View
623
Download
1
Category
Tags:
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
Priority, Performance and Partnership
Children’s Forum Event
June 13th 2012
Pam Weston/ Bill Morris
Whatever
it takes…
TFL
Poverty measures in Leicester
• Benefit take-up in Leicester is high• Employment levels are low ( compared to national
averages)• Unemployment levels are high – and disproportionately
affect some communities more than others – e.g. Somalis, Pakistani and Bangladeshi communities
• Skills levels are low – high proportion with low or no qualifications
• 63% adults in Leicester have expressed difficulty in literacy
Indices of Multiple Deprivation
Children and young people (0-19) living in poverty by ward (1 in 3 = 27,000 !!)
NI116 % of Children in Poverty
Spin
ney
Hills
New
Par
ks
Cha
rnw
ood
Free
men
Brau
nsto
ne P
ark
& R
owle
y Fi
elds
Eyre
s M
onse
ll
Beau
mon
t Ley
s
Ston
eyga
te
Wes
tcot
es
Col
eman
Abbe
y
Belg
rave
Latim
er
Cas
tle
Foss
e
Thur
ncou
rt
Hum
bers
tone
and
Ham
ilton
Evin
gton
Ayle
ston
e
Rus
hey
Mea
d
Wes
tern
Par
k
Knig
hton
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
% in
pov
erty
City Average
Level Playing Field ?Map could show• Ethnicity
breakdown• Deprivation • Achievement at
KS2 /KS4 / 19+• NEET•Life expectancy
Hei
ght i
n In
ches
ScissorsWestern Roll
Fosbury Flop
StraddleScissors
Fosbury Flop
1900 1920 1952 1968 1996
Hei
ght i
n in
ches
Grint, K. (2010) Wicked Problems and Clumbsy Solutions [PowerPoint slides] Retrieved from National College for Leadership of Schools and Children's Services
The ‘High Jump’ approach to system-wide improvement
Foundation Stage Outcomes (5 year trend)
Foundation Stage Headlines• In 2011, the gap between Leicester and national outcomes
closed following a slight widening of the gap 2009-10. This rate of improvement is one of the fastest nationally.
• The gap between the lowest performing 20% and all children in Leicester is now closer than it is nationally.
• Wide variation between wards (48% Charnwood- 70% Evington)
• Performance of Asian and Mixed Heritage groups are higher in Leicester than nationally.
• Largest gap is for WBr (-7% against national)
Key Stage 1 outcomes
Reading at KS1
Leicester’s Reading Pledge
Whatever
it takes…
We will do whatever it takes... To get every child in Leicester reading.
KS1 Headlines
• Outcomes at Level 2b and above have risen in all 3 subjects.
• Gap between Leicester and national are closing
• Boy’s outcomes rose higher than those for girls in reading, writing and maths.
• Largest gap between Leicester and national are for WBr (-8% points)
Key Stage 2 outcomes
% making expected progress in English at KS2
% making expected progress in maths at KS2
KS2 Headlines (Attainment)
• The attainment gap (level 4+ Combined) between Leicester and national has closed to 2% compared to an 8% gap in 2007
• The gender gap has also closed to 2% for both boys and girls.
• In 2007, the attainment gap between Leicester’s boys and national was 10%
• In 2007, Leicester was ranked 148/151 local authorities. Our national rank in 2011 is 109/152
KS2 Headlines (Progress)
• In English, both boys and girls exceeded national expectations for progress by 1%
• In Maths, both boys and girls exceeded national expectations for progress by 2%
• In Maths, boys made slightly better progress than girls (85% boys compared to 84% girls).
EIP % 5A*-C EM 2006 - 2011
34 3641 44
49 52
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
EIP 2006 EIP 2007 EIP 2008 EIP 2009 EIP 2010 EIP 2011
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Improvement in KS4 results in Leicester EIP schools
KS4 attainment outcomes
Combined characteristics
Ethnic Group Gender FSM Cohort Size %5A*-C(EM)
Indian Female No 490 70
Indian Female Yes 78 56
White British
Male No 530 34
White British
Male Yes 109 15
KS4 Progress
KS4 Headlines (Attainment)
• Year on year improvement in GCSE attainment in the 3 core subjects since 2007
• The attainment gap between boys and girls widened in 2010 but closed again in 2011, however, both groups improved.
• National results for all pupils and girls improved more than in Leicester which has led to a widening of the attainment gap.
KS4 Headlines (Progress)
• The expected progress in English in Leicester is better than national and the gap widened in 2011.
• The picture in maths is less favourable. Expected progress is less than national and the gap is widening.
• Outcomes for ‘disadvantaged groups’ are close to or exceed outcomes for the same groups nationally. However, the gap between this group and all pupils in Leicester, has widened since 2010.
• The most significant gaps exist for all White groups and Black African Boys against national comparators.
KS4 relative performance
Standing at the Crossroads
• 0-19 Strategic review• Changing role of the LA• Academies/ Free schools• New Ofsted Framework (Sept 2012)• School Funding Review (incl. Pupil Premium)• Schools as commissioners• New National Curriculum
Over-Arching Priorities
• See CYPP– Maths (all phases but especially secondary)– Reading– Closing the achievement gap particularly for key
groups (WBr, non-FSM, LAC)– Reduce Health Inequalities (child obesity, TP…)
• Local and city-wide
5 Top Tips for securing greater school engagement
• Demonstrable Impact (standards, behaviour, attendance, raised ambition)
• Evidence Based (see Sutton Trust recommendations re. Pupil Premium)
• Quality Assured (‘kite-marked’)• Value for Money• Proven Track Record ( eg. Personal
recommendation by another Head Teacher/ evidence of meeting local needs)
Contact DetailsPam Weston (Liz Warren)Strategic Primary Lead Headteacher(pam.weston@leicestercph.org.uk)(liz.warren@leicestercph.org.uk)
Bill MorrisDirectorSecondary Education Improvement Partnership(bmorris@svc-leicester.org.uk)
Recommended