Visual Evaluation · 2014. 11. 8. · Crooked Creek 0.5 Feet. —SYS 2,000 4,000 and Foyest Land PO...

Preview:

Citation preview

Visual Evaluation

Three Evaluation Factors: 1. State Method

2. Local Input

3. Professional Experience of Evaluators

Evaluation Form

Evaluation Form

Modified Table of Scenic Components

Example of Evaluation Process

Water 2

Geology 3

Architecture 2 Vegetation 3

Terrain 3

Shoreline Configuration 2

Landscape 3

Ephemera 2

Views 3 Overall Score: 3: Distinctive

Example of Evaluation Process

Water n/a

Geology +1

Architecture -2

Vegetation +1

Terrain +1

Landscape -1 Ephemera -3

Views -2

Water n/a

Geology 1

Architecture 1

Vegetation 1

Terrain 1

Landscape 1 Ephemera 1

Overall Score: 1 Common

Views 2

Example of Evaluation Process

Example of Evaluation Process

Example of Evaluation Process

Example of Evaluation Process

Example of Evaluation Process

Example of Evaluation Process

Subunit 1, Overall Score = 3 “Distinctive”

Example of Evaluation Process

Example of Evaluation Process

Evaluation Results

lmplementation

Scenic Areas of Local Significance

Promotion

Education

SASS Designation

Conclusion