Technologies for Anaerobic Digestion of Flushed Swine Manure

Preview:

Citation preview

Douglas W. Hamilton, Ph.D., P.E.

Associate Professor

Waste Management Specialist

Mixed and

Heated

effluentinfluent

Volume in ≈ Volume out

Bio

gas

Mixed and

Heated

effluentinfluent

Volume in ≈ Volume out

Bio

gas

Volume of Reactor

Volume Leaving Daily

HRT

Mixed and

Heated

effluentinfluent

Volume in ≈ Volume out

Bio

gas

Mass of Solids in Reactor

Mass of Solids Leaving Daily

SRT

Mixed and

Heated

effluentinfluent

Volume in ≈ Volume out

Bio

gas

SRT = HRT

~3% TS Manure

HRT = 18 to 20 days

0.22 to 0.25 m3 CH4 kg-1 VS

Fisher et al., 1979Schulte, et al., 1985Zhang, et al., 1990

“pull plug” barns

Sow Farm c Offsite Nursery

60 L per sow - day

< 1% TS Manure

Flushed Swine Manure

HRT = 60 daysSRT ~ 10 years0.16 m3 CH4 kg-1 VS

Cowley, 2015

Mixed and

Heated

effluentinfluent

Volume in ≈ Volume out

Bio

gas

SRT > HRT

Manure Inflow

Manure Solids

Manure Liquids

Solid – Liquid

Separator

Effluent OutflowRecycled

Effluent

Packed

Digester

Column

Biogas Recovery

Manure Inflow

Manure Solids

Manure Liquids

Solid – Liquid

Separator

Effluent OutflowRecycled

Effluent

Packed

Digester

Column

Biogas Recovery

HRT = 6 days

0.43 m3 CH4 kg-1 VS

Hashheider and Sievers, 1984

Biogas Recovery

Recycled

EffluentEffluent Outflow

Screened Manure Inflow

Sludge Blanket

HRT = 1 day~0.5 m3 CH4 kg-1 VS

Kalyuzhni et al., 1998

Biogas Recovery

Recycled

EffluentEffluent Outflow

Screened Manure Inflow

Sludge Blanket

MaManure Liquids

HRT = 2 to 5 day

0.48 m3 CH4 kg-1 VS

Cobb and Hill, 1989

Chen and Liu, 2002

Biogas Recovery

Recycled

EffluentEffluent Outflow

Screened Manure Inflow

Sludge Blanket

Manure

Inflow

Effluent

Outflow

Fill React Settle Decant

HRT = 5 days

0.46 m3 CH4 kg-1 VS

Sung and Dague, 1995

Zhang et al., 1997

Angenent et al., 2002

Ndegwa et al., 2005

Manure

Inflow

Effluent

Outflow

Fill React Settle Decant

Hamilton and Steele, 2014

1.98 m

2.59 m

3.20 m

3.75 m

V3V2

V1

V4

P2 P3 P4

P5

ML Sampling

HE

Equalization Tank ASBR

Sludge Withdraw

Influent Sampling

Lift Station 1

P1

Flushed Manure

Lagoon Effluent

Decanted Effluent

400 m3

“Run of Farm” Conditions

Manure

20 m3 day-1

0.64% VS

20 Day HRT

400 m3

“Run of Farm” Conditions

Manure

20 m3 day-1

0.64% VS

20 Day HRT

Decant

20 m3 day-1

0.24% VS

400 m3

0.41% VS

“Run of Farm” Conditions

Manure

20 m3 day-1

0.64% VS

20 Day HRT

51 Day SRT

Decant

20 m3 day-1

0.24% VS

400 m3

0.41% VS

“Run of Farm” Conditions

Manure

20 m3 day-1

0.64% VS

20 Day HRT

51 Day SRT

Decant

20 m3 day-1

0.24% VS

400 m3

0.41% VS

0.55 m3 CH4 kg-1 VS

“Run of Farm” Conditions

Manure

20 m3 day-1

0.64% VS

20 Day HRT

51 Day SRT

Decant

20 m3 day-1

0.24% VS

400 m3

0.41% VS

0.55 m3 CH4 kg-1 VS

0.18 m3 CH4 m-3 reactor day-1

“Optimum” Conditions

Manure

19.8 m3 day-1

0.64% VS

5 Day HRT

341 m3

Lagoon Effluent

48.4 m3 day-1

0.03% VS

“Optimum” Conditions

Manure

19.8 m3 day-1

0.64% VS

5 Day HRT

26 Day SRT

Decant

68.2 m3 day-1

0.11% VS

341 m3

0.48% VS

Lagoon Effluent

48.4 m3 day-1

0.03% VS

“Optimum” Conditions

Manure

19.8 m3 day-1

0.64% VS

5 Day HRT

26 Day SRT

Decant

68.2 m3 day-1

0.11% VS

341 m3

0.48% VS

0.38 m3 CH4 kg-1 VS

0.18 m3 CH4 m-3 reactor day-1

Lagoon Effluent

48.4 m3 day-1

0.03% VS

Correctly Sized Reactor

Manure

20 m3 day-1

0.30% VS

6 Day HRT

60 Day SRT

Decant

20 m3 day-1

0.09% VS

120 m3

0.54% VS

0.55 m3 CH4 kg-1 VS

0.70 m3 CH4 m-3 reactor day-1

Sludge

?

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

10/14/2010 10/28/2010 11/11/2010 11/25/2010 12/9/2010

Cu

mm

ula

tive G

as P

rod

ucti

on (l b

iog

as)

Date

0.5 % Vol/Vol Glycerol

Control

(405) 744-7089

dhamilt@okstate.edu

http://osuwastemanage.bae.okstate.edu/

YouTube: OSUWasteManagement

Twitter: OSUWasteManage

Recommended