Visualizing Carbon and Energypsdconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/ACI_2009_GT_Movi… ·...

Preview:

Citation preview

Visualizing Carbon and Energy

Gregory Thomas

Performance Systems

Ithaca, NY

Who is Performance Systems?• Ithaca NY based, 50+ person company

• Development (Nationally)– Software and Training

• Compass Benchmarking, TREAT, BPI, RESNET and Contractor Training

– State and Utility Program Support • NY, NE, NH, PA, OH, MD, CA, MA, WI (Home Performance, Multi and Commercial)

– Energy and Green Building Services for Building Owners– Energy and Green Building Services for Building Owners• Multifamily and Commercial Energy Audits, M&V and Evaluation

• Contracting (Locally)– Home Performance with Energy Star

– Energy Star Energy Ratings

– Geothermal Systems

– Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems

– Multifamily Retrofit

kWh Carbon Intensity to Cost Comparison EIA 2006

10

15

20

25

15

20

25

30

35

40

0

5

10

0

5

10

15

Verm

ont

Idaho

Wash

ington

Oregon

California

Connecticut

New Hampsh

ire

New Jersey

Maine

New York

South Carolin

a

Rhode Island

South Dakota

Arizona

Illin

ois

Massach

usetts

Nevada

Arkansas

Mississippi

Florida

Pennsylvania

Virginia

North Carolin

a

Louisiana

Alabama

US Average

Maryland

Texas

Georgia

Tennessee

Michigan

Montana

Alaska

Nebraska

Minnesota

Oklahoma

Hawaii

Wisco

nsin

Kansas

Delaware

Colorado

Ohio

Missouri

Utah

New M

exico

Iowa

West Virginia

Indiana

Kentucky

Wyoming

North Dakota

District of …

kWh Carbon Intensity to Cost Trend Line with Pacific NW Hydro and HI Removed

EIA 2006

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

25

30

35

40

Tons per 100MMBtu

0

2

4

6

8

0

5

10

15

Verm

ont

Idaho

Wash

ington

Oregon

California

Connecticut

New Hampsh

ire

New Jersey

Maine

New York

South Carolin

a

Rhode Island

South Dakota

Arizona

Illin

ois

Massach

usetts

Nevada

Arkansas

Mississippi

Florida

Pennsylvania

Virginia

North Carolin

a

Louisiana

Alabama

US Average

Maryland

Texas

Georgia

Tennessee

Michigan

Montana

Alaska

Nebraska

Minnesota

Oklahoma

Hawaii

Wisco

nsin

Kansas

Delaware

Colorado

Ohio

Missouri

Utah

New M

exico

Iowa

West Virginia

Indiana

Kentucky

Wyoming

North Dakota

District of …

Tons per 100MMBtu

National Carbon per kWh Intensity - 2006

From 0 to 5 (4)

(1)From 5 to 9

(7)From 9 to 14 (7)

From 14 to 19

From 19 to 24 (12)

From 24 to 28 (8)

From 28 to 33 (6)

From 9 to 14

(12)

2000

2500

3000

3500

2,000,000

2,500,000

3,000,000

3,500,000

Lbs of CO2 per MMBtu at the Meter

Btu of Site and Source Energy

All Btus Are Not Created Equal - Lbs CO2 per MMBtu

0

500

1000

1500

0

500,000

1,000,000

1,500,000

Electricity Non Summer

NYC

Electricity Summer NYC

Gas Fuel Oil Steam Cooling NYC

Steam Heating NYC

Lbs of CO2 per MMBtu at the Meter

Btu of Site and Source Energy

Lbs CO2 per MMBtu Site Energy Source Energy per MMBtu

2,000,000

2,500,000

3,000,000

3,500,000

$40

$50

$60

$70

Btu of Site and Source Energy

$ per MM Btu at the Meter

All Btus Are Not Created Equal - $ Per MMBtu

0

500,000

1,000,000

1,500,000

$0

$10

$20

$30

Electricity Non Summer NYC

Electricity Summer NYC

Gas Fuel Oil Steam Cooling NYC

Steam Heating NYC

Btu of Site and Source Energy

$ per MM Btu at the Meter

$ MMBtu Site Energy Source Energy per MMBtu

Cost and Carbon per 100 MMBtu of Delivered Energy

10

20

30

40

50

60

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Tons per 100 MMBtu and $ per MMBtu

0

10

0

5

Tons per 100 MMBtu and $ per MMBtu

Tons of CO2 per 100 MMBtu Customer $ Cost per MMBtu at the Meter

Gas = $2 per Therm, Oil = $4 per Gallon, Propane = $4 per Gallon, kWh = $.15

Solar Intensity and kWh Carbon combine to create $/ton of Solar CO2 reduction

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

15

20

25

Annual kWh per installed kW and $/on of CO2

Reduction

Tons of CO2 per 100 MMBtu of kWh

-

200

400

600

800

0

5

10

MN GA PA NY USA NH CA

Annual kWh per installed kW and $/on of CO2

Reduction

Tons of CO2 per 100 MMBtu of kWh

Solar $/Ton (secondary) Tons per MMBtu of Kwh (primary) Solar Intensity (secondary)

Solar Return on Investment with Subsidy

0.80

1.00

1.20

1.40

40%

50%

60%

Subsidy

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0%

10%

20%

30%

MN GA PA NY USA NH CA

Subsidy

IRR

SIR

50

100

150

200

250

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

$1,600

$1,800

$2,000

Cost per Ton of CO2 by ImprovementNew York

0$-

$200

Cost per Ton of CO2 Cumulative Tons of CO2

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500Carbon Dioxide Cost per Ton

New York Cost per Ton of CarbonLower is better (capped at $2000 per ton of Carbon Dioxide)

$0

$500

$1,000

$0 $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000

Carbon Dioxide Cost per Ton

Cumulative Level of Investment

NY Energy Efficiency $/Ton NY Solar Carbon $/Ton

$800

$1,000

$1,200

Carbon Dioxide Cost per Ton

Tennessee Cost per Ton of Carbon Saved

Lower is better (capped at $2000 per ton of Carbon Dioxide)

$0

$200

$400

$600

$0 $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000 $30,000 $35,000 $40,000

Carbon Dioxide Cost per Ton

Cumulative Level of Investment

TN Energy Efficiency $/Ton

TN Solar Carbon $/Ton

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400Carbon Dioxide Cost per Ton

Georgia Cost per Ton of CarbonLower is better (capped at $2000 per ton of Carbon Dioxide)

$0

$200

$400

$600

$0 $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000 $30,000

Carbon Dioxide Cost per Ton

Cumulative Level of Investment

GA Energy Efficiency $/Ton GA Solar Carbon $/Ton

5

6

7

8

9

Savings to Investment Ratio

New York Savings to Investment Ratio ComparisonHigher is better (capped at SIR of 10)

0

1

2

3

4

$0 $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000

Savings to Investment Ratio

Cumulative Level of Investment

Eff SIR Solar PV SIR

4

5

6

7

Savings to Investment Ratio

Georgia Savings to Investment Ratio ComparisonHigher is better (capped at SIR of 10)

0

1

2

3

$0 $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000 $30,000

Savings to Investment Ratio

Cumulative Level of Investment

Energy Efficiency SIRs Solar PV SIR

Total Lifetime Carbon SavingsAn $11K HP job vs an $11K 3 kW PV job (after incentives)

Asset and Operational Ratings

Relative Source and Carbon Impacts Across Multifamily Developments

Actual Performance as Expected

Poor Performance Detected

NYSERDA Benchmarking Tool

Compare to Your Community

Compare Buildings You Support

Understand Building Performance

Track Energy Over Time

Contact Info

gthomas@psdconsulting.com

607-277-6240 x201

www.psdconsulting.com

www.treatsoftware.com

www.pscontracting.com

Recommended