View
380
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
Study on Gap Analysis of Malaysia Robotics Industry for the Implementation of IC Innovation for National Robotics (IC-I NR)
7. Gaps and Issues
Identification of Gaps
• Questionnaires• Visits• Interview with Domain Experts• Articles, Journals• Previous Workshop Input
Identify Issues
• Gap 1: Robotics Adoption in Malaysia
• Gap 2: Robotics National Centre• Gap 3: Integrated Value Chain• Gap 4 : Human Capital• Gap 5 : Standards
Group the issues into Gaps • Learn from others’ success:
• As input for Gap Closing Strategies (not in project scope)
• Input for ICI-NR Implementation Plan
Benchmark with Global Robotics Industry
based on Gaps identified
Issues Repository
Insufficient Commercialisation
Fund
Insufficient Technical Manpower
R&D Costly Investment –
Insufficient cash flow to support R&D
Local market not ready for automation
Automation is very expensive investment
and looking at very short ROI
Insufficient facilities Limited R&D
Research Fund to turn ideas to product – too many documentation for grant application
Knowledge and Capability Limitations Talent Limitation Know how and skill
sets Funding Insufficient research funds
Trust and demand from superior due to
high cost
Insufficient skilled discipline and integration for
automation system
Difficult to get materials and components
Budget to run robot club
Local manufacturer with lower
manufacturing cost
Price and ready deployment specific
to industryFundings
Expectations from consumers and
publics
Adhoc requests by government agencies Users’ Acceptance Limited Budget on
Funding
Less Research Grant
Perception of public that products from
overseas is of higher quality
Need more funding Robotics need advanced facilities
Lack of Testing Equipment
Lack of Testing Facilities
Expensive components
imported from overseas
Access to electronic components
Test Equipments Limited FundLack of commitment from top university
managementFunding Insufficient research
fund
Price of existing technology is
expensive
Local industry doesn’t need high level of
automation products currently
Poor exposure on interest in robotics
field
Unclear career path prevents creative
products produced by locals
Lack of recognition from international
communityCredibility
Source: Questionnaires
Issues Repository
Scattered and Uncoordinated
elements to develop conducive eco-system
Access to market
Insufficient co-ordination among IHL
and RIs to support industry development
Source: National Focus Group on
Robotics
Market too small (Source: Interview with VEPRO)
No incentive by government to encourage user/company apply
robotic, when compared to Singapore where 60% incentive to buy/apply robotic in their industry (Source:
Interview with Leeden)
Market share does not rapidly increase, out of 10 customer, 6 of
them are regular customer which are continue order for new robot. The rest
is new customer with zero skill in handling sophisticated robot, need to frequently educated , but order from this new customer too low (Source:
Interview with VEPRO)
Expensive spare-part (Source: Interview with Leeden)
Industry comments that Malaysia need to do something to improve the
technology otherwise we will be left behind by other players in the region
like Singapore and China (Source: Interview with VEPRO)
No skilled worker for maintenance in the event of breakdown, company cannot wait/delay/stop production
(Source: Interview with VEPRO)
Hired/dependent a lot to foreigner worker (Source: Interview with VEPRO)
Robotics Customers/Users lack of skills in handling sophisticated robot, need
to be frequently educated.(Source: Interview with Leeden)
Some SMEs has no budget to implement
local robotics solutions (Source: Interview with
CAIRO)
No robotics related standards (Pn Salwa
Denan)
No integrated value chain (Ir. Dr Mazlee)
Market Creation (Ir. Dr Mazlee)
Limited resources to have full fledged R&D
departments
Majority of SMEs are owner-managed
companies mostly find it difficult to invest
significantly in R&D
High development costs for prototypes
Limited collaboration between R&D institutes
and the industry
Need for revised standards and certification
Source: Presentation to the Malaysian Investment Development Authority “Enhancing the Development of the Machinery and Equipment (M&E) Industry in Malaysia, Frost
and Sullivan
Source: Visits to Industry
Source: Interview with Experts
•Market too small (Source: Interview with VEPRO)•No incentive by government to encourage user/company apply robotic, when compared to Singapore where 60% incentive to buy/apply robotic in their industry (Source: Interview with Leeden)
•Market share does not rapidly increase, out of 10 customer, 6 of them are regular customer which are continue order for new robot. The rest is new customer with zero skill in handling sophisticated robot, need to frequently educated , but order from this new customer too low (Source: Interview with VEPRO)
•Expensive spare-part (Source: Interview with Leeden)
Gap 1: Robotics Adoption in
Malaysia
•Currently in Malaysia no dedicated national robotics centre/agency to undertake activities and co-ordinate Malaysia’s Robotics Stakeholders
•Some SMEs has no budget to implement local robotics solutions (Source: Interview with CAIRO)
Gap 2: Robotics National Centre
•There is no integrated value chain from R&D System Integration Distribution Users• Industry comments that Malaysia need to do something to improve the technology otherwise we will be left behind by other players in the region like Singapore and China (Source: Interview with VEPRO)
Gap 3 : Integrated Value Chain
•No skilled worker for maintenance in the event of breakdown, company cannot wait/delay/stop production (Source: Interview with VEPRO)
•Hired/dependent a lot to foreigner worker (Source: Interview with VEPRO)•Robotics Customers/Users lack of skills in handling sophisticated robot, need to be frequently educated.(Source: Interview with Leeden)
Gap 4:Human Capital
•No adoption of robotics related standards to be Malaysian standard Gap 5: Standards
Gaps and Issues
• Japanese companies including Fanuc, Yaskawa Electric, and Kawasaki Heavy Industries command 50 percent of the global market, according to the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI)
•South Korea has doubled the size of its robot sales since 2009 to 2.4 trillion won ($2.2 billion) in 2013. The country is working on service robots for health care and other markets.
Gap 1: Robotics Adoption
•Establishment of government agencies to perform robotics industry development from policy formulation, standardization activities, infrastructures and facilities to promoting R&D = KIRIA
• In Korea = KIRIA, Australia = Australia Centre of Field Robotics, US = US National Robotics Engineering Centre
Gap 2: Robotics National Centre
•Japan’s Robot Revolution Initiative Council on May 15, Abe urged companies to “spread the use of robotics from large-scale factories to every corner of our economy and society.” Backed by 200 companies and universities, the five-year, government-led push aims to deepen the use of intelligent machines in manufacturing, supply chains, construction, and health care, while expanding robotics sales from 600 billion yen ($4.9 billion) annually to 2.4 trillion yen by 2020
Gap 3 : Integrated Value
Chain•Human capital redeployed to higher value tasks that robots can’t do•By 2025, Japan’s robots could shave 25 percent off factory labor costs (Boston Group Consulting)
Gap 4:Human Capital
•France, Germany, Japan, Korea, United Kingdom and the United States are main contributor in ISO committee TC184/SC2 “Robots and robotic devices” - http://www.eu-robotics.net/cms/upload/PDF/2010-07_euRobotics_Standardisation_Newsletter2.pdf Gap 5: Standards
Global Robotics Industry
Gap 1: Robotics’ Adoption in Malaysia
Export Performance (Thousand USD)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Thailand 185 479 690 748 656 Malaysia 14,085 8,616 3,954 4,903 2,762 Indonesia 138 216 671 258 1,829 Taiwan 91,932 84,151 32,963 56,197 78,849 India 941 1,629 322 1,305 1,040 China 20,103 44,700 24,084 55,711 129,250
Import Performance (Thousand USD)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Thailand 13,774 12,389 7,383 42,860 43,424 Malaysia 30,627 31,228 17,825 41,742 36,038 Indonesia 9,197 13,542 6,246 25,534 45,169 Taiwan 275,801 336,516 99,871 165,593 112,832 India 18,931 30,735 30,801 26,201 40,857 China 292,204 337,298 304,935 486,537 830,547
Source : Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry of Japan(International Federation of Robotics – IFR)
The situation is….. Malaysia’s Robotics Industry, huge gap between the import and export in 2011 where import exceeded export by more than $33 million indicates the huge demand that is not fulfilled by the local technology provider in the country.
In Malaysia, less than 5% of machinery used by manufacturing industry worth RM14 billion are from local technology. (Source: Statistics Department)
Robot Density in Malaysia is very low at 16.8 (averaged from 2007 – 2011 compared to South Korea at 437 )
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011Thailand 9 12 14 18 25Malaysia 14 14 15 19 22Indonesia 4 6 7 10 15Taiwan 91 102 105 116 129India 0 1 1 1 1China 7 9 11 15 21
Number of Industrial Robots use per 10,000 Employees in the Manufacturing Industry
Low adoption of Robotics in Malaysia
Robotics Adoption in Malaysia
Market too small (Source: Interview with VEPRO)
No incentive by government to encourage user/company apply robotic, when compared to
Singapore where 60% incentive to buy/apply robotic in their industry (Source: Interview with
Leeden)
Market share does not rapidly increase, out of 10 customer, 6 of them are regular customer which
are continue order for new robot. The rest is new customer with zero skill in handling sophisticated
robot, need to frequently educated , but order from this new customer too low (Source: Interview
with VEPRO)
Users’ Acceptance
Market Creation (Ir. Dr Mazlee)
Access to market
Gap 1 : Robotics Adoption in Malaysia
Robotics Adoption in Malaysia
Perception of public that products from overseas is of
higher quality
Expensive components imported from overseas
Access to electronic components
Price of existing technology is expensive
Local industry doesn’t need high level of automation
products currentlyExpensive spare-part
(Source: Interview with Leeden)Local market not ready for
automation
Difficult to get materials and components
Gap 1 : Robotics Adoption in Malaysia
Japanese companies including Fanuc, Yaskawa Electric, and Kawasaki Heavy Industries command 50 percent of the global market, according to the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI)
Market too small (Source: Interview with VEPRO)
Global
Malaysia
Gap 1 : Global vs Malaysia
Gap 2: Robotics National Centre
Robotics National Centre
Currently in Malaysia no dedicated national robotics centre/agency to undertake
activities and co-ordinate Malaysia’s Robotics Stakeholders
Some SMEs has no budget to implement local robotics solutions (Source: Interview
with CAIRO)
Limited resources to have full fledged R&D departments
Scattered and Uncoordinated elements to develop conducive eco-system
Insufficient co-ordination among IHL and Ris to support industry development
Gap 2 : Robotics National Centre
Robotics National Centre
Robotics need advanced facilities
Lack of Testing Equipment
Lack of Testing Facilities
Test Equipments
Credibility
Insufficient facilities
Limited R&D
Gap 2 : Robotics National Centre
Establishment of government agencies to perform robotics industry development from policy formulation, standardization activities, infrastructures and facilities to promoting R&D = KIRIA
Currently in Malaysia no dedicated national robotics centre/agency to undertake activities and co-ordinate Malaysia’s Robotics Stakeholders Global
Malaysia
Gap 2 : Global vs Malaysis
Gap 2 : No Robotics National Centre
Ministry
Research Institutes/ Government Agencies
National Robotic Centre/ Agencies
Robotics Associations
Robotics Research/COEs
South Korea Malaysia
To establish the Korea Institute for Robot Industry Advancement as an institute to systematically promote various project for cultivating intelligent robot industry and support development of related policies
Establishment and development of policies, Statistics and actual situation survey, Support of International Cooperation and overseas expansion, Support Robot Manufacture, Quality Certification Project, Standard research, Development, Distribution and international standardization activities, Support SMES, Industrial technology development
To promote and strengthen the robotics industry in Korea, to protect its business interest, to cause public awareness about robotics technologies and to deal with other matters of relevance to its members
Research, development, use and international co-operation in the entire field of robotics, and to act as a focal point for organizations and governmental representatives in activities related to robotics
To contribute to the advancement of the robot industry by creating and developing the technologies for robot innovation and by offering and distributing them to relevant industries
KAIST has developed into one of the world’s leading research universities in education, science, and technology with students motivated to pursue excellence, distinguished professors committed to quality teaching and research, and state-of-the-art facilities to support technology innovation
Technology
Robotics StandardsHuman Capital
Korea Robotics Centre
Reference Model : Korea Institute for Robot Industry Advancement (KIRIA) - Established Korea Institute for Robot Industry Advancement (KIRIA)
to enhance the Korea Robot Industry
- KIRIA has so far promoted the Korean robot industry through robot policy formulation, robot information dissemination, standardization activities, and infrastructures. KIRIA is also responsible for constructing a national robot research and development center (Source: roboticbusinessreview.com)
- Established Intelligent Robot Development and Promotion Act
- Since 2012, Korean market has also promoted rapid growth and reached at the market size of $2b (Source: Robotworld Korea)
- Robot sales increased by 9% to 25500 units (IFR Press Release, Aug 2012)
- 2009 to 2012: - Robot sales increased from $940 million to $2 billion- Exports grew from $96 million to $590 million- Employment raised from 5,068 to 10,515 workers.
Gap 3: Integrated Value Chain
Integrated Value Chain
There is no integrated value chain from R&D System Integration Distribution Users
Industry comments that Malaysia need to do something to improve the technology otherwise
we will be left behind by other players in the region like Singapore and China (Source:
Interview with VEPRO)
R&D Costly Investment – Insufficient cash flow to support R&D
Research/ Commercialisation Funding (13 respondents)
Price and ready deployment specific to industryExpectations from consumers and publics
Some SMEs has no budget to implement local robotics solutions (CAIRO)
No integrated value chain (Ir. Dr Mazlee)
Limited collaboration between R&D institutes and the industry
Gap 3 : Integrated Value Chain
Value chain is a set of activities that a firm operating in a specific industry performs in order to deliver a valuable product or service for the market
Japan’s Robot Revolution Initiative Council on May 15, Abe urged companies to “spread the use of robotics from large-scale factories to every corner of our economy and society.”
Backed by 200 companies and universities, the five-year, government-led push aims to deepen the use of intelligent machines in manufacturing, supply chains, construction, and health care, while expanding robotics sales from 600 billion yen ($4.9 billion) annually to 2.4 trillion yen by 2020
There is no integrated value chain from R&D System Integration Distribution Users
Global
Malaysia
Gap 3 : Global vs Malaysia
• Research Centres• Solutions Provider• Distributors• Academia
Robotics Stakeholders
• Limited collaboration between R&D institutes and the industry in Malaysia (Source: Frost and Sullivan)
Collaboration between Research Centres and
Industry
• Malaysia’s Distributors are mainly distributors for foreign products
• Low percentage of research being commercialized. • Difficulties in moving from a working prototype to sales
of a finished product
Commercialising Research Output
• The market needs to be educated in what robots can do, how they can be used, and how they can increase productivity
Market/Users’ Awareness
Study shows strong relationship between industry technology capabilities and alliances with
university. As such, in house R&D capacity is important for industry to benefit from collaboration with
universities
Openness of industry to collaborate with
universities as involve proprietary knowledge
exchange
Ensure industry knows the benefits of
collaboration
To avoid the perception of industry that universities and public institutes lack
of transparency and bureaucratic
Access to information on R&D by universities and research institutes
Industry especially of small and medium size with limited R&D facilities will see university as
opportunity for them to do R&D with their limited resources as
proved by the study in Malaysia as compared to large firms
STRATEGY
SITUATION Source:
University – Industry R&D Collaboration in the Automative, Biotechnology and Electronics Firms in Malaysia, Rajah Rasiah and Chandran Govindaraju
Research Prototype Integration and Customisation Distribution
After Sales/ Customer Support
HUMAN CAPITAL
STANDARDS
Service Robots
• Consumers• Education• Healthcare
Industrial Robots
• Manufacturing• Oil and Gas• Defense • Agriculture• SMEs
Research
Centres
Solutions
ProviderDistribut
or
Training Provider Academia
Standards Institution
Users/ Implement
er
TECHN
OLO
GY
Industry Stakeholder
Target :Integrated Value Chain
Solutions Provider : Ideally can be spin-offs or start ups from research centres 1 product = 1 companies
Integration and Customisation Distribution After Sales/ Customer
Support
HUMAN CAPITAL
STANDARDS
Service Robots
• Consumers• Education• Healthcare
Industrial Robots
• Manufacturing• Oil and Gas• Defense • Agriculture• SMEs
Research
Centres
Solutions
ProviderDistribut
or
Training Provider
Academia
Standards Institution
Users/ Implement
er
TECHN
OLO
GY
Industry Stakeholder
Research Prototype % research prototype
commercialized?
% local made robotics
solutions?
Import robotics solutions Distribution After Sales/ Customer Support
Importer and
Authorised Distributor
% foreign made robotics
solutions?
Frost and Sullivan Study◦ One of key challenges in Machinery and Equipment (M&E) Industry
(which includes Robotics and Factory Automation) is the industry consists of SMEs which limits the R&D efforts: ◦ Limited resources to have full fledged R&D departments◦ Majority of SMEs are owner-managed companies mostly find it difficult to invest
significantly in R&D◦ High development costs for prototypes◦ Limited collaboration between R&D institutes and the industry
Source:Presentation to the Malaysian Investment Development Authority “Enhancing the Development of the Machinery and Equipment (M&E) Industry in Malaysia, Frost and Sullivan
Gap 4: Human Capital
Human Capital
No skilled worker for maintenance in the event of breakdown, company cannot wait/delay/stop
production (Source: Interview with VEPRO)
Hired/dependent a lot to foreigner worker (Source: Interview with VEPRO)
Robotics Customers/Users lack of skills in handling sophisticated robot, need to be frequently educated.(Source: Interview with Leeden)
Insufficient Technical Manpower
Knowledge and Capability LimitationsKnow how and skill sets
Talent Limitation
Insufficient skilled discipline and integration for automation system
Poor exposure on interest in robotics field
Unclear career path prevents creative products produced by locals
Gap 4 : Human Capital
Human capital redeployed to higher value tasks that robots can’t do
No skilled worker for maintenance in the event of breakdown, company cannot wait/delay/stop production (Source: Interview with VEPRO)Global
Malaysia
Gap 4 : Global vs Malaysia
Justification◦ One of key challenges in Machinery
and Equipment (M &E) Industry (which includes Robotics and Factory Automation) is difficulty in HR recruiting and development
Source:Presentation to the Malaysian Investment Development Authority “Enhancing the Development of the Machinery and Equipment (M&E) Industry in Malaysia, Frost and Sullivan
Malaysia’s Robotics Education - CertificatesLevel Duration Theory Practical Remarks
Sijil Kemahiran Malaysia (Mechatronics) –P/T
SKM Level 3 1 year Once a week for 12 months OJT – 3 months Malaysian Institute of Technology Academy
Training and certification in hardware/software
Certificate MyRAIG
Industrial Robotics Simulation and Programming
Short Course 4 days (RM 2000)
Knowledge and method of robotics programming
GMI
Certificate in Industrial Robotics & Automation
Certificate 6 months 3 months theory OJT – 3 months Sarawak Skill Development Centre
Kursus Teknologi Mekatronik
Tahap 2 dan 3 ( Sijil Kemahiran Malaysia) & Sijil Teknologi Mekatronik ( Mechatronic Technology)
2 years Robotik, Elektronik, Elektrik,Pneumatik, Hydraulik, Pemesinan, Autocad, Programmable Logic Controller (PLC), Networking, Jigs and fixtures
Bengkel dan makmal
ILP KangarJuruteknik atau Juruteknik kanan
Sijil Teknologi Mekanik Industri
Sijil • Lukisan Teknikal• Pengukuran Bahan• Operasi Menggegas• Penyambungan Bahan• Operasi Pemesinan• Pemasangan Mesin• Penyenggaraan Mekanikal• Penyenggaraan Elektrik• Automasi Industri
Bengkel dan makmal
Juruteknik dan penyelia pengeluaran (production)(bench-fitting work), fabrikasi bahan, memasang dan menyenggara mesin dan peralatan, memotong dan membentuk bahan melalui proses-proses pemesinan, menyenggara kelengkapan pneumatik, elektro-pneumatik, hidraulik dan elektro-hidraulik, serta menyenggara kelengkapan PLC
Malaysia’s Robotics Education - Diploma
Duration Theory Practical Remarks
Diploma Teknologi Kejuruteraan Mekatronik
3 years ADTEC
Advanced Diplomen in Mechatronic Eng Tech
JMTI
Electronics Product Development 3 years 3 months industrial training
Megatech
Diploma in Mechatronics Engineering
FT – 2.5 yrsPT – 4.5 yrs
90 credit hours
Final year project & industrial training
AIMST University
Diploma in Mechatronics Engineering
FT – 2.5 yrs OJT – 3 months Int College of Adv Tech S’wak
Diploma in Manufacturing Eng 3 years Industrial Training KKTM Kuantan
Malaysia’s Robotics Education - Degree
Duration Theory Practical Remarks
BEng Mechatronics Engineering Lectures/tutorials UCSI University
BEng Mechanical Engineering 4 years Lectures/tutorials Industrial Training, Lab, Projects
UCSI UniversityTaylors University
BEng Electrical & Electronic Eng Lectures/tutorials
Bachelor of Electrical Engineering Tech (Industrial Automation)
Lectures/tutorials UTHM
BEng Electronics majoring in Robotics an Automation
4 yrs Lectures/tutorials Projects, Industrial training MMU Melaka
BEng of Engineering (Robotics and Mechatronics) 4 yrs Lectures/tutorials Manage projects, entrepreneur, industry based learning (6 – 12 months)
Swinburne
BEng Electronics majoring in Robotics and Automation
4 yrs Lectures/tutorials Projects, Industrial training MMU
BEng industrial Automation and Robotics Lectures/tutorials Project, industrial training UNIKL-MFI
Beng Electrical and Engineering Technology (Industrial Automation and Robotics)
4 yrs Lectures/tutorials Industrial Training, Projects UTEM
South
Korea’s Huma
n Capi
tal
•Industrial – Academia Research Integration (industry oriented, industry-academia-research partnership)•Very specialized area for different institution – e.g: Chonnam National University pursuing robotics technology for new cancer treatment (The Quiet Giant of Asian Robotics: Korea – Robotics Review)•In 2008, established 5 years $1 billion program to build up 10000 human capital consisting on masters and doctoral degree in robotics and mechatronics•Global Alliance Program - collaboration with world leading universities to train experts in medical robotics•Lab Rotation Program – enable students to gain experiences in various research fields
Malaysi
a’s Huma
n Capital
• Practical Program prior to graduation for hands on industrial experience (average : 3 months for a 3 years degree course)
• Courses ranging from certificate level to PhD
• Courses offered by colleges and universities
• Establishment of robotics research and development centres such as:• Cent
re for Artificial Intelligence and Robotics (CAIRO)
• Center for Robotic and Industrial Automation (CeRIA) – UTeM
• Specialised research centres/lab• USM
Underwater Robotics Research
• CISIR – Biomedical and Image Analysis
• Exam oriented and Spoon Fed – lack of innovation and creative/critical thinking and decision making (Source: Transformative Robotic Education for the Realization of Malaysian National Philospohy of Education, UM)
USA’ Human Capital
• The roadmap for the workforce is as follows:• 5
years: Each public secondary school in the U.S. has a robotics program available after school. The program includes various informational and competitive public events during each session, and participants receive recognition comparable to other popular extra-curricular activities.
• 10 years: In addition to the 5-year goal, every 4-year college and university offers concentrations in robotics to augment many Bachelor’s, Master’s, and PhD degrees.
• 15 years: The number of domestic graduate students at all levels with training in robotics is double
Source:US Robotics Roadmap
Source:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korea_University_of_Science_and_Technology
Gap 5: Standards
Robotics Standards Development in
Malaysia
No adoption of robotics related standards to be
Malaysian standard
No robotics related standards (Pn Salwa
Denan)Need for revised standards and certification
Gap 5 : Standards
Source: http://www.eu-robotics.net/cms/upload/PDF/2010-07_euRobotics_Standardisation_Newsletter2.pdf
France, Germany, Japan, Korea, United Kingdom and the United States are main contributor in ISO committee TC184/SC2 “Robots and robotic devices”
No adoption of robotics related standards to be Malaysian standard
Global
Malaysia
Gap 5 : Standards
Source: http://www.eu-robotics.net/cms/upload/PDF/2010-07_euRobotics_Standardisation_Newsletter2.pdf
Justification◦ One of key challenges in Machinery and Equipment (M &E) Industry (which
includes Robotics and Factory Automation) is need for revised standards and certification
◦ Adherence to international standards is needed for companies seeking to be subcontractors for OEM manufacturers
◦ Malaysian M&E standards to focus more on quality of products in addition to safety requirements◦ Adopting international standards on safety and quality and modifying the same to develop Malaysian
standards◦ In addition to standard, also certification program by Robotics Industrial
Association (RIA) = Certified Robots Integrator◦ Identifies robotics solution provider as expert skilled in integration best practices
◦ Other standardization are EU Robot Ethics, South Korea Robot Ethics and Principles of Robotics from Japan
Source:Presentation to the Malaysian Investment Development Authority “Enhancing the Development of the Machinery and Equipment (M&E) Industry in Malaysia, Frost and Sullivan
Published Standards related to Robotics
Source: www.iso.org
Global Standardization Activities in Robotics
IEEE Robo
tics and
Automati
on Socie
ty
•IEEE Robotics and Automation Society’s Standing Committee for Standards Activities (RAS-SCSA) is to formally adopt and confirm best practices in robotics and automation as standards. :
• promote common measures and definitions in robotics and automation• promote measurability and comparability of robotics and automation technology• promote integrity, portability, and reusability of robotics and automation technology
ISO TC
184 Auto
matic Syste
m and
Integration
•SC 2 Robots and robotic devices•WG 1 Vocabulary•WG 3 Industrial Safety•WG 7 Personal Care Safety (non-medical)•WG 8 Service Robots•JWG 9 Medical Robot Safety
Occupatio
nal Safety and Healt
h Administra
tion
•General Industry (29 CFR 1910)•1910 Subpart J, General environmental controls •1910.147, The control of hazardous energy (lockout/tagout) •1910 Subpart O, Machinery and machine guarding•1910.211, Definitions•1910.212, General requirements for all machines.•Guidelines For Robotics Safety. STD 01-12-002
Source: http://europeanrobotics12.eu/media/15087/1_Jacobs_Possibilities_to_contribute_to_ISO_standardisation.pdfhttps://www.osha.gov/SLTC/robotics/standards.html
Standardization in Canada Automotive Manufacturing
Standards to ensure vehicle production line accuracy and operability:◦ Motor Vehicle Safety Act◦ National Safety Mark (NSM)◦ Canada-US Regulatory Cooperation Council
As such, need to create system for auto manufacturers to meet these standard
Standard and Metrology Needs for Tele-operated Surgical Robotic Systems◦ Develop System to measure overall input/output motion performance of teleoperated surgical robots◦ Develop performance metrics to evaluate overall input/output motion of teleoperated surgical robots◦ Determine critical performance metrics for robotics surgical stimulators◦ Determine critical performance metrics of force and haptic feedback for surgical robotic systems◦ Develop communication and data standards to link surgical robotics with medical imaging systems
Robot Metrology and Calibration in Standardisation – Products and Services • IsiOS offers metrology products and services for high precision robot
applications. Develop software and sensor devices to enhance robot accuracy• IsiOS Standard Calibration – raises positioning accuracy of industrial robots up to average errors below 0.1mm• IsiOS Inline Calibration – keeps robot on maximum precision levels
• SABS – Offers certification and assessment – qualification scheme for metrology and calibration industry• ISO/TR 13309:1995 - Manipulating Industrial Robots –Informative Guide on test equipment and metrology
methods of operation for robot performance evaluation in accordance with ISO 9283
• National Metrology Institute of Japan• High Accuracy Angle Standard for use in Robotics
•Develop a rotary encoder angle self calibration system with world’s highest accuracy of 0.01” using equal division averaged method (Masuda- Kajitani method)
Recommended