View
216
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
8/11/2019 What is Met a Fiction
1/19
8/11/2019 What is Met a Fiction
2/19
i o M e t a f i c t i o n
Fiction is woven into all . . . I find this new reality (or
un reality) more valid.
( John Fowles ,
4
The French Lieutenant'sWoman,
pp. 86-7)
If ask ed to point out the sim ilarities am ong st this d isconcerting
selection of quotations, most readers would immediately list
tw o or three of the following : a ce lebra tion of the_power of jh e .
cre ativ e im agination together with an uncejjLainty^ a b o u ^ jh e
validity of its representations; an extreme self-consciousness
about language, literary form and the act of writing fictions; a
perv^asiyeinsecu rity ab ou t the relationsh ip of fiction to re ali ty a
pa rod ic, p lay ful, excessive or deceptively naive style of writing.
In compiling such aHlist, the reader would, in effect, be
of fer in g a brief description ofthe basic concerns and character-
istic s of the fiction which will be explore d in this book. 4
ieLaJktion
is a tefrm given to fictional writing which sdf^consciousLy^and
sy s tem a t i ca l l y ~d i l^ i n
o rd er to p o s e j ^ ^ m ^ a ^ u ^ t h e relatim iship betw een fiction
an d reglity^ In prov iding a critiqu e of their own m ethods of
construction, such writings not only e^amin^the fundamental
structures of narrative fiction, they also explore the possible
^c tion ality of th ew or l'do u tside the literary fictional text.
Most of the quotations are fairly contemporary. This is
deliberate. Over the last twenty years, novelists have tended to
become much more aware of the theoretical issues involved in
constructing fictions. In consequence, their novels have tended
to embody dimensions of self-reflexiyity and formal uncer-
tainty. What connects not only these quotations but also ail of
tKe very different writers whom one could refer to as broadly
'metafictional', is that they all explore atheoryof fiction through
the
practiceof w riting fiction.
r
~
The term 'metafiction' itself seems to have originated in an
ess ay by the A m eric an critic and self-conscious novelist W illiam
H. Gass (in Gass 1970). However, terms like 'metapolitics' ,
'metarhetoric' and 'metatheatre' are a reminder of what has
been, since the ig6os
L
a more general cultural mterest in the
problem of how human beings reflect, construct and mediate
t^heirexp^iej^ce of the world. Metafiction pursues such ques-
tions through its formal self-exploration, drawing on the tradi-
8/11/2019 What is Met a Fiction
3/19
W h a t is m eta f i c t i o n? 3
tional metaphor of the world as book^-but often recasting it in
the terms of contemporary philosophical, linguistic or literary
the ory . If , as indivichmls^jwe now occu py 'ro le s', rather than
'selves '^ then the study of^aracter^jn novels may provide a
useful model fox^MnderstandinugjJie^constriirtion of siLhjprtivitu
in the world outside, novels. If our knowledge_Dilthis~war4d-is
now seen to be jne dia ted lhr ou gh langu age, then literary fiction
(worlds constructejd^entirely of language) becomes a useful
modeLfor learnmgabout- thexonstmct ion
The present increased awareness of 'meta' levels of discourse
and experience is partly a consequence of an increased social
and cultural self-consciousness. Beyond this, however, it also
reflects a greater awareness within contemporary culture of the
func tion of langu age in constructing and m aintainin g our sense
o f e ver y d a y l r ea l i ty ' .T h e s im pl^no t i o n j h ^ passively
reflects a coherent^ m ean ingful and 'ob ject ive ' wo rld is no
longeiMtenable. Language-is an independent, self-contained
system which generates its own 'meanings*. Its relationship to
the phenomenal world is highly complex, problematic and
regulated by convention. 'Meta' terms, therefore, are required
in order to explore the relationship between this arbitrary
linguistic system and the worldTolvKichlT^ppaTetitly refers. In
fiction they are required TrTorder to explore the relationship
between the world
of the
fiction and the wo rldoutsidethe fiction.
In a sense, m elafiction rests on a version of the Q eiseab^Xgian
un certain ty principle: an aw areness th a t' for jthe^smal le st b u ild ^
i ng blocks of m atter, every p r oces s o f qbsery atio n eaus es a m a j o r
disturb a ncel_(Heisenberg 1972 , p. 126 ), and th atjt i sim pp ssjb le
to describe^ an ob jective world because the observ er alw ay s
changes
The
oEseryed_
v
H ow ever, Ih e concerns of metafiction are
even more complex than this. For while Heisenberg believed
one could at least desc ribe, if not a ^ / M ^ of n at u re , then a
picture of one's
relationto
nature, metafictionjshows the uncer-_
tainty even of this process. How is it possible to 'describe'
anything? The rretafictionist is highly conscious of a basic
dilemma: if he or she sets out to 'represent' the world, he
or she realizes fairly soon that the world, as such, cannot be
'represented'. In literary fiction it is, in fact, g^d.ble_QBiyJto
'represent' the discourses of that world. Yet, if one attempts to
8/11/2019 What is Met a Fiction
4/19
i o M e t a f i c t i o n
, a n a ly s e aa et of Unguis tic relationships using those sam e relation-^
sh ips as the instrum ents of analy sis^ lan gu ag e soon becomes a
'prisonhouseMrom which the possibility of escape is remote.
M et afic atio n sets out to explore this dile m m a.
The l inguist L. Hjelmslev developed the tern^i^eulanguage
(H jelm sle v 19 6 1) . H e defined it as a lang uag e w hichy-iusteadof-
refexxipjg^to non-lu^uistic^evenJ;&>^&ituatiQns Qr,_ab)eets in the
world, refers to
another^
la n gu ag e ;it is a lang uag e w hich takes
another language as its object. Saussure's distinction between
the s i g n i f i e s relevant here. T he signifier is the
sou nd rim age o ft h e w or do r its shape on the page; the signified is
thej^poiceplevoked by the word. A^netalanguageis a language
tha t func tions as.a. signifier
to
jmother4anguage
y
jain this other
lan gu ag e thus becomes its signified .
1
In novelistic practice, this results~in ^nting which consist-
ent ly j l i s p la y s j^ jc o n y ^ , which explici ty and overtly
la ys ba re its conditioiTofartifice, and wh ich thereby explores the
p ro b lem at ic relationship between life and fiction - both the fact
th at "all the w orld is not of course a stag e' an d
4
the crucial w ays
in which it isn't ' (Goffman 1974, p. 53). The 'other' language
may be ei ther the^^gbters^everyday discourse or , more usu-
a ll y , the 'lapguage^cEthe^^iiteraiy sysf en iitself,includ ing the con-
ven tions of the novel as a whole or pa rticu larformsof that genre.
M eta fict ion m ay concern itself, then, withjDarticular conven-
^ions jo f the novel , tQLxUsplay jhe jDn^
""(for exa m ple, J o h n Fow les's use of the 'omniscient author'
convention inThe French Lieutenant's Woman( 196 9). It ma y, often
in the form of parody,, comm ent on a sp ed fie -w o rL o r fictional
inode ( for example, John Gardner 's
Grendel
( 1 9 71 ) , which
retells, and thus comments on, the
Beowulf
story from the point
of vie w ofthemonster; or Jo h n H aw kes 's
The Lime Tw ig (1961),
w h ich constitutes both an exam ple an d a critiqu e of the pop ular
f i l l e r . . Less centrally metaf ictional, but sti ll displaying 'meta '
features, are f ictions like Richard Brautigan's
Trout Fishing in
America
(1967). Such novels attempt to create alternative ling-
uis tic structures or fictions wh ich m erely
imply
the old form s by
encouraging the reader to draw on his or her knowledge of
traditional literary conventions when struggling to construct a
m ea nin g for the new text.
8/11/2019 What is Met a Fiction
5/19
W h a t is m eta f i c t i on? 5
Metafiction and the novel tradition
I would argue that metafictional practice has become particu-
larly pro m ine nt in the fiction of
the
last twenty years. However,
to draw exclusively on contemporary fiction would be mislead-
ing, for, altho ug h theterm'm etafiction ' m ight be new , the
practice
is as old (if not older) than the novel itself. What I hope to
estab lish du rin g the course of this book is that ^ ta fi c ji o n is a
tendency or fun ction inherent in
all
nov els. Th is form of fiction is
w orth stu dy ing not only because of its con tem porary em ergence
but also b ec au se of the insights itoffersinto both therep resenta-
tiona l-nature of all fiction and the litera ry history of th en ov el as
genre. By studying metafiction, one is, in effect, studying that
which gives the novel its identity.
Certainly more scholarly ink has been spilt over attempts to
define the h ay et tJia n perhaps for any other literary genre. T h e
novel no t o r io u s l y ^ Je s definit ion. Its instabi li ty in this respect
is part of its 'definition': the language of fiction appears to spill
ov er into , an d m erge with , the instab ilities o f the real w orld , in a
way that a five-act tragedy or a fourteen-line sonnet clearly does
not. Metafiction flaunts and exaggerates and thus exposes the
foundations of this instability: the fact that novels are con-
structed through a continuous assimilation of everyday histori-
cal for m s of com m unication . T he re is no one privileged 'Ian- ,
gu ag e of fiction'. T he re are the lang uag es of m em oirs, jo u rn als , }
dia ries , histories, conversational registers, legal records, jo u r- \
nal i sm, documentary . These l^guagesjcompete for pr iv i lege.
They question and relativize each otKer to such an extent that
the 'language of fiction' is always, if often covertly, sxlfr-
conscious.
Mikhail Bakhtin has referred to this process of relativization
as the 'dialogic' potential of the novel. Metafiction simply
makes this potential explicit and in so doing foregrounds the
essential mode of all fictional language. Bakhtin defines as
overtly 'dialogic' those novels that introduce a ^seraaiitic djreci.
tio.n into tHe wo rd which is dia m etric ally opp osed to its origin al
direction. . . . the word becomes the arena of conflict between
two voices' (Bakhtin 1973, p. 106). In fact, given its close
relation to ev ery da y form s of discou rse, the lang uag e of fiction is
8/11/2019 What is Met a Fiction
6/19
i o M e t a f i c t i o n
always
to some exte nt jdia log icJT he novel assimilates a variety of
di&courses (representations of spee ch, form s of na rrativ e) -
discourses that
always
to some extent question and relativize
each other's authority. Realism, often regarded as the classic
fictional mode, paradoxically functions by suppressing this
dialogue. The conflict of languages and voices is apparently
resolved in realistic f iction T h ro u g h T h e ir su b < ^ ina tion to the
donunant 'voice' of the omniscient, godlike author. Novels
which Bakhtin refers to as 'dialogic' resist such resolution.
Metaf ict ion
displays
and rejoices
in
the impossibility of such a
resolution an d thu s clearly r ev ea ls the ba sic identity of the nov el
as genre.
Metafictional novels tend to be constructed on the principle
of a fy n d a m e m al -a i i d ^ u s^ the construction of a
fictionalJllusign (as in traditional realism ) and the la ^ n g Jb ar e
of i lSnJ iusion. In other words, the lowest common denomina-
tor of metaf iction is s imultaneously to^reatej j f ict ion and to
make a statement about jthe creation of that fiction. The two
processes are held together in a formal tension which
dovm tl^distincJtions between 'creation' and 'criticism' and
merges them into the concepts of ' interpretation' and 'decon-
structioritr
Although this oppositional process is to some extent present
in all fiction, and particularly likely to emerge during 'crisis'
periods in the literary history of the genre (see Chapter 3), its
prom inence in the con tem porary novel is unique. T h e historical
period w e, are living:...through ha s been sin gularly un certa in,
insecure, seIf jyitioning.
f all.navels: their 'ou tstan din g
freed om to ch oose' (Fo w les 1*971, p. 4 6). It is this i as lab ility ,
openness anlllflexibility which has allowed the novel remark-
ab ly to su rviv e and a da pt to social chan ge fo r the last 300 years.
In the fac e of the po litical, cultural an d techno logical up heav als
in society since the Second World War, however, its lack of a
fix^ydem iiy.,has now left the novel vu ln er ab le .
Hence critics have discussed the 'crisis of the novel' and the
'death of the nove l'. Inste ad of recog nizing
the
positive-aspects of
fictional selfnconsciousness, they have tended to see such liter-
ary^ be ha viou r as a form of the self-indu lgen ce and decaden ce
characteristic of the exhaustion of any artistic form or genre.
8/11/2019 What is Met a Fiction
10/19
i o M e t a f i c t i o n
C o u ld it not be argued instead that m etafictional w riters, highly
cons cio us of the problem s of artistic leg itim acy , sim ply sensed a
need for the novel to theorize about itself? Only in this way
might the genre establish an identity and validity within a
culture apparently hosti le to i tVp^rn^^7^
n
e a r T i a r i ^ i W * * ^ d
conventional assumptions about 'plot ' , 'character ' , 'authority '
and 'representation'. The traditional fictional quest has thus
been transformed into a quest for fictionality.
M etafiction and the contem porary avant garde
T h is search has been further m otivated by novelists ' responses
to anothe r featu re of con tem porary cultural life: the abse nc e of a
clearly def ined ava nt- gar d^ Jm i^e m eiit l . T h e existence"oT an
unprecedented cultvmid pluralism has meant that post-
m ode rnist w riters are noTconfronteH with the sam e clear-cut
opp ositions as m od ern ist writers were. A n innovation in a
~ r
literary form cannot establish itself as a n^\^dii^.ctiQBainless a
sense pf shared a ims a n d o b j ectives develops amon g ex-
perim en tal w riters. T h is has been slow m recent
years. An argument originally advanced by Lionel Trill ing in
Beyond
Culture(Trill ing 1966) and reiterated by Ge ra ld G ra ff has
suggested one reason for this: that the unmasking of the 'hypo-
critical bourgeois belief in the material and moral progress of
civilization ' ( G ra ff 197 5, p. 308) has been so thoroughly a c c o m
:
plh he cL bj^ m odernism that the creative ten sionjprod uced by
opposing this 'bourgeois belief ljTno longer clearly ava ilable
the novelist.
In eighteenth- and nineteenth-century f iction, tl^indiyiduai.
is a lw ay s finally in tegr ate d into the,sociaL sjtructure (usu ally
through family relationships, marriage, birth or the ultimate
dissolution of death). In modernist fiction the struggle for
personal autonomy can be continued only throughopposition to
existing social institutions and conventions. This struggle
necessarily involves individual alienation and often ends with
mental dissolution. The power structures ofcontemporarysociety
are, however, more diverse and more effectively concealed or
mystif ied, creating greater^groblems for the post-modernist
8/11/2019 What is Met a Fiction
11/19
W h a t is m e t a f i c t io n ? 1 1
novelist in identifying and then representing the object of
' o p p o s i t i o n ' ^
M et afi ction al w riters hav e found a solution to this by turning
inw ard s to their own.m edi^mijailexpi^ssion, in order to exa m ine
the relationship be tw ee niic tioa al form and social reality . Th ey
have come to focus on the notion that 'every
8/11/2019 What is Met a Fiction
12/19
i o M e t a f i c t io n
them selves produce wo rks of art which are ep hem eral and even
trivialLJn the present situation 'even a single work willbe
sufficient grounds for declaring a style finished^ exhausted'
(Ro chb erg 1 9 7 1, p. 73). T h e practitioners of so-calle3^aleatory
ar t ' (which attempts to be jota Jly a n d o m in or d erjo suggest the
chaotijc, frenetic ^ad coUiding surfaces of contemporary tech-
nologica)society) are opeiTtoThese charges. Literarytexts-tend
to function by p reserving a balan ce betw een the un fam iliar (the
innovatory) and the familiar (the conventional or traditional).
Both are necessary because some degree ^ j ^ u j i d a r i c y i s
essential for anvJDiessage to he co m m jltd ^ om em or y^ Redun-,
cfancy isp ro vi d ed for in H ter ar y texts ..through thep reSe nc e of
fanil lmr conventiomTExperimental f iction ofthe a L e a l o ^ v a ^ "
C t y je s ^ u nd ancy by s imply ignor ing the c o n tr i -
tions of literary trad ition. Su ch texts set out to resist the n orm al
processesjDflxe^ding, m em ory ^iid ^n d.er stan d^ without
re d ^ d an cy -. texts.are read and forgotten. Th ey cannot unite to
form a literary 'movement' because they exist only at the
rnqmenLofjieading. ~
The metafictional response to the problem of how to repre-
s e n ^ m ^ c h ao j^ in the, p erm a n en t a nd
orde red terms"of literature,TiasTiaH " a 'much m ore significan t
influen ce on the de velo pm en t "of the novel as ge nre. A lea tor y
w riting might im itate the experience ofTivnT giHltrerbntemp or-
ary world, but it fails to offer any of the comfort traditionally
supplied by literary fiction through a 'sense of an ending'
(Ke rm od e 1966). M etafictio n, however, offers both innovation
and fam iliarity through the indiv idua l reworking and und er-
mining of familiar conventions.
Aleatory writing simply responds with a reply in kind to the
jaljuralistic, hyperactive multiplicity of styles that constitute the
surfac es of present-day cu lture. W hat is m ain fy asserted in su ch
novels i s an^^nai^hit l^vtdual ism, a randomness des igned to
represent an avoidance of social cohtfohby~stressing theam - -
poss i b i l i ty o f easi lyc ate go riz in g.i t o r a s s i m i la tin g the reader to
' fam iliar structures of com m unication. A n argum ent somelimes
prbpSfl-
8/11/2019 What is Met a Fiction
13/19
W h a t is m e t a f i c t i o n ? 1 3
realism, for example, certifies concepts like 'eternal hujrian
n^luxe ^ar the assumption that authority as manifestecTThrougfi^
the omniscient author is somehow free of both gender distinc-
tions and of historically constructed and provisional moral
values). Such novels supposedly expose the way in which these
social practices are constructed through the languagcjof op-
pressive ideologies, by refusing to allow the reader the^role.of
passive consumer or any means of arriving at a 'tojtalljrUergre-
tafio n of tKeftextT
" A1 though IFTsTtrue that m uch of this sho uld und oub tedly
be the task of experimental fiction, it does seem questionable
whether, for many readers, so-called 'aleatory writing' is going
to accom plish all of this. Novels like J o h n Fo w les's TheFrench
Lieutenant's
Woman
or Robert Coover 's Pricksongs and
Descants
(1969), though apparently less 'radical ' , are in the long run
likely to be more successful. Both are metafictional novels in
that they .employ p arody self- m os do us lvr Bo th take as their
'object' language^tHe simctures of nineteenth-century realism
and of histon calrom an ce or of fa iry -ta les .T H Fp aro dy of these
'lang ua ge s' functions to efam ilmjize.su ch structures by setting
up vario us co unt e r-1 e c h n i q ues tojin de rniin e tKe aiitho rityo the
orhnisclerTt author, of the closure of the~TTfral' ending, of the
definitive interpretation. Although the reader is thereby dis-
tanced from the language, the literary conventions and, ulti-
m ately, from conventional ideologies, the de fam iliarization pro-
ceeds from an extremely familiar base. Such novels can thus
initial ly be comprehended thr o u g h jj i j Q ^ nd can
therefore beei^Syed and remain in the consciousness of a wide
read ership wh ich is given a fa r m ore active role in the construc-
tion of the 'm eaning ' j j f l h e text t h a n i s provided either in
con tem po rary realist n ovels or I n novels" w hich convert their
readers into frenetic human word-processors, and which ' last '
only as long as it takes to read them.
The mirror up to art: metafiction and its varieties
It remains, within this introductory chapter, briefly to examine
some alternative definitions of self-conscious writing. These
sim ilar m odes ha ve been vario usly term ed 'the jnjtroverted.
8/11/2019 What is Met a Fiction
14/19
i o M e t a f i c t i o n
jioveF; 'the anti-novel' , ' irreaHsjn', 'surfiction', ' the self-
begett ing novel7TaBulaFion
5
.
3
All, l ike 'metafiction', imply a
fiction that self-consciously reflects uponqts own structure as.,
lan gu ag e; all offer differen t perspectives on the sam e process.
8 u t the terms shif t the je m j^ h as is j^ T h e 'self -
begeiJUng^jjyel ' , for example, is described as an 'account
us ua lly first pe rson, of tliejdevel(^m ent o fA c h a ra ct er to a poTnt,
at^dych^ie ihrgBIe jo take up_and compose the novel we have_
|u st finishedreading.' (K ellm an 19 76, p. 124 5). TK e em p h a si s
l s
on the develop m ent of the na rrat or, on the m odernist concern of
consciousness rather than the post-modernist oneoffictionality (a
in, for exam ple, An dre G ide 's The
Counterfeiters
( 1925)) .
T h e entry of the na rra to r into the text is also a definin g feat ur e
of w ha t has been called 'surf iction' . Ra ym on d Fe de rm an 's book
of that name discusses the mode in terms of overt narratorial
intrusion so that, as in the 'self-begetting novel', the focus
ap p ea rs to be on the ironist him /herself rather than on the ove rt
and covert levels oftTTe tfJnic^ext. Telling as indivi
8/11/2019 What is Met a Fiction
15/19
W h a t is m e t a f i c t io n ? 1 5
make an artefact out^of the mater.ials~.and so to treat the
medium as an end.^ (Ga ss 1970)
The expression ofthis tension is present in much contemporary
writing but it is the
dominant
function in the texts defined here as
metafictional.
T h e metafict ions o f j o rg e Luis Borges and V ladim ir Nabokov
illustrate this point. In some of their work - Borges'Labyrinths
(1964 ) and N ab o ko v's Eale^Eire^ (19 62 ), for ex am ple - fiction
explicitly
masquerades as formalized critical interpretation. In
all their"w ork, ho w eve r, as uT alToThef m etafiction^ fKere is a
more complex im/?/fc/t^Xex:d^endencej30evels than this. The
reader is.always presented with embedded strata which contra-
dict the pje ^ju pp ositio n^ tFataJm .m diate 1 y abo ve or
^elow. The fictional
contmLs>(
the story is continually reflected
by itsform al existence as text, and the existence of that text
withinlTvVorkl viewed in terms oPt^tuzditY^. Brian McHale
has suggested that such contradictions are essentiallyontologicaI
(p os in ^^ es tio n ^ ab gu t the nature and existence of reality) an d
are therefore cha racteristically p ost-m od ernist H e sees as mod-
ernist those epistemological contradictions which question how
we can know^^real ityl^bse existence is f inal ly not in doubt
(McHale, forthcoming).
Borges ' imaginary kingdom Tlon, discovered by the ' fortun-
ate conjunction of a mirror and an encyclopaedia' , is a post-
m odern ist w or ld . It is twice a fiction because it is suggested tha t,
before its invention by B or ge s, it has alread y been inven ted by a
secret society of idealists including Bishop Berkeley, and both,
of course, are finally dependent upon the conventions of the
short story (Labyrinths, p. 27). The fact that this ' imaginary'
world can take over the 'real ' one emphasize^moxeahan. the
oTtHem (which would be the
a r ^ o f T H F ^ s H f ^ ^ ') . ' T l o n l J q b a r O r b is T e r t ius ',
the stor y, ij^afaouLa s to ry th a t invents an imagirvary^woild, and
it prim arily and self-consciously isa story w hich , like all stories,
iftyents. a n im agin a r y w o r Id. It imp lies that hu m an beings can
only ever achieve a m etap ho r for reality, a nother -layer^of
' interpjr^tation'. (Borges story 'FuneTTKcTMemorias' (1964)
shows that this need not be cause for despair, for if indeed we
8/11/2019 What is Met a Fiction
16/19
i o M e t a f i c t i o n
could not create these metaphorical images then we would all
surely become insane.)
l ^ t a f i c t i ^ ^ 'sur fict ion ' or 'the self-begett ing
nov el ') thus reject~the~tmd m ^ of the a u th o ^ s a
transcendental imagination fabricating, through an ultimately"
moifiologic^scourse, structures oford'er~which will replace the
forgotten m ate rial text of the w orld . Th ey show not only that the
'author' is a concept produced through previous and existing^
literary and social texts but that what is generally taken to be
' re^it^isa lso constructed and mediated in a s imi lar fashion.
S t H l I t } ^ a nd can be und ersto od
through an appropriate 'reading' process.
Also rejected is the displacement of 'historical man' by
'structural man' advocated by Robert Scholes as the basis of
wh at he nc^ ^T abu lationn^ Schro les 1975) . D avid Lo dge has
pointed out that ^history may be in a philosophical sense,_a_
fiction, but it does not feel like that when we miss a train or
somebody starts a war' .* As novel readers, we look to fiction to
o f fer u s^ ^n i t iv e j^ ct io n sr ta lo c^ at eu s with in everyday as we ll
as within philosophical paradigms, to explain the historical
w-orld a s w _ e i L a s ^ comfort and^certa inty :
Scholes argues that the empirical has lost all validity and that a
collusion between the ph iloso ph ic and the m ythic in the form of
'ethically controlled fantasy' is the only authentic mode for
fiction (Scholes 19 6 7, "p. 1 1 J. H ow ev er, m etafiction offers the
recognition, no yh at_the e ve ryd ay has ceased to m atter, but that
its formulation through social and cultural codes bririgs ircloser
to the ph ilosoph ical and m yth ic than w as once assumed*-
A brief comparison oftw o self-conscious novels, one obvious-
ly 'm etafiction al ' , the other m ore obviously ' fab ula tor y' , shows
how metafiction explores the concept of fictionality through an
opposition between the construction and the breaking of illu-
sion, while fabulation reveals instead what Christine Brooke-
Rose (1980) has referred to as a reduced tension between
technique and counter-technique: a 'stylizationVwhich enables
either voices to be
assirmlaierf,
rathe r than presen ting a con flict of
v o i c e s . "
Murie l Spark ' s met fiction l novels lay bare the process of
imposing form upon contingent matter through the discursive
8/11/2019 What is Met a Fiction
17/19
W h a t is m e t a f i c t io n ? 1 7
organization ofJplotL She can, however, as David Lodge has
said o f J o y c e , afford her metap horic flights becau se of the
stability of her m etonymic base (Lo dge 19 77 a , p. 1 1 1 ) . Sh e uses
her 'fligh ts ', in
fact,
to com m ent on the very pa rad igm s that they
are in the process of constructing (this embedding of strata, of
course , being f u n d a m e n t ^ In Not to Disturb
(1971), for example, this highly obtrusive simile describes a
storm:
Meanwhile the lightning which strikes the clump of elms so
that the two
friends
hud dled there are killed instan tly without
pain, zigzags across the lawns, illuminating the lily-pond and
the sunken rose garden like a self-stricken flash photo-
gra ph er, a nd like a zip-fastener ripped fro m its garm ent by a
sexual maniac.
(p. 86)
This appears to be a piece of highly stylized descriptive prose
marked particularly by the appearance of extremely bizarre
metaphors. To this extent it is very similar to Richard Brauti-
gan's
fadulatory
novel,
Trout
Fishing in
America
(19 67 ), which is
full of similar metaphorical constructions where the extreme
polarity of vehicle and tenor im plicitly rem inds the reader of the
way in which metaphor constructs an image of reality by
connecting apparently quite disparate objects. In this novel, for
example, trout are described waiting in streams 'l ike airplane
tickets' (p. 78), and the reader's imagination is stretched
throughout by the incongruity ofthe comparisons. The novel is
a celebration o f the creative im agina tion: it is a 'fab ula tion '.
IntITe""Spark example, however, there is a furtKe
more
subtle function that is part of a sustained metafictional display;
for the vehicle of the metaphor is explicitly related to what is
happening at the contiguously unfolding level of the story. A
group of entrepreneurial and enterprising servants have
arran ged the film ing of the last m om ents of an eternal triang le of
superannuated aristocrats. The servants know their masters are
going to die and also know how to capitalize on their deaths.
Aristocratic scandals provide excellent material for media sen-
sationalism. The photographer and the zip fastener (which the
mentally deficient aristocratic son is continually attempting to
8/11/2019 What is Met a Fiction
18/19
i o M e t a f i c t i o n
rip off in the excitement of his intermittent sexual energy) are
im por tant elem ents in the plot being constructed by the novelist
(who also, as in the example, arranges appropriate climatic
conditions) and, of course, by the characters. The reader is
alerted to the w ay in w hich the ex plic uly jtrt if icial construction
of these conn ections fits in with the larger designs of d ieja o^i isJ:
p la yin g Go d., T h e elemen ts at the metaph orical level of the
con struction break dow n not into na tural ' or random lyjchosgn ,
components, hut to another level of artifice: the level of the
'plo t ' . T h e reader is thus reminded that .pu i^jcp ntir^ e^ y^in _
novels i s a lway^ar^k^ony-aj j j inugh the lgvyest^ jeyel of the
artif ice (what the Russian formalist Boris Tomashevsky has
refer red to as realistic m otivation; see Lem on an d Re is 196 5, pp.
6 1 - 9 9 ) is assu m ed to be rgality.-Th us not only do the cha racters
in this no vel p lay roles, fictionalize'in terms of the
content
of the
plot; they too are 'fictionalized', created, through the formal
CQiutxuction
oCthe plot.
M etaf ict ion expl icit ly lays bare the jxm yen tion s^ it
does not ignore or abandon them. Very often realistic conven-
tions su pply the 'con trol' in m etafictiona l texts, .the norm or
background against-which the experimental strategies can fore-
ground themselves. More obviously, of course, this allows for a
stable level of readerly familiarity, without which the ensuing
dislo ca tio ns m igh t be eith er totally m eaning less or so_x>u ts.ide
the normal modes of literary or non-literary communication
that they cannot be committed to memory (the problem,
already discussed, of much contemporary 'aleatory' writing).
M e ta fict io n, t h e n ^ j i o ^ n Q ^ the
n arc is^ fefi^ ple asu res of the im agination^ W hat it does is to
r e - e x a m i n e t h e - e o n v e n f i o n s o f r e a l i g m J n u a r d e r ^ ^ i s c o w r ^
throug h its ow n self-reflecliorT ^ a fijmonaJJ&H T^^
ally relevant and comgrehensilj le to contemporary readers: In
showing us how l i terary f i c t ion crea^ i ts jmaginary wor lds ,
metafiction helps us to understandliow the reality welive day "
by j j& yjs s imilarly con stru H eaj l im ilariy 'written".
'Metaficdonl. is thus an elastic term which covers a wide
range of fictions. There are those novels at one end of the
spectrum which take fictionality as a theme to be explored (and
in this sense would include the 'self-begetting novel'), as in the
8/11/2019 What is Met a Fiction
19/19
W h a t is m e t a f i c t io n ? 1 9
work of Iris M urd och or Je r z y K osin sk i, whose form al self-
consc iousness is jim ite d . A t the centre of this spectrum are those
texts that manifest the symptoms of formal and ontological
insecurity but allow their deco nstructions to be finally recontex-
tualized or 'na turalize d' and given a total interpretation (which
constitute, the refore, a 'new rea lism '), as in the work of J o h n
Fow les or E . L . Doctorow. 'F in a lly , at the furthest extrem e
(which would include Tabulation') can be placed those fictions
that, in rejecting realism more thoroughly, posit the world
as a fabrication of competing semiotic systems which never
correspond to material conditions, as in the work of Gilbert
Sorrentino, Raymond Federman or Christine Brooke-Rose.
Much British fiction fits into the first half of the spectrum,
though problematically, and much American fiction into the
other half, though w ith the sam e proviso. T h e n ovelist at either
end, how eve r - in confronting the problem that, 'wh ether or not
he mak es ^pjeacewith r ea lis m ,.b e m ust so m eho w .xop e with
realit^'jpickinson 19 75 , p. 37 2) - has ackno wled ged the fact
that this 'rea lity' is jn fi jc u a g ^ by nineteenth-
cei^jcyjiov^li&ts-and experienced by nineteenth-century read-
ers. Indeed, it could be argued that, far from 'dying', the novel
has reached a mature recognition of its existence as writing,
wh ich can only ensure its continued viab ility in and relevan ce to
a contemporary world which is similarly beginning to gain
awareness ^_pjrecisely how its values and practices are con-
s t r u ^ e J a n d legitimized.
Recommended