- 1. Comparing ArtefactsA good and bad example
The Discovery Bay Challenge
&
Mervyn Bishop photographer
2. TheDiscovery Bay Challenge
In critically reflecting uponquestions based on the N.S.W. Quality
Teaching Model,I rated this educational artefact 10.5 / 15. This
was my preferred artefact and my voice narration heard over the
slides will indicate as to why.
3. MervynBishopsphotographer
In critically reflecting uponquestions based on the N.S.W. Quality
Teaching Model,I rated this educational artefact 4 / 15. This was
my least preferred artefact which I will delineate as to why in the
following slides.
4. Mervyn Bishops PhotographyMy Critical Evaluation( 4 / 15 )Read
the following slides for my evaluation on this educational artefact
and listen, now or re-watch, to hear my view on, what I thought to
be a more appropriate comparison.
5. Failing in Intellectual QualityMervyn Bishop
photographer
- Although representing an aboriginals artistic career offering
another point of view, it failed to teach or engage students about
the importance of the artist success, as a non- white Australian,
other than by reading text- not interactive at all. 6. There were
no opportunities for students to use higher order thinking and
metacognition as there were no interactive, engaging or challenging
activities to expand on their knowledge. 7. on what they thought.
Although strong and emotive photographswere depicted there was
nothing asked of the students to create anything of their own. 8.
There was no attempt to encourage meaningful class discussion or
feedback between other students orwith the teacher. 9.The
artefactdid not give students any opportunity to demonstrate what
they have learned in any real depth, only minor reflective
questions
Failing In Creating A Quality Learning Environment Mervyn Bishop
photographer
- There were no activities required of the students at all and so
no need for explanation or modelling was necessary. Further more,
there were no in depth explanations highlighting or modelling the
artistsown professional practiceortechnical skill for students to
be inspired by and want to try themselves. 10. There was nothing in
the lesson to test students skills or ability on any level. 11.
Students had no input as to how the lesson was navigated as it was
linear and non-interactive. Itrequired mostly only the turning of
pages.
Failing In Significant Learning Mervyn Bishop
photographer
- Students were not given a chance to use already learned
knowledge or skills. 12. Although the body of work portrayed the
work of an aboriginal photographer and his experiences, no real
effort was made to relate to the students the critical nature of
the work by incorporating aspects of Australia's colonial history
or aboriginal life or culture. 13. There were no interdisciplinary
connections made despite the many opportunities to cross over other
Key Learning Areas, especially in to history and the socials
sciences. 14. No practical connections were made and it failed to
offer any real world applications to their present or future
learning. 15. There was no audio or artist commentary which would
have been of great significancein adding value to the lesson.
Additional links to recommended sites would have beenvaluable for
extra information also.
Mervyn Bishop PhotographerWhat I liked about this artefact as an
educational learning tool.
- The artefact remained focused on the artists life of
photography. 16. It demonstrated good use of strong emotive, and in
a sense candid, photography. 17.It focused on aboriginal, rather
than non-white Australian,photography and perspectives beyond our
recognised and cultural acceptances. 18. Displayed photographs were
well documented and referenced. 19. It had a really strong
narrative quality of real life experiences offering real value and
meaning.
That concludes my virtual presentation for todayThankyouBy
Charmaine ONeill