14
Food Localization: Niche Merchandising PRESENTED BY EXECUTIVE DETECTIVES: LINDSAY BRIGHTWELL EILEEN CORLEY MICHAEL DIGIORGIO FAWNA WASSON

2014 Target Case Competition

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Project Objective: To gain local relevancy while maintaining corporate brand, margin goals, and commitment to shareholders in order to provide a relevant shopping experience for Target customers. Managed a team of four members to obtain an overall goal; Studied demographics and geographics in order to determine consumer preferences base on regionalization throughout the United States and Canada, Researched and developed the concept of mobile application implementation in Target stores across these regions, allowing sales and product promotions to be delivered to customers via email & mobile notifications; Regionalized areas of the United States and Canada based on location of Distribution Centers, Food Distribution Centers, and Corporate Offices to analyze best delivery of implementation of new ideas; Consulted with upper-management to improve product niche merchandising and later presented ideas to these members of the Target team; Placed 2nd out of 24 competing teams in overall competition.

Citation preview

Page 1: 2014 Target Case Competition

Food Localization:

Niche Merchandising

PRESENTED BY EXECUTIVE DETECTIVES:LINDSAY BRIGHTWELL

EILEEN CORLEY

MICHAEL DIGIORGIO

FAWNA WASSON

Page 2: 2014 Target Case Competition

04/12/2023 ALPHA KAPPA PSI 2014 TARGET CASE COMPETITION

What to Expect!Company overviewProject objectiveInitial SWOTImplementationAfter SWOTQuestions

Expect more, pay less!

Page 3: 2014 Target Case Competition

04/12/2023 ALPHA KAPPA PSI 2014 TARGET CASE COMPETITION

Target - Company OverviewWho are we?

oExpect more, pay less!

Who are our guests? oAvg. Age = 40oAvg. Income = $64,000oCollege Education = 55%oChildren at Home= 43%

Expect more, pay less!

US Age Demographics

Under 18 18-65 Over 65

Page 4: 2014 Target Case Competition

04/12/2023 ALPHA KAPPA PSI 2014 TARGET CASE COMPETITION

Project Objective

To gain local relevancy while maintaining its corporate brand, margin goals, and commitment to shareholders in order to provide a relevant shopping experience for our

customers.

Expect more, pay less!

Page 5: 2014 Target Case Competition

04/12/2023 ALPHA KAPPA PSI 2014 TARGET CASE COMPETITION

SWOT Analysis as of NowStrengths Weaknesses Opportunities ThreatsFeed the latest trends; one-stop-shop; visually appealing stores;

Brand awareness: Expect more, pay less! ;1st largest retail in America

Products not segmented; low inventory; self-service focus;

Damage reputation (Data Security Breach);Not always lowest prices;Stores are not location specific

Product promotion; store expansion; demand for private label products

Room for new localized merchandise

In EXPANSION of business cycle!

Economic growth; unemployment; inflation;

Competition: Costco, K-Mart, & Wal-Mart

Expect more, pay less!

Page 6: 2014 Target Case Competition

04/12/2023 ALPHA KAPPA PSI 2014 TARGET CASE COMPETITION

Implementation – Online SurveysBrief surveyoAllows customer to obtain additional discount on overall purchase

Implement at checkout

oInformation on store receipts

oExample:Q: What style BBQ sauce do you prefer?

a) Tangyb) Originalc) Spicyd) Other – Please indicate!

Expect more, pay less!

Page 7: 2014 Target Case Competition

04/12/2023 ALPHA KAPPA PSI 2014 TARGET CASE COMPETITION

Implementation – Product SpecificRegionalized BBQ sauce – store locationoThrough FDC

Promotions (Location Specific)oREDcard Exclusive OffersoiBeacon – discounts according to locationoBOGO – Compliments in economics

Expect more, pay less!

Page 8: 2014 Target Case Competition

04/12/2023 ALPHA KAPPA PSI 2014 TARGET CASE COMPETITION

Implementation – Mobile ApplicationiBeaconoPromo’s according to locationCertain products, certain areas

oTexts/Notifications while in store

Expect more, pay less!

Page 9: 2014 Target Case Competition

04/12/2023 ALPHA KAPPA PSI 2014 TARGET CASE COMPETITION

Food Distribution Center LocationsFt. Worth, TexasPhoenix, ArizonaLake City, FloridaCedar Falls, Iowa**West Jefferson, Ohio**

Expect more, pay less!

Page 10: 2014 Target Case Competition

04/12/2023 ALPHA KAPPA PSI 2014 TARGET CASE COMPETITION

Implementation – Regional MapMidwest RegionoRegion specific according to preference and stock store locations accordingly.

Expect more, pay less!

Tomato & sugar

Mop sauce/spicy

Tomato & vinegar Vinegar/mustard

Page 11: 2014 Target Case Competition

04/12/2023 ALPHA KAPPA PSI 2014 TARGET CASE COMPETITION

Implementation – Product Specific Ex.Kansas City, MO. (Region)oKansas City Style

Expect more, pay less!

Page 12: 2014 Target Case Competition

04/12/2023 ALPHA KAPPA PSI 2014 TARGET CASE COMPETITION

SWOT Analysis After Implementation

Expect more, pay less!

Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities ThreatsTargeted market due to localized products; relevant branding & shopping experience for customers.

Higher shipping cost; customer rejection of new brands;

Larger consumption; growth to implement with other products

Competitors can use similar tactics; economy; inflation; unemployment

Page 13: 2014 Target Case Competition

04/12/2023 ALPHA KAPPA PSI 2014 TARGET CASE COMPETITION

Project Timeline4 months of Research &

Development

4 months of Implementation

Adjustments

Expect more, pay less!

Page 14: 2014 Target Case Competition

04/12/2023 ALPHA KAPPA PSI 2014 TARGET CASE COMPETITION

Questions?

Expect more, pay less!