In-Store Analysis with Hadoop

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

While user tracking with WebTrends, comScore, Google Analytics etc. is a de-facto standard in the online world, tracking visitors in the real world is still fragmented. From a wide perspective, potential tracking data is produced by various sensors. With a real ‘bricks and mortar’ store, one could figure out possible sensors they could use: customer frequency counters at the doors, the cashier system, free WiFi access points, video capture, temperature, background music, smells and many more. For many of those sensors additional hardware and software would be needed, but a few sensors already have solutions available, e.g. video capturing with face or even eye recognition. The most interesting sensor data that doesn’t require additional hardware and software could be the WiFi access points. Especially given that many visitors will have WiFi enabled mobile phones. This talk demonstrates how WiFi access point log files can be used to answer different questions for a particular store.

Citation preview

CC 2.0 by Mr. T in DC | http://flic.kr/p/7khrin

CC 2.0 by Franck BLAIS | http://flic.kr/p/cwVnSy

CC 2.0 by John Steven Fernandez | http://flic.kr/p/a8uTzz

CC 2.0 by Ian Carroll | http://flic.kr/p/6NWoGm

CC 2.0 by Perry French | http://flic.kr/p/8wDMJS

CC 2.0 by John Mitchell | http://flic.kr/p/5UaPg8

7

How do we answer these questions?

Before we started designing a blueprint solution we first of all asked ourselves:

1 Who would be asked to answer questions like this?

2 Who is this person?

3 What tools does this person expect to use?

4 And what is a typical skill set of this person?

5 How do they work?

Preparation

May

21,

2013

8

So, how do we answer these questions as a Data Scientist?

From a high level of abstraction the

answer is simple. We need a data

management system with three pieces:

ingest, store and process.

Traditional Data Management System Approach

May

21,

2013

Data

Source Data

Ingestion

Data

Processing Data

Storage

9

So, how do we answer these questions as a Data Scientist?

We take this basis architecture and replace the generic terms while mapping it onto the Hadoop ecosystem.

With this Hadoop architecture a Data Scientist should be able to answer the questions without any programming environment. He/she can also use familiar BI, analysis and reporting tools as well.

Blueprint for a Data Management System with Hadoop

May

21,

2013

Data

Source Flume

HIVE,

Impala HDFS

BI/Analysis/R

eporting

10

Ingrediants

1 2 WiFi access points to simulate two different stores with

OpenWRT, a linux based firmware for routers, installed

2 Flume to move all log messages to HDFS, without any

manual intervention (no transformation, no filtering)

3 A 4 node CDH4 cluster (2GB RAM, 100GB HDD)

4 Pentaho Data Integration‘s graphical designer for data

transformation, parsing, filtering and loading to the

warehouse

5 Hive as data warehouse system on top of Hadoop to

project structure onto data

6 Impala for querying data from HDFS in real time

7 MS Excel to visualize results

Setup

May

21,

2013

11

How it Works

Analytics System

May

21,

2013

Flume Hive

Impala

OpenWRT

00:A0:C9:14:C8:28

Syslog Server

Flume

Source

Sinks to

HDFS Loads Raw CSV

Hadoop/HDFS

M/R

Pentaho

UDP

CC 2.0 by Qi Wei Fong | http://flic.kr/p/7w8vfq

13

Visits for stores number one & two

The plot indicates that about 85% of the visits were detected in store

number one and about 15% in store number two. One might draw the

conclusion that store number one is in a much better location with more

occasional customers.

But let’s gain more insights by analysing the number of unique visitors.

Analysis Result

May

21,

2013

14

Unique visitors

This plot gives us more details about the customers. It turns out that

the 135 visits in store number one were caused by just 9 unique

visitors while store number two encountered 5 unique visitors.

Analysis Result

May

21,

2013

15 This plot indicates that we have more returning than new users in both

stores. In store number two we didn’t see a new user over the past 4 days at

all.

It’s probably a good idea to start a marketing campaign which aims at new

customers, e.g. to give out vouchers for the first purchase.

New vs. returning users

Analysis Result

May

21,

2013

16 The plot for the last 4 days vividly visualizes that the visit duration in store number one was evenly distributed while the distribution in store number two shows some peaks.

We can also see that visitors tend to stay in shop number one much longer.

Visit duration over the past 4 days

Analysis Result

May

21,

2013

17 There is a lot of useful information that can be derived from this plot.

1. There is a repeating pattern of step-ins and step-outs within a short period of time.

2. There was a step-out of store number one and a step-in into store number two within just 28 seconds.

Avg. Duration Between Visits of one particular user

Analysis Result

May

21,

2013

May 21, 2013

CC 2.0 by Aurelien Guichard | http://flic.kr/p/cjg9yw

19

CCAH Course in ZH

• Cloudera Administrator Training for

Apache Hadoop (CCAH)

• June 26th – 28th 2013

• Limmatstrasse 50, Zurich

• More info's: http://www.ymc.ch/training

Announcement

May

21,

2013

20

Links

1 Presentation, Video and Post Series

• http://bitly.com/bundles/cguegi/1

2 http://www.bigdata-usergroup.ch

3 http://about.me/cguegi

4 http://www.ymc.ch/training

May

21,

2013

Recommended