View
37
Download
2
Category
Tags:
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
VFDs and rooftop units
Citation preview
ABC’s of VFDs and Rooftop UnitsTechnology overview and available incentives
Greg Rushby, Rushby Energy Solutions
saveONenergy Show & SymposiumJune 17, 2014
www.saveonenergy.ca
Outline
Topic
VFD Overview
VFD Applications & Incentives
RTU Overview
RTU Incentives
Summary
www.saveonenergy.ca
Variable Frequency Drives (VFD)
› VFD
› Adjustable speed drive
› Vary frequency (Hz) and voltage going to the motor
› Motor RPM is reduced at lower Hz
› VFDs save energy when the load varies› HVAC equipment is sized for peak loads
› Peak conditions are ~1% of annual operating hours
www.saveonenergy.ca
VFDs vs. Other Starters
Type Pros Cons Applications
Across-the-line Simple, low-cost No variable speedoperation
<5 hP
Soft starter Variable speed operation
Inefficient part-load operation
Motors that cycle frequently
Variable Frequency Drive
Efficient, active variable speed control
High cost (relative to other starters)
Systems that operate at part-load frequently
www.saveonenergy.ca
Variable Flow vs. Variable Speed
› Many systems have variable flow with constant speed motors
› Valves used to vary flow for pump systems
› Dampers or inlet vanes used to vary flow for fan systems
› Inlet valve modulation used to vary compressed air output
› VFDs vary motor speed to vary flow
www.saveonenergy.ca
Common VFD Applications
Commercial› Air distribution systems (fans)› Hydronic distribution systems (pumps)› DCW booster pumps› Cooling tower fans› Chillers
Industrial› Air compressors› Vacuum pumps› Baghouse fans› Refrigeration compressor
www.saveonenergy.ca
VFDs on Constant Torque Loads
› Power varies linearly with speed
› Example loads:› Conveyors, mixers, positive displacement
pumps, rotary screw air compressors
Image Source: Natural Resources Canada
www.saveonenergy.ca
VFDs on Constant Torque Loads
› Power varies with the speed cubed
› Torque varies with the speed squared
› Example loads:› Centrifugal pumps, centrifugal and axial
fans
Image Source: Natural Resources Canada
www.saveonenergy.ca
VFDs on Pumps and Fans
› The majority of pumps and fans used in HVAC applications are centrifugal
› Centrifugal pumps and fans have a variable pressure / flow relationship
www.saveonenergy.ca
Typical Centrifugal Pump Curve
Image Source: US DOE – Improving Pump System Performance: a Sourcebook for Industry
www.saveonenergy.ca
Centrifugal Pump & Fan Affinity Laws
Flow vs. Motor Speed Q1/Q2 = N1/N2
Power vs. Speed bhp1/bhp2 = (N1/N2)3
Q – Volumetric flowN – Pump shaft rotational speed or fan wheel velocity (RPM)BHP – Brake horsepower
www.saveonenergy.ca
VFDs on Pumps and Fans
› VFD› Adjustable speed drive
› Vary frequency (Hz) and voltage going to the motor
› Motor RPM is reduced at lower Hz
› VFDs save energy when the load varies› HVAC equipment is sized for peak loads
› Peak conditions are ~1% of annual operating hours
www.saveonenergy.ca
VFD Opportunity - Pumps
Image Source: Eaton
www.saveonenergy.ca
VFD Opportunity - Fans
Source: 2012 ASHRAE Handbook
www.saveonenergy.ca
Typical VAV Load Profile
Source: 2012 ASHRAE Handbook
www.saveonenergy.ca
Typical Cooling Tower Load Profile
Source: Danfoss VLT Application Guide
www.saveonenergy.ca
saveONenergy RETROFIT VFD Incentives
› Prescriptive Incentives
› Incentive is ~30 to 50% of VFD materials costs
› VFD materials cost rule of thumb = $1,000 + ($75 per hP)
› Demand savings are ~10% at 75% motor loading
Advantages Disadvantages
• Simple application
requirements
• Incentive often ~50% of
materials costs
• Engineered / Custom usually has
higher incentives
• Does not cover motors >100 hP
www.saveonenergy.ca
saveONenergy RETROFIT VFD Incentives
› Engineered Incentives
› Engineered Worksheets for VFDs on Pumps/Fans/Air Compressors
› Engineered worksheets calculate savings for pumps / fans with the same flow profile before and after VFD operationAdvantages Disadvantages
• Potential for higher incentive
• No hP limit
• Complex inputs required
• Only one flow profile
• Only for pumps / fans
www.saveonenergy.ca
saveONenergy RETROFIT VFD Incentives
› Custom Incentives› Best for projects with different before and after load profiles
› Projects with incentives >$10,000 require M&V
› VFDs measure kW and amps
Advantages Disadvantages
• Potential for higher incentive
• May require M&V
• Savings must be calculated
• May require M&V
www.saveonenergy.ca
Example Custom VFD Project
Base Case
› Induced Draft Cooling Tower with 20 hP Axial Fan
Efficient Case
› Install VFD and new 20 hP motor ($6,200)
www.saveonenergy.ca
Example Custom VFD Project
%Flow % Run Hours Run HoursBase Case Input
Power (kW)
Efficient Case
Input Power
(kW)
Base Case
Annual Energy
Use (kWh)
Efficient Case
Annual Energy
Use (kWh)
Annual Energy
Savings (kWh)
40 5 70 3.978 0.83 278.46 58.12 220.34
50 15 200 3.978 1.62 795.60 324.35 471.25
60 35 450 13.26 2.80 5,967.00 1,261.06 4,705.94
70 20 270 13.26 4.45 3,580.20 1,201.51 2,378.69
80 15 210 13.26 6.64 2,784.60 1,394.96 1,389.64
90 10 140 13.26 9.46 1,856.40 1,324.12 532.28
100 0 0 13.26 12.97 0.00 0.00 0.00
www.saveonenergy.ca
Example Custom VFD Project
Results
› Peak Demand Savings = 3.8 kW
› Annual kWh Savings = 9,698
› Incentive = $3,040
› Annual Cost Savings = $1,250
› Payback ~ 2.5 years
www.saveonenergy.ca
Unitary AC
› AHRI defines Unitary as:› one or more factory-made assemblies ordinarily including an
evaporator or cooling coil(s), compressor(s), and condenser(s) and
may include a heating function
› Unitary AC equipment includes:› Split systems
› Air-source heat pumps
› Single package systems a.k.a. rooftop units
www.saveonenergy.ca
Rooftop Unit Components
Image Source: Bryant / Carrier
www.saveonenergy.ca
Economizers
Image Source: Energy Designs Resources
www.saveonenergy.ca
Rooftop Units
› All-in-one functionality – H, V & AC in a box!
› Relatively inexpensive
› Do not take up interior space
› Very high market share in Ontario
› Distribution may be:› Constant volume or variable volume
› Single zone or multi-zone
› Installed cost approx. $1,200 to $1,800 per ton
www.saveonenergy.ca
Rooftop Unit Efficiency Ratings
› Efficiency ratings – the higher the better!
› Energy Efficiency Ratio (EER)
› Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio (SEER)
› Integrated Energy Efficiency Ratio (IEER)
www.saveonenergy.ca
EER
›Ratio of cooling rate (in Btu/h) to electrical input power (in
W)
›Determined at:
› Outdoor = 95ºF Dry Bulb
› Return Air = 80ºF Dry Bulb, 67ºF Wet Bulb
www.saveonenergy.ca
SEER
› Ratio of annual cooling energy (in Btu) to annual
electricity consumption (Wh)
› Only units 5.4 tons and below receive SEER ratings
› SEER is primarily a residential rating
www.saveonenergy.ca
IEER
› IEER is a part load efficiency rating
› IEER is the weighted average of EER at various loads:
› 100% load; 2% weighting
› 75% load; 61.7% weighting
› 50% load; 23.8% weighting
› 25% load; 12.5% weighting
› Two units can have the same EER and a different IEER
www.saveonenergy.ca
RTU Efficiency – Standards & Specifications
› ASHRAE
› Energy Star
› CEE
www.saveonenergy.ca
ASHRAE 90.1
› ASHRAE Standard 90.1:› Energy efficiency standard
› Adopted by building codes (including Ontario)
› Specifies minimum efficiency (EER) for RTUs
› Latest version is 2010
› “ASHRAE 90.1 compliant” units
www.saveonenergy.ca
Energy Star and CEE
› Energy Star maintains a list of qualified Light Commercial Heating & Cooling products up to 20 tons
› Consortium for Energy Efficiency (CEE) publishes a three tiered specification for Unitary A/C equipment
› Tier 0, Tier 1, Tier 2
www.saveonenergy.ca
ASHRAE 90.1 vs. CEE Efficiency
Equipment TypeSize Category
(Btu/h)
Size Category
(Tons)
Heating Section
Type
Subcategory or
Rating Condition
ASHRAE 90.1
- 1989
ASHRAE 90.1
- 2010
CEE Tier 0 /
Energy StarCEE Tier 1 CEE Tier 2
Air conditioners,
air cooled
<65,000 <5.4 All Split / package 10/9.7 SEER 13 SEER N/A 14.0 SEER 15.0 SEER
>=65,000 and
<135,000
>=5.4 and
<11.25
Electric resistance
or none
Split system, single
package
8.9 EER 11.2 EER 11.7 EER 11.7 EER 12.2 EER
8.3 IPLV 11.4 IEER 11.8 IEER 13.0 IEER 14.0 IEER
All otherSplit system, single
package
8.9 EER 11 EER 11.5 EER 11.5 EER 12.0 EER
8.3 IPLV 11.2 IEER 11.6 IEER 12.8 IEER 13.8 IEER
>=135,000 and
< 240,000
>=11.25 and
<20
Electric resistance
or none
Split system, single
package
8.2 EER 11 EER 11.7 EER 11.7 EER 12.2 EER
7.2 IPLV 11.2 IEER 11.8 IEER 12.5 IEER 13.2 IEER
All otherSplit system, single
package
8.0 EER 10.8 EER 11.5 EER 11.5 EER 12.0 EER
7.0 IPLV 11 IEER 11.6 IEER 12.3 IEER 13.0 IEER
>=240,000 and
< 760,000>=20 and <63.3
Electric resistance
or none
Split system, single
package
8.2 EER 10 EER 10.5 EER 10.5 EER 10.8 EER
7.2 IPLV 10.1 IEER 10.6 IEER 11.3 IEER 12.3 IEER
All otherSplit system, single
package
8.0 EER 9.8 EER 10.3 EER 10.3 EER 10.6 EER
7.0 IPLV 9.9 IEER 10.4 IEER 11.1 IEER 12.1 IEER
>= 760,000 >=63.3
Electric resistance
or none
Split system, single
package
8.0 EER 9.7 EER 9.9 EER 9.9 EER 10.4 EER
7.2 IPLV 9.8 IEER 10.0 IEER 11.1 IEER 11.6 IEER
All otherSplit system, single
package
7.8 EER 9.5 EER 9.7 EER 9.7 EER 10.2 EER
7.0 IPLV 9.6 IEER 9.8 IEER 10.9 IEER 11.4 IEER
www.saveonenergy.ca
RTU Efficiency – Old vs. New
› ASHRAE 90.1–2010 min. EERs ~ 2 higher than ASHRAE 90.1 –1989 min.
EERs
› ~0.2 to 0.3 kW per ton improvement
› CEE Tier 1 min. EERs ~ 0.5 higher than ASHRAE 90.1 – 2010 min. EERs
› ~0.02 to 0.05 kW per ton improvement
› CEE Tier 2 min. EERs ~ 1 higher than than ASHRAE 90.1 – 2010 min.
EERs
› ~0.08 to 0.09 kW per ton improvement
www.saveonenergy.ca
RTU Efficiency – Existing Units
› Ensure proper maintenance
› Consider advanced controls› Demand control ventilation› After market controllers
› Replacing an existing unit with a new unit is typically not cost-effective
www.saveonenergy.ca
RTU Efficiency – Advanced Controls
› Demand control ventilation› Reduce outdoor air intake when areas are sparsely occupied
› Aftermarket controllers› Digi-RTU› Catalyst› Aircosaver› Regen
www.saveonenergy.ca
RTU Efficiency – Advanced Controls
› Advanced Controls Benefits› Low-cost (relative to new unit)› May be cost-effective (2 - 4 year payback or better)
› Advanced Controls Drawbacks:› May not be suitable for all applications
www.saveonenergy.ca
RTU Efficiency – New & Replacement Units
› Ensure units are properly sized
› Specify high-efficiency units
› Consider specifying high-efficiency controls
› Commissioning
www.saveonenergy.ca
saveONenergy RETROFIT RTU Incentives
Track Incentive
Type
Base Case Pros Cons
Prescriptive
Fixed $/unit
or
Fixed $/ton
Code
Minimum
Unit
• Pre-approval not
required for
incentives
<$10,000*
• Lower incentive
• Minimum EER
requirements
Engineered $800/kW Existing Unit
• Higher incentive
• No minimum EER
requirements
• Pre-approval
required
www.saveonenergy.ca
Example Rooftop Unit Retrofit
New CEE Tier 1 Unit – EER = 11.5 New CEE Tier 2 Unit – EER = 12
Incremental Cost
(over ASHRAE 90.1 unit)
$1,200 $2,400
Prescriptive Incentive Ineligible $1,000
Engineered Incentive $1,200 $1,360
Energy Savings* 804 kWh – vs. existing unit
125 kWh – vs. new 90.1 unit (EER = 11)
919 kWh – vs. existing unit
240 kWh – vs. new 90.1 unit (EER = 11)
Demand Savings* 1.5 kW – vs. existing unit
0.2 kW – vs. new 90.1 unit (EER = 11)
1.7 kW – vs. existing unit
0.5 kW – vs. new 90.1 unit (EER = 11)
Payback Instant 16 years**
www.saveonenergy.ca
SummaryVFDs› VFDs are a cost-effective way to control flow
RTUs
› Maintain units to maintain efficiency
› Consider advanced controls
› Specify high efficiency equipment for replacement units
saveONenergy incentives are available to help fund your project!
www.saveonenergy.ca
Thank You
Greg RushbyRushby Energy Solutions Inc.226-747-5066grushby@rushbyenergy.com
www.rushbyenergy.com
Recommended