Upload
madsen720
View
2.626
Download
9
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Basic AI & RCA
Citation preview
Accident Investigation &Root Cause Analysis
Steve Madsen
Food for thought
Big things go wrong because wedon’t act on small things.
Food for thought
“Only investigating big thingswill insure that you’ll continue tohave big things.”
Motor Vehicles32%
Struck by Moving, Falling or Stationary
Objects18%
Heart Attacks/Strokes
13%
Slips and Falls8%
Gunshot Wounds8%
Airplanes5%
Caught Between Object/Equip
5%Miscellaneous
11%
Leading Causes of Workplace Deaths
Root Cause Analysis DefinedA Structured Investigation thatAims To Identify The True
Causes Of A Problem, and The Actions Necessary To
Eliminate Them.
Work Space
Work Environment
Work Organization
Conditions
Behaviors
Goal: Smooth Flow of Profitable Production
Weeding
“Weeding Out” The Causes Of Injuries And Illnesses
CutsBurns
Strains
Conditions
Behaviors
Surface Causes of the Accident
Root Causes of the Accident
Direct Causes of Injury/Illness
Accident InvestigationsWhy InvestigateBenefitsWho InvestigatesCurrent EffectivenessCommon ErrorsObstacles
Why Investigate Accidents?Protect people, Property, and CommunitiesData for trendingID Deficiencies in Safety ProgramsMoraleStimulate Interest in SafetyLegal considerations:
Quality of the informationEnsuring that we correctly identified deficiencies
Identify “True” Multiple Root Causes Develop “Effective” Corrective/Preventive Measures to
Prevent Recurrence Improve Effectiveness of Management Systems Share Lessons Learned Improve Safety Performance Reduce Direct & Indirect Accident Costs Improve Efficiency, Productivity, Profitability & Morale Enhance Product Quality & Public Image Demonstrate Commitment To Continual Improvement
Benefits
Who Investigates?
Supervisors/Managers/TrainersSerious Accidents may need a Team Approach
• Death, multiple serious injuries, or potential for multiple serious injuries.
• Complexity of conditions/operations/hazards
• Near miss with high risk potential
Common ErrorsStating the apparent cause rather than the root cause.
Slip on oil spot on floor.Cause is related to outcome rather than the incident itself.
Foreign Object in the eye - “employee not using safety glasses”
Stopping investigation too soon or not going far enough.Facility equipment failure Lack of Training“Be more careful”
Time Information
Company Culture
Obstacles
System Faults
OutputInput
MethodsSupervision
Rules Procedures
Polices
System Faults
System Faults
System Faults
Accident
EnvironmentAgents
Facilities Temperature
Atmosphere
Equipment
Product
Guards Machinery
Materials
PersonnelProtection
Training Fatigue
Fitness
Accident Causation Model
Accident Investigation Process
Follow-Up
Corrective Action
Response
Fact-Finding
Analysis
Notification
Notification PhaseDo we have effective processes in place
to encourage immediate reporting of incidents to the stakeholders? Plan to notify the right people? What is the Flow of information?
Are we identifying and removing barriers to reporting?
Back-up plans in place?
Response• Ensure medical treatment• Eliminate obvious hazards - don’t wait for investigation
process to control a known hazard.• Determine if the area needs to be secured:
• unsafe conditions exist• critical evidence needs to be preserved• possible third party involvement
• Identify stakeholders that will need to be involved and how investigation will be done.
Fact Finding Phase • Conduct interviews using Simple Approaches
• Who, What, Where, When , Why, How• Keep Probing for More Information
• “What else can you tell me that might have been a factor ?”
• Don’t jump to conclusions and recommendations too quickly
• Avoid the “quick fix” if a system problem exists.• Video/Photograph/Diagram scene• Examine equipment*
Interviews: Who? By Whom?
Injured Person Witnesses Pre-Accident Accident Post-Accident Non Witnesses
Interview Techniques
Conduct the interview as soon as possible after the incident.
Create a relaxed atmosphere, avoid blame, get all sides and request ideas for prevention.
Keep the interview private to avoid group biases.
Interview Techniques
Look for facts, beware of smoke screen.
Listen, test, investigate and validate all evidence.
Repeat the story back, probe into all aspects of the non-conformance or accident, get all sides of the story.
Have witnesses sign their statements.
Analyzing the Facts
Primary Surface Causes•Directly causes the injury event•Unique hazardous conditions•Individual unsafe behaviors•Events occur close to the injury event•Controllable or uncontrollable factors•Failure to perform safety practices, procedures, processes•Involves the victim, others
Secondary Surface Causes•Indirectly causes the injury event•Specific hazardous conditions•Individual unsafe behaviors•Events occur distant to the injury event•Controllable or uncontrollable factors•Failure to perform safety practices, procedures, processes•Co-workers, supervisors – anytime, anywhere
Implementation Root Causes• Common conditions & behaviors• Inadequate implementation of
safety policies, programs, plans• Inadequate design of processes &
procedures• Pre-exist the surfaces causes• Controllable• Middle management – anytime,
anywhere
System Design Root Causes• Inadequate design of safety
policies, programs, plans• Pre-exist all other causes• Controllable• CEO, Top management – anytime,
anywhere
Fails to inspect
No recognition planInadequate training plan
No accountability policy No inspection policy
No discipline procedures
Outdated hazcom programNo orientation process
Unguarded machineHorseplay
Fails to trainTo much work
Defective PPEFails to
report injury
Inadequate training
Create a hazard
Fails to enforce
Untrained worker
Broken tools
Ignore a hazard
Lack of time
Inadequate labeling
No recognition
CutsBurns
Lac
k of
vis
ion
Strains
No
mis
sion
sta
tem
ent
Chemical spill
Root Cause Analysis
Root Cause Analysis Tools
Events & Condition Charting
Fishbone Diagrams
Cause & Effect Model – “5 Whys”
Events & Condition ChartingGraphical representation to illustrate
• Facts as they occurred• In the sequence they occurred• Additional known conditions• Deviation or change from expected step or action
Foundation for investigation organizationCondition
Event Event Event
Condition Condition
Events & Condition ChartingEvents- "Who did What“ action statements that describe what led up to the incident .
John Doe reports to work
John assigned to change fuse
Obtain fuse from store room
Tagged out fuse box
Replaced fuse
Energized System
System not functioning
John open fuse box
Tied out the interlocks
Put meter across fuse
6:56 am
Fireball exploded in John’s face
What action happened next? Arrange chronologically Times can be added to chart.
Include one action per box.
Quantify when possible. Use precise factual words.
Conditions - Amplify or explain the event
Events & Condition Charting
For each event box ask, "what else do I know about it?"
Conditions are information, including problems, about an action
Use precise, factual, non-judgmental wordsQuantify when possibleUse dotted ovals for assumptions
Regular employee sick
Safety requirement
Wanted to check it out
System blowing fuse when starting
System designed for
continuous op
Defect not corrected
Fuse outof date
Fuse blown
Meter not properly installed
Used 600 volt meter
Pressure to get back on line
Wanted to check again
Did not follow
procedures
Wanted to check voltage
across line
Not experienced
Did not follow procedures
Lack of training
Not supervised
John Doe reports to work
John assigned to change fuse
Obtain fuse from store room
Tagged out fuse box
Replaced fuse
Energized System
System not functioning
John open fuse box
Tied out the interlocks
Put meter across fuse
Events & Condition Charting6:56 am
Fireball exploded in John’s face
Regular employee sick.
Safety requirement
Wanted to check it out.
System blowing fuse when
starting
System designed for
continuous op.
Defect not corrected
Fuse outof date
Fuse blown
Meter not properly installed
Used 600 volt meter
Pressure to get back on line.
Wanted to check again
Did not follow
procedures
Wanted to check voltage
across line
Not experienced
Did not follow procedures
Lack of training
Not supervised
John Doe reports to work
John assigned to change fuse
Obtain fuse from store room
Tagged out fuse box
Replaced fuse
Energized System
System not functioning
John open fuse box
Tied out the interlocks
Put meter across fuse
Events & Condition Charting
6:56 am
Fireball exploded in John’s face
CF
CF
CFCF
CF
CF
Events & Condition Charting – Causal Factors
6:56 am Regular employee sick.
Safety requirement
Wanted to check it out.
System blowing fuse when starting
System designed for
continuous op.
Defect not corrected
Fuse outof date
Fuse blown
Meter not properly installed
Used 600 volt meter
Pressure to get back on line.
Wanted to check again
Did not follow
procedures
Wanted to check voltage
across line
Not experienced
Did not follow procedures
Lack of training
Not supervised
John Doe reports to work
John assigned to change fuse
Obtain fuse from store room
Tagged out fuse box
Replaced fuse
Energized System
System not functioning
John open fuse box
Tied out the interlocks
Put meter across fuse
Fireball exploded in John’s face
CF
CF
CFCF
CF
CF
Events & Condition Charting – Causal Factors
Conditions that if removed would keep the incident from happening or make it less severe in its consequences.
Not all conditions are necessarily Casual Factors.
Utilize analysis tools on the identified causal factors to determine Root Cause
Events & Condition Charting
Defect not corrected
Fuse outof date
Fuse blown
Did not follow
procedures
Did not follow procedures
Lack of training
Not supervised
CF
CF
CFCF
CF
CF
ProblemRoots
People
Environment
Methods
Equipment
Fishbone Diagram
Fishbone Diagrams
Analysis tool for systematic review of cause and effects.
Assists in categorizing many potential causes of problems in orderly way.
Start with categories – people, methods, environment, equipment, etc.
“Brainstorm” within each category.
ProblemRoots
People
Environment
Methods
Equipment
System Faults
OutputInput
Methods
System Faults
System Faults
System Faults
Accident
Environment
Equipment Personnel
Fishbone Diagrams: – Root Examples
People – Rules Known But Not Used, Did Not See Hazards During Field Inspections, Misaligned Parts, etc.
Methods – Inadequate/ Non-Existent Procedures, Training
Environment – Noise, Cold/Hot, Inadequate Lighting, Slippery Floors, etc.
Equipment – Worn or Defective Bearing, Seal, Pump, Motor, Switch, Light, etc.
Simply put, a ‘5 Why’ analysis adds discipline to the problem investigation to ensure that as many contributors as possible are reviewed up front.
This makes it possible to create an action plan taking into account all the information . . . which should lead to much better results.
Cause & Effect Analysis – “5 Whys”
Why?
Why?
Why?
Why?
Why?
Cause & Effect Analysis – “5 Whys”
Cause & Effect Analysis – “5 Whys”
Why are we notable to build good
widgits?
Don’t producegood widgits
Poor Material
Insufficient Definition
Insufficient Tools
Poor Processing
Once you have your basic problem determined, ask yourself ‘why’ that may be happening.
Be sure to consider all areas of the process, not just ones that you know are involved. Brainstorming is a useful tool in this stage.
Why would we havepoor processing?
Staff not TrainedCorrectly
Paint too old
Vendor Change
ProceduresIncorrect
Insufficient Definition
Insufficient Tools
Poor Processing
Poor Material
Cause & Effect Analysis – “5 Whys”
The process of questioning the answer is continued at least 4 more times (ie, 5 Why) off each response.
Be sure to keep your questions in line with the original issue. Otherwise, you can stray into unrelated areas and waste time.
Cause & Effect Analysis – “5 Whys”
The resultant tree of questions and answers should lead to a comprehensive picture of POTENTIAL root causes for the incident.
Corrective Action
Identify and address multiple root causes - not just the apparent, immediate causes.
Develop system controls to solve the causes:
“If this is corrected, will the likelihood of recurrence be eliminated?”
Multiple root causes will need multiple controls so don’t focus on a single solution.
Areas for Corrective Action
EnvironmentChanges
ProcedureChanges
Training
Program
BehavioralPersonnel
PhysicalChanges
Current Effectiveness (Nationally)
A Study of Accident Investigations Showed The Following:Root Cause Identification
43% were appropriate 32% were deficient 25% included no causes
Corrective Action 53% were appropriate 23% were deficient 24% included no solutions
Source: Hagan, P.(2001). Accident Prevention Manual – Administration & Programs, 12th Edition, National Safety Council, Itasca, IL
Areas for Corrective Action
System Faults
OutputInput
MethodsSupervision
Rules Procedures
Polices
System Faults
System Faults
System Faults
Accident
EnvironmentAgents
Facilities Temperature
Atmosphere
EquipmentProduct
Guards Machinery
Materials
PersonnelProtection
Training Fatigue
Fitness