1. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> 5 Filmstrip Countdown

2. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> INTEGRATED MENTAL MODELS AND PROJECT LIFE CYCLE Dr.Tsunemi Watanabe Kochi University of Technology, Japan 3. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> 5 4. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> 4 5. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> 3 6. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> 7. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> 8. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> integrated mental models and project life cycle 9. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> 1. ? 2. ? 3. ? 1. Failure analysis 2. Stakeholders mental models analysis 1. 2. Integrated mental models with project life cycle perspective 1. 2. 3. 10. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> 17% 27% 43% 8% 5% Water resources project condition (Department of Water Resources: DWR, 2008) / 11. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> 12. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> 13. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> Mental models) (Project Life Cycle) 14. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> ? 15. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> http://www.visualthinkingmagic.com/mental-model 16. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> 17. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> INTEGRATED MULTI-STAKEHOLDER MENTAL MODELS AND PROJECT LIFE CYCLE A B C 18. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> INTEGRATED MULTI-STAKEHOLDER MENTAL MODELS AND PROJECT LIFE CYCLE 19. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> 20. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> 21. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> 22. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> 23. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> SEMI-STRUCTURED INTERVIEW) 24. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> 25. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> 26. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> 27. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> 28. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> 29. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> - - - - - - - - - - - 30. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> 31. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> 32. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> PROJECT LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT 33. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> 34. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> 35. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> 36. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> 37. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> 38. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> 39. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> 40. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> 1. 2. 3. 4. 41. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> I: II: MOU III: 42. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> STAGES IN DEVELOPMENT OF BENEFICIARY CONTRIBUTION SCHEME 43. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> CROSS IMPACT BALANCE (CIB) ANALYSIS FOR PROPOSED SCHEME Qualitative but systematic form of systems analysis Based on expert judgments of interactions of system elements Balance algorithm to determine consistent network configurations Applied as qualitative scenario technique in various fields Analysis via ScenarioWizardBasic (Weimer-Jehle 2006) 44. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> DESCRIPTORS IN CIB A. Financial B. Public participation C. Local poverty D. Policy and regulation E. Corruption F. Stakeholder relationship G. Political interference H. Project management I. Economic tools 45. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> DESCRIPTORS AND STATES A1 A2 B1 B2 B3 C1 C2 C3 D1 D2 E1 E2 E3 F1 F2 F3 G1 G2 G3 H1 H2 I1 I2 I3 A.Financial A1 Uncertaintyin budget -2 -2 -2 0 -2 -2 -1 -1 0 0 0 2 0 -2 0 1 3 -2 -2 -2 -2 -3 A2 Budget line commitment 2 2 2 0 2 2 1 3 0 0 0 -2 2 3 3 1 0 1 2 1 2 3 B.Public paricipation B1 Inform- Lowest 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 -3 1 3 2 0 -2 -2 2 3 -3 -3 -3 3 -2 B2 Involve-Moderate 0 1 0 1 1 -1 1 1 0 -1 0 3 1 2 -2 -3 3 3 1 0 1 B3 Collaborate and empower-Highest 1 3 0 3 2 -2 3 3 -2 -3 -2 3 3 3 -3 -3 3 3 3 -1 3 C.Local poverty C1 income not increase and lower than average 0 0 3 -2 -3 0 -3 -1 1 3 1 1 1 -2 2 3 -2 2 -3 3 -3 C2 Income increase but lower than average 0 0 -1 2 3 -1 2 -1 2 -1 0 1 1 -1 2 2 -1 1 0 3 1 C3 Income increase to higher than average 0 0 -3 3 3 -2 3 -1 -2 -1 -1 1 1 2 -1 -2 0 3 0 3 2 D.Policyand regulation D1 Command and control 1 0 3 1 -2 0 0 0 -3 2 2 3 2 -3 -2 2 2 2 -2 -3 2 -3 D2 Collaborative decision making 0 0 -1 1 2 0 0 0 3 -3 -3 -3 2 3 2 -2 -2 -2 2 1 2 2 E.Corruption E1 None 0 -2 0 0 0 0 0 0 -1 -1 1 -1 0 0 1 -3 -1 -1 0 0 0 E2 Moderate 1 -2 0 0 0 -1 -1 -1 -2 -2 2 -1 2 -2 0 1 -2 -2 0 0 0 E3 Strong 2 -2 0 0 0 -2 -2 -2 -3 -3 2 -2 2 -3 1 0 -3 -3 0 0 0 F.Stakeholder relationship F1 Conflict 0 0 2 -1 -1 0 0 0 -1 -1 0 0 0 0 1 1 -2 -3 -3 2 -3 F2 Consult 0 1 1 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 -1 -1 1 2 1 1 1 F3 Collaborate and Engage 0 2 -1 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 -2 -2 2 -2 -2 2 3 2 1 2 G.Political interference G1 None 0 0 0 1 2 0 -1 -2 0 0 0 -1 -2 -2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 G2 Moderate 1 -1 1 -1 -1 1 -1 -2 -1 0 1 0 -1 1 -1 -1 -1 -1 0 0 0 G3 Strong 2 -2 2 -1 -1 2 -2 -3 -2 -1 1 1 2 2 -2 -2 -2 -1 0 0 0 H.Project management H1 Business as usual 0 0 0 2 -2 1 -1 0 2 -2 0 1 1 1 1 -1 -2 1 1 -1 2 -1 H2 Life cycle management -1 1 -2 0 1 -1 1 1 -2 2 1 -1 -2 -1 1 2 1 -1 -1 1 1 1 I.Economic tools I1 Charge for use 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 1 -1 0 0 0 -1 0 I2 National and local govenrment grants 1 -2 -1 -1 0 1 1 1 1 -1 0 1 1 1 1 -1 0 1 2 2 1 I3 Beneficiarycontribution and government grants 0 1 0 1 2 1 1 1 -1 2 1 -1 -1 -1 1 2 1 -1 -1 -1 1 G.Pol interfere H.Proj mngt I.EconomicA.Finance B.Paricipation C.Poverty D.Policy E.Corruption F.SHrelationship 46. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> CONSISTENCY SCENARIO Scenario No. 1 Current Scheme A.Financial: A1 Uncertainty in budget B.Public participation: B1 Inform- Lowest C.Local poverty: C1 income not increase and lower than average D.Policy and regulation: D1 Command and control E.Corruption: E3 Strong F.Stakeholder relationship: F1 Conflict G.Political interference: G3 Strong H.Project management: H1 Business as usual I.Economic tools: I2 National and local government grants 47. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> CONSISTENCY SCENARIO Scenario No. 2 Beneficiary Contribution A.Financial: A2 Budget line commitment B.Public participation: B3 Collaborate and empower-Highest C.Local poverty: C2 Income increase but lower than average D.Policy and regulation: D2 Collaborative decision making E.Corruption: E1 None F.Stakeholder relationship: F3 Collaborate and Engage G.Political interference: G1 None H.Project management: H2 Life cycle management I. Economic tools: I3 Beneficiary contribution and government grants 48. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> E-MAIL: P.URAIWONG@GMAIL.COM 49. >> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >> USE OF TEMPLATES You are free to use these templates for your personal and business presentations. Do Use these templates for your presentations Display your presentation on a web site provided that it is not for the purpose of downloading the template. If you like these templates, we would always appreciate a link back to our website. Many thanks. Dont Resell or distribute these templates Put these templates on a website for download. This includes uploading them onto file sharing networks like Slideshare, Myspace, Facebook, bit torrent etc Pass off any of our created content as your own work You can find many more free templates on the Presentation Magazine website www.presentationmagazine.com We have put a lot of work into developing all these templates and retain the copyright in them. They are not Open Source templates. You can use them freely providing that you do not redistribute or sell them.