View
791
Download
0
Category
Tags:
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
Sustainable Development Using Vertical Farms
Citation preview
Grow Up, Grow Smart 1
Grow Up, Grow Smart:
Sustainable Development Using Vertical Farms
Mohammad Beheshtaein
Jacob Deline
Craig Hyatt
Wilson Tsan
Chris Slafter
UNVS 196D
Professor Quill
December 5, 2008
Grow Up, Grow Smart 2
Table of Contents
Page
Introduction 4
Section I. Sustainability and vertical farms 5
A. The general problem of sustainability 5
B. Sustainability and agriculture 6
Section II. Problems with current methods of farming 7
A. How is it unsustainable? 8
1. Soil 8
2. Water 10
3. Energy and Transportation 11
B. Urban farming 11
1. Vertical farms boost crop yield 12
2. Vertical farms make water use sustainable 13
3. Vertical farms improve waste management and distribution 14
Section III. How vertical farms will help San Jose State University 15
A. Spartan Dining's current environmental and business practices 15
B. Green rooftops and vertical farms are the next step for SJSU 16
C. Our proposed model 18
Section IV. Integration of a vertical farm into the San Jose State University campus 19
A. Potential structure sizes 19
B. Proposed structure locations 21
Grow Up, Grow Smart 3
C. Estimated construction timeline 23
Section V. The nutritional benefits of eating healthy 23
A. Eating healthy is good for you both physically and mentally 24
Conclusion 29
References 30
Grow Up, Grow Smart 4
Introduction
Our purpose is to examine, in the words of Thomas Friedman, what we can “do in
response to the truly massive challenge that we face to preserve the natural world that has been
bequeathed to us.”1 San Jose State has a long history of innovation and progress. Our plan is to
continue San Jose State University’s history of innovation by growing vegetables and fruits on
campus for use by the campus. We will utilize once unused land while taking advantage of
sustainable practices. Our proposal is to begin with rooftop gardens and then progress to
constructing a vertical farm on campus.
Our ultimate goal is to demonstrate the utility of vertical farms and develop their usage in
San Jose and beyond. This urban farming technique offers many benefits including: sustainable
farming techniques, low cost food production, a new sense of civic pride, more nutritious eating
habits, and an innovative plan that could make SJSU and San Jose an even better place to live,
work and play.
Beyond these benefits, we feel that urban farming offers San Jose a chance to
systemically address the problems facing the environment and the community. We do not aim
merely at a solution to fix an isolated problem. By asking San Jose to accept our proposal we are
giving San Jose the opportunity to embark on a path of real change. Already, we have garnered
support from Associated Students, Spartan Dining, and Professor Mathur. A change in behavior
will go a long way toward finding solutions to our environmental problems. John Gardner, the
founder of Common Cause, remarked that, “today’s energy – climate challenge is a series of
great opportunities disguised as insoluble problems”.2
1 Friedman, Thomas L. Hot, Flat, and Crowded. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York. 2008. Pg 397.2 Ibid. 170.
Grow Up, Grow Smart 5
Section I. Sustainability and vertical farms
The purpose of our paper is to clearly define the problem with which the human species
is confronted and to offer an answer. The proposed solution to this problem will be a proactive
approach that addresses the issue systemically rather than an approach that only addresses
technical problems as they arise. Solutions which solve individual technical problems do not
address the core issue. An examination of the history of how western thought3 has come to
understand the relationship between the human species and nature will reveal that the western
outlook has lead to the creation of methods of production that are not sustainable. A lack of
sustainability is the systemic problem that we are faced with and any proposed solution to the
myriad problems facing the human species needs to address this directly. This lack of
sustainability needs to be addressed first conceptually, and then at a technical level.
A. The general problem of sustainability
Our civilization cannot currently provide for itself without utterly exhausting the natural
resources that it uses. Derrick Jensen notes:
Industrial fishing practices have decimated every one of the world’sbiggest and most economically important species of fish….Fully 90 percent ofeach of the world’s large ocean species, including cod, halibut, tuna, swordfish,and marlin, have disappeared from the world’s oceans in recentdecades….[F]ishing has become so efficient that it typically takes just 15 years toremove 80 percent or more of any species unlucky enough to become the focus ofa fleet’s attention.4
The Earth’s resources are finite; therefore, we must live in a manner that is sustainable.
According to Jensen, a lifestyle “is sustainable if it does not damage the capacity of the landbase
3 We say ‘western thought’ because though there are many other ways of life, the way of life determined by western thought hasbecome the dominant paradigm in the world. Therefore, if we are going to address problems that have arisen within our culturewe need to discuss how our world view came to be.4 Jensen, Derrick. Endgame. Seven Stories Press, 2006. 235-236.
Grow Up, Grow Smart 6
to support its members.”5 From a western perspective, the practice of unsustainably gathering
resources has its roots in how the relationship between human beings and nature has been
defined.
Clive Ponting, author of A New Green History of the World: the Environment and the
Collapse of Great Civilizations, discusses the history of how human beings have articulated their
relationship to nature. According to Ponting, there is a tendency to place human beings in a
position of privilege over nature; nature is seen as a resource to be used. Classical Greek thought,
Judeo-Christian thought, modern economics, science, and philosophy have all given weight to
arguments in support of anthropocentrism. Within these systems of thought, the unrestrained use
of natural resources has been justified and encouraged. Human beings now find themselves in a
position where their civilizations are using more resources than the natural world can provide.
Derrick Jensen points out, in Endgame, that this is evidenced by the historical fact that every
civilization, with the exception of hunter-gatherer communities, imports its resources once it has
exhausted the resources immediately available to it. “[C]ities must import resources, a process
also known as conquest, colonialism, and these days, the global economy.”6
B. Sustainability and agriculture
As an example, the agricultural industry currently does not preserve the very natural
systems upon which it depends. Global growth is causing more land and resources to be used for
agricultural purposes. Friedman notes that “Global growth is driving up commodity prices,
prompting companies to put more land under agricultural cultivation for food, fiber, and
biofuels”.7 In an echo of Ponting’s statement that the problems we face cannot be solved by
simply coming up with new resources or technological fixes, Thomas Friedman in his book, Hot,
5 Ibid, 233.6 Ibid, 104.
Grow Up, Grow Smart 7
Flat, and Crowded, points out that this lack of a systemic approach to the problem of resources
“is why we need a strong ethic on conservation. There have to be limits to how much and where
we encroach on the natural world.”8 If we do not approach the problem in this manner “we will
continue to lurch from single response to single-issue response – without ever developing a
systematic approach”.9 The lack of resources is the problem facing the agricultural industry and
it is emblematic of the problem facing all aspects of our civilization. However, there is another
way to grow as a population and a civilization. Among, and in conjunction with, other solutions
“you can grow more food per acre”10, says Friedman.
Section II. The problems with current methods of farming
Citizens of the developed nations enjoy a wide range of foods. It is not until a detailed
look at the resources and systems needed, before the food even arrives into a person’s kitchen
that we begin to understand the enormous effect food has on industrial infrastructures and on the
environment. Environmental experts Paul Hawken, Amory Lovins and L. Hunter Lovins in their
book Natural Capitalism, point out the inefficiency and linearity of conventional agriculture
lifecycle, from the use of raw material to the method in which food waste is disposed of.
Pioneers such as Dickson Despommier of Columbia University have too, noted these inefficiencies by the agricultural industry, and
developed a new system called a Vertical Farm, that can be non-polluting, energy efficient, and
an overall more effective way of feeding people. This new system of food production and
distribution can be the counter to the perilous method of agriculture that we have grown used to.
To understand the benefits of a Vertical Farm, we must first look at the techniques of modern
agriculture.
A. Current Methods 6 Friedman, Thomas L. Hot, Flat, and Crowded. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York. 2008. Pg., 148.7 Ibid, 148.10 Ibid, 70.
Grow Up, Grow Smart 8
1. Soil
According to J. P. Kimmins in Forest Ecology: a Foundation for Sustainable
Management, soil is “those upper layers of the unconsolidated surface of the landscape that
provide forest plants with the following necessities: water, nutrients, and a firm anchorage”.11
Samples of “healthy” soil can reveal two types of nutrients: primary nutrients and secondary
nutrients. Primary nutrients include nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium which is scarce in the
beginning of a plant’s growing stage. This is because the plant uses a large amount of these
nutrients in the beginning, to grow and survive. As the plant matures, the absorption of primary
nutrients decline and eventually, a state of homeostasis is reached between the plant and the
soil.12 The problem, however, begins when a farmer decides to grow a single species of crops, in
large amounts, also known as a monoculture.
Year after year of growing the same crop will eventually render the soil to be non-arable.
To counter this, conventional farming methods add chemical fertilizers primarily consisting of
nitrogen, phosphorous, and potassium to “replenish” the soil nutrients. However, commercial
fertilizers focus on only primary nutrients, but do not provide much else in regards to the
secondary nutrients. This practice oversimplifies the biochemistry of the soil, which will
eventually diminish the soil’s ability to retain water and allow for a healthy microbe
population.13 The inability to retain and filter water by the soil has led to various water
pollutions, as exemplified by the creation of a Dead Zone in the Gulf of Mexico due to fertilizer
11 Dr. James, Danoff-Burg A. "The Terrestrial Influence: Geology and Soils." SEE-U: Module 10. 2000. Columbia University. 29Nov. 2008 <http://www.columbia.edu/itc/cerc/seeu/atlantic/restrict/modules/module10_content.html>.
12, 3 "Plant Nutrients." Mineral Nutrients & Soil. North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services. 29 Nov.2008 <http://www.agr.state.nc.us/cyber/kidswrld/plant/nutrient.htm>.
Grow Up, Grow Smart 9
run off by nearby farms into the Mississippi River.14 A Dead Zone is a body of water where algal
growth is increased by the nitrogen-rich fertilizer runoffs enough to where it depletes the area of
any oxygen, rendering it uninhabitable for fishes, plants, and other types of organisms.15 In
addition to polluting water, cultivating monocultures also cause farmlands to be non-arable. Soil
that is not replenished naturally, with the right combination of components is susceptible to
erosion. According to a study from Cornell University, “around the world, soil is being swept
and washed away 10 to 40 times faster than it is being replenished, destroying cropland the size
of Indiana every year...”16 which leads to, “60-80% of farmland around the world is ‘moderately
to seriously degraded’ and harmful to agricultural productivity”.17 Soil erosion reduces the
amount of arable land for farming which can prove to be disastrous because as populations
around the world increase, the demand for food will also increase.18
In order to meet food demands, agribusinesses have chosen to develop monocultures
because of its ability to produce high volumes of crops.19 However, one of the residual effects of
a single-crop farm is pests.
The single-crop mentality both ignores natures’ tendency to foster diversity andworsens the ancient battle against pests. Monocultures are rare in nature, in partbecause they create paradises for plant diseases and insects – as science writerJanine Benyus puts it, they are like equipping a burglar with the keys to everyhouse in the neighborhood.20
14 Susan, Lang S. "Soil erosion threat." Chronicle Online. 20 Mar. 2006. Cornell University. 30 Nov. 2008<http://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/march06/soil.erosion.threat.ssl.html>.15 "Dead Zone in the Ocean." Harm From Conventional Farming. 2004. Om Organics. Nov.-Dec. 2008<http://www.omorganics.org/page.php?pageid=90>.16Susan, Lang S. "Soil erosion threat." Chronicle Online. 20 Mar. 2006. Cornell University. 30 Nov. 2008<http://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/march06/soil.erosion.threat.ssl.html>.17 "Degraded Soil" Harm From Conventional Farming. 2004. Om Organics. Nov.-Dec. 2008<http://www.omorganics.org/page.php?pageid=90>.8, 9 Despommier, Dickson. "The Vertical Farm Essay I." Vertical Farm-Essays. 2008. The Vertical Farm Project. 28 Nov. 2008<http://www.verticalfarm.com/vfessay1.aspx>.
20 Hawken, Paul, Amory Lovins, and L. Hunter Lovins. Natural Capitalism. New York, NY: Bay Back Books, 1999. 195.
Grow Up, Grow Smart 10
The manifestation of pests has led agribusinesses to resort to using pesticides. The unexpected
effect, however, is that using pesticides frequently actually helps pest species to evolve to be
more resilient “as most pesticides tend to affect the weaker pests, thereby leaving the stronger,
more resilient pests alive to reproduce.”21 Farmers in return will use more quantities or more
toxic forms of pesticides to kill those pests, which creates a cycle of stronger pests and increase
potency chemicals.
2. Water
Studies found in Natural Capitalism revealed that conventional methods of watering have
led farms to be the number one leading cause of water waste, in the United States.
Agriculture is responsible for about twice as much of total U.S. water withdrawalsas all buildings, industry, and mining combined. It accounted for 81 percent of all1995 consumptive use. Eighty-eight percent of the nation’s 1995 irrigation waterwent to 17 western states, where the great majority of all water districts weremining groundwater faster than it was being recharged.22
What had led to this trend was not necessity or the biology of the crops, but lack of incentives to
use water efficiently because of government subsidies. A 1997 study by researchers at Cornell
University suggests that more than 50 percent of irrigation water never reaches crops because of
losses during pumping and transport.23 Current watering technology and methodology reflects
the linearity of practices in farming: The current technology is able to dispense water but not
reclaim it. Once the water is used, it is allowed to be lost because recovering it would cost more
than using newly drawn water.
3. Energy and Transportation
21 Ibid, 195.22Ibid, 214.23 Ibid, 193.
Grow Up, Grow Smart 11
The lifecycle of delivering food from a farm to a kitchen is quite significant. Most of the
energy needed in the lifecycle of getting food goes towards other areas besides the actual
cultivation of food. Two-fifths of the energy needed is used to process, package, and distribute
the food, and another two-fifths is used by the end user to refrigerate and cook the food. Only
one-fifth is actually used on the farm, in which half of that is used to apply chemicals to the
farmland.24
Hawken the Lovins note that the process to get strawberry yogurt, in Germany,
totaled to 7, 250 miles of transportation, “enough in all to bring the yogurt to Germany
from New Zealand”25 Although this case study highlights the process of Germany, the
methodology of their food processing industry is not too different from that of the United
States.
These problems associated with current farming methods can be solved by
adopting vertical farming practices.
B. Urban Farming
Our current agribusiness industries operate in a linear fashion: raw materials and
resources are used to cultivate food, the food is transported to the end user and the leftovers or
wastes from the farm and the end user are not recycled, but discarded. According to a report
done by the New York Times,
In1997, in one of the few studies of food waste, the Department of Agricultureestimated that two years before, 96.4 billion pounds of the 356 billion pounds ofedible food in the United States was never eaten. Fresh produce, milk, grainproducts and sweeteners made up two-thirds of the waste.26
24 Ibid, 193.25 Ibid, 200-201.26 Martin, Andrew. "One Country’s Table Scraps, Another Country’s Meal." NYTimes.com. 18 May 2008. The New YorkTImes. 30 Nov. 2008 <http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/18/weekinreview/18martin.html?_r=2&oref=slogin>.
Grow Up, Grow Smart 12
In order to make significant changes in food production, we must change the entire model. Paul
Hawken, Amory Lovins and Hunter Lovins put it simply in Natural Capitalism that,
Because farms are (or used to be) natural systems, they offer major opportunitiesto combine the resource-productivity first principle of natural capitalism with theloop-closing second principle.27
Part of what the authors mean by “Loop-closing”, is a design-integration strategy that reuses the
waste generated by a system, as a resource to be utilized by that system. Trying to implement
this on a conventional farm can be difficult, and does not necessarily remedy the components of
the agribusiness system that withdraws the most energy: crop cultivation, water use, and waste
management and distribution. A vertical farm can provide a way to implement these changes.
1. Vertical farms boost crop yield
One benefit that a vertical farm provides is protection of crops from external factors such
as floods, droughts, and other weather factors.28 Since the construction of a vertical farm is in a
commercial grade building; it will not be susceptible to the changes in weather. Conversely,
Despommier suggest that vertical farms equipped with a climate control system could even be
better for growing crops. In an interview with Scientific America, while refuting skepticism that
indoor crop would be subjected to genetic modification, a controversial practice of agriculture,
he also promoted the abilities of indoor climate control for crops.
None of these crops has to be modified further for life indoors. In fact, they’ll domuch better because we can match their growth characteristics with temperatureand humidity conditions and nutrition profiles.29
In addition to protecting crops from weather variability, an indoor farm will also prevent diseases
and insects infestation by virtue of being indoors and having an air system that circulates the
27 Hawken, Paul, Amory Lovins, and L. Hunter Lovins. Natural Capitalism. New York, NY: Bay Back Books, 1999. 201.28 "The Vertical Farm Project." Home Page 2008. The Vertical Farm Project. 28 Nov. 2008 <http://www.verticalfarm.com/>.29. Fischetti, Mark. "Growing Vertically." Scientific American: Earth 3.0 Sept. 2008: 74-79.
Grow Up, Grow Smart 13
indoor air with the air outdoor. Disease and insect prevention translates to an increase in overall
crop yield.
Disease already damages or destroys 13 percent of the world’s crops, insects 15percent, and weeds 12 percent; in all, two-fifths of the world’s harvest is lost inthe fields, and after some more spoils, nearly half never reaches a human mouth.30
Eliminating the issue of pests, diseases, and weeds would conversely eliminate the need for
herbicides and pesticides. Preventing crop loss due to disease and insects ultimately means a
higher yield of crops per production cycle. In the vertical farm, having a higher crop yield can be
quite significant as Despommier and his researchers propose that year-round crop production can
occur, with a possible indoor to outdoor acre ratio of 1:4 or 1:6. This means that every acre
inside a vertical farm is equivalent to 4-6 acres on a conventional, outdoor farm. Depending on
the crop, such as strawberry, Despommier and his researchers note that the ratio can be as high
as 1:30.31 An estimation of yield, as Despommier mentioned in Scientific American, is that “a 30-
story farm that covered a city block could feed 50,000 people year-round.”32 Additionally,
Despommier and his researchers mention that smarting growing techniques such as a hydroponic
system, organic farming, and diverse crop culture, the use for fertilizers are become obsolete.
2. Vertical farms make water use sustainable
Circle of Blue, a nonprofit affiliate project of the Pacific Institute noted that the benefits
vertical farms can provide for the water industry,
In present day hydroponics farms outside of Phoenix, for example, water use isabout 90 percent less than in traditional farms. Why? Because traditional outdoorfarming loses thousands of gallons of water daily to runoff, evaporation, andtranspiration — water “breathed out” by the plant’s leaves. Indoors all this wateris captured and reused. The end result is closed system, where the only waterleaving is the water in the produce itself.
30 Hawken, Paul, Amory Lovins, and L. Hunter Lovins. Natural Capitalism. New York, NY: Bay Back Books, 1999. 195.
32. Fischetti, Mark. "Growing Vertically." Scientific American: Earth 3.0 Sept. 2008: 74-79.
Grow Up, Grow Smart 14
This exemplifies the closed-loop system that is non-existent in conventional farming.
Despommier, in his website, expands on a system that could make watering a closed-loop
system. “A cold brine piping system could be engineered to aid in the condensation and
harvesting of moisture released by plants.” Additional water needed for the vertical farm can also
come from black and gray water by collecting the water of evapotranspiration.
Evapotranspiration is the process by which plants expire water as a by-product of metabolism.
This not only gives a vertical farm a double use as a water treatment facility,33 but it ultimate
means that a vertical farm system can be virtually water-self-reliant: drawing little or no water
from natural resources.
3. Vertical farms improve waste management and distribution
Despommier discusses the issue of current waste management practices:
One of the toughest challenges facing urban planners is trying to incorporate theconcept of sustainability into waste (both solid and liquid) management. Even inthe best of situations, most solid waste collections are compacted and relegated tolandfills. In a few rare instances they are incinerated to generate energy. Liquidwastes are processed, then treated with a bactericidal agent (e.g., chlorine) andreleased into the nearest body of water34
What vertical farm advocates suggest, is that food waste generated by the end user (i.e.
individuals, restaurants, and grocery stores) could be sent back to the vertical farm, where it can
be treated and broken down into compost and reused for the crops inside. In addition, a “vertical
farm [can] add energy back to the grid via methane generation from composting non-edible parts
of plants and animals”.35 A vertical farm system has the potential to not only affect the
agricultural production model, but from the example of recycling solid and liquid waste, a
second infrastructure advantage of waste management is created.
21,33 25 "The Vertical Farm Project." Home Page 2008. The Vertical Farm Project. 28 Nov. 2008 <http://www.verticalfarm.com/>.34 Despommier, Dickson. "The Vertical Farm Essay I." Vertical Farm-Essays. 2008. The Vertical Farm Project. 28 Nov. 2008<http://www.verticalfarm.com/vfessay1.aspx>.
Grow Up, Grow Smart 15
Besides the benefits of managing waste, locating a vertical farm within an urban setting
changes the conventional model of food processing and distribution. Producing food in a
building, as Despommier and his researcher suggest, will not require the use of tractors or plows,
which could significantly reduce the use of fossil fuels. Additionally, producing food in a
building and locating the building within an urban area will reduce or eliminate the need to
transport the food to the consumer.
Section III. How vertical farms will help San Jose State University
A. Spartan Dining's current environmental and business practices
Spartan Dining is a non profit organization which means the students receive fair prices
uninhibited by a desire for large profits. Spartan Dinning also has other great practices, such as:
providing nutritional facts for all food served by Spartan Dinning, using potato based plastic
containers which help the environment, sourcing local ingredients when possible, changing the
menu with the seasons to allow more local ingredients to be used, much of the food is trans fat
free to help student and faculty health, a majority of food waste is composted into fresh soil, and
waste fry oils are turned into bio-diesel.
Additionally, Spartan Dinning is currently working with the school's Nutrition Department
to provide healthier food to SJSU. Spartan Dining plans to have a fruit cart sometime in 2009 to
provide low cost fresh fruit to students. Spartan Dinning has also agreed to work with our project
to bring most fresh locally sourced foods to SJSU. Having Spartan Dinning on board makes
distributing our harvest much easier and is beneficial to all parties involved.
Grow Up, Grow Smart 16
B. Green rooftops and vertical farms are the next step for SJSU
The urban and vertical farming idea is the next step of progress for Spartan Dining and
SJSU. One great example of rooftop gardening is mentioned in Kym Pokorny's article,''Rocket
Science – An edible rooftop garden in Portland”(2007). In the article, Pokorny explains how the
garden atop the Rocket building successfully grows vegetable for the nearby Rocket restaurant.
Changing what is planted with the seasons allows the garden to produce a variety of vegetables.
It is the first of its kind in Portland and has drawn new attention to the idea of rooftop farming. In
the article Pokorny says, “All of this saves money for Rocket co-owners Leather Storrs and
Mukund Devan.” The garden is relatively new, but it's ability to provide the restaurant with a
variety of fresh vegetables shows promise that urban farming can be applied successfully in
businesses.
The rooftop garden in Portland Oregon
http://www.cityfarmer.info/rocket-science-%E2%80%93-an-edible-rooftop-garden-in-portland/
Grow Up, Grow Smart 17
Possibly the best example of what we are proposing is located at Trent University in
Peterborough, Ontario. “In from Rooftop to Restaurant: A University Café Fed by A Rooftop
Garden” Blyth and Menagh explain how the garden supplies an on campus café called The
Seasoned Spoon Café, with fresh ingredients grown on campus. In the article Blyth and Menagh
(2006) say, “the price is easy to swallow as The Spoon's food is often less costly than other food
served on campus.” This shows that rooftop gardens at universities can not only provide
Roof top garden at Trent University
http://www.trentu.ca/admin/eab/files/Rooftop_Gardens-Zipple.pdf
vegetables grown on campus with a neutral or negative carbon footprint, but they can also do so
at a lower cost than vegetable and fruits traditionally sourced. Trent Universities' rooftop is a
good example of our proposed project at SJSU.
Grow Up, Grow Smart 18
C. Our proposed model
Our initial plan at SJSU is to establish rooftop farms in order to provide students with on
campus grown, cheaper food. This project can benefit SJSU in many ways and make SJSU more
self reliant. It can also lower the carbon footprint of SJSU while helping to create healthier,
lower cost food choices to students and staff. We plan to establish the initial roof top gardens to
research growing techniques and other factors with the next step being to establish a vertical
garden at SJSU and eventually several throughout the city of San Jose. The initial project should
be able to provide low price high quality produce since it will be exempt from several costs.
Extensive use of volunteers will allow labor costs to be extremely low. The use of
rooftops rather than land that would normally have to be purchased or leased eliminates land
costs and the project has the ability to receive grants and donations that could allow it to provide
food to SJSU nearly cost free. Since it will be a non-profit organization it will sell at cost or at a
small profit margin to allow for expansion and the purchasing of other materials, but these
margins will be much lower than what is typical of the agriculture industry.
Another benefit of the rooftop garden would be the natural evaporative cooling plants
provide, Jeff Sonne's (2006) article “Evaluating Green Roof Energy Performance” goes into the
detail about the energy savings associated with green roofs, which would be similar to our
rooftop garden.
Summertime data indicate significantly lower peak roof surface temperaturesand higher nighttime surface temperatures for the green roof. The maximumaverage day temperature seen for the conventional roof surface was 130°F(54°C) while the maximum average day green roof surface temperature was91°F (33°C), or 39°F (22°C) lower than the conventional roof.
Grow Up, Grow Smart 19
All of this adds to the potential viability of the project and its ability to bring healthier lower cost
food to SJSU. The next step is to discuss how a vertical farm can be integrated into the
university.
Section IV. Integration of a vertical farm into the San Jose State University campus
San Jose will require an innovative strategy to successfully implement a vertical
farming project throughout the city. This section will address how to implement the project,
making urban farming a reality. Relevant considerations include the possible sizes of vertical
farm structures, the process of choosing a proper location for the pilot project at San Jose State
University, what costs would be involved with construction, and how long the project should
take to get off the ground. These estimates and plans are tentative and based on data gathered
from existing research and urban development expert analysis.
A. Possible structure sizes
The objective of this project is to develop a farm that suits San Jose State’s needs as
well as its current landscape.
Photo: Craig Hyatt - © Chris Jacobs
Vertical farms have great potential for increasing production well beyond traditional farming
methods and can reach as heights beyond fifty stories (Despommier et al., 2006); however, we
are proposing a much smaller design. By farming indoors and upwards, it is possible to grow
Grow Up, Grow Smart 20
continuously year-round and compact a great deal of land currently used for farming into a
smaller area. Wheat, one of the foods that can be grown indoors, is an excellent example of this
method. Suppose the project requires a vertical farm structure that sits on one acre of land and is
built with standard ten feet tall ceilings. Using National Institute of Standards and Technology
conversion standards and average crop heights of wheat as found in the Blaes and Defourny
study published by Remote Sensing of Environment, the average height of wheat crops are
between 1.54 and 1.91 feet tall. By farming wheat on one floor of a vertical farm, we can achieve
up to 5 times the amount of wheat grown on one acre on a traditional farm, (Despommier, 2007).
The same can be achieved with other crops as well. By farming upwards, we are substantially
reducing the amount of necessary land needed to produce food.
These numbers demonstrate the potential for even a small structure at San Jose State.
The suggested height for farms throughout San Jose is 3 stories above ground, based on
recommendation of Dr. Shishir Mathur, an associate professor of San Jose State’s college of
Social Sciences urban and regional planning department. This height would prevent residents
from rejecting the farms as intrusions on the city’s skyline, (Mathur, personal communication,
November 10, 2008). We recommend the structure at San Jose State be similar in height in order
to demonstrate the efficiency of the design and minimize initial costs.
Though constraints on the above ground height of these farms create limitations on the
total output of the farm, there are several processes that are possible below ground. By building
farms both skyward and earthward, the production of the farm can remain high while the
intrusion on the skyline can remain low. Fish farming, water filtration, and composting are prime
examples of functions that can take place below ground in 1 to 3 basement levels.
Grow Up, Grow Smart 21
A very important part of the project is choosing the optimal location to showcase a
vertical farm at San Jose State. This process is critical to the success of urban farming’s launch in
San Jose. A good location should offer maximum exposure to the public and San Jose State
students. A location that is in an area with a large amount of pedestrians will spark interest and
promote the initiative.
B. Proposed structure locations
San Jose State offers several locations for a vertical farm. The first is near south
campus near Spartan Stadium, (Mathur). This area has three potentials including the track on the
east side on Tenth Street, the field directly beside Spartan Stadium, and the old student housing
building property, located on the north side of Spartan Stadium. Though these locations are away
from the main campus, the area receives a good deal of attention from motorists and pedestrians.
The San Jose Sharks’ practice facility, the San Jose Giants stadium, and Spartan Stadium provide
a great deal of attraction to the area, so the farm will achieve a high degree of visibility. These
areas are also currently being used minimally or not at all in the case of the old student housing
property. If placed at these locations, there will be little displacement of current activities on the
land; however, if the property of the old student housing is chosen, the current buildings will
need to be either modified greatly or taken down.
Another potential location is on the east side of the main campus beside the Boccardo
Business Tower, (Mathur). At this location there is currently a ground level parking lot. This
location offers great potential because there would be little to no displacement of the parking
spaces and the location is in a heavily trafficked area of the San Jose State campus. This location
would make the facilities easy for students and local residents around San Jose State to access.
The location is directly beside the business school, several ATMs, the career center, the Student
Grow Up, Grow Smart 22
Union, and a short walk from the Campus Village housing and the engineering building. These
are all factors that make this a prime location for the San Jose State vertical farm.
The third, and most public of the locations is at the south east entrance to the Dr. Martin
Luther King, Jr. Library. This location is ideal for many reasons. The exposure is the most
apparent. It is next to the largest public and college library west of the Mississippi, the downtown
area of the city, and in a great place for students to access the facilities. Construction of a vertical
farm in this location would best serve the initial stage in the plan to introduce urban farming to
San Jose and as a showcase the progressive image of San Jose State and the city of San Jose,
which continues the legacy the King library has already started. The library is used greatly by
both students and the community, thus, bringing a meeting of the two to one location. A structure
placed here would receive maximum exposure from both.
Beginning this project will require several other considerations. Initial costs to build
these structures include architectural and design processes with assistance from specialist
consultants with experience building vertical farms, (Mathur). This consideration also requires
the project managers to determine whether the first structure on San Jose State University
property adheres to city building codes, because the university does not have to comply with
those standards, (Mathur). We submit that the first structure be compliant with city codes to
encourage the greatest support for furthering the project’s implementation throughout the city.
Other initial costs are environmental impact research, land, and construction.
C. Estimated construction timeline
The estimated time for the completion of the first structure given that there is
acceptance of the project, financial investment, and support from city officials and university
personnel is one year, (Mathur). The primary parties on which the success of the project is
Grow Up, Grow Smart 23
contingent on are the City Council, Mayor, City Manager, Planning Director, Public Works
Director, Vice President of Finance, and the University Committee, (Mathur). Without the
support of these parties, the proposed urban and vertical farm development system within San
Jose would be difficult. The most probable impediments other than the previously mentioned are
location controversy and lack of funding, (Mathur). Now that we have discussed how urban
farming can be integrated into a community, we will discuss the benefits that will be derived
from the fruits and vegetables that the farm supplies.
Section V. Nutritional benefits of eating healthy
A number of College students now run a greater risk of developing chronic diseases, a
situation due, in part, to a low intake of fruits and vegetables (Brown, Dresen, and Effett, 2006).
Studies have shown that a healthier diet (consumption of more fruits and vegetables as well as
whole grains) is positively associated with better academic performance (Adams, T, PhD., &
Colner, W, BS. 2008). Dr Adams, from the Exercise and Wellness Department at Arizona State
University, and Ms Colner from the Nutrition Department at Arizona State University, following
their study on nation wide sample of college students, state that, “predictors of high fruit and
vegetable intake for men and women include better: seatbelt and helmet use, physical activity,
perceived health, sleep, self-care behaviors, and grades.” (2008). A similar study conducted by
the American College Health Association36, included thirty-seven US colleges in a Spring 2003
survey. The data collected was striking. 20,724 surveys were collected, which revealed that only
6.9% of college students (n=1,312) ate five or more serving of fruits and vegetables on daily
basis.
A. Eating healthy is good for you both physically and mentally
36 American College Health Association – is the principal advocate and leadership organizationfor college and university health.
Grow Up, Grow Smart 24
In a research article published by the American Dietetic Association (2006) Richards,
Kattelmann, and Ren (2006), studying the consumption of fruits and vegetables in 18- to 24-
year-olds, the authors suggested that there was a strong positive correlation between the
consumption of adequate amount of fruits and vegetables (5 servings of fruits and vegetables)
and a decreased in the risk of chronic disease. In addition, Amy Richards (2006), who is a child
nutrition program specialist, suggested that consuming a healthy diet that contains a variety of
fruits and vegetables can prevent up to 20% or more incidences of cancer.
During college years, the consumption of a healthy diet is not a high priority for many
students; an unfortunate situation that, due to heightened stress levels, contributes to ill health.
According to the Center for Disease Control (CDC) “fruits and vegetables are a natural source of
energy and are one of the best eat-on-the-go foods.” (2008). Furthermore, the CDC (2008)
suggests that consumption of more fruits and vegetables may help protect you from chronic
diseases, including stroke and other cardiovascular diseases, as well as certain cancers.
According to a study by Florence, Asbridge, and Veugelers, a healthy diet does make an
impact on students over all health and their academic performance (2008). In this study Florence
et al. (2008) surveyed 5,200 fifth grade students and their parents as part of the children’s
Lifestyle and School-performance study in Nova Scotia, Canada. In this survey, the researchers
measured information on weight, height, dietary intake and other important factors such as
sociodemographic status. In addition, to make sure they collected enough information on dietary
intake, the participants Diet Quality Index – International (an effective tool for cross- national
comparison of diet quality) was used to sum-up the participants over all diet quality, and rate
each participants food intake based on their over all nutrition needs. The survey was intended to
illustrate the correlation between healthy food and literacy (Florence et al., 2008). The results of
Grow Up, Grow Smart 25
this study suggested that the students with poor dietary habits (reduced consumption of fruits and
vegetables and increased fat and sugar intake) were likely to perform poorly on the assessment.
In addition, a healthy diet is not only good for your mind, but it is also good for ‘personal
well-being.’ According to another study conducted by Jyoti, Frongillo, and Jones, six- to twelve-
year-old children with food insufficiency37 had poorer math scores, higher grade repetition,
absenteeism, and tardiness (2005). In addition, this group paid frequent visits to psychologist,
reported higher anxiety, aggression, psychological dysfunctions, and difficulty getting along with
other children in their age range (13-15 years old). Finally, amongst the adolescent participants,
who were fifteen to sixteen years old, food insufficiency was positively correlated with
depressive disorder and suicidal symptoms despite their family income and other factors such as
low-socioeconomic status that could affect their food sufficiency. Thus this study suggests that
food nourishes your psychological state and that the availability of healthier and affordable food
options would result in better mental and physical stability as well as an improved academic
performance.
Based on the 2006, National College Health Assessment, published by the American College
Health Association, which analyzed 94,806 student from 117 schools in the U.S., the following
data was revealed:
Table 1.General Health of college Students
(117 campuses in the U.S)Anorexia 1.9%Anxiety disorders 12.4%Bulimia 11.2%Chronic fatigue syndrome 3.4%Depression 17.8%Diabetes 0.9%High blood pressure 4.5%
37 Food Insufficiency – Restricted availability of, or incapability to acquire nutritious, safe, andacceptable foods, due to financial instability.
Grow Up, Grow Smart 26
High Cholesterol 4.0%Other Health Related issues 43.09%
In addition, the National College Health Assessment (2007) was also performed for San Jose
State University which revealed the following:
Table 2.General Health of college Students
(San Jose State University)Anorexia 1.4%Anxiety disorders 7.5%Bulimia 1.1%Chronic fatigue syndrome 2.0%Depression 15.0%Diabetes 0.9%High blood pressure 5.2%High Cholesterol 4.1%
Other Health Related issues 62.8%
Given these figures, it is obvious that over 50% of students (nationally) and approximately 37%
of students at San Jose State University, are suffering from health issues that are related to their
poor eating habits. Thus, all efforts should be taken to make nutritious food available at
affordable prices for students.
College years for many are often the start of independent living, and students at this
period are faced with different food choices, which often results in an unhealthy diet (Brunt, B,
PhD., Rhee, Y, PhD., Zhong, L, MS. 2008). Brunt et al. (2008) state that consumption of fat,
sodium, and sugar is higher in these groups. Furthermore, for students to control their weight,
skipping meals is a common habit (Brunt et al., 2008). According to Racette, Deusinger S, Stube,
Highstein, and Deusinger R, the weight that is gained and behavioral patterns during college,
account for obesity and overweight in adulthood and beyond (2005). In their study Racette et al.
(2005) examined 764 freshman and sophomore college students with an even number of men and
women, for weight and exercise assessment as well as dietary patterns. According to this study,
Grow Up, Grow Smart 27
29% of the participants did not exercise regularly, 70% ate fewer than 5 servings of fruits and
vegetables per day, more than 50% consumed high-fat fast food three times in the prior week
before the testing and assessments, and by the end of their sophomore year, 70% of the 290
participants had gained weight. These startling statistics suggested these students’ unhealthy
eating habit (high-fat and sugar diet), together with lack of exercise and inadequate
consumption of vegetable and fruits (5 servings per day) contributed to overweight, which could
lead to future health problems.
A well-balanced and wholesome diet is a proven way to improve and maintain successful
academic scores. According to the Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion38 at least 5
servings of fruits and vegetables are recommended per day to develop a healthy diet. However,
referring to the previous study conducted by the American College Health Association for San
Jose State University (2007), approximately 65% of students are consuming 1 or 2 servings of
fruits and vegetables on daily basis, while only 8% of students consuming the minimum amount
of 5 servings per day. In addition, in the same study, it has been reported that large number of
student (25%) at San Jose State University, are considered overweight, with an estimated
average Body Mass Index of 25-29.9. In comparison, in the national level, it is shown that
approximately 57% of students consume 1 or 2 servings of fruits and vegetables per day, while
only less than 8% are consuming the recommended 5 servings of fruits and vegetables per day
(2006). Also, approximately 22% of students are considered overweight, based on this report
(2006). In addition to poor eating habit, it is indicated that a large percentage of students at both
national level and at San Jose State University, practice healthy and unhealthy ways of losing the
excess weight that has been gained, due to an unhealthy diet (illustrated in Table 3.)
38 The Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion – is an organization of the U.S. Departmentof Agriculture, established to improve the nutrition and well-being of Americans.
Grow Up, Grow Smart 28
Table 3.
Nutrition and Exercise
PracticesNationally(117 U.S
Campuses)(%)
San JoseState
University(%)
Exercising to lose weight 55.2 45.4Dieting to lose weight 34.5 23.0Vomiting or taking laxatives to lose weight 2.5 1.2Taking diet pills to lose weight 3.6 3.2Doing none of the above 37.6 38.6
In summary, College should not only be about academic learning but also about
developing healthy eating habits for life. With obesity being at the clinical level and
approximately 24 million Americans (7.8% of the U.S. population) being diagnosed with
diabetes (CDC, 2007), the food that is available at college campuses should be carefully selected
and healthy foods should be more available at lower costs. San Jose State and other colleges in
California should make the choice to have healthier foods available and reasonable price, thus
setting an example for other college campuses in the United States.
Conclusion
Vertical farms offer a solution to the problems that we face due to a lack of sustainability.
A vertical farm can be distinguished from simply a technological solution and can be
characterized as a systemic solution because the purpose of a vertical farm is to facilitate a
process by which more food is grown per acre while preserving the resources of the natural
world. Additionally, a vertical farm provides business opportunities, efficient city planning, and
easy access to essential nutritional food.
We have come to understand that a change in behavior is necessary to overcome the
sustainability problem and must come in the form of a change in resource acquisition and
Grow Up, Grow Smart 29
management. We cannot look at this world as something merely to be used for our purposes. The
lives we lead, no matter what our personal convictions are regarding humanity’s relation to
nature, are dependent on the systemic health of Earth. Civilization, as it is currently organized, is
unsustainable because it exhaustes natural resources and/or harms the environment with the
methods of resource use. In order to address this problem we need to change our behavior, we
need to become sustainable.
References
Adams, B. T, PhD., & Colner, W, BS. (2008). The Association of Multiple Risk Factors With
Fruit and Vegetable Intake Among a Nationwide Sample of College Students. Journal Of
American College Health, 56, NO. 4: 455 – 461.
American College Health Association. (2006). Reference group executive summary. American
College Health Association – National College Health Assessment.
Retrieved November 24, 2008, from http://www.acha-ncha.org/pubs_rpts.html
American College Health Association. (2007). San Jose State University executive summary.
American College Health Association – National College Health Assessment.
Grow Up, Grow Smart 30
Retrieved November 24, 2008, from http://www.acha-ncha.org
Baumguartner, J., Chambers, L., Despommier, D., Harman, A., Mitsumoto, J., Rothschild, J. The
Vertical Farm Entrepreneurship: Developing a Model of Profitability, Targeting
Funders and Stakeholders. (Spring 2006).
Blaes, X., & Defourny, P. (2003, December 30). Retrieving crop parameters based on tandem
ERS 1/2 interferometric coherence images. Remote Sensing of Environment, 88(4), 374.
Retrieved November 17, 2008, doi:10.1016/j.rse.2003.08.008
Blyth, A. & Menagh, L. (2006, Fall). In from Rooftop to Restaurant: A University Café Fed by A
Rooftop Garden. Retrieved Nov. 29th 2008 from
http://www.cog.ca/documents/RooftopRestaurantFA06.pdf
Brunt, A, PhD., Rhee, Y, PhD., & Zhong, L, MS. (2008). Differences in Dietary Patterns Among
College Students According to Body Mass Index. Journal Of American College Health, 56, No.
6: 629 – 634.
Brown, B. L, EdD, RD., Dresen, K. R., & Eggett, L. D, PhD. (2005). College Students Can
Benefit by Participating in a Prepaid Meal Plan. Journal Of The American Dietetic
Association, 105: 445 – 448.
"Dead Zone in the Ocean." Harm From Conventional Farming. 2004. Om Organics. Nov.-Dec.
2008 <http://www.omorganics.org/page.php?pageid=90>.
"Degraded Soil" Harm From Conventional Farming. 2004. Om Organics. Nov.-Dec. 2008
<http://www.omorganics.org/page.php?pageid=90>.
Despommier, Dickson. "The Vertical Farm Essay I." Vertical Farm-Essays. 2008. The Vertical
Farm Project. 28 Nov. 2008 <http://www.verticalfarm.com/vfessay1.aspx>.
Despommier, D., (2007, November 19). Video posted to www.youtube.com, (2008, January 26).
Grow Up, Grow Smart 31
Original broadcast CNN Eco Solutions, (2007, November 19).
Dr. James, Danoff-Burg A. "The Terrestrial Influence: Geology and Soils." SEE-U:
Module 10. 2000. Columbia University. 29 Nov. 2008
<http://www.columbia.edu/itc/cerc/seeu/atlantic/restrict/modules/module10_content.html
Fishetti, Mark. Scientific American: Earth 3.0. Solutions for Sustainable Progress. October 1,
2008.
Florence, D. M, MSc, PDt., Asbridge, M, PhD., & Veugelers, J. P, PhD. (2008). Diet Quality
and Academic Performance. American School Health Association, 78, No. 4: 209 – 215.
Friedman, Thomas L. Hot, Flat, and Crowded. New York, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux,
2008, pp. 70, 148, 397.
GrowingPower.org. (2008) http://www.growingpower.org/growing.htm
Hawken, Paul, Amory Lovins, and L. Hunter Lovins. Natural Capitalism. New York, NY: Bay
Back Books, 1999.
Jensen, Derrick. Endgame. New York, New York: Seven Stories Press, 2006, pp. 104, 233, 235-
236.
Jyoti, F. D., Frongillo, A. E., & Jones, J. S. (2005). Food Insecurity Affects School Children’s
Academic Performance, Weight Gain, and Social Skills. American Society for Nutrition,
135: 2831 – 2839.
Kurasek, Blake. "The Living Skyscraper: Farming the Urban Skyline" 2 Dec. 2008. Graduate
School of Architecture, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign.
Martin, Andrew. "One Country’s Table Scraps, Another Country’s Meal." NYTimes.com. 18
May 2008. The New York TImes. 30 Nov. 2008
<http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/18/weekinreview/18martin.html?_r=2&oref=slogin>.
Grow Up, Grow Smart 32
Narain, Sunita. "The politics of inefficient irrigation technology." Subsidy Watch. 2007. Global
Subsidies Intiative. 03 Dec. 2008 <http://www.globalsubsidies.org/en/subsidy-
watch/commentary/the-politics-inefficient-irrigation-technology>.
Pokorny, K. (2007). Rocket Science – An edible rooftop garden in Portland. Retrieved Nov. 29th
2008 from http://www.cityfarmer.info/rocket-science-%E2%80%93-an-edible-rooftop-
garden-in-portland/
"Plant Nutrients." Mineral Nutrients & Soil. North Carolina Department of Agriculture and
Consumer Services. 29 Nov. 2008
<http://www.agr.state.nc.us/cyber/kidswrld/plant/nutrient.htm>.
Racette, B. S, PhD., Deusinger, S. S, PT, PhD., Strube, J. M, PhD., Highstein, R. G, RN, PhD.,
& Deusinger, H. R, PT, PhD. (2005). Weight Changes, Exercise, and Dietary Patterns
During Freshman and Sophomore Years of College. Journal Of American College
Health, 53, No. 6: 245 – 251.
Richards, A, MS, RD., Kattelmann, K. Kendra, PhD, RD., & Ren, C, PhD. (2006). Motivating
18- to 24- Year-Olds to Increase Their Fruit and Vegetable Consumption. Journal Of The
American Dietetic Association, 106: 1405 – 1411.
Sonne, J. (February 2006). Evaluating Green Roof Energy Performance. Retrieved Dec. 3rd
2008 from
http://www.fsec.ucf.edu/en/media/newsletters/brpost/winter2006/ASHRAEJeffSonne.pdf
Susan, Lang S. "Soil erosion threat." Chronicle Online. 20 Mar. 2006. Cornell University. 30
Nov. 2008 <http://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/march06/soil.erosion.threat.ssl.html>.
Grow Up, Grow Smart 33
The American Journal Health Association. (2008). The American College Health Association
National College Health Assessment (ACHA-NCHA), Spring 2003 Reference Group
Report. Journal Of American College Health, 53, No. 5: 199 – 210.
United States National Institute of Standards and Technology. Conversion Standards [Data file].
Retrieved from http://ts.nist.gov/WeightsAndMeasures/Publications/Upload/h4402_app
enc.pdf
Yale University. (2008). Yale sustainable food project. Retrieved on Nov. 29th 2008 from
http://www.yale.edu/sustainablefood/farm.html
Recommended