Building a low carbon economy

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

In this presentation, Faithful+Gould's Sean Lockie discusses the main drivers for investing in sustainable building solutions. He cites examples of clients that are benefiting from improvements in energy efficiency, health and safety, and performance. This presentation was originally delivered in October 2013. Read more: http://www.atkinsglobal.com/en-GB/media-centre/events/atkins-lectures/2013/building-a-low-carbon-economy

Citation preview

Building a low carbon economy

Chinese media delegation briefing

Sean Lockie, director of

sustainability, Faithful+Gould

11 October 2013

A framework for sustainability

Energy

Carbon

Waste

Water

Ecology

Comfort

Drivers

Cost Compliance

CSR Customer

Sustainability

Drivers - Cost

● Energy costs 25 per cent of total business cost

● Energy costs increasing

● Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of circa 40 per cent on some projects

● Changing business case (valuations, rentals, voids)

● Costs of techs coming down.

Cost Compliance

CSR Customer

Sustainability

Drivers - Compliance

● Energy Act 80 per cent by 2050

● Carbon budgets

● Carbon Reduction Commitment

● Mandatory reporting

● 2016 / 2019

● Faithful+Gould rated buildings 2018.

Cost Compliance

CSR Customer

Sustainability

Risks - unsustainable traits

Savings are available

Hospital Office Restaurant

Hotel Shopping Centre School

Source: Siemens Building Technologies 2012

Drivers - CSR

● Productivity

● Health

● Carbon footprint

● CSR strategies required certain investment funds

● Local jobs

● Voluntary reporting – CDP, GRI, GRESB etc.

Cost Compliance

CSR Customer

Sustainability

The business case is there

Source: WGBC 2013

And it’s not just a label

Valuations > rental > demand > voids > brown discount > green premium

Drivers - Customer demand

● Increasing amount of labelling

● Leading players aggressive targets

● Labelling of products.

Cost Compliance

CSR Customer

Sustainability

Atkins' turnkey energy

efficiency solution How it works

Client advantages

● Atkins designs, finances, installs and maintains the systems

● Atkins’ costs are repaid through the energy savings

● Reduce overall client operation cost

● Risks and responsibilities are rested on Atkins

● No upfront costs or investment for the client.

Identification of opportunities

Full investment grade proposal

Detailed design

Agree M&V strategy

Install & PM energy conservation

measures

Implement M&V

Ongoing guarantee of energy savings

Survey

Funding

Design

Maintenance

‘Energy

performance

contract’

Installation

The process

How can we be certain

technologies will pay back?

saved per year

34,000tCO2

Salix finance

£750m

9000

143 funds established

saved over project lifetimes

projects in 662 organisations

“A government fund

for the public sector ”

Technology Typical payback

LED lighting – lamp retrofit 4 to 5 years

LED lighting – complete luminaire upgrade 6 to 7 years

Building fabric insulation 3 to 10 years

Building management system upgrades 3 to 4 years

Combined heat & power (cogeneration) 5 years

Boiler replacements 4 to 5 years

Heating zoning and controls 3 years

Free cooling 4 years

Motor variable speed drives 3 years

Technologies and paybacks / Salix

UK case study - Frimley Park hospital

3.5 £3m

£900k loan for 17 EE projects

years payback

lifetime savings

UK case study – Marks & Spencer

Faithful+Gould is undertaking an in-depth Post Occupancy Evaluation (POE) of

Marks & Spencer’s (M&S) second largest store at Cheshire Oaks near Chester.

This prestigious new study is part of an extensive £8 million programme funded by the

Technology Strategy Board (TSB) designed to deliver more efficient, better performing buildings.

Post occupancy evaluation

Source: Marks and Spencer

Post occupancy evaluation

Source: Marks and Spencer

Post occupancy evaluation

Source: Marks and Spencer

China case study Confidential technology company

Production facility in Suzhou

2,500m² production area

24 hour operation

Injection machines

High-speed stamping.

• Poor HVAC design for production

area with insufficient cooling

capacity and distribution

• High energy consuming metal

halide lighting

• No use of free heating energy

from production waste heat for

heating offices in winter

• No energy monitoring system

• No effective maintenance

programme.

Problems

• New chillers and free cooling

• Re-design of HVAC System in

production & office areas

• Implementation of power meter

monitoring system (PMMS) to

improve equipment reliability and

energy consumption efficiency

• New lighting

• China and UK skills and products

used.

What we did

15% 36

£300k savings in 3 years

energy saving

The results

month ROI

Concluding themes

● Business case is changing

● Regulation and targets are getting tougher

● Importance of good data (evidence)

● New technologies.

For more information contact

Sean Lockie

sean.lockie@atkinsglobal.com

Celebrating 75 years of

design, engineering and

project management

excellence.

www.atkinsglobal.com