View
1.062
Download
3
Category
Tags:
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
This is the Dec 2011 set of results from the IPv6 Matrix Project testing IPv6 connectivity of the World's 1 Million most popular Web Sites.
Citation preview
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 1
IPv6 Matrix Project
Tracking IPv6 connectivity Worldwide
http://www.ipv6matrix.org
Dr. Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond – ocl@gih.comDecember 2011 Update for ICCA January 2012
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 2
We are running out of IP addresses
When we reach this point, it will be too late since
there will be no more “free” IPv4 addresses!
Real time data collected September 2011
http://www.potaroo.net/tools/ipv4/index.html
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 3
IPv6 Matrix Project
� ISOC England was awarded a Community Grants Programme award in November 2009
� Design and implementation of an “IPv6 Crawler,” software on a computer that crawls through the DNS at regular intervals in order to detect and test:� IPv6 DNS servers
� IPv6 compliant Web servers� IPv6 compliant SMTP mailers
� IPv6 compliant NTP servers.
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 4
Project Rationale
� Today, more than 95% of Internet traffic is generated by a small number of data sources – i.e. the world’s busiest Web Sites
� Without IPv6 accessible content, IPv6 has no chance of being used - ever.
� Take the 1 Million most popular Web site list from alexa.com as a starting point for the domains to be tested. Add more domains later.
� Test them for IPv6 connectivity
� This is equivalent to testing about 6.3 million hosts worldwide
� Use GeoIP database to estimate real host location
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 5
Project Teams
� London, UK:
� Project Management and support
� Hardware supply and installation
� Data Centre and IPv6 connectivity
� Nile University, Egypt:
� Software Programming
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 6
Crawler
CENTOS 5 Linux / updatedOperating
System
2 x hot-swappable redundant
535W.
PSU
146 Gb hardware SATA 2-disk
RAID (hot swappable)
HD Storage
4 Gb DDR2 SDRAMRAM
2 x Dual Core Intel(R)
Xeon(TM) CPU 3.60GHz
CPU
194.33.63.250 / 1 Gb/s (GIH
private address space)
IPv4 address
(eth1) /
speed
shell.ipv6matrix.orgName (eth1)
2a00:19e8:20:1::a2 / 100 Mb/sIPv6 address
(eth0) /
speed
212.124.204.162 / 100 Mb/sIPv4 address
(eth0) /
speed
turtle.ipv6matrix.org ;
crawler.ipv6matrix.org
turtle.ipv6matrix.com ;
crawler.ipv6matrix.com
turtle.ipv6matrix.net ;
crawler.ipv6matrix.net
Name (eth0)
HP DL360pModel
Crawler (back
end)
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 7
Web Server
Ubuntu 4.4 Linux / updatedOperating System
Single 500WPSU
2 x 1 Tb fast SATAHD Storage
4 Gb DDR2 SDRAMRAM
2 x Dual Core Intel(R) Xeon(TM)
CPU 3.40GHz
CPU
194.33.63.251 / 1 Gb/s (GIH
private address space)
IPv4 address
(eth1) /
speed
tusk.ipv6matrix.orgName (eth1)
2a00:19e8:20:1::aa / 100 Mb/sIPv6 address
(eth0) /
speed
212.124.204.170 / 100 Mb/sIPv4 address
(eth0) /
speed
elephant.ipv6matrix.org ;
www.ipv6matrix.org
elephant.ipv6matrix.com ;
www.ipv6matrix.com
elephant.ipv6matrix.net ;
www.ipv6matrix.net
Name (eth0)
HP DL140Model
Web Server
(front end)
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 8
Router
MN-16ESW 16 port / 100
Mb/s
Interface card /
speed
2 / 100 Mb/sEthernet Ports /
speed
64 MbDRAM
Advanced IP Services IOSOperating
System
CISCO 2811Model
Router
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 9
Local Network
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 10
Software flowchart
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 11
Web Site
Structure
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 12
www.ipv6matrix.org Web Site
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 13
What are we tracking?
� Host IPv6 penetration
� Using IPv4 Geo-location coordinates
� Includes generic TLD (gTLDs, .com, .net, .org) and country code ccTLDs
� Two types of information:
� Infrastructure: DNS + Web + E-mail + Time server (NTP)This tracks all of the infrastructure required to run IPv6 Web services
� Web sites only (actual content)This tracks the Web services themselves. Usually this percentage is lower than the figure for the infrastructure
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 14
What are we archiving?
� Everything that we are tracking on the previous page, plus:
� Testing of connectivity to the above services in case IPv6 addresses are advertised but no service runs on them
� Tracing of route from London Docklands to each one of these hosts both using IPv4 and IPv6 – and archiving all of this information in text format
� A lot more data, accessible from the Web site archive
� In April 2011, the size of this database in text format is approx 60Gb and continually increasing (the testing software runs 24/7)
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 15
Data Archives
Selecting Data Archives provides
a link to the detailed information
Table.
Click on “Search”, to go
directly to the Top Level Domain,
or scroll down to the desired
Top Level Domain.
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 16
Data Archives
� Example Data in Data Archives (stop
at date)
Click on the “+” to the left of the
Top Level Domain to gain
access the sub-menu containing
the dates of all the data runs,
and so on, to reveal results.
year-month-day__hour-min-sec
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 17
Data Archives - results
Click on the links to open a
new window containing
all of the detailed results
formatted in a table.
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 18
Data Archives - resultsBasic IPv4/IPv6 connectivity table
Domain penetration summary table
Geographical IP database
Type of IPv6 access (tunnels etc.)
Trace path, hop count, MTU IPv4 & IPv6
Ping count IPv4 and IPv6
Reverse IPv4 and IPv6
SOA for Nameserver
Service detection for SMTP, HTTP and HTTPs
TLS detection for SMTP
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 19
Detailed Data for .AEClicked on tcp80_WWW_ae: connection to http port
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 20
Using the filter
Use the filter to select by Top Level Domain, or by type of service tested.
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 21
Results
November-December 2011
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 22
Europe Data snapshot
July 20119.97%
14.74%
3.53%
2.29% 2.86%
1.56%
8.88%5.48%
2.02%
2.02%
5.58%
8.98%
4.47%
6.86%
5.44%
0.47% 0.60%
10.92%
2.99%
4.00%
0.88%
16.25%6.31%
5.98% 2.69% 8.07%
10.72%
5.68%
2.80% 4.06% 6.44%9.34%
7.91%
13.70%
4.75% 2.13%
2.71%
5.39%
6.72%
15.14%
9.82%
10.01%
6.14%11.09%
16.66%
6.30%
4.34%
0.64% 0.58%
11.83%
0.83%
4.04%
3.01%
20.36%18.54%
2.67%
IPv6 Host Penetration
Infrastructure
- DNS
- Web
- NTP
16.43%
2.41%
16.26%
2.33%
December 2011
Low Sample
Low accuracy
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 23
Europe Data snapshot
December 2011
12.01%
0.87%
0.28%
0.64% 1.85%
0.48%
1.68%7.15%
0.94%
0.47%
0.93%
2.07%
1.07%
0.26%
2.50%
0.32% 0.24%
0.41%
2.47%
0.19%
0.91%
4.08%8.16%
0.77% 1.32% 3.71%
0.34%
2.60%
0.71% 2.41% 7.45%1.68%
0.51%
2.19%
0.99% 1.17%
0.27%
0.94%
0.86%
1.00%
11.67%
4.00%
9.14%0.48%
4.15%
0.85%
1.59%
0.32% 0.29%
0.42%
0.95%
0.19%
1.71%
26.58%26.70%
1.30%
IPv6 Host Penetration
Web only
12.48%
0.63%
12.29%
0.65%
July 2011
Low Sample
Low accuracy
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 24
Infrastructure
- DNS or
- Web or
- E-mail or
- NTP
IPv6 Host Penetration
(*) Low Sample
Low accuracy
Country DNS+WEB+E-mail+NTP % change
July 2011 Dec 2011
Moldova (*) 20.36% 18.54% -1.82%
Switzerland 16.25% 16.66% 0.41%
Slovakia 16.43% 16.26% -0.17%
France 14.74% 15.14% 0.40%
Finland 8.98% 13.70% 4.72%
Ukraine 10.02% 11.83% 1.81%
Slovenia 10.93% 11.33% 0.40%
Poland 10.72% 11.09% 0.37%
Czech Republic 8.07% 10.01% 1.94%
Portugal 9.97% 9.82% -0.15%
Netherlands 8.88% 9.34% 0.46%
Denmark 6.86% 7.91% 1.05%
Bosnia and Herzegovina (*) 7.66% 7.51% -0.15%
Latvia 0.88% 6.72% 5.84%
Germany 5.48% 6.44% 0.96%
Austria 5.98% 6.30% 0.32%
Spain 6.31% 6.14% -0.17%
Croatia 5.68% 5.83% 0.15%
Norway 5.44% 5.68% 0.24%
Estonia 5.58% 5.39% -0.19%
Sweden 5.44% 4.75% -0.69%
Greece 3.91% 4.34% 0.43%
Belgium 2.86% 4.06% 1.20%
Lithuania 4.00% 4.04% 0.04%
Macedonia 4.04% 3.33% -0.71%
Luxembourg 3.21% 3.21%
Serbia (*) 3.09% 3.06% -0.03%
Ireland 2.29% 2.80% 0.51%
United Kingdom 3.53% 2.71% -0.82%
Italy 2.69% 2.67% -0.02%
Hungary 2.41% 2.33% -0.08%
Russia 2.02% 2.13% 0.11%
Iceland 1.56% 2.02% 0.46%
Belarus 2.99% 0.83% -2.16%
Romania 0.60% 0.58% -0.02%
Bulgaria 0.71% 0.50% -0.21%
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 25
IPv6 Host Penetration
Web only
(*) Low Sample
Low accuracy
Country WEB % change
July 2011 Dec 2011
Moldova (*) 26.58% 23.70% -2.88%
Slovakia 12.48% 12.29% -0.19%
Portugal 12.01% 11.67% -0.34%
Spain 8.16% 9.14% 0.98%
Germany 7.15% 7.45% 0.30%
Slovenia 3.96% 4.77% 0.81%
Macedonia 5.43% 4.23% -1.20%
Switzerland 4.08% 4.15% 0.07%
Czech Republic 3.71% 4.00% 0.29%
Norway 2.50% 2.60% 0.10%
Belgium 1.85% 2.41% 0.56%
Finland 2.07% 2.19% 0.12%
Netherlands 1.68% 1.68% 0.00%
Croatia 1.55% 1.63% 0.08%
Greece 1.71% 1.59% -0.12%
Italy 1.32% 1.30% -0.02%
Russia 0.94% 1.17% 0.23%
France 0.87% 1.00% 0.13%
Sweden 1.07% 0.99% -0.08%
Belarus 2.47% 0.95% -1.52%
Estonia 0.93% 0.94% 0.01%
Latvia 0.91% 0.86% -0.05%
Austria 0.77% 0.85% 0.08%
Ireland 0.64% 0.71% 0.07%
Hungary 0.63% 0.65% 0.02%
Denmark 0.26% 0.51% 0.25%
Poland 0.34% 0.48% 0.14%
Iceland 0.48% 0.47% -0.01%
Ukraine 0.41% 0.42% 0.01%
Romania 0.24% 0.29% 0.05%
United Kingdom 0.28% 0.27% -0.01%
Lithuania 0.19% 0.19% 0.00%
Bulgaria 0.31% 0.16% -0.15%
Bosnia and Herzegovina (*) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Serbia (*) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 26
Europe Trends
� Many countries see a significant rise in infrastructure� Likely to be caused by a main hosting
provider, installing dual-stack Name-servers
� Slovakia & Portugal still leading with dual-stack Web sites
� Spain catching up.
� Country with largest number of dual stack Web sites in Europe: Germany
� IPv6 Day in June 2011 might have generated positive results
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 27
Asia Data snapshot
2.02%
0.18%
3.80%3.65%
2.85%
0.48%
0.22%
0.65%
15.89%
11.32%
3.03%5.90%
0.00%
1.69%
0.30%
3.58%
3.42% 0.10%
1.92%
1.23%
1.87%
2.21%
6.16%
2.21%
0.54%
2.13%
0.20%
2.38%
0.25%
1.83%
3.52%
0.10% 3.47%4.16%
2.76%
0.00%
0.64%
3.12%
0.50%
1.22%
1.84%11.94%
4.22%
12.90%
22.73%22.73%
December 2011
July 2011
Infrastructure
- DNS or
- Web or
- E-mail or
- NTP
IPv6 Host Penetration
Low Sample
Low accuracy
SG: 25.52%SG: 25.52%
HK: 2.61%
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 28
Asia Data snapshot
0.94%
0.16%
0.99%0.95%
1.83%
0.46%
0.14%
0.69%
4.29%
11.76%
3.03%1.03%
0.00%
0.23%
0.30%
4.46%
0.88% 0.11%
3.70%
1.23%
0.48%
1.44%
1.14%
0.38%
0.14%
1.17%
0.15%
1.49%
0.13%
0.28%
4.69%
0.11% 0.91%0.97%
1.77%
0.00%
0.65%
3.12%
0.38%
1.22%
3.57%11.21%
1.24%
3.49%
50.00%50.00%
December 2011
July 2011
IPv6 Host Penetration
Web only
Low Sample
Low accuracy
SG: 0.00%SG: 0.65%
HK: 0.71%
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 29
IPv6 Host Penetration
Infrastructure
- DNS or
- Web or
- E-mail or
- NTP
(*) Low Sample
Low accuracy
Country DNS+WEB+E-mail+NTP % change
July 2011 Dec 2011
Singapore 25.52% 31.32% 5.80%
Armenia (*) 15.89% 12.90% -2.99%
Sri Lanka (*) 11.32% 11.94% 0.62%
Indonesia 5.90% 6.16% 0.26%
Malaysia 3.42% 4.22% 0.80%
New Zealand 3.65% 4.16% 0.51%
Philippines (*) 3.58% 3.52% -0.06%
Australia 3.80% 3.47% -0.33%
Oman (*) 3.03% 3.12% 0.09%
Saudi Arabia (*) 2.85% 2.76% -0.09%
Hong Kong 2.61%
Taiwan 2.21% 2.38% 0.17%
Thailand 1.87% 2.21% 0.34%
Russia 2.02% 2.13% 0.11%
Qatar (*) 1.92% 1.84% -0.08%
Japan 1.69% 1.83% 0.14%
Pakistan 1.23% 1.22% -0.01%
United Arab Emirates (*) 0.65% 0.64% -0.01%
India 0.22% 0.54% 0.32%
Iran 0.48% 0.50% 0.02%
South Korea 0.30% 0.25% -0.05%
China 0.18% 0.20% 0.02%
Vietnam (*) 0.10% 0.10% 0.00%
Kuwait (*) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 30
IPv6 Host Penetration
Web only
(*) Low Sample
Low accuracy
Country WEB % change
July 2011 Dec 2011
Sri Lanka (*) 11.76% 11.21% -0.55%
Philippines (*) 4.46% 4.69% 0.23%
Qatar (*) 3.70% 3.57% -0.13%
Armenia (*) 4.29% 3.49% -0.80%
Oman (*) 3.03% 3.12% 0.09%
Saudi Arabia (*) 1.83% 1.77% -0.06%
Taiwan 1.44% 1.49% 0.05%
Malaysia 0.88% 1.24% 0.36%
Pakistan 1.23% 1.22% -0.01%
Russia 0.94% 1.17% 0.23%
Indonesia 1.03% 1.14% 0.11%
New Zealand 0.95% 0.97% 0.02%
Australia 0.99% 0.91% -0.08%
Hong Kong 0.71% 0.71%
United Arab Emirates (*) 0.69% 0.65% -0.04%
Singapore 0.00% 0.65% 0.65%
Thailand 0.48% 0.38% -0.10%
Iran 0.46% 0.38% -0.08%
Japan 0.23% 0.28% 0.05%
China 0.16% 0.15% -0.01%
India 0.14% 0.14% 0.00%
South Korea 0.30% 0.13% -0.17%
Vietnam (*) 0.11% 0.11% 0.00%
Kuwait (*) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 31
Asia Trends
� Singapore still leading by far in infrastructure but trailing in dual-stack Web Site content
� China results abnormally very low – content not dual stacked or IPv6 behind firewall?
� India also low both in infrastructure and most popular Web sites with dual stack
� Less reliability of results due to smaller sample size in many countries of the region
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 32
Africa Data snapshot
36.24%
16.67%
6.64%
10.20%
0.84%0.96%
10.20%
7.42%
36.61%
9.52%
December 2011
July 2011
Infrastructure
- DNS or
- Web or
- E-mail or
- NTP
IPv6 Host Penetration
Low Sample
Low accuracy
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 33
Africa Data snapshot
0.00%
10.00%
2.63%
14.29%
0.33%0.41%
14.29%
2.78%
0.00%
10.00%
December 2011
July 2011
IPv6 Host Penetration
Web only
Low Sample
Low accuracy
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 34
IPv6 Host Penetration
Infrastructure
- DNS or
- Web or
- E-mail or
- NTP
(*) Low Sample
Low accuracy
The small number of hosts tested make the results
for most of Africa appear higher than they really are
Country DNS+WEB+E-mail+NTP % change
July 2011 Dec 2011
Tunisia (*) 36.24% 36.61% 0.37%
Tanzania (*) 10.20% 10.20% 0.00%
Senegal (*) 16.67% 9.52% -7.15%
Kenya (*) 6.64% 7.42% 0.78%
South Africa 0.84% 0.96% 0.12%
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 35
IPv6 Host Penetration
Web only
(*) Low Sample
Low accuracy
The small number of hosts tested make the results
for most of Africa appear higher than they really are
Country WEB % change
July 2011 Dec 2011
Tanzania (*) 14.29% 14.29% 0.00%
Senegal (*) 10.00% 10.00% 0.00%
Kenya (*) 2.63% 2.78% 0.15%
South Africa 0.33% 0.41% 0.08%
Tunisia (*) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 36
Africa Trends
� Very few countries with IPv6
connectivity
� Dual Stack Islands starting to appear
� Can be compared with the growth of
Internet connectivity in the nineties
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 37
Compare Historical data on
African Internet Connectivity
June 1994 May 1997
Source: Internetology - http://www.nsrc.org/codes/bymap/ntlgy/ntlgy.htm
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 38
North/South America
0.53%
2.32%0.93%
2.22%
4.79%
December 2011
Infrastructure
- DNS or
- Web or
- E-mail or
- NTP
IPv6 Host Penetration
Low Sample
Low accuracy
100.00%
4.05%
5.33%
0.48%
3.70%
PR: 7.14%
0.30%
3.57%
July 2011
2.42%
5.81%3.12%
PR: 6.25%
4.27%
100.00%
0.84%
2.45%
0.30%
1.93%
5.41%
0.49%
0.56%
0.56%0.57%
2.63%0.00%
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 39
North/South America
0.97%
1.36%0.29%
0.54%
0.19%
IPv6 Host Penetration
Low Sample
Low accuracy
0.00%
1.79%
5.11%
0.24%
1.80%
PR: 7.14%
Web only
0.34%
0.26%
PR: 6.25%
1.85%
1.34%
0.86%
0.00%
0.23%
6.38%
0.49%2.68%0.00%
2.44%
0.31%0.31%
July 2011
December 2011
0.54%0.56%
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 40
For (*) the small number of hosts tested make the results
in many countries appear higher than they really are
IPv6 Host Penetration
Infrastructure
- DNS or
- Web or
- E-mail or
- NTP
(*) Low Sample
Low accuracy
Country DNS+WEB+E-mail+NTP % change
July 2011 Dec 2011
Guatemala (*) 100.00% 100.00% 0.00%
Puerto Rico (*) 6.25% 7.24% 0.99%
United States 4.79% 5.81% 1.02%
Uruguay (*) 5.33% 5.41% 0.08%
Venezuela (*) 4.27% 4.05% -0.22%
Ecuador (*) 2.45% 3.70% 1.25%
Cuba (*) 3.12% 3.57% 0.45%
Peru (*) 0.00% 2.63% 2.63%
Canada 2.22% 2.42% 0.20%
Brasil 1.93% 2.32% 0.39%
Panama (*) 0.84% 0.93% 0.09%
Chile 0.56% 0.57% 0.01%
Mexico 0.56% 0.53% -0.03%
Argentina 0.48% 0.49% 0.01%
Colombia (*) 0.30% 0.30% 0.00%
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 41
For (*) the small number of hosts tested make the results
in many countries appear higher than they really are
IPv6 Host Penetration
Web only
(*) Low Sample
Low accuracy
Country WEB % change
July 2011 Dec 2011
Puerto Rico (*) 6.25% 7.14% 0.89%
Ecuador (*) 1.80% 6.38% 4.58%
Uruguay (*) 2.68% 2.68% 0.00%
Peru (*) 0.00% 2.44% 2.44%
Venezuela (*) 1.79% 1.85% 0.06%
Brasil 1.34% 1.36% 0.02%
Mexico 0.97% 0.86% -0.11%
Chile 0.54% 0.56% 0.02%
Canada 0.34% 0.54% 0.20%
Colombia (*) 0.31% 0.31% 0.00%
Panama (*) 0.23% 0.29% 0.06%
Argentina 0.28% 0.24% -0.04%
United States 0.26% 0.19% -0.07%
Guatemala (*) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Cuba (*) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 42
America Trends
� USA leads in infrastructure but low on dual Stack Web site.Results of IPv6 Day on infrastructure itself?
� Brazil leading in Latin America
� Low percentage of IPv6 Web Sites across the region shows little impact of IPv6 day (June 8)
� Elsewhere, data based on low number of Web sites, needs to be taken in moderation (the restricted number of hosting providers can make figures jump several percentage points)
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 43
Worldwide Trends
� We are seeing a slow growth in dual stack IPv4-IPv6 implementation
� The June 8th IPv6 Day appears to have had more impact in several European Countries than elsewhere
� A decrease in percentage in some countries, points to unstable peering agreements (the IPv6 network is less closely meshed than the IPv4 network)
� Bearing in mind the Asia Pacific Regional Internet Registry has run out of IPv4 addresses, it is alarming to see so few Web sites up and running IPv6 in that region, especially in countries where Internet growth is high, such as in India.
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 44
Problems / Possible Errors
� Lots of errors in the DNS – commas, no A, no AAAA record, looping MX, etc.
� Firewalls and security software:
� Blocking of network segments
� detecting denial of service attack (DoS) by error:
• Unusual UDP traffic. Trace-path / ping, SMTP, HTTP, Secure HTTP, NTP port testing.
� Internet snapshot from one location only
� Less accurate results with small input data size (small number of domains tested)
� Disputed accuracy of Geographical IP database
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 45
Example: fake IPv6 AAAA record
� Country specific results? /P2
� (examples from the report / finding
errors etc.)
Perform a search for ipv6 field starting with ::ffff
These “ipv6” addresses are AAAA records
which pretend to denote an IPv6 address,
but are actually IPv4 addresses.
There are plenty of examples of such mis-
configuration in the DNS.
Worse problems are caused by commas in domain
names, ie. www.domain,com as well as IP
addresses returning localhost 127.0.0.1 or ::1 etc.
Comma!
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 46
Machine readable output
Command directly to SQL database
http://www.ipv6matrix.org:4444/getTable?crawl=2010-07-18_12-24-48&tld=com&table=WWW_com
It is therefore possible to use an entirely new user interface with the back end database
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 47
Future work / funding required
� Add more domains to be tested
� Add more features to be tested
� Current front end Web Pages are only an example of possible analysis
� Develop new data visualisation
� Perform further analysis
� Perform historical/time analysis from archives
� Develop an engine to write automated reports
� Duplicate Crawler to other regions
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 48
World IPv6 Launch
� Major Internet service providers (ISPs), home networking
equipment manufacturers, and web companies around the world
are coming together to permanently enable IPv6 for their products and services.
� Target: 6 June 2012
� http://www.worldipv6launch.org
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 49
Thank you
CTMInternational
Contact: ISOC England – contact@isoc-e.org
Recommended