Archivematica integration handshaking towards comprehensive digital preservation workflows

Handshaking towards comprehensive digital preservation workflows

Courtney C. Mumma, Artefactual#OR2015 @archivematica @arxiverdama

June 10, 2015

we should be building systems that enable a high-level of linkability

repositories need digital preservation

showing my hand➢ artefactual & archivematica➢ why integration ➢ endpoints and how to integrate➢ open source vs. proprietary ➢ scoping and requirements➢ some systems integrated with archivematica

who is artefactual?➢ b. 2001: FOSS, standards-based solutions for the cultural heritage community

➢ AtoM (description and access) and Archivematica (digital preservation)

➢ archivists, librarians and developers➢ support, hosting, development, migration, training, theming

what does archivematica do?

➢ standards-based digital preservation workflows in a web dashboard

➢ incorporates FOSS tools to perform digital preservation functions

➢ creates consistent, system independent AIPs, human readable in a file system

why do integration work?➢ leverage resources already invested○ acknowledge systems of record and

overlapping functionality➢ add value to repository

○ digital preservation workflows for diverse procedural contexts (ex: archives vs digitized content)

○ multiple endpoints for ‘handshaking’

why do integration work?➢ reduce duplication of effort between projects/systems

➢ empower adoption by small/mid-sized institutions○ if we work together rather than

compete the community is larger and more powerful, sharing is possible, implementation is easier and training is more accessible

archivematica integration endpoints

➢ handoff from source systems➢ access and description handoff➢ archival storage handoff

○ repositories○ secure storage

➢ administrative handoff

how do we do integration work?➢ consistently encourage and drive integration opportunities○ we pay attention to the needs of the

community○ we pay attention to the direction of

cultural heritage projects○ we pay attention to cultural heritage

system innovations ➢ bounty model

system synthesis➢ AtoM➢ ArchivesSpace➢ Archivists’ Toolkit

➢ Arkivum➢ CONTENTdm➢ DSpace➢ DuraCloud

➢ Fedora➢ HPTrim➢ Islandora➢ LOCKKS➢ OpenStack➢ Hydra?➢ DataVerse?

we prioritize integration work with other open source

systems

(but we’ll integrate with proprietary systems to meet you

where you are)

OS vs proprietary handshaking

open source➢ transparency➢ download/install current versions

➢ configurable➢ aligned ideals

proprietary➢ can’t see the hand

➢ can’t get the hand

➢ what is the hand doing?

➢ too many unknowns

system synthesis➢ AtoM➢ ArchivesSpace➢ Archivists’ Toolkit

➢ Arkivum➢ CONTENTdm➢ DSpace➢ DuraCloud

➢ Fedora➢ HPTrim➢ Islandora➢ LOCKKS➢ OpenStack➢ Hydra?➢ DataVerse?

scoping integrations

➢ sponsoring partners and contributors○ cultural heritage organizations of any

size, including other developers➢ sponsor’s functional needs

○ realistic goals○ limited resources to allocate to

development, testing and training➢ no such thing as ‘complete’

scoping integrations

➢ generalize needs to broader community○ accommodate diverse workflows

■ no two institutional, or even unit, workflows are exactly the same

○ transparent during the development process

○ consistent attention to ecosystem○ awareness of other projects,

innovations and technological changes

some of the integration work we’ve done so far

source endpoints

➢ sources of content to be processed in Archivematica○ DSpace○ DuraCloud (ArchivesDirect hosting)○ CONTENTdm○ BitCurator○ Islandora○ HPTrim

access & description endpoints

➢ AtoM➢ Archivists’ Toolkit➢ ArchivesSpace➢ CONTENTdm➢ DSpace (pending)

storage endpoints

➢ Arkivum➢ DuraCloud➢ Fedora (via Islandora integration)

➢ LOCKSS➢ OpenStack

DSpace*➢ ingest exports

○ collection and/or item)➢ dark archive for a DSpace repository○ descriptive and rights MD preserved○ community/collection relationships

preservedarchivematica.org/en/docs/archivematica-1.4/user-manual/transfer/dspace/#dspace

sponsored by University of British Columbia

CONTENTdm➢ OCLC let’s us see their hand➢ Project Client DIP uploads

○ includes MD for simple and compound object(s)

○ maintains order of files and directories

archivematica.org/en/docs/archivematica-1.4/user-manual/access/contentdm/#contentdm

sponsored by University of British Columbia

Islandora

➢ Archidora○ Islandora front-end○ archival storage in Fedora○ notification to Islandora

github.com/discoverygarden/archidora

sponsored by University of Saskatchewan

AtoM➢ upload access copies and MD from Archivematica to AtoM description

➢ MD parsed into descriptive standards ○ (RAD, DACS, MODS, ISAD-G, EAD)

➢ link to the AIP from description ➢ arrange to levels of description reflected in AtoM

accesstomemory.org

Archivists’ Toolkit➢ upload DIP MD (incl PREMIS rights/restrictions) from Archivematica

➢ AT link to access copies on web server

➢ generate EAD from ATarchivematica.org/en/docs/archivematica-1.4/user-manual/access/archivists-toolkit/#archivists-toolkitsponsored by RAC

ArchivesSpace

➢ current integration similar to AT

➢ coming soon: arrangement to AS resources from Archivematica Appraisal Tab

archivematica.org/wiki/ArchivesSpace_integration

sponsored by RAC and by Bentley Historical Library

DuraCloud➢ store AIPs in DuraCloud➢ process and store AIPs in DuraCloud using ArchivesDirect

➢ integration works without ArchivesDirect○ local installations can leverage

archival storage in their own DuraCloud instance

created in partnership with DuraSpace

Other AIP stores

➢ DSpace - pending Bentley work➢ Fedora

○ but not Fedora 4 (yet)○ Archidora

➢ LOCKSS➢ OpenStack

conclusionsustainable, digital preservation ready, repository ecosystems are

interoperable

thank you!

archivematica.org @archivematicaaccesstomemory.org @accesstomemory

archivesdirect.org

documentation and the user community isfree & open