What is a good Learning Object? - Med Uni Grazuser.medunigraz.at/andreas.holzinger/holzinger/papers...

08.11.04 Wien

andreas.holzinger@meduni-graz.at IMI Graz

What is a good Learning Object?

Andreas HolzingerMedical Informatics, Graz

08.11.04 Wien

Andreas HolzingerAssociate Professor of Information Processing

Institute for medical Informatics, Statistics & Documentation

Affiliation

08.11.04 Wien

Angela

Katharina Barbara

My assistants ...

08.11.04 Wien

IWK ... my personal motto ...

"The old computing is about what computers can do; The new computing is about what people can do"

Shneiderman (2002)

08.11.04 Wien

IWK My books

www.basiswissen-it.atHardware

Software

Application

08.11.04 Wien

www.basiswissen-multimedia.at

… more books …

Human ̶ Computer

Computer

08.11.04 Wien

Technology(Computer)

Human – Computer Interaction

Interaction Design(Human ̶ Computer)

Cognition & Learning(Human)

08.11.04 Wien

IWK A few words about learning …

Learning online is just learning.

Only the tools are different.

08.11.04 Wien

Learning is a basic cognitive process … not an object...

Skinner (1954), Gagné (1965), Holzinger (2000), 54, 105

08.11.04 Wien

cause learning deliver information

Practice

Simulation

Discussion

Presentation

Demonstration

Methods versus Media

08.11.04 Wien

IWK Multimedia Design

Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) includes both, methods and media

Humans

TechnologyTasks

Design

08.11.04 Wien

IWK Moore’s Law

MemorySpeed

PortabilityAffordabilityPerformance

1950 1990 2030

Computer "capabilities"

Moore (1997) and cf. Holzinger (2002), 69

08.11.04 Wien

IWK Human versus Computer

Computers

Human Abilities

1950 1990 203010.000 BC

08.11.04 Wien

IWK The Media does not matter …

Rich media may be more entertaining but it doesn’t necessarily lead to better learning!

Salomon (1984)

Exceptions:SimulationsVisualizations &Motivational Effects

Schank (1994), Holzinger (1997), Holzinger (2000)

Richard Clark (1994) Media will never influence learning, Educational Technology R&D (42) 21-29

08.11.04 Wien

IWK Learning Object Definitions

IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) “Any entity, digital or non-digital, which can be used, re-used or referenced during technology supported learning”

– Learning Object Metadata Working Group of the IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee (LTSC)

Wiley (2000)“any digital resource that can be reused to support learning”

– David A. Wiley (2000), "Connecting Learning Objects to Instructional Design Theory"

Cisco“A digital learning resource that is reusable, sharable, interoperable, and discoverable.”

08.11.04 Wien

IWK Fundamental Idea of a LO

“…. a fundamental idea is that a learning object can stand on its own and may be reused.”

Metaphor behind: Lego bricks, molecules, atomsReigeluth & Nelson (1997), Saddik et al. (2000) Holzinger (2001)

08.11.04 Wien

Learning Objects are generally:GranularReusableInteroperableAddress an educational concept.May have prerequisites.Must have metadata.

Holzinger (2001)

08.11.04 Wien

IWK Types of Learning Objects

Raw assets – e.g., image, video, text, referenceRaw ingredients from which content is made

Learning assets – e.g., image with textIngredients contextualized and organized into focused learning content

Activities – e.g., task relating to imageAny activity having implicit or explicit learning objectives and outcomes

Courses – containing a number of assets and activities

Integrated into a Lesson or Course schedule

Templates – e.g., quiz generator

08.11.04 Wien

The end-user must be considered

… research has to be centered on better understanding the end-user and the context in which the user works and learn …

But alwaysconsider the Human in Multimedia Design …

✠ U S A B I L I T Y E N G I N E E R I N G

08.11.04 Wien

IWK Which aims encompasses Usability Engineering?

Ease of learningGrasp, understand fast, efficient, effective …

RecallRemember materials for a long time …

ProductivityPerform tasks quickly and efficiently …

Minimal error ratesAdapt in new situations …

High end-user satisfactionConfident of success … Nielsen (1994), Holzinger (2004)

08.11.04 Wien

IWK Problems with online learning

Inadequate access to technology (digital divide)Driven by economics rather than educationDriven by technology Excessive commercializationDisembodiment of instructorLack of good contentLack of pedagogic and didactical knowledgeLack of understanding of technology

08.11.04 Wien

IWK Audience Analysis

“Know thy end-users”

Common dimensions includeRole – Dominant persona of users (job, affiliation)Goals – Reason for the interactionCircumstances of Use – Setting, resources, strategy, timing Culture – Group level beliefs, language, preferencesErgonomics – Relevant perceptual & motor abilities, skills

08.11.04 Wien

IWK User Centered Design

Know thy end-users!Cognitive abilitiesPhysical abilitiesMotivational backgroundPrevious knowledge and skills!

Keep users involved throughout the system development process

Karat (1997)

08.11.04 Wien

4Phase 1: Analysis

Phase 2: Design

Phase 3: Development

Phase 4: Testing

Level I: Requirements Analysis

Level II: Low-FiPrototyping

Level III: Hi-FiPrototyping

(Level IV): Usability Reengineering

Engineering a LO

08.11.04 Wien

Phase 1: Analysis

Phase 2: Design

Phase 4: Testing

Level I: Requirements Analysis & Specification

Focus on: Who? What? Why? Where? When?

A) Identify users and analyze learning requirements

B) Define learning outcomes

C) Define context

D) Define content

Participants: Learners, Teacher (usually Domain Expert), Multimedia Expert (usually software Freak), Design Expert (usually Usability Engineer), Didactical Expert

08.11.04 Wien

Phase 1: Analysis

Phase 2: Design

Phase 4: Testing

Level II: Multimedia Application Design

Focus on: Presentation, Access, Engagement

A) Select appropriate Didactical Model

B) Follow pedagogical Design Guidelines (Pedagogy)

C) Follow principal Design Guidelines (Information Design)

D) Select proper Interactions (Interaction Design)

08.11.04 Wien

Phase 1: Analysis

Phase 2: Design

Phase 4: Testing

Level III: Multimedia Application Development

Focus on: Usability Engineering

A) Prototype and implement Design from Level II

B) Follow pedagogical Design Guidelines (Pedagogy)

C) Apply current technology (Media, XML, Metadata etc.)

D) Provide always good accessibility (bandwidth etc.)

08.11.04 Wien

1. Gain Attention

2. Introduce Objectives

3. Recall Prior Knowledge

4. Present New Concepts

5. Guiding Learning Process

6. Feedback

7. Assessment

8. Enhance Retention & Transfer

Only one Example: Gagne´s Theory of Learning

Gagné (1965)

Holzinger (2000)

08.11.04 Wien

IWK Nature of Content

Learning Goals according to Bloom (1956):

1) Cognitive Goals (Information, Knowledge, …)2) Affective Goals (Curiosity, Awareness, …)3) Psychomotoric Goals (Hands-On, Know-How)

What does the nature of your content require?

08.11.04 Wien

IWK Instructional Design Strategies

Orientation “Students need to know where they are, how they got there, and how to get back”

Electronic Medium Conceals InformationPlacement CuesHierarchies and IndicesSemantic Nets (make the associations between related information specific)

08.11.04 Wien

IWK Instructional Design Strategies (continued)

Navigation“Minimize the mental load required to understand

the interface”Simple and ConsistentLayer Content Use Inverted Pyramids

“When a screen changes, change only the information to which the learner is directed”

08.11.04 Wien

IWK Presentation of Content

TextAmount of Text

Text Display

Text Structure

Readability

Fragmentation

Nielsen (1994), Holzinger (2002)

08.11.04 Wien

IWK Presentation of Content (continued)

MultimediaKeep Download Time to a Minimum

Hybrid Approach for Rich Media

28.8K Modem 56K Modem 112K ISDN 416K SDSL

Example: Downloading a 40 kilobyte image

After 1 second:40 Kbytes loaded

After 1 second:10.5 Kbytes loaded

Holzinger (2000), Holzinger (2002)

08.11.04 Wien

How interactive?

‘stop’‘start’‘watch’‘listen’

‘browse’‘investigate’‘explore’‘choose’‘do’

PASSIVE ACTIVE

TEACHER-CENTRED STUDENT-CENTRED

From teacher centered to student centered

Interactivity

Motschnig & Holzinger (2002)

08.11.04 Wien

How interactive?

‘stop’‘start’‘watch’‘listen’

‘browse’‘investigate’‘explore’‘choose’‘do’

PASSIVE ACTIVE

TEACHER-CENTRED STUDENT-CENTERED

Leeder & Davies (2002)

08.11.04 Wien

IWK Students using material

Download DelaysDownloading millions of Plug-insHaving to Change Fonts or Other SettingsHaving to Reboot after every sessionLong Scrolling Text – endless reading on screensLinks Within a Page and not finding backDead Ends/Can’t Get BackGetting LostNo Online Moderator, no instructor availableOverly Detailed Graphical User InterfaceUnnecessary Distractions (flashing, popping, …)

What students hate …

08.11.04 Wien

IWK Summarizing

e-Learning at the university:It is one small step for mankind, But one giant leap for a teacher.

08.11.04 Wien

IWK Conclusion

A good learning object fits to its end-users; It addresses the questions:Who are the learners?What do they need to be able to achieve the learning goals?How will I know when they’ve achieved the learning goal? How will they get to the learning goal?

WHO WHAT WHEN HOW

08.11.04 Wien

We must provide benefits and gain acceptance in the sense of UBIQUITOUS USABILITY

08.11.04 Wien

www.basiswissen-multimedia.at

www.basiswissen-it.at

What is a good Learning Object? - Med Uni Grazuser.medunigraz.at/andreas.holzinger/holzinger/papers...

Documents

A. Holzinger LV 709hci-kdd.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/1... · A. Holzinger LV 709.049

10-LV709049-INFORMATION-SYSTEMS-Holzinger-2016...Unsolved: Data Integration, Data Fusion, Data Mapping Goal: Unified View, (as electricity IS already!) Holzinger, A. & Jurisica, I

A. Holzinger LV709human-centered.ai/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/... · The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. Second Edition, New York, Springer

Beste Qualität seit 1892 · Holzinger Fisch - seit 1892 2 Unternehmensphilosophie Das traditionsreiche Familienunternehmen HOLZINGER steht bereits seit 1892 für Frische,

Informatics 2016S, VU, ECTS Week Tutorial on Stochastic ... · Holzinger Group 1 Machine Learning Health 185.A83 Machine Learning for Health Informatics 2016S, VU, 2.0 h, 3.0 ECTS

U. Dusek 1 , R. Holzinger 1 , T. Röckmann 1

03-DAY-MAKE-Graphs-HOLZINGER-Verona-2017human-centered.ai/.../01/03-DAY-MAKE-Graphs-HOLZINGER-Verona-2… · Predicting Pragmatic Reasoning in Language Games 9 Ha-KDD* Wickens, C

Probabilistic Graphical Models 1: Making under to …...2016/02/02 · Holzinger Group hci‐kdd.org 1 MAKE Health Module 02 Andreas Holzinger 185.A83 Machine Learning for Health

9-LV709049-VISUALANALYTICS-Holzinger-2016-slides-fullsizehuman-centered.ai/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/...Data Visualizatim HCI Machine Learning Data prepro- Mapping cessing Data

LV 706.046 3SE AK Mensch-Maschine Kommunikation Usability ...user.medunigraz.at/andreas.holzinger/holzinger... · design 11.04.05 IICM andreas.holzinger@meduni-graz.at 16 Usability

Michael Holzinger , Alan Le Goff and Serge Cosnier · sensors Review Synergetic Effects of Combined Nanomaterials for Biosensing Applications Michael Holzinger , Alan Le Goff and

02-DAY-MAKE-Data-HOLZINGER-Verona-2017human-centered.ai/.../01/02-DAY-MAKE-Data-HOLZINGER... · Data Skills MAKE Health Verona 02 For further reading this is recommended: Buffalo,

03-3403000-HOLZINGER-Reinforcement-Learning-2017-slideshuman-centered.ai/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/... · Status as of 03.04.2016 e Machine Learning JYU Scientists in this area

Welcome to the Holzinger Group HCI KDD 2: What are some ...2016/10/02 · Holzinger Group, HCI‐KDD.org 1 Student Seminar, Winter 2016 Andreas Holzinger VO 706.996 W DiplomandInnen

From Clinical Decision Support to explainable AI (ex-AI)€¦ · Holzinger Group hci-kdd.org 1 Machine Learning Health 08 Andreas Holzinger 185.A83 Machine Learning for Health Informatics

Multi Agent Interaction in the loop · Holzinger Group, hci‐kdd.org 1 Machine Learning Health 10 Andreas Holzinger 185.A83 Machine Learning for Health Informatics 2017S, VU, 2.0

LV 706.046 3SE AK Mensch-Maschine Kommunikation Usability ...user.medunigraz.at/andreas.holzinger/holzinger... · LV 706.046 3SE AK Mensch-Maschine Kommunikation Usability Engineering

Thomas Holzinger, Holzinger Consulting, grinding system ......mill systems with pre‑grinders (HPGR, roller presses, or VRM pre‑grinders) to increase cement production from about

oaisd/ctc/ Aubrey Holzinger

Perspektiven für das m-Working 5.10.2005 Wienuser.medunigraz.at/andreas.holzinger/holzinger/papers en/K18_Holzi… · 1 University Hospital + 21 General Hospitals Styria 1.200.000