View
1.377
Download
1
Category
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
Chancellor Cheek provided an overview of the university's accomplishments and progress toward its goals at the DDDH retreat on August 27.
Citation preview
Deans, Directors and Department Heads
August 27, 2012UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE, KNOXVILLE
Journey to the Top 25
June Board of Trustees
8% Tuition Increase
Fee Increases
Take 15, Graduate in 4
5% Raises
Long Term Compensation
Campus/System/BOT Relationships
DevelopmentCelebration: $860 Million
Chairs & Professorships
(Chancellor’s Challenge)
Scholarships & Graduate
Fellowships
College Priorities
Development Priorities
Athletics
Compensation/Performance
Hire at market
Work with Provost and
Human
Resources
Performance-based raises
Merit raises/plan for full
Professor
Teacher/Scholar Model
Teaching/Advising
Scholarship
Research
Creative Activities
Take 15,Graduate in 4
Fall 2013 Tuition Model
A New Expectation for Undergraduate Students
Graduation in Four Years
Used to be the “norm” Off track Must become the “new norm” Critical to our Top 25 goal Better for our students and our state
It’s Better for Students
Spend less on their education
Incur less debt
Opportunity costs
Begin their careers earlier
Dr. Bill FoxDirector of the Center for Business and Economic Research
It’s Better for Students
“A Profile of Non-Completers in Tennessee Higher Education”—a study by the Center for Business and Economic Research and the Tennessee Higher Education Commission
Impact on Student DebtAverage UT student debt:
Less than $20,000
UT students with NO debt:
52%
Average expenses: ~$24,000/year
Most scholarships expire:
4 years
It’s Better for UT
Improves graduation rate
Increases state funding
Increases capacity to serve other students
Produces more undergraduate
degrees/year
Accelerates progress toward Top 25
It’s Better for Tennessee
Increase the number of college graduates
Nat. Average Tennessee0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
30%
21%
Population with Bache-lor's Degree**25+ years of age
Degrees Awarded 2010-2011 Academic Year
UT KNOXVILL
E
MIDDLE
TENNES
SEE
UNIV. MEM
PHIS
VANDERBILT
EAST
TENNES
SEE
TENNES
SEE T
ECH
UT CHATT
ANOOGA
TENNES
SEE S
TATE
Austin Pea
y
UT MARTIN
UT HSC
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
41083629
2562
1583 18731528 1275 984 1157 1017
117
2053
715
1062
1913831
473459
449 267129
683
Bachelor's Graduate/Professional
6161
4344
3624 3496
2704
20011734
1433 14241146
800
FOUR-YEAR FIVE-YEAR SIX-YEAR
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 20080.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
30.6% 29.4% 30.0% 31.2% 30.6% 33.7% 35.7% 36.7% 40.0%
24.2% 23.7% 24.7% 24.3% 25.2%24.8%
25.8% 26.3%
5.3%4.7% 5.1% 5.1% 4.7%
4.7%4.5%
60%
60%
58%
61%
61%
63%
66%
Graduation Rates
Preliminary
Six-Year Graduation RateFall 2006 cohort
#2 V
irgin
ia#2
UCL
A#1
Ber
keley
#4 M
ichiga
n
#5 U
NC C
hape
l Hill
#13
Penn
Stat
e#1
9 Flo
rida
#23
Geor
gia#1
0 W
iscon
sin#1
3 Illi
nois
#9 U
C Da
vis
#17
UMD
Colle
ge P
ark
#10
Was
hing
ton*
*#1
3 UT
Aus
tin#2
5 Cl
emso
n#1
9 Te
xas A
&M
#10
UC Sa
nta B
arba
ra#1
7 Ohi
o St
ate
#19
Pitts
burg
h#2
5 Ru
tger
s
#28
Mich
igan
Stat
e#3
1 In
dian
a#4
6 NC
Stat
e**
#25
Min
neso
ta#2
3 Pu
rdue
#44
Iowa
Stat
e#3
6 Au
burn
#46
UT K
noxv
ille
50%
55%
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%Aspiration Target Peer
Proposed New Tuition Model
Take 15, graduate in 4
Students pay for 15 hours
Implementation in Fall 2013
Full year to communicate
No additional cost for 15+ hours
Increase revenue by ~$6 million in
year 1
Funds Will Provide Courses and laboratories needed for
graduation
More academic advisors
UTracK system for monitoring progress to graduation
More tutoring and academic support services
More effective communication with undergraduates
Increased communications with prospective students
Funds Will Provide Better faculty/student ratio
More summer school options
More courses online
Additional need-based scholarships for Tennesseans
Performance-based, market-driven compensation
Implementation All current students continue under the
old model– No change for current students
Proposed new model starts fall 2013
Expectation – limit tuition increases to 3% annually for three years
After four years, pay the prevailing rate
15 hours becomes the “new norm”
Average Net Price of Tuition
$(8,000.00)
$(6,000.00)
$(4,000.00)
$(2,000.00)
$-
$2,000.00
$4,000.00
$(5,711.00)
$2,013.00 $2,870.00 $3,040.00
Bottom Quartile($0 - $43,065)
SecondQuartile
($43,066 - $87,800)
ThirdQuartile
($87,801 - $143,044)
FourthQuartile
($143,045 - $1,430,000)
We Remain a Great Value
New Tuition Model Endorsed
“The prime beneficiaries will be UT students. Graduating sooner translates into spending less money on school and incurring less debt….
The new tuition model is a positive step that will bring UT closer to its laudable goal of becoming a top-25 public research institution.”
JOURNEY TO THE TOP 25
MetricsUTK
June 2010UTK
June 2012
UTK Change
2010-2012
ACT Equivalent 29/24 29/24 No change
Retention Rate 84% 85% +1 pt
6-Year Graduation Rate 60% 63% +3 pt
Ph.D. Degrees 277 270 - 7
Master’s and Professional Degrees 1,845 1726 - 119
Federal Research Expenditures $70 M $109 +$39
Total Research Expenditures $165 M $208 +$43
Tenure-Line Salary Range $66 to $107 K
$71 to $115 + $5 to $8
Undergraduate Student/Tenure-Line Faculty 20 20 No change
Faculty Awards 10 TBD
Teaching and Support Expenditures/ Student $16,100 $17,698 + $1,598
Endowment/ Student $14,380 $16,250 + $1,870
UTK Position
Progress
7 Metrics improved
2 stayed same
2 decreased
1 Metric TBD
31
#1 B
erke
ley
#2 V
irgin
ia
#2 U
CLA
#5 U
NC C
hape
l Hill
#4 M
ichig
an
#13
Illin
ois
#19
Flor
ida
#17
UMD
Colle
ge P
ark
#19
Pitts
burg
h
#13
UT A
ustin
#10
Wisc
onsin
#17
Ohi
o St
ate
#25
Clem
son
#19
Texa
s A&
M
#25
Min
neso
ta
#10
Was
hing
ton
#9 U
C Da
vis
#10
UC S
anta
Bar
bara
#23
Geor
gia
#36
Aubu
rn
#46
UT K
noxv
ille
#13
Penn
Sta
te
#25
Rutg
ers
#23
Purd
ue
#46
NC S
tate
#31
Indi
ana
#28
Mich
igan
Sta
te
#44
Iow
a St
ate
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
ACT Equivalent Range
ACT Scores for SEC Schools
Vand
erbi
lt
Flor
ida
Texa
s A&
M
Aubu
rn
Geo
rgia
UTK
Sout
h Ca
rolin
a
Arka
nsas
LSU
Miss
ouri
Alab
ama
Kent
ucky
Miss
. Sta
te
Miss
issip
pi
18
21
24
27
30
33
36
Freshman Retention Rate1st to 2nd Year Retention Rate; 2004 to 2010 Freshmen Cohort
Years
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 201074
76
78
80
82
84
86
88
90
84.5%
ResearchFederal Research Expenditures; 2004-2011
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 $-
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
$140
$160
$180
$200
Top 25 Target Peers, No Med School
UTK
Faculty#1
Ber
keley
#2 U
CLA
#4 M
ichiga
n
#17 U
MD Co
llege
Park
#13 U
T Aus
tin#1
3 Illin
ois#1
7 Ohio
Stat
e#9
UC D
avis
#5 U
NC Cha
pel H
ill#2
Virg
inia
#10 W
ashin
gton
#25 M
innes
ota
#23 P
urdu
e#2
5 Rut
gers
#10 U
C San
ta B
arba
ra#3
1 Ind
iana
#13 P
enn S
tate
#10 W
iscon
sin#2
3 Geo
rgia
#44 I
owa S
tate
#19 P
ittsb
urgh
#19 T
exas
A&M
#46 U
T Kno
xville
#46 N
C Sta
te#2
5 Clem
son
#28 M
ichiga
n Sta
te#1
9 Flor
ida#3
6 Aub
urn
$50
$55
$60
$65
$70
$75
$80
$85
$90
$95
$71
Aspiration Target Peer
UTK in 2010 –
up 4 position
s
Average Assistant Professor Salary; Fall 2011
FacultyAverage Associate Professor Salary, Fall 2011
#2 U
CLA
#1 B
erke
ley#2
5 Rut
gers
#4 M
ichiga
n
#17 U
MD Co
llege
Park
#2 V
irgini
a
#5 U
NC Cha
pel H
ill#9
UC D
avis
#19 P
ittsb
urgh
#13 U
T Aus
tin#1
7 Ohio
Stat
e
#13 P
enn S
tate
#28 M
ichiga
n Sta
te
#10 W
ashin
gton
#10 W
iscon
sin#2
3 Pur
due
#31 I
ndian
a#1
3 Illin
ois
#25 M
innes
ota
#10 U
C San
ta B
arba
ra#4
6 NC S
tate
#44 I
owa S
tate
#19 T
exas
A&M
#46 U
T Kno
xville
#19 F
lorida
#23 G
eorg
ia#2
5 Clem
son
#36 A
ubur
n
$50
$60
$70
$80
$90
$100
$110
$120
$83
Aspiration Target Peer
UTK in 2010 –
up 1 position
FacultyAverage Full Professor Salary, Fall 2011
#2 U
CLA
#1 B
erke
ley#4
Mich
igan
#25 R
utge
rs
#5 U
NC Cha
pel H
ill#2
Virg
inia
#13 U
T Aus
tin
#10 U
C San
ta B
arba
ra#1
3 Illin
ois
#17 U
MD Co
llege
Park
#19 P
ittsb
urgh
#17 O
hio St
ate
#13 P
enn S
tate
#9 U
C Dav
is
#28 M
ichiga
n Sta
te#3
1 Ind
iana
#25 M
innes
ota
#23 P
urdu
e
#10 W
ashin
gton
#19 F
lorida
#19 T
exas
A&M
#46 N
C Sta
te
#44 I
owa S
tate
#46 U
T Kno
xville
#10 W
iscon
sin#2
5 Clem
son
#23 G
eorg
ia#3
6 Aub
urn
$50
$70
$90
$110
$130
$150
$170
$11
5
Aspiration Target Peer
UTK in 2010 – up 1
position
Top 25 Infrastructure Progress Buildings underway
Student Union
Natalie Haslam Music Center
John Tickle Engineering Building
Strong Hall
Residence Hall Major Renovations
Humanities and Social Sciences
Greve Hall
Brehm Animal Science and Food Science Buildings
Top 25 Investments Strategic Instructional Fund
Relieve bottleneck courses
Additional tenure-line faculty
Additional lecturers
Raises
First Year and Transition Programs
Additional advisors
The journey we take is just as important
as achieving the goal
Issues for the Future
Civility/Diversity/Citizenship
Internationalization
InternationalizationTop 25 Institutions % of Total Enrollment
2010-11
#13 University of Illinois-Urbana-Champaign
18.22%
#2 UCLA 15.78%
#17 Ohio State University 10.85%
#19 University of Florida 10.82%
#25 Rutgers University 7.26%
#46 University of Tennessee 3.79%
Communication
How do we
communicate
better?
Academics
Focus on Better Teaching and
on Student Learning
Rigor
Advising
Tracking students
Course availability
Academics
How much do we grow? When?
Utilization of summer
Distance education
Harvard/MIT/Berkeley Experiment
Multiple Approaches to Institution
Higher Education is Under Attack
Higher Education is Under Attack
Governor’s Review of Higher Education
Access
Quality
Preparing the
Workforce
Morrill Act Anniversary
Celebrating the 150th
Anniversary
Land grants vital to future of
higher education
Questions/Comments
Recommended