View
245
Download
1
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
7/25/2019 WEIRS classification
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 1/30
WEIRS
Classification of Weirs:
Design of Weirs:
Hydraulic Design
Structural Design
Floor Design
Detailed Drawings
Solved Example
RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm
0 1 16:29 23-01-2016
7/25/2019 WEIRS classification
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 2/30
Objectives of Weirs in Irrigation Canals
Proper distribution of water carried by a main canal among the branchcanals depending upon it
Reducing the hydraulic slope (gradient) in a canal (if canal water slope is
greater than the allowable water slope)
Reducing head on existing structures
Collecting sediments at US of structures (sand strap)
RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm
0 2 16:29 23-01-2016
7/25/2019 WEIRS classification
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 3/30
Weirs for reducing water slope in steep lands
Distance between weirs
ac = L * Slope (before)
ab = L * Slope (after)
rise (R) = ac – ab
= L {Slope (before) – slope (after)}
L = distance between weirs
RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm
0 3 16:29 23-01-2016
7/25/2019 WEIRS classification
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 5/30
Classification According to Position in Plan
RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm
0 5 16:29 23-01-2016
7/25/2019 WEIRS classification
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 6/30
Classification According to Dimensions of Cross Section
Classification According to Position of Down-Stream Water Level
a) Free- Overfall Weir (Clear-Overfall)
Q = 2/3 Cd B (2g) 0.5 H1.5
· DSWL is lower than crest level
· Q is independent of DSWL
· Q α H
RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm
0 6 16:29 23-01-2016
7/25/2019 WEIRS classification
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 7/30
b) Submerged Weir
Q = 2/3 Cd B (2g) 0.5 H1.5 + Cd B h1 (2gh2)0.5
· DSWL is higher than weir crest
Q α H, h , h
Classification According to Crest Length (B)
Design of Weirs
Design of Weirs is divided to 3 parts:
1 2
RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm
0 7 16:29 23-01-2016
7/25/2019 WEIRS classification
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 8/30
I. Hydraulic Design (determination of crest level and weir length according to head(
II. Structural Design (Empirical Dimensioning – check of
stability(
III – Detailed Drawings
For proper Design of Water Structures:
Velocity of Flow:
Must cause minimum Loss in Head
Or minimum Heading Up
Flow of Water in a Channel is controlled either by:
§ A Weir or
§ A Regulator
RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm
0 8 16:29 23-01-2016
7/25/2019 WEIRS classification
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 9/30
Weirs: For lands having steep slopes
Regulators: For lands having mild slopes or flat lands
I- Hydraulic Design of Weirs
1- Clear Over fall Weir
Q = 2/3 Cd B (2g) 0.5 H 1.5
2 – Submerged Weir
Q = 2/3 Cd B (2g) 0.5 h21.5 + Cd B h1 (2*g*h2) 0.5
3 – Broad–Crested Weir
Q = 1.71 Cd B H 1.5
4 – Fayum Type Weir
Q = 1.65 B H 1.5
5 – Standing Wave Weir
RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm
0 9 16:29 23-01-2016
7/25/2019 WEIRS classification
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 10/30
Q = 2.05 B H 1.5
II Structural Design
1 The super structure
Theoretical Weir Profile
Scour Length of Weir Floor
Scour may be defined as deepening and widening of water channel under the
influence of the flowing water with high velocities.
The scour continues until the energy of the flowing water reaches the normal
channel energy.
RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm
0 10 16:29 23-01-2016
7/25/2019 WEIRS classification
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 11/30
Velocity distribution through scour hole
Precautions against scour
RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm
0 11 16:29 23-01-2016
7/25/2019 WEIRS classification
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 12/30
Floor of Heading Up Structures
A weir on solid rock (impervious foundation) does not need long apron (Floor), butneeds sufficient width “b” to resist soil stresses.
RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm
0 12 16:29 23-01-2016
7/25/2019 WEIRS classification
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 13/30
A weir on pervious soil needs length “L” to:
a) Cover percolation length,
b) Resist scour from falling water
Definitions
Percolation is the flow of water under the ground surface due to an applied
differential head
Percolation length (creep length) is the length to dissipate the total
hydraulic pressure on the structure
Undermining (Piping) is to carry away (wash) soil particles with flowing water
below the ground surface causing collapse or failure of the above structure
RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm
0 13 16:29 23-01-2016
7/25/2019 WEIRS classification
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 14/30
Determination of Percolation Length
To determine the critical head: (after which undermining occurs)
RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm
0 14 16:29 23-01-2016
7/25/2019 WEIRS classification
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 15/30
1- Measure Q for different heads
2- H1 ----- Q1, v1= Q1 / A
H2 ------Q2, v2………. (k determined)
3- H……..Hn varies until Hcritical (soil particles begin to move)
Vcritical = Qcritical / A vcr
vcr = k Hcr / L = K icr L = K Hcr / vcr
k = vcr L / Hcr = Qcr L / A Hcr
Soil K (cm / min) Type of flow
Clean gravel 5000 – 50 Turbulent
Clean sand 50 – 0.05 Turbulent or laminar
Fine sand + silt 0.05 – 0.00005 Laminar
Clay < 0.00005 Always laminar
Permeability : (hydr. Conductivity)
Ability of fluid to move in the soil under certain head (dimensions of velocity)
v = k i
i = H / L
v α porosity + arrangement of grains
Seepage or percolation below weirs on previous soils:
- a weir may be subject to failure from under seepage
- water head will force (push) the water to percolate through the soil voids
RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm
0 15 16:29 23-01-2016
7/25/2019 WEIRS classification
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 16/30
- if water velocity at D.S. end is not safe (> v critical) then undermining occurs,i.e. water at exit will carry away soil particles
v = k I (Darcy,s law)
= k dP / dl = k H / L
In practice: icr = vcr / k is unknown
Therefore we carry the 2nd experiment
e = voids ratio
e = vv/ vs
e = (1 – vs) / vs = (1 / vs) –1
Or 1+e = 1 / vs or vs = 1 / (1+e)
Upward force = H * A
Downward force =
RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm
0 16 16:29 23-01-2016
7/25/2019 WEIRS classification
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 17/30
(net weight)
= sp. Gr. Wt. Of soil under water
= ( -1) A L / (1+e)
for stability: H. A. = ( -1) A L / (1 + e)
H / L = icr = ( - 1) / (1 + e) can be determined
Safe percolation length L = H / icr
Or L = H / icr (F.S.)
Values of i cr & F.S.
Soil icr F.S.
Fine gravel 0.25 – 0.20 4 –5
Coarse sand 0.20 – 0.17 5 – 6
Fine sand 0.17 – 0.14 6 – 7
Silt & clay 0.14 – 0.12 7 – 8
If I > icr undermining (piping)
i.e. water has v >> to carry away soil particles
Bligh Creep Theory
The length of the seepage path transversed by the water is known as the length of creep
(percolation length).
Bligh supposed that the dissipation of head per unit length of creep is constant
throughout the seepage path.
CB = Bligh coefficient of percolation C B = V/K
Percolation length is the path length from (a) to (b)
LBligh = CBligh . H
RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm
0 17 16:29 23-01-2016
7/25/2019 WEIRS classification
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 18/30
L` = 2 t + L
If L` > LB (Design is safe, no possibility of undermining)
If L` < LB (Design is unsafe, undermining occurs, leads to failure)
L` = L + 2 t + 2 S1 + 2 S2
L` LB (design is safe, no possibility of undermining)
L` < LB (design is unsafe, undermining occurs, leads to failure)
Lane’s Weighted Creep Theory
Lane suggested that a weight of three should be given to vertical creep and a weight of one to horizontal creep.
LL = CL H
Lane percolation length L` = 1/3 L (horizontal) + L (vertical)
RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm
0 18 16:29 23-01-2016
7/25/2019 WEIRS classification
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 19/30
L` = 1/3 L + 2 t + 2 S1 + 2 S2
RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm
0 19 16:29 23-01-2016
7/25/2019 WEIRS classification
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 20/30
Distance between successive sheet piles
· Distance between sheet piles a-a and b-b d1 + d2
· Water percolation length takes the right path -----safe
RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm
0 20 16:29 23-01-2016
7/25/2019 WEIRS classification
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 21/30
Distance between sheet piles a-a & b-b < d1 + d2;
Water percolation length takes a short cut from a to b;
Actual percolation length is smaller than designed
unsafe
Design Head for Percolation
H = USHWL – DSHWL (1)
H = USLWL – DSLWL (2)
H = Crest level –DSBL (3)
Design head H is the biggest of (1), (2), and (3)
RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm
0 21 16:29 23-01-2016
7/25/2019 WEIRS classification
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 22/30
Determination of Floor Dimensions
t1 = 0.5 – 1.0 m assumed
t2 is taken 2.0 m or t2 = 0.8 (H)0.5
t3 = t2 / 2 1 m
and l1 is assumed (1-2) H
L2 = is determined according to weir type (3-8) m
LScour = Cs (Hs) 0.5
Or
LScour = 0.6 CB (Hs) 0.5
Hs = USHWL – DSBL – Yc
= Scour head; Yc = critical depth
& q = Q / B
where B is the weir length; q is the discharge per unit length
L` = l1 + l2 + ls + 2 t2
LB = CB . H if L` LB no need for sheet pile
RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm
0 22 16:29 23-01-2016
7/25/2019 WEIRS classification
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 23/30
If L` < LB unsafe; use sheet pile
Depth of sheet piles = (LB – L`) / 2
Sheet pile depth m
Determination of the uplift diagram
HD
h2 = H – t1/CB – l1 / CB
t2 = t / (γm) * Factor of safetyγ
t2 = F.S. [ h2 / (γm)] m.; γm = 2.2 t/m3
t2 = 1.3. [ h
2 / (γ
m)]
then t3 = t2/2 ≥ 1 m.
t3 = F.S. [ h3 / (γm)] m then the head h3 which corresponds to floor
thickness t3
L3 = CB * h3 = x + t3 then get distance x
RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm
0 23 16:29 23-01-2016
7/25/2019 WEIRS classification
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 24/30
Precautions Against Percolation
· The aprons are of plain concrete blocks of about 1.5 * 1 * 0.75 m deep
· For small structure blocks of about 1 * 0.75 * 0.5 m deep may be used
· The blocks are placed in rows with (70 – 100) mm open joints filled with broken
stone.
An inverted filter of well graded gravel and sand is placed under the blocks in order
to prevent the loss of soil through the joints
RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm
0 24 16:29 23-01-2016
7/25/2019 WEIRS classification
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 25/30
RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm
0 25 16:29 23-01-2016
7/25/2019 WEIRS classification
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 26/30
EXAMPLE
A canal (A) is divided into two branches (i & ii).The discharge of branch (i)=2Q of branch (ii) at all times. Two weirs have to be constructed at the entrance of each canal
.
Data :-
- Bed width of canals (i & ii ) = ( 23.0 & 8.0 ) m .
- Flood discharge of canal (A) = 105 cum/sec .
- Summer discharge of canal (A) = 45 cum/sec .
- DSHWL in the two canals = ( 11.00 )
- minimum water depth in the two canal branches = 4.0 m .
- Difference between H.W.L & L.W.L in canal(A) = .7 m .
- Submergence in canal (i) = 1/3
- Bligh coeff. of percolation = 16
- Bed level is constant in canal (A) and its branches .
- Q = 2 B H1.5
If a Board crested weir is constructed at the entrance of the two branches (i&ii) it isrequired to :-
1- Crest level of weirs ( i & ii ) .
2- Length of each weir .
3- HWL in canals (A) .
4- LWL in canal (A) & (i) .
5- Design of weir floor for canal (i) by applying Bligh method..
solution
Q A = Qi + Qii & Qi = 2 Qii
Q A = 2 Qii + Qii
At flood
RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm
0 26 16:29 23-01-2016
7/25/2019 WEIRS classification
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 27/30
Q A = 105 = 3 Qii
Qii = 35 m3/s & Qi = 70 m3/s
At summer
Q A = 45 = 3 Qii
Qii = 15 m3/s & Qi = 30 m3/s
For branch ( i )
Qmax /Qmin = (2 B H11.5) / (2 B H2
1.5) = H12/H2
2
H1/H2 = (Qmax /Qmin )2/3 = (70/30)2/3
H1/H2 = 1.527 & H1 = 1.76 H2 (1)
H1 - H2 = .7 (2)
From (1) & (2)
1.76 H2 - H2 = .7 H2 = .92 m
H1 = 1.62 m
h1/H1 = 1/3 h1 = 1.62/3
1- Crest level of weirs ( i & ii ) = 11 - .54 = ( 10.46 )
2- length of weir (i)
Qmax = 70 = 2 B (1.62)1.5 B = 17 m
RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm
0 27 16:29 23-01-2016
7/25/2019 WEIRS classification
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 28/30
Qmin = 30 = 2 B (.92)1.5 B = 17 m
B = 17 m
Length of weir (ii)
Qmax = 35 = 2 B (1.62)1.5 B = 8.5 m
Qmin = 15 = 2 B (.92)1.5 B = 8.5 m
B = 8.5 m
3- HWL in canals (A) = 10.46 + 1.62 = (12.08)
4- LWL in canal (A) = 10.46 + .92 = (11.38)
h2/H2 = 1/3 & h2 = .92/3 = .3
LWL in canal (i) = 10.46 + .3 = ( 10.76 )
Design of weir floor for canal (i) by applying Bligh method
BED LEVEL = 10.76 – 4 = 6.76
HD = 12.08 - 11 = 1.08
HD = 11.38 - 10.76 = .62
HD = 10.46 - 6.76 = 3.7
take HD = 3.7 m
LB = CB * HD = 16 * 3.7 = 59.2
RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm
0 28 16:29 23-01-2016
7/25/2019 WEIRS classification
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 29/30
Assume L1 = 6 m L2 = 6 m
LS = CS (HS).5 CS = .6 CB
HS = 12.08 - 6.76 - Ycr & HS = 4.37 & LS = 20 m
Assume t2 = 2 m
L\ = 6 + 6 + 20 + 2 * 2 = 36
L\ < LB unsafe use sheet pile d = (59.2 – 36) / 2 = 11.6
Use two sheet pile d =7 m & d = 5 m
h2 = 3.7 - .5/16 – 6/16- (2*7)/16 = 2.9
t2 = 2.9 * (1.3/1.2) = 3.1 m
t3 = t2/2 = 1.6 m > 1
RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm
0 29 16:29 23-01-2016
Recommended