View
784
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
E D I N B U R G H
7.9.2016 • session 8Landscape management
RIZZO et al.Participatory scenario building
RIZZO
MARRACCINI
FILIPPINI
GENNAI-SCHOTT
JOHANY
LARDON
Session 8 Landscape management
E D I N B U R G H
7.9.2016 • session 8Landscape management
RIZZO et al.Participatory scenario building
Davide RIZZO ¹
E MARRACCINI ²
R FILIPPINI ¹,³
S GENNAI-SCHOTT ¹
F JOHANY ³
S LARDON ³
¹ Institute of Life Sciences, Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, ITA
² UP 2012-10-103 PICAR-T, Institut Polytechnique LaSalle, FRA
³ UMR 1273 Métafort, INRA & AgroParisTech, FRA
2
Sustainability of the urban agricultures in the Mediterranean
http://www1.montpellier.inra.fr/daume
E D I N B U R G H
7.9.2016 • session 8Landscape management
RIZZO et al.Participatory scenario building 3
50 researchers from10 research teams
Comparative & multidisciplinary
Ended in 2015
Fundedby the French ResearchAgency
Which agricultural-urban dynamicsprotect, threaten, improve or create
urban and periurban agricultures ?
Towards Sustainable
Urban-AgriculturalSystems
How the relations between agriculture and city are managed? through which
integrating projects and public policies?
Sustainability of the urban agricultures in the Mediterranean
E D I N B U R G H
7.9.2016 • session 8Landscape management
RIZZO et al.Participatory scenario building 4
a territorialperspective*
with the landscapeagronomy
framework**
*Lardon et al. 2012
Boiffin et al., 2014
** Benoit, Rizzo et al. 2012
Rizzo et al. 2013
E D I N B U R G H
7.9.2016 • session 8Landscape management
RIZZO et al.Participatory scenario building 5
Opportunity to deal with complexland management issues
Increasing attention for the territorial aspects of agriculture and agrofood industries
→ landscape perspectiveBenoit, Rizzo et al. 2012Lardon et al. 2012
→ landscape approachSayer et al. 2013Kissinger et al., 2013
Boiffin et al. 2014
E D I N B U R G H
7.9.2016 • session 8Landscape management
RIZZO et al.Participatory scenario building 6
6 municipalities in the urban region of Pisa
200,000 inhab. (431 /km²)
Regional natural park
Reclaimed area (dense drainage network and pumping system)
Agriculture
476 km², 49% agriculture
Average UAA 7 ha
Dominant arable farms
Others: livestock, vegetables
Issues
Decrease of UAA and farm number of vegetables + urban sprawl
Water protectionreclaimed area
Local food production urbanized area
E D I N B U R G H
7.9.2016 • session 8Landscape management
RIZZO et al.Participatory scenario building 7
17%
49%, 23,440 ha
31%
3%
82% arable (crops & vegetables)
6% olive groves
6% mixed/complex areas
2% grasslands
+ vineyards, nurseries, fruit groves
Artificial
Agricultural
Natural
Humid areas
Source: Land use and cover map, Region Tuscany, 2013
Tyrrhenian sea
PISA
Italy Tuscany
E D I N B U R G H
7.9.2016 • session 8Landscape management
RIZZO et al.Participatory scenario building 8
Imaging scenariosof change
Sets of possible actions
building a shared vision of territory for collective action
1
2
3
Use and production of spatial representations as intermediate objects* between experts and actors’ knowledge
* Buller et al. 2009
Easing the expression of actors’ point of view, to clarify tacit knowledge and issues.
Cards summarizing the available data and information
Diagnosis(territorial issues)
E D I N B U R G H
7.9.2016 • session 8Landscape management
RIZZO et al.Participatory scenario building 9
Lardon S., Piveteau V., 2005. Méthodologie de diagnostic pour le projet de territoire : une approche par les modèles spatiaux. Géocarrefour, Vol 80
Spatializing the information
Articulating the scales
Eliciting transversality
Mixing knowledge
Personal expression
Providing arguments
Being creative
Lardon S., 2013. Developing a territorial project. The 'territory game', a coordination tool for local stakeholders. FaçSADe, Research results, No 2013 / 38, 4p.
Territorial diagnosis Participatory approach&
E D I N B U R G H
7.9.2016 • session 8Landscape management
RIZZO et al.Participatory scenario building 10
key question on a territorial issue
cards (played) & maps (drawn)
PLAYERS(more groups)
ORGANISERS
1
Shared DIAGNOSISof current issues
SCENARIOSCo-drawn mapsexaggerating the desired traits of future land systems
PROPOSALS for (feasible) actions
Reports and notes on the DYNAMICS
2
3
results
E D I N B U R G H
7.9.2016 • session 8Landscape management
RIZZO et al.Participatory scenario building 11
title
legend
diagnosis
scenarios
proposals
reports
Chorematicanalysis*
* Lardon Roche 2008
Occurrenceanalysis
outputs
E D I N B U R G H
7.9.2016 • session 8Landscape management
RIZZO et al.Participatory scenario building
natural areas withecological functions
fruit and vegetables
livestocks & cereals
agriculture to maintain landscape
new wind mills to be placed by the actors
cycle and pedestrian network
periurban areas withsocial gardens & educational farms
farmers markets
grid
contact
hierarchy
tropism
transformation
attraction
« Pisa: the new agri-eco-learning center »
Chorème: symbolicrepresentation of territorialfeatures and dynamics
E D I N B U R G H
7.9.2016 • session 8Landscape management
RIZZO et al.Participatory scenario building 13
WATER: drainage channels (element cross-cutting the actions of various actors of the agri-urban system).
FOOD: diversification(e.g., with herbals that could valorize the prized local olive oil)
& shortening of supply chains to improve coordination between agriculture and urban actors and expectations
Each game session dealt with 1 of two main territorial issues:
- water management - local food productionFor each we counted the landscape elements mentioned by actors
LAND SYSTEM COMPONENTS mentioned by players
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION mentioned by players
E D I N B U R G H
7.9.2016 • session 8Landscape management
RIZZO et al.Participatory scenario building 14
35 actors involvedIncluding farmers, policy-makers and advisers
7 diagnoses
27 proposalsfor management actions
12 scenariosExaggerating desired traits
E D I N B U R G H
7.9.2016 • session 8Landscape management
RIZZO et al.Participatory scenario building 15
Analysis and comment of the territorial dynamics by involving both farmers and other decision (policy) makers.
Applicable in different regions and on various territorial issues.
Exploring the narrative scenarios issued from the different games (e.g., elaborated by experts or researchers).
Using game outputs to feed models of land use change (e.g. CLUE) or farming system change (e.g. APSIM).
Verifying and enriching territorial data with local actors
Creating an informal learning environment for local actors
Plus: using the approach as educational platform for students (Moonen et al., 2016)
…and perspectives
1
2
3
E D I N B U R G H
7.9.2016 • session 8Landscape management
RIZZO et al.Participatory scenario building
16
Davide Rizzoridavide@gmail.com
E D I N B U R G H
7.9.2016 • session 8Landscape management
RIZZO et al.Participatory scenario building 17
Boiffin J, Benoît M, Le Bail M, Papy F, Stengel P, 2014. Agronomie, espace, territoire : travailler « pour et sur » le développement territorial, un enjeu pour l’agronomie. Cahiers Agricultures, 23:72–83.
Debolini M, Valette E, François M, Chéry JP, 2015. Mapping land use competition in the rural–urban fringe and future perspectives on land policies: A case study of Meknès (Morocco). Land Use Policy,47:373–381. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.01.035.
Kissinger G, Brasser A, Gross L, 2013. Reducing Risk: Landscape Approaches to Sustainable Sourcing. EcoAgriculture Partners, on behalf of the Landscapes for People, Food and Nature Initiative, Washington DC, USA
Lardon S, 2013. Developing a territorial project. The 'territory game', a coordination tool for local stakeholders. FaçSADe, Research results, No 2013 / 38, 4p.
Lardon S, Piveteau V, 2005. Méthodologie de diagnostic pour le projet de territoire : une approche par les modèles spatiaux. Géocarrefour, Vol 80
Lardon S, Roche S, 2008. Représentations spatiales dans les démarches participatives. Production et usages. Revue Internationale de Géomatique, 18(4), 423-428.
Lardon S, Moonen C, Marraccini E, Debolini M, Galli M, Loudiyi S, 2012. The territory agronomy approach in research education and training. In Farming System Research in the 21st Century, pp. 257–280. Eds I. Darnhofer, D. Gibbon and B. Dedieu. Springer.
Lardon S, Marraccini E, Filippini R, Gennai Schott S, JohanyF, Rizzo D, (under review). Prospective participative pour la zone urbaine de Pise (Italie) : l’eau et l’alimentation comme enjeux de développementterritorial. Cahiers de Géographie du Québec
Marraccini E, Lardon S, Loudiyi S, Giacché G, Bonari E, 2013. Durabilité de l’agriculture dans les territoirespériurbains méditerranéens : enjeux et projetsagriurbains dans la région de Pise (Toscane, Italie). Cahiers Agricultures, 22:517–525.
Moonen AC, Lardon S, Marraccini E, Pinto-Correia T, Rizzo D, 2016. From Action Research to Action Learning –Ecosystem services assessment as a learning platform for students, local land users and researchers. In: Wilcox A, Vinall S (eds) Social and technological transformation in farming systems - Diverging and converging pathways. Harper Adam University, UK, p 8
Rizzo D, Marraccini E, Lardon S, Rapey H, Debolini M, BenoitM, Thenail C, 2013. Farming systems designinglandscapes: land management units at the interfacebetween agronomy and geography. GeografiskTidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography 113:71–86. doi: 10.1080/00167223.2013.849391
E D I N B U R G H
7.9.2016 • session 8Landscape management
RIZZO et al.Participatory scenario building 18
to involve farmers and other local actors in a shared discussion about the management issues of the common space of action
to foster the multifunctionality of agriculture through exploring the effective integration of activities (services) different from production
to address the land as an integrative platform of decision-making processes
spatial approach
Boiffin J, Benoît M, Le Bail M, et al. (2014) Agronomie, espace, territoire : travailler « pour et sur » le
développement territorial, un enjeu pour l’agronomie. Cahiers Agricultures 23:72–83. doi: 10.1684/agr.2014.0688
local
territorial development
land use management
E D I N B U R G H
7.9.2016 • session 8Landscape management
RIZZO et al.Participatory scenario building
5 km
19
Mixed
Forage
Ceral
Industrial crop
Olive grove
Horticultural
other agric. (2010)
urban
UsableAgricultural Area:
17,622 ha
Farms: 2,614
Source: ISV elaboration on ARTEA database 2012
park
E D I N B U R G H
7.9.2016 • session 8Landscape management
RIZZO et al.Participatory scenario building
20
Recommended