Context Adaptation in Image Search

Context Adaptation in Image Search

arjen@acm.org

Context Adaptation

GOAL:

Present different photos to a sports journalist who queries for Beckham, than the glossy magazine editor issuing the same query

IPTC Categories

• ACE (arts, culture, entertainment)

• CLJ (crime, law & justice) • DIS (disasters & accidents) • EBF (economy, business &

finance) • EDU (education) • ENV (environment) • HTH (health) • HUM (human interest) • LAB (labour, work)

• LIF (lifestyle & leisure) • POL (politics) • REL (religion) • SCI (science & technology) • SOI (social issues) • SPO (sports) • WAR (unrest, conflicts,

war) • WEA (weather)

What Context?

• Collection context– One “main” IPTC category per image

• 96,351 out of 97,760 images in 100k Belga Collection• Note: noisy data, in spite of it being edited content!

E.g., we found lifestyle Beckham images annotated as SPO, and even typos in IPTC category assignment!

• User context– Classified 813 users into IPTC categories to

represent their main interest (based on Belga input about the user’s organizations)

Filter on IPTC?

//image[@IPTC eq SPO][about(.,Beckham)]

• Bad for recall:– Not all images have been assigned IPTC

categories

• Bad for precision:– Noisy assignment of IPTC categories to

images• At least 4 of the top 10 SPO Beckham results do

not show Beckham taking part in sporting activities

Retrieval Model

• Re-rank results based on cluster membershipλρd(q) + (1-λ) ∑c ∈ Clusters ρc(q) ρc(d)

– Modify scores based on document’s contextOren Kurland and Lillian Lee. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 27(3), 2009.

• Novelty in Vitalas:– Modify scores based on user’s context

• Cluster formation based on user clicks• Cluster selection based on user context

P(Q|D)P(Q|c) P(D|c)

Retrieval Model

• Cluster formation:– IPTC-image categories; forms disjoint clusters

– IPTC-user categories of users who clicked the image; gives overlapping clusters

• Cluster selection:– {d∈c}: cluster contains document

– {u∈c}: cluster/@category corresponds to user's interests

Results on Click Prediction

NDCG D image0.0

image0.1

image0.4

image0.7

user0.0

user 0.1

user 0.4

User0.7

ACEEBFEDUHTHHUMLABLIFPOLSOISPO

0.17240.55270.01450.13080.18490.13310.12450.07230.28800.1811

0.14230.47440.01630.13470.16120.15430.08880.05860.18060.1801

0.17410.54600.01450.13080.17980.13310.12340.07040.28830.1809

0.17210.54970.01450.13080.17720.13310.12330.07170.28800.1806

0.17210.55040.01450.13080.18490.13310.12320.07210.28800.1807

0.20700.48820.01650.63420.21090.21640.18940.10540.29640.2151

0.19780.55190.01670.37120.20430.23390.15550.09900.29700.2005

0.17670.55090.01550.19340.17760.18170.11210.09160.29680.1839

0.17470.55090.01460.14140.17600.13800.12530.07690.30080.1820

Related literature on evaluation methodology: Carterette and Jones, NIPS 2007, and, Carterette, Allan, and Sitaraman, SIGIR 2006.

No

Ada

ptat

ion

“Gre

ece”

SP

O A

dapt

atio

n“G

reec

e, c

olle

ctio

n-ba

sed

clus

ters

, λ=

0.1”

SP

O A

dapt

atio

n“G

reec

e, c

olle

ctio

n-ba

sed

clus

ters

, λ=

0.0”

SP

O A

dapt

atio

n“G

reec

e, u

ser-

base

d cl

uste

rs, λ

=0.

1”

SP

O A

dapt

atio

n“G

reec

e, u

ser-

base

d cl

uste

rs, λ

=0.

0”

SPO Observations

• Re-ranking pushes the sports-related images to the top– No more images about the fires

– When λ=0.0 the initial retrieval score is not taken into account (initial text ranking ignored)

• Minimal differences between collection-based and user-based cluster formation– Archivists consider as sports-related those

images that users with sports-related interests click on

PO

L A

dapt

atio

n“G

reec

e, c

olle

ctio

n-ba

sed

clus

ters

, λ=

0.1”

PO

L A

dapt

atio

n“G

reec

e, c

olle

ctio

n-ba

sed

clus

ters

, λ=

0.0”

PO

L A

dapt

atio

n“G

reec

e, u

ser-

base

d cl

uste

rs, λ

=0.

1”

PO

L A

dapt

atio

n“G

reec

e, u

ser-

base

d cl

uste

rs, λ

=0.

0”

POL Observations

• Re-ranking for a politics context shows a difference in interpretation between the archivist and the user group– Archivists focussed on the actual political

rallies etc.

– Users focussed on the forest fires

AC

E A

dapt

atio

n“G

reec

e, c

olle

ctio

n-ba

sed

clus

ters

, λ=

0.1”

AC

E A

dapt

atio

n“G

reec

e, c

olle

ctio

n-ba

sed

clus

ters

, λ=

0.0”

ACE Observations

• Re-ranking for arts, culture and entertainment requires λ=0.0, to ignore the initial ranking and let the right images shine

No

Ada

ptat

ion

“Bec

kham

”

SP

O A

dapt

atio

n“B

eckh

am,

colle

ctio

n-ba

sed

clus

ters

, λ=

0.1”

SP

O A

dapt

atio

n“B

eckh

am,

colle

ctio

n-ba

sed

clus

ters

, λ=

0.0”

HU

M A

dapt

atio

n“B

eckh

am,

colle

ctio

n-ba

sed

clus

ters

, λ=

0.1”

Conclusions this far

• Adaptation also retrieves images not assigned IPTC category, by considering clusters formed by the images clicked by users with the same interests

• Alternative cluster formation approaches can be investigated; e.g., using visual features

• Method easily adapted for personalised and/or collaborative search

Potential for Personalization

• Which queries have the potential to benefit by context adaptation (personalisation)?

• The ones for which different users click on different results– Can be studied looking at nDCG of one user

assuming another user’s clicks are idealJaime Teevan, Susan T. Dumais and Eric Horvitz. Potential for Personalization. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (ToCHI) special issue on Data Mining for Understanding User Needs, 17(1), March 2010.

• Novel in Vitalas: compare IPTC-defined user groups (instead of individual users)

P4P in Belga 100K

P4P in Belga 100K

nDCG low: high potential

nDCG high: low potential

greece (0.3910)

Dean (0.8067)

King albert ii (0.7810)

No

Ada

ptat

ion

“Kin

g A

lber

t II

”

EB

F A

dapt

atio

n“K

ing

Alb

ert

II”

PO

L A

dapt

atio

n“K

ing

Alb

ert

II”

No

Ada

ptat

ion

“Dea

n”

AC

E A

dapt

atio

n“D

ean,

use

r-ba

sed

clus

ters

”

AC

E A

dapt

atio

n“D

ean,

col

lect

ion-

base

d cl

uste

rs”

Dean: Temporal Effect

• Log files: “Dean” = “Hurricane Dean”• Still, query is quite ambiguous:

– James Dean– Agyness Dean (a model)– a (university) dean– Dean Dealannoi– Howard Dean– Dean Martin

• Context adaptation for “Dean” requires archivist

Future Work

• Address various normalization issues– In context adaptation (due to NLLR

approximation)– In “potential for personalization”/adaptation

• Explore temporal dimension – Combinations of collection and user context?

• Explore cross-media cluster-based retrieval– Use visual features in cluster formation

See also

“CWI” Vitalas demonstrations:

http://www.ins.cwi.nl/projects/M4/vitalas/

Collection context instead of user context:

http://www.ins.cwi.nl/projects/M4/vitalas/context_adaptation.html

Detectors trained by query log

http://olympus.ee.auth.gr/diou/civr2009/