Hicks Site 2008 Project Write Presentation

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

A presentation by Troy Hicks for the SITE 2008 conference about Red Cedar Writing Project's Title II Professional Development grant, Project WRITE.

Citation preview

hickstro.org

Project WRITE

Writing, Reading, Inquiry, andTechnology in Education

Troy Hicks, PhDCentral Michigan University

SITE 2008

hickstro.org

Today’s Talk

• Framing the Project– Writing Instruction, Adolescent

Literacy, and Digital Literacy– Teacher Professional Development

• Current PD Work• Implications of Current Work and

Next Directions for Project

hickstro.org

The State of English EducationImplications of CEE Summit - May 2005

Today, new technologies are changing the types of texts we and our students create and interpret even as they are influencing the social, political, and cultural contexts in which our texts are composed and shared. Since these technologies are influencing the development of individuals, institutions, and communities (and since individuals, institutions, and communities are shaping these technologies and their uses), it is essential for English educators to turn a critical eye toward the benefits and affordances; the limitations and liabilities of integrating these newer technologies into our teaching.

- Swenson et al. (2005)

hickstro.org

Writing Inst.

“Grammar of Schooling”Assessment

AttitudesGenres

Adol. Lit.

Literacy “Crisis”Curriculum

RelationshipsRelevance

Rigor

Digital Lit.

Changing Technologies

Newer LiteraciesAccess and

Infrastructure

hickstro.org

The Pedagogy of MultiliteraciesIn this book, we attempt to broaden this understanding of literacy and literacy teaching and learning to include negotiating a multiplicity of discourses... We argue that literacy pedagogy now must account for the burgeoning variety of text forms associated with information and multimedia technologies.

New London Group, p. 9

Project WRITE: Pedagogy of Multiliteracies Model

Situated PracticeCreating a community of learners with a shared understanding of content area

literacy and digital literacy

Overt InstructionModeling content area literacy strategies and uses of technologies such as blogs, wikis, podcasts, and digital stories while explicitly

teaching skills to support teacher

learning

Critical FramingReflecting on current practices and how

our understanding and teaching of content area literacy and digital literacy is

enacted

Transformed PracticeMoving towards a

complex and creative understanding of

literacy practices and how they are fully

enacted within and across classrooms by

engaging in collaborative work

Core Goals

Identify classroom literacy practices and

implement new practices

Develop thematic units of study that utilize

technology

hickstro.org

Effective Professional Development

• Engaging in pertinent literacy practices that will be used in their classrooms

• Observing teacher leaders demonstrate these literacy practices

• Focusing on students’ needs and achievements

hickstro.org

hickstro.org

Project WRITE PD Calendar

• Two full days of PD - Oct and Nov 2007• One full day of PD - Dec 2007• Monthly night sessions - Jan - Apr 2008• One full day of PD - May 2008• One week of PD - August 2008• Two days of PD in fall 2008

hickstro.org

Project WRITE Shared ReadingsBeers, G. Kylene, Probst, Robert E., & Rief, Linda.

(2007). Adolescent literacy: Turning promise into practice. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Burke, Jim. (2003). Writing reminders: Tools, tips, and techniques. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Fletcher, Ralph J. (2006). Boy writers: Reclaiming their voices. Portland, Me.: Stenhouse Publishers.

Warlick, D. (2005). Raw materials for the mind: A teacher's guide to digital literacy. Lulu.com.

hickstro.org

Current Project Work

• Monthly Professional Development Sessions– Focus on adolescent literacy, writing

assessment, boy writers, digital literacies

• Project Wiki– Reading and Discussion– Developing Own Curriculum– Collaborating with Others

• Summer Workshop

hickstro.org

http://projectwritemsu.wikispaces.com/

hickstro.org

Implications of a Multiliteracies Approach

The metalanguage of Multiliteracies describes the elements of Design, not as rules, but as an heuristic that accounts for the infinite variability of different forms of meaning-making in relation to the cultures, the subcultures, or the layers of an individual’s identity that these forms serve.

- New London Group, p. 36

hickstro.org

Implications

• Teacher Professional Development– Professional Learning Communities,

as Enabled by Virtual and Face-to-Face Work

• Purpose of English Education– Engaging in Multiliteracies Work– Teacher Education and Professional

Development

hickstro.org

ReferencesNew London Group. (2000). A pedagogy of multiliteracies:

Designing social futures. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 9-37). London ; New York: Routledge.

Swenson, J., Rozema, R., Young, C. A., McGrail, E., & Whitin, P. (2005). Beliefs about technology and the preparation of English teachers: Beginning the conversation. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education [Online serial] Available: http://www.citejournal.org/vol5/iss3/languagearts/article1.cfm, 5(3/4).

hickstro.org

Photo Credits

• Logos from Wikipedia, Edublogs, del.icio.us, YouTube, Wikispaces, and MySpace are screenshots from the respective sites and copyrighted by those sites.

• All other images: Troy Hicks or Red Cedar Writing Project, Michigan State University

hickstro.org

Produced by Troy Hickshickstro@gmail.com

hickstro.org

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.