How to use science maps to navigate large information spaces? What is the link between science maps...

Preview:

Citation preview

Wie können Wissenschaftskarten zur Suche in grossen Informationsräumen eingesetzt werden?

How to use science maps to navigate large information spaces?

What is the link between science maps and predictive models of science?

Invited lecture, Fraunhofer-Institut für Naturwissenschaftlich-Technische Trendanalysen, Euskirchen, Germany

December 7, 2016

Andrea ScharnhorstDANS – Coordinator Research&Innovation GroupRoyal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences

Story line• Where do I come from?• Global science maps as

scientific revolution• KnoweScape and

knowledge maps as new area

• Insights

• From maps to models• Science of science and

science observatories • Forecast of complex

dynamics – what is possible?

• Models as heuristic devices

WHERE DO I COME FROM

NARCIS - http://www.narcis.nl/

EASY: https://easy.dans.knaw.nl/ui/home

Models, metrics, policies

PhD on math models of science dynamics – measurement – scientometrics(e.g., # researcher in a field; # PhD students in a field)

Use of metrics in science policy – EastEurope in the mirror of bibliometrics – Matthew effect of countries (Bonitz)

New practices, new metricsWeb indicators for scientific, technological and innovation research – WISER 2002-5Academic Careers Understood through Measurement and Norms - ACUMEN 2011-14Impact-EV - Evaluation of SSH 2013-17

Visualisation of structure and evolution of scienceVisualising NARCISMapping Digital HumanitiesDigital Observatory for DH (Pilot)

Semantic web technologies - Open DataCEDAR Dutch Historic Census

New practicesResearch Data - FAIR

Andrea Scharnhorst – “science located”

GLOBAL SCIENCE MAPS AND MACROSCOPES AS SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION

MESUR ProjectClickstream map of science

www.mesur.org

FOSTERING KNOWLEDGE MAPS AS NEW INTERDISCIPLINARY AREA

Information professionals• Collections, Information retrieval• WG 1 Phenomenology of

knowledge spaces• WG 4 Data curation & navigation

Social scientists• Simulating user behavior• WG 2 Theory of

knowledge spaces• WG 4 Data curation &

navigationComputer scientists • Semantic web, data models• WG 1 Phenomenology of Knowledge Spaces• WG 4 Data curation &navigation

Physicists, mathematicians

Digital humanities scholars• Collections, interactive design• WG 3 Visual analytics –

knowledge maps• WG 4 Data curation & navigation

Participating communities

• Structure & evolution of complex knowledge spaces, big data mining

• WG 2 Theory of knowledge spaces

• WG 3 Visual analytics – knowledge mapswww.knowescape.org

Designing interfaces to collections – visual enhanced browsing

All datasets in the digital archive of DANS at one glance.

www.drasticdata.nl

Application areas

TD1210: Better interfaces to large collections – visual analytics and semantic browsingOCLC, Rob Koopman, Shenghui Wang, et al.“a workflow which allows the user to browse live entities associated with 65 million articles ….by clicking through, a user traverses a large space of articles along dimensions of authors, journals, Dewey classes and words simultaneously. “

Koopman, R., Wang, S., Scharnhorst, A., & Englebienne, G. (2015). Ariadne’s Thread. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA ’15 (pp. 1833–1838). Digital Libraries. doi:10.1145/2702613.2732781

Science dynamics and Information retrieval

Application areas

Knowledge maps - insights TD1210 Visual

analytics

How clean are the data?

Baseline statistics about the

composition of data (time, geo,

attributes)

Visual enhanced browsing

serendipity

ranking

contextualisation

overview

PurposeFeasibilityCosts

Ready-made tools versusTaylor made

Part of a larger development:InfoVizDHLOD….

FROM MAPS TO MODELS

Knowledge landscapes – emergence, change, occupation, navigation

Paul Otlet, Mundaneum, http://www.mundaneum.be/

“Alle Kennis van de Wereld” http://www.archive.org/details/paulotlet

Searching agents in a problem space

TD1210: Better understanding the dynamics of science – the rise and fall of scientific fieldsParis, David Chavalarias“.. introduce an automated method for the bottom-up reconstruction of the cognitive evolution of science, based on big-data issued from digital libraries …sketches a prototypical life cycle of the scientific fields: an increase of their cohesion after their emergence, the renewal of their conceptual background through branching or merging events, before decaying when their density is getting too low.

Chavalarias, D., & Cointet, J.-P. (2013). Phylomemetic patterns in science evolution--the rise and fall of scientific fields. PloS One, 8(2), e54847. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054847

Science/knowledge dynamics

TD1210: Better understanding the dynamics of science – diversification and merging of fieldsMartin Rosvall“.. With increasingly available data, networks and clustering tools have become important methods used to comprehend instances of these large-scale structures. But blind to the difference between noise and trends in the data, these tools alone must fail when used to study change. Only if we can assign significance to the partition of single networks can we distinguish structural changes from fluctuations and assess how much confidence we should have in the changes.”

Rosvall, M., & Bergstrom, C. T. (2010). Mapping change in large networks. PLoS ONE, 5(1). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008694

Science/knowledge dynamics

TD1210: Better understanding of the flaws of current methods to measure the impact of science – rankings, individual careers, interdisciplinarity

ETH Zurich, Ingo Scholtes, Frank Schweitzer“authors importance in the collaboration network is indicative for the citation success of the papers in the network “

Sarigöl, E., Pfitzner, R., Scholtes, I., Garas, A., & Schweitzer, F. (2014). Predicting Scientific Success Based on Coauthorship Networks. EPJ Data Science, 3 doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-014-0009-x

Science/knowledge dynamics

SCIENCE OF SCIENCEDESCRIPTIVE VERSUS PREDICTIVE MODELSSCIENCE OBSERVATORY

From maps to monitoring

Local, rich, not interoperable

Global, sparse, partly representative, partly curated Its all about data

FORECAST OF COMPLEX SOCIAL DYNAMICS – FORECAST OF SCIENCE

What would we do with such an observatory? Knowledge discoveryHead hunting, accountancy and advocacy, ….Role of boundary conditions and inner dynamics for scientific success

Scientific development based on competition between scientific fields and fieldmobility of scientists

System-Umwelt-Grenze

Teilsystem 1 Teilsystem i

Teilsystem j0

Di0

Di1

Ai0

Aij0, Mij

Aij1

x1 xi

xj

Ai1

CijBij

Physics

Biology

Chemistry

Education

Scientific schools

Retirement

Fieldmobility

Ebeling, W., Scharnhorst, A. (1986) Selforganization Models for Field Mobility of Physicists. Czechoslovak Journal of Physics B36 , pp. 43-46. Bruckner, E., Ebeling, W., Scharnhorst, A. (1990) The Application of Evolution Models in Scientometrics. Scientometrics 18 (1-2), pp. 21-41

Models as heuristic devices

Self-citation networkModels as heuristic devices

The clustered self-citation network

Plasma

Self-organization

Complexity, active Brownian particles

Models as heuristic devices

Hellsten Iina, Renaud Lambiotte, Andrea Scharnhorst, Marcel Ausloos. 2007 "Self-citations, co-authorships and keywords: A new approach to scientists' field mobility?", Scientometrics 72(3): 469-486

Models as heuristic devices

Models as heuristic devices

Toy model simulation Models as heuristic devices

Models as heuristic devices

Models as heuristic devices

Encourage field mobility, it supports interdisciplinarity + job opportunities. This increases the connectivity between fields but be aware: schematic, undirected, field mobility, e.g. regular pattern of job hopping, may act as random diffusion – destroying differentiation

Support the search for the BEST (most attractive) BUT be aware: too much imitation leads to fashionwaves which finally can also destroy a system Encourage scientific school formation, this enhances the

attractivity of a field BUT be aware: big schools can work like a “dominant”design and blocking further development

Possible science policy recommendation

“The more ‘credible’ predictions are, the more likely they are to not happen” (Peter Allen)

Best models are not “problem solvers” they are “trouble makers”

Thank you very much for your attention!

Recommended