Comparing JVM Web Frameworks - Devoxx France 2013

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

A comparison on JVM Web Frameworks. Includes strategies for choosing and results from research by InfoQ and devrates.com. Also, lots of pretty graphs. See blog post about this presentation at http://raibledesigns.com/rd/entry/devoxx_france_a_great_conference and video recording at http://raibledesigns.com/rd/entry/video_of_comparing_jvm_web

Citation preview

COMPARING JVM WEB FRAMEWORKS

Matt Raiblehttp://raibledesigns.com@mraible

© 2013 Raible Designs

Photos by Trish McGinity © 2013 Raible Designs

© 2013 Raible Designs

Blogger on raibledesigns.com

Founder of AppFuse

Father, Skier, Cyclist

Web Framework Connoisseur

Who is Matt Raible?

© 2013 Raible Designs

Introductions

‣ Are you currently developing web applications for the JVM?

‣ Have you written web apps with Servlets or JSF?

‣ Experience with Grails, GWT, Rails, Spring MVC, Wicket, Tapestry or Play?

‣ Does anyone hate a framework? Love a framework?

3

© 2013 Raible Designs

‣ History of JVM Web Frameworks‣ The Paradox of Choice‣ Methods and Metrics‣ Conclusion‣ Q and A

Session Agenda

4

© 2013 Raible Designs

History of Web Frameworks

5

© 2013 Raible Designs

History of Web Frameworks

6

© 2013 Raible Designs

History of Web Frameworks

7

© 2013 Raible Designs

Comparing Web Frameworks

8

© 2013 Raible Designs

History of Web Frameworks

9

© 2013 Raible Designs

History of Web Frameworks

10

© 2013 Raible Designs

History of Web Frameworks

12

© 2013 Raible Designs

© 2013 Raible Designs

Today

14

© 2013 Raible Designs

Too many web frameworks?

15

© 2013 Raible Designs

Remember SOFEA?

© 2013 Raible Designs

SOFEA became a Reality

© 2013 Raible Designs 19

traditional web frameworks are still relevant

© 2013 Raible Designs

The Paradox of Choice

20

© 2013 Raible Designs

Good Decisions Involve

21

1. Figure out your goal or goals

2. Evaluate the importance of each goal

3. Array the options

4. Evaluate how likely each of the options is to meet your goals

5. Pick the winning option

6. Modify goals

© 2013 Raible Designs

Maximizer vs. Satisficer

22

‣ maximizer - tries to make best possible choice‣ satisficer - tries to find first suitable choice

(Photo: Tori Cat at Flickr)

© 2013 Raible Designs

How do you choose?

23

© 2013 Raible Designs

The Real Problem

24

© 2013 Raible Designs

The Real Problem

25

© 2013 Raible Designs

The Real Problem

26

© 2013 Raible Designs

© 2013 Raible Designs

‣ 2006: Choose based on the type of app you’re developing‣ 2010: Choose based on 20 different criteria (the Matrix)‣ 2013: Narrowed it to 5

- Community / Support

- HTML5

- REST

- Mobile

- Performance

- Page Speed28

How to Constrain Choices

© 2013 Raible Designs

‣ Language‣ Platform ‣ Application Type

29

Predetermined Constraints

© 2013 Raible Designs

Choose the JVM

30

© 2013 Raible Designs

Get Fast Hardware

31

© 2013 Raible Designs

IntelliJ

32

© 2013 Raible Designs

Goals

‣ Pure Web Frameworks‣ Full Stack Frameworks‣ SOFEA Frameworks

- API Frameworks

- JavaScript MVC Frameworks

33

© 2013 Raible Designs

Full Stack Frameworks

34

© 2013 Raible Designs

API Frameworks

35

© 2013 Raible Designs

JavaScript MVC Frameworks

36

© 2013 Raible Designs

Pure JVM Web Frameworks

‣ Apache: Wicket, Struts, Sling, Tapestry, Click‣ GWT: SmartGWT, GXT, Vaadin, Errai‣ JSF: Mojarra (RI), MyFaces, Tomahawk, IceFaces, RichFaces,

PrimeFaces‣ Spring MVC, Stripes, RIFE, ZK

38

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_web_application_frameworks#Java

© 2013 Raible Designs

Frameworks I’ve Used

‣ Apache: Wicket, Struts, Sling, Tapestry, Click‣ GWT: SmartGWT, GXT, Vaadin, Errai‣ JSF: Mojarra, MyFaces, Tomahawk, IceFaces, RichFaces,

PrimeFaces‣ Spring MVC, Stripes, RIFE, ZK

39

© 2013 Raible Designs

Comparison Matrix

http://bit.ly/jvm-frameworks-matrix

40

© 2013 Raible Designs

Matrix Results

0

4.5

9

13.5

18

Grail

s

Sprin

g

Rails

GWT

Vaad

inTa

pestr

yW

icket

Stru

ts 2

Play

Strip

es JSF

Flex Lift

11.513.5141414.514.51515.515.5

17171717.5

41

© 2013 Raible Designs

Matrix Results

‣ Grails (17.5)‣ GWT (17)‣ Ruby on Rails (17)‣ Spring MVC (17)‣ Vaadin and Tapestry (15.5)‣ Wicket (15)

42

© 2013 Raible Designs

Weighted Matrix

43

© 2013 Raible Designs

Weighted Results

‣ Grails (90)‣ Play (87.5)‣ Spring MVC (85)‣ Ruby on Rails (82.5)‣ Vaadin (82.5)‣ GWT (80)

44

© 2013 Raible Designs

‣ Developer Productivity: Lift gets a 11, Rails gets a 5, most Java-based frameworks get a 1 or less.

‣ Developer Perception: Every web framework gets a 1.  ‣ Learning Curve: Lift gets a 2.‣ Job Trends, yep, it's zero.

http://lift.la/my-take-on-matt-raibles-spreadsheet

* Matt's scale is 0-1 and my ratings are on Matt's scale, except mine goes to 11.

45

David Pollack’s Lift Ratings

© 2013 Raible Designs

Peter Thomas’s Perfbench

‣ Seam / JSF vs. Wicket Performance Comparison

- January 2009: Seam 2.1.1 and Wicket 1.3.5

- Average page response time in milliseconds

46

© 2013 Raible Designs

Peter Thomas’s Perfbench

‣ On the Seam / JSF side, the 20 sessions each take up about 800 KB adding up to around 16 MB total. On the Wicket side the 20 sessions add up to around 1.5 MB.

‣ + Lots of banter between Peter and Seam developers @ http://bit.ly/3X50Gc

47

© 2013 Raible Designs

Peter Thomas’s Perfbench

‣ Added Tapestry 5 and Grails in September 2009:

- Grails was far more productive than Tapestry 5.

- Grails still has some ways to go in terms of performance.

- Overall, Wicket is fastest, with Tapestry coming a close second.

- Wicket takes up the least amount of heap.

- Session usage of the Seam + JSF combination is significantly higher compared to the rest.

48

© 2013 Raible Designs

World Wide Wait - Devoxx

50

© 2013 Raible Designs

World Wide Wait - Devoxx

51

© 2013 Raible Designs

World Wide Wait - Devoxx

52

© 2013 Raible Designs

World Wide Wait - Devoxx

53

© 2013 Raible Designs

devrates.com - by rating

55

© 2013 Raible Designs

devrates.com - popular

56

© 2013 Raible Designs

Top JVM Frameworks

57

‣ Raible Matrix: Grails, GWT, Rails, Spring MVC

- Weighted: Grails, Play, Spring MVC, Rails, Vaadin

‣ Peter Thomas: Wicket‣ InfoQ: Spring MVC, Play, Grails, JSF, Struts‣ devrates.com:

- PrimeFaces, Grails, Tapestry, Vaadin, Wicket

© 2013 Raible Designs

Raible’s Recommendations

58

‣ Full Stack: Choose by language (JRuby, Groovy, Java or Scala)‣ Pure Web Framework: Spring MVC, Struts 2, JSF w/ PrimeFaces,

Tapestry, Wicket or Vaadin‣ JavaScript MVC: Ember, Angular JS, Backbone

- API Framework: Jackson + ?

© 2013 Raible Designs

The Problem with GWT

59

© 2013 Raible Designs

Comparison Statistics

60

‣ Elimination Criteria

- At least 1 release in 2012

- At least 1 book on Amazon

- At least 10 jobs on dice.com

- At least 250 questions on Stack Overflow

‣ Remove Seam (development halted)

© 2013 Raible Designs

Jobs on Dice.com

0

75

150

225

300

Grails

JRub

y on R

ails Play Lift

Sprin

g Roo

Full Stack Frameworks, March 2013

61

© 2013 Raible Designs

Jobs on Dice.com

0

150

300

450

600

Sprin

g MVC

Strut

s 2

Wick

et

Tape

stry

Prim

eFac

es

Vaad

in

Pure Web Frameworks, March 2013

62

© 2013 Raible Designs

Jobs on Dice.com

0

75

150

225

300

Back

bone

Embe

r

Angu

lar

JavaScript MVC Frameworks, March 2013

63

© 2013 Raible Designs

Jobs on Dice.com

0

125

250

375

500

Jerse

y

Apac

he C

XF

REST

Easy

Dropwiza

rd

vert.x

JVM API Frameworks, March 2013

64

© 2013 Raible Designs

LinkedIn Skills

0

3,750

7,500

11,250

15,000

Grails

Play

Sprin

g Roo

JRub

y on R

ails Lift

Full Stack Frameworks, March 2013

65

© 2013 Raible Designs

LinkedIn Skills

0

3,750

7,500

11,250

15,000

Sprin

g MVC

Strut

s 2

Wick

et

Prim

eFac

es

Vaad

in

Tape

stry

Pure Web Frameworks, March 2013

66

© 2013 Raible Designs

LinkedIn Skills

0

3,750

7,500

11,250

15,000

Back

bone

Angu

lar

Embe

r

JavaScript MVC Frameworks, March 2013

67

© 2013 Raible Designs

LinkedIn Skills

0

3,750

7,500

11,250

15,000

Jerse

y

Apac

he C

XF

REST

Easy

vert.x

Dropwiza

rd

JVM API Frameworks, March 2013

68

© 2013 Raible Designs

Google Trends

69

© 2013 Raible Designs

Google Trends

70

© 2013 Raible Designs

Google Trends

71

© 2013 Raible Designs

Google Trends

72

© 2013 Raible Designs

Indeed Job Trends

73

© 2013 Raible Designs

Indeed Job Trends

74

© 2013 Raible Designs

Indeed Job Trends

75

© 2013 Raible Designs

Indeed Job Trends

76

© 2013 Raible Designs

Mailing List Traffic

AngularJSPlayLift

GrailsWicket

TapestryApache CXFDropwizard

StrutsJersey

Backbone.js

0 750 1500 2250 3000

516882

157432

730790828

10491623

2340

February 2013

* Frameworks not listed here use Forums, which don’t provide this data.

77

© 2013 Raible Designs

StackOverflow

0

3,750

7,500

11,250

15,000

Grails Play Lift Spring Roo JRuby on Rails

Tagged Questions (March 28, 2013)

78

© 2013 Raible Designs

StackOverflow

0

2,500

5,000

7,500

10,000

Spring MVC Struts 2 PrimeFaces Wicket Vaadin Tapestry

Tagged Questions (March 28, 2013)

79

© 2013 Raible Designs

StackOverflow

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

Backbone.js Angular JS Ember.js

Tagged Questions (March 25, 2013)

80

© 2013 Raible Designs

StackOverflow

0

750

1,500

2,250

3,000

Jersey Apache CXF RESTEasy Dropwizard vert.x

Tagged Questions (March 25, 2013)

81

© 2013 Raible Designs

Java Developers

82

“Java remains – in spite of the fragmented programming language landscape – a viable, growing language.”

http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2012/02/08/language-rankings-2-2012/

© 2013 Raible Designs

The Modern JVM Web Developer

‣ Starts with Fast Hardware‣ Uses IntelliJ IDEA‣ Leverages JavaScript, HTML5, and CSS3‣ Creates High Performance Web Sites‣ For Mobile Devices‣ In the Cloud‣ And cares about Security

84

© 2013 Raible Designs

There is no “best” framework

87

Just lots of awesome choices...

© 2013 Raible Designs

Don’t listen to me!

88

© 2013 Raible Designs

Choose your own!

‣ Prioritize a list of goals that are important to your application.‣ Pick 3-4 frameworks and do a spike with each, developing the

same application.‣ Document and rank each framework against your list of goals.‣ Calculate and choose!‣ Don’t be a Picker.

89

© 2013 Raible Designs

Questions?

Contact Informationhttp://raibledesigns.com@mraible

Presentationshttp://slideshare.net/mraible

90

Recommended