The shape of brand conversations

1

The shape of brand conversations

Kyle FindlayHead of Data Science & Knowledge CreationThe TNS Global Brand Equity Centre

Winner of the Best Methodological Paper award at the 2015 ESOMAR Congress conference in Dublin, Ireland

2

We connect users that interact with each other into a “conversation map”

3

We end up with conversation maps that look like this(this is the picture for the market research category on Twitter)

4

Hub-and-spoke Spin-off Ecosystem

Centralised De-centralised

We’ve found that the “shapes” of conversation maps tend to sit on a continuum from centralised-decentralised

Brand conversations

5

6Source: Mayweather vs. Pacquiao fight (Q1 2015)

Sport Center’s account during the Mayweather-Pacquiao is an example of a hub-and-spoke ‘shape’

7Source: Mayweather vs. Pacquiao fight (Q1 2015)

Shallow calls to actions like these lead to sharing but not two-way conversation:

8Source: Ford North America footprint (May-June 2015)

The following two week slice of converations around the Ford brand give us a good example of a decentralised brand ecosystem

9Source: Ford North America footprint (June 2015)

Parent brand

EnthusiastsVariant brand

Ford has an organic ecosystem around its brand made up of multiple distinct constituencies

Campaign conversations

10

11

B

A

B

Two competing campaigns; one based on a single influencer (B), the other based on an ecosystem of accounts (A)…

12

FootballerB

Musician

Campaign account

Musician Brand account

Music promoterA

B

A

B

It’s easier to understand Campaign A’s strategy if we summarise their ecosystem in diagram form…

13

Bud’s “Lost Puppy” ad from Superbowl 2015 received the most retweets out of all the 70+ Superbowl ads

14

It is a great example of a centralised, hub-and-spoke shape…

15Source: Super Bowl (Feb 2015)

But if we look at it’s shape, it’s very centralised with little organic conversation around it

NOTE: If Bud’s goal was to simply update existing associations with the brand (i.e. a “maintenance strategy”), it likely succeeded. If the goal was to draw in new users and/or change perceptions, it probably could have done more.

16Source: Super Bowl (Feb 2015)

The ad was very emotive and thus was widely shared but it lacked relevance to beer and so did not encourage much organic conversation

17Source: Oscars (Q1 2015)

+ =

Lego partnered with artists, Nathan Sawayan, to present Oscar winners with trophies made out of Lego

18Source: Oscars (Q1 2015)

The resulting conversation map was very de-centralised, likely due to the campaign’s good mix of novelty, emotion and relevance

In summary

19

20

Hub-and-spoke Spin-off Ecosystem

Centralised De-centralised

Conversation maps sit on a continuum: as the conversation becomes more organic, we move from a centralised broadcasting shape to a more decentralised ecosystem of conversations

21

It’s a balance

Centralised messaging controls the conversation BUT also tends to be a bit boring.

One-directional broadcasting might help update brand associations

Can engaged conversations more strongly affect perceptions?

De-centralised creates sustained engagement

…BUT too de-centralised makes it difficult to lead conversation

Centralised De-centralised

Different shapes play different roles…

22

Tap into enthusiast communities

Copy in spokespeople where appropriate

How does one create a social ecosystem?

23

Strategically @mention influencers & spokespeople to access their communities

Strategic use of hashtags to bind/extend conversations

But, most importantly… [next slide]

@

#

How does one tap into multiple constituencies?

24

…spur on two-way conversation

Start real conversations

Rather than just one-way sharing…

25

Start real conversations

Any model of virality will tell you that emotion/valence/ affective stimuli gets shared….

+

…EBUT emotional + relevant content gets shared and talked about organically!

26

Thank youOckert Janse van Rensburg Tanweer Fareed

Acknowledgements