1
TEMPLATE DESIGN © 2008 www.PosterPresentations.com Knowing What You Already Know: A Case for the Adoption of a Knowledge Management Approach to Standardized Patient Case Creation, Management and Storage. Introduction A Knowledge Management Adoption Staff Workgroup for Continued Improvement References Contact information KM Best Practices for Consideration Document Management Surveys Howard M Gregory, MSKM; Lori Gourley Babbey, MBA & Jinny Fedorchak William G. Wasson, M.D. Center of the Northeastern Ohio Universities Colleges of Medicine and Pharmacy Asprey, L., & Middleton, M. (2003). Integrative Document & Content Management: Strategies for Exploiting Enterprise Knowledge. Hearsey: Igi Global. Craine, K. (2000). Designing a Document Strategy. Grapevine, Texas: Mc2 Books. Grayson, C. S., Jackson, C., Essaides, J., & O'Dell, N. (1998). If Only We Knew What We Know. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster. To better address concerns outlined in the Center’s document management assessment a staff workgroup was created. Led by management, this group will research, explore and implement Knowledge Management inspired solutions to the Center’s documents beginning with our SP Cases. Staff concerns about changes included; Overcoming the "because we've always done it this way“ mentality Changes in folder and storage structure Change for the sake of change Having no input into process Staff hopes for the changes included; A standardized naming convention Finding a way to have one document for multiple case versions The creation of templates to standardize document creation The ability to archive outdated documents Document Management Assessment What does a Knowledge Management (KM) approach to document management mean? KM creates a uniform structure that makes documents more accessible while improving time management and reducing information loss caused by employee retirement and turnover. KM focuses on the way in which individuals & organizations create, learn, store and share knowledge. It is our hope that collaborative creation, learning, storage and sharing of knowledge will result in added value to our organization. While software tools may help the process, KM is NOT, necessarily, a vendor created software solution. The Wasson Center of Northeastern Ohio Universities Colleges of Medicine and Pharmacy (NEOUCOM) has recently experienced increasingly high demands on time and resources caused by internal program growth due to changes to the medical curriculum and the addition of a PharmD program. This has resulted in our scheduled programming doubling in the past year. We asked what strategies and techniques we could adapt that will allow us to continue quickly creating and executing high quality Standardized Patient (SP) teaching and testing activities within these new constraints? The opportunity arose for a staff review of current document and content management practices to answer this question. An initial literature review revealed several interesting facts: 80% of Documents are Never Retrieved 50% of Documents are Duplicates 60% of Documents are Obsolete Craine, 2000 The ease of creating and updating documents with word processing software combined with inexpensive hard drive storage has created a situation in which a Digital Landfill of documents becomes an increasing risk. With over 200 active SP Case Scripts updated continually, tailored for diverse demographics, and versioned for different levels of learners, the Wasson Center looked at the benefits to be gained from the adoption of a Knowledge Management approach to document management. It was decided to survey SP Educators to see how they addressed the issues. Templates Standardized format Quickly locate information Quickly reproduce data and format requirements Case Naming Conversion and Version Control Quickly and easily determine SP case study files Document Control Control who can create, modify and delete documents Prevent orphaned documents Protects documents from accidental deletion and change Taxonomy Standardization with a controlled vocabulary Documented “use for” section Records Retention Schedule Deleting or Archiving outdated versions of SP Cases Better access to the information you need when you need A survey addressing SP Case Storage and Naming was created using Survey Monkey and distributed to SP Educators internationally (N=21). Survey results found that the majority of educators kept SP Cases in several locations using both paper and electronic formats. Additionally 73% reported that they have found themselves comparing different versions of documents to find the one they needed. When asked what SP Case naming features they currently implemented and which they would like in future, SP Educators responded as outlined below. William G Wasson MD Center for Clinical Skills Training, Assessment and Scholarship 4209 SR 44 PO Box 95 Rootstown, Ohio 44272 330-325-3202 http://www.neoucom.edu/wasson 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% Paper My Computer Network - private space Network - department Network - invited users Network - open to organization Portable - CD or Jump Drive On WWW - in the cloud Where Do You Store Your SP Cases? 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% Naming that allows logical sort in MS Windows Ability to track versions Ability to identify contents without opening Content protected from accidental changes Content protected from accidental deletion Naming standards which minimize development time Ability to identify outdated documents easily Naming standards which minimize misfiles None With Regards to SP Case Documents Like To Have Currently Have

ASPE Poster Wasson Center, NEOUCOM

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Original Standardized Patient (SP) Cases represent a costly, time intensive collaboration between staff, physicians and course directors, as such these documents are updated and repurposed numerous times. How do we track those changes? Are we able to find the case version we need when we need it? When I create or update an SP case how would others be able to find and identify that specific case when I needed?

Citation preview

Page 1: ASPE Poster Wasson Center, NEOUCOM

TEMPLATE DESIGN © 2008

www.PosterPresentations.com

Knowing What You Already Know:A Case for the Adoption of a Knowledge Management Approach to Standardized Patient Case Creation, Management and Storage.

Introduction A Knowledge Management Adoption Staff Workgroup for Continued Improvement

References

Contact information

KM Best Practices for Consideration

Document Management Surveys

Howard M Gregory, MSKM; Lori Gourley Babbey, MBA & Jinny FedorchakWilliam G. Wasson, M.D. Center of the Northeastern Ohio Universities Colleges of Medicine and Pharmacy

Asprey, L., & Middleton, M. (2003). Integrative Document & Content Management: Strategies for Exploiting Enterprise Knowledge. Hearsey: Igi Global.

Craine, K. (2000). Designing a Document Strategy. Grapevine, Texas: Mc2 Books.

Grayson, C. S., Jackson, C., Essaides, J., & O'Dell, N. (1998). If Only We Knew What We Know. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.

To better address concerns outlined in the Center’s document

management assessment a staff workgroup was created. Led by

management, this group will research, explore and implement

Knowledge Management inspired solutions to the Center’s documents

beginning with our SP Cases.

Staff concerns about changes included;• Overcoming the "because we've always done it this way“ mentality• Changes in folder and storage structure• Change for the sake of change• Having no input into process

Staff hopes for the changes included;• A standardized naming convention• Finding a way to have one document for multiple case versions• The creation of templates to standardize document creation• The ability to archive outdated documentsDocument Management Assessment

What does a Knowledge Management (KM) approach to document

management mean? KM creates a uniform structure that makes

documents more accessible while improving time management and

reducing information loss caused by employee retirement and turnover.

KM focuses on the way in which individuals & organizations create,

learn, store and share knowledge. It is our hope that collaborative

creation, learning, storage and sharing of knowledge will result in added

value to our organization.

While software tools may help the process, KM is NOT, necessarily, a

vendor created software solution.

The Wasson Center of Northeastern Ohio Universities Colleges of

Medicine and Pharmacy (NEOUCOM) has recently experienced

increasingly high demands on time and resources caused by internal

program growth due to changes to the medical curriculum and the

addition of a PharmD program. This has resulted in our scheduled

programming doubling in the past year.

We asked what strategies and techniques we could adapt that will

allow us to continue quickly creating and executing high quality

Standardized Patient (SP) teaching and testing activities within these

new constraints? The opportunity arose for a staff review of current

document and content management practices to answer this question.

An initial literature review revealed several interesting facts:

80% of Documents are Never Retrieved

50% of Documents are Duplicates

60% of Documents are Obsolete Craine, 2000

The ease of creating and updating documents with word processing

software combined with inexpensive hard drive storage has created a

situation in which a Digital Landfill of documents becomes an

increasing risk.

With over 200 active SP Case Scripts updated continually, tailored for

diverse demographics, and versioned for different levels of learners,

the Wasson Center looked at the benefits to be gained from the

adoption of a Knowledge Management approach to document

management. It was decided to survey SP Educators to see how they

addressed the issues.

Templates Standardized formatQuickly locate informationQuickly reproduce data and format requirements

Case Naming Conversion and Version Control Quickly and easily determine SP case study files

Document Control Control who can create, modify and delete documents

Prevent orphaned documentsProtects documents from accidental deletion and change

Taxonomy Standardization with a controlled vocabularyDocumented “use for” section

Records Retention Schedule Deleting or Archiving outdated versions of SP Cases

Better access to the information you need when you need

A survey addressing SP Case Storage and Naming was created using Survey Monkey and distributed to SP Educators internationally (N=21).

Survey results found that the majority of educators kept SP Cases in

several locations using both paper and electronic formats. Additionally

73% reported that they have found themselves comparing different

versions of documents to find the one they needed. When asked what

SP Case naming features they currently implemented and which they

would like in future, SP Educators responded as outlined below.

William G Wasson MD Center for Clinical Skills Training, Assessment and Scholarship4209 SR 44 PO Box 95Rootstown, Ohio 44272330-325-3202http://www.neoucom.edu/wasson

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0%

Paper

My Computer

Network - private space

Network - department

Network - invited users

Network - open to organization

Portable - CD or Jump Drive

On WWW - in the cloud

Where Do You Store Your SP Cases?

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0%

Naming that allows logical sort in MS Windows

Ability to track versions

Ability to identify contents without opening

Content protected from accidental changes

Content protected from accidental deletion

Naming standards which minimize development time

Ability to identify outdated documents easily

Naming standards which minimize misfiles

None

With Regards to SP Case Documents

Like To Have Currently Have