUs’BPM ImplementationGiving SWU the Keys to Business Process Improvement
Mark Carlson IT600-0704B-01 : Information Technology Management
Prof. Jason G. Andress
Overview• The chosen vendor: BlueSpring
Software™• The software: BPM Suite 4.5• BPM Project Proposal
– Business Case– Project Management Methodology
• General Timetable• Resource and Cost Estimates
The Chosen Vendor• BlueSpring Software
– Founded in 1998– Microsoft Gold Partner– Dedicated business process
management software company– Specialize in simplifying collaboration
using common desktop tools, such as Excel ™, Word ™, Email, and Adobe Acrobat ™
– Over $200 million, privately-owned company, that has the agility of a private company and resources of a large one (BlueSpringsSoftware, 2007)
The SoftwareBPM Suite 4.5
• Service Orientated Architecture application built on Microsoft .NET 3.0
• Pre- integrated with Microsoft Office and Microsoft Business Solution products
• No programming knowledge required for business designers• Built-in business activity monitoring tools• Low entry cost point (BlueSpring, 2007)
• Considered a BPMS market leader by Forrester Research and IDC
• Developed from the ground up as a true 3rd generation BPM system, not workflow upgrades
BPM Project Proposal
• Business Case Presented– Improves Competitiveness and SWU’s Bottom
Line– Synergistic Effect with other Business
Applications– Aggressive ROI– Regulatory Augmentation
BPM Project Proposal Continued
• Standard Project Management Institute (PMI) Phases used for the Length of the Project (GlobalKnowledge, 2006)– Initiation– Planning (including risk assessment)– Execution– Control/QA– Close-Out
General Timetable
Initiation Phase
2 Weeks
Planning Phase
4 Months
Execution Phase
4 Months
Monitoring/QA Phase
1 Month
Close Out Phase
2 Weeks
TOTAL 10 MONTHS
• Total 10 Month Implementation
• From Initiation to Close-Out
• Extended Planning phase for Business Alignment
Resource and Cost Estimates
Project Phase Resource QTY Weeks Hours% Billable
TimeBillable Hours
Initiation Project Phase Project Mgmt 1 2 80 50% 40Business Analyst 3 2 80 50% 120
Planning Project Phase Project Mgmt 1 16 640 50% 320Business Analyst 3 16 640 50% 960Management 10 16 640 10% 640Training 2 16 640 25% 320
Execution Project Phase
Project Mgmt 1 16 640 50% 320IT 6 16 640 25% 960Business Analyst 3 16 640 25% 480Training 4 16 640 25% 640
Monitoring/QA Project Phase
Quality Assurance 10 4 160 50% 800Project Mgmt 1 4 160 50% 80
IT 1 4 160 10% 16 Close-Out Phase Project Mgmt 1 2 80 50% 40 Sub Total 47 146 5840 N/A 5736
Internal Labor Costs $401,520
Product & Travel Expenses
Internal Labor Expenses
Resource Costs Broken Down by Department
Item Description QTY Price Total
SoftwareBPM Suite, MSSQL, Standard Server Software, Clustered 2 $50,000 $100,000
HardwareHP Proliant Blades, SAN Space Provision, Clustered 2 $20,000 $40,000
Travel Expenses Stakeholder Budget 10 $1,000 $10,000Product & Travel Expenses $150,000
Conclusion
• A BPM system is recommended to increase business efficiency and transparency for process improvement
• BlueSpring Software’s BPM Suite 4.5 offers a true BPM application that integrates easily into SWU’s operational and IT areas at an affordable price.
• Implementation yields to be 10 months and about $500,000
References
• BlueSpring. (2007). Retrieved December 9, 2007 from http://www.bluespringsoftware.com/products
• GlobalKnowledge. (2006). Retrieved December 26, 2006 from http://images.globalknowledge.com/wwwimages/whitepaperpdf/WP_PMLifeCycle.pdf
• Carlson, M. (2007). Group BPM Presentation. Retrieved December 26, 2007 from CTU Online, IT600-0704B-01 : Information Technology Management