View
221
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
7/28/2019 Un Aerobic
1/21
1Low Temperature Thermo - chemical Pretreatment of Dairy Waste
Activated Sludge for Anaerobic Digestion Process
.
Abstract
An investigation into the influence of low temperature thermo-chemical pretreatment on sludge
reduction in a semi-continuous anaerobic reactor was performed. Firstly, effect of sludge
pretreatment was evaluated by COD solubilization, suspended solids reduction and biogas
production. At optimized condition (60C with pH 12), COD solubilization, suspended solids
reduction and biogas production was 23%, 22% and 51% higher than the control, respectively.
Secondly, semi - continuous process performance was studied in a lab-scale semi-continuous
anaerobic reactor (5L), with 4L working volume. With three operated SRTs, the SRT of 15 days
was found to be most appropriate for economic operation of the reactor. Combining pretreatment
with anaerobic digestion led to 80.5%, 117% and 90.4% of TS, SS and VS reduction
respectively, with an improvement of 103% in biogas production. Thus, low temperature thermo-
chemical can play an important role in reducing sludge production.
1 1 *Corresponding author: Dr. J. Rajesh Banu, Department of Civil Engineering, Anna
University of Technology Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli - 627007, India. Tel: 9444215544, Email
id:rajeshces@gmail.com.
7/28/2019 Un Aerobic
2/21
Keywords: Waste Activated Sludge, Solubilization, Thermo-chemical pretreatment, Biogas,
Biodegradability, Anaerobic Digestion.
1. Introduction
Dairy industry is one of the prime sectors in India. Studies say that Indian dairy industries have a
growth at more than 15% and are estimated to cross 150 million tons per annum. Water
management in the dairy industry is well documented, but effluent production and disposal
remain a problematic issue for the dairy industry. Proper management of excess sludge is a big
challenge to wastewater treatment operators because sludge handling and disposal accounts for
up to 60% of total treatment plant operating costs (Neyens and Baeyens, 2003). Anaerobic
digestion is of particular interest in sludge treatment since it can reduce the overall amount of
sludge to be disposed, while producing an energy-rich biogas that can be valorized energetically
(Appels et al., 2010). Anaerobic digestion thus optimizes wastewater treatment costs, its
environmental footprint and is considered a major and essential part of a modern wastewater
treatment plant. Anaerobic degradation can be achieved through several stages: hydrolysis,
acidogenesis, acetogenesis and methanogenesis. Anaerobic digestion of sludge is hampered due
to the rigid structure of the microbial cell walls, protecting the inner cell products. Hence,
hydrolysis of sludge requires longer retention time and has been pointed as the rate limiting step.
In order to improve the rate of hydrolysis and the anaerobic digestion performance, sludge
disintegration was developed as a pre-treatment process to accelerate the anaerobic digestion and
to increase the degree of stabilization. Increasing the degree of sludge stabilization using a
disintegration process provides less sludge production, more stable sludge and more biogas
production compared with classical anaerobic digestion. Various methods like Ultrasonic
treatment (Pham et al., 2009), Ozone oxidation (Ahn et al., 2002), alkaline treatment (Lin et al.,
7/28/2019 Un Aerobic
3/21
2007), thermal treatment (Barjenbruch and Kopplow, 2003), Fenton process (Kaynak and
Filibeli, 2008) and biological hydrolysis with enzymes (Ayol et al., 2008) were investigated for
sludge disintegration by several researchers in half-scale and lab-scale plants to bypass the rate
limiting stage of hydrolysis. Mechanical treatment employs several strategies for physically
disintegrating the cells and partly solubilizing their content. Although less results are available
for the other pretreatment methods, it is seen that their efficiency of improving anaerobic
digestion of sludge is rather low, compared to the other methods. Ultrasonic pretreatment is the
alternate method to disrupt sludge cells without doubt. Although cell disintegrations of 100% can
be obtained at high-power levels, power consumption thus becomes a serious problem, and the
ultrasound probes need replacement every 1.5 to 2 yrs, which causes great concerns on its
practical application (Zhang et al., 2007). However its application as a sludge pretreatment
process in anaerobic digestion is scarcely mentioned.
The heat treatment of waste activated sludge was shown to be an effective pretreatment method
for anaerobic digestion. The optimum treatment conditions and digestion improvement are
largely depending on the nature of the sludge. Various temperatures, ranging from 60 to 270C
have been studied in literature. However, temperatures higher than 180C lead to the production
of recalcitrant soluble organics or toxic/inhibitory intermediates, hence reducing the
biodegradability (Wilson and Novak, 2009). The only alternative to overcome this drawback is
the application of low temperature treatment, and it has been pointed out as an effective
treatment for increasing biogas production (Climent et al., 2007). In thermo-chemical methods,
an acid or base is added to solubilize the sludge. The addition of acid or base avoids the necessity
of high temperature and these methods are carried out at ambient or moderate temperatures.
These methods are shown to be effective and cumbersome for sludge solubilization. The
7/28/2019 Un Aerobic
4/21
objective of the current work is to study the solubilization of organic and inorganic compounds
during thermo-chemical treatment and the effects on anaerobic biodegradability. Finally, this
thermo-chemical pretreatment was combined with semi continuous anaerobic digesters in order
to evaluate their effects in terms of solids reduction and of biogas production.
2. Materials and methods
2.1 Sludge sampling and characterization
The Waste activated sludge was obtained from a dairy plant at Tirunelveli in Tamil Nadu (India).
Samples were collected and stored at 4C. The Characteristics of the raw sludge were as follows:
pH was 6.96, CODS (SCOD) was 420 mg/L, Total COD (TCOD) was 22000 mg/L, Total solids
(TS) content was 8513 mg/L, Volatile solids (VS) content was 5160 mg/L, Suspended solids
(SS) content was 4700 mg/L, Proteins was 780 mg/L and Carbohydrates were 320 mg/L.
2.2 Thermo-chemical Pretreatment
In this study, the effect of low temperature thermo-chemical pretreatment was investigated. The
low temperature thermo-chemical pretreatment was carried out at 50, 60, 70 and 80C in order to
enhance solubilization of particulate material, as well as enzymatic hydrolysis. The effect of
thermo-chemical treatment depends on both temperature and time. In this work, the effect of
pretreatment time was evaluated by taking samples at different pretreatment times (6, 9, 12, 24,
36 and 48 h) in order to study the combined effect.
Batch reactors containing 1L of sludge were submerged in a thermostatic bath at various
temperatures (50, 60, 70 and 80C) during 6, 9, 12, 24, 36 and 48 h. The reactors were covered
with an aluminium foil, to avoid water evaporation. The sludge in the reactor was kept in
suspension by a slow-speed stirrer (Digital Overhead IKA RW 20), to ensure temperature
7/28/2019 Un Aerobic
5/21
homogeneity. For the waste activated sludge studied, different concentrations of NaOH were
added to reach different pH values of 10, 11 and 12. Even though, sodium decrease the
dewaterability of the sludge, the choice of this alkaline agent was made from different studies
indicated that, for anaerobic digestion, pretreatment with NaOH was more efficient than using
other alkaline agents (Kim et al., 2003, Lin et al., 1997). The negative influence of sodium over
sludge dewaterability is reduced when NaOH is combined with other treatment methods such as
microwave and thermal (Jin et al., 2009; Ilgin and Dilek., 2009). Dewaterability of the sodium
pretreated sludge can be improved by the subsequent sludge management using lime. Banu et al.,
(in press) have used lime to decrease the capillary suction time of sodium pretreated sludge.
2.3 Biochemical methane potential assay
Biogas production of raw and pretreated sludge samples at various temperatures (50 to 80C) for
6, 9, 12, 24 h was initially determined by batch tests at mesophilic conditions. After pretreatment
applications and before the reactor setup, pH of all pretreated samples was neutralized to 7. The
biodegradability assays were conducted in batch reactors with 300 mL serum bottles. The rumen
micro-organisms of cattle dung were used as an inoculum. Moreover in case of anaerobic
biodegradability, the use of a highly active animal inoculum waste will reduce the experimental
time significantly, or reduced the amount of inoculum required in full-scale batch digesters, and
consequently, the corresponding digester volume (Borja et al., 2003). Each serum bottle was
filled with 100 g of inoculum and 50 g of substrate. A blank treatment with only 150 g of
inoculum was used to determine biogas production due to endogenous respiration. After adding
the substrates and inoculum, the reactors were closed with a rubber septum and an aluminium
seal to make them air tight and was subsequently purged with nitrogen gas at the rate of 10 mL
per second for 20 minutes into the reactors to maintain anaerobic conditions. Bottles were
7/28/2019 Un Aerobic
6/21
maintained at 35C under shaking (220 rpm). Batch reactors were operated with a residence time
of 50 days. Samples were analyzed in duplicate. Enhancement of biodegradability was evaluated
by comparison of biogas volumes produced by treated and untreated samples.The anaerobic
biodegradability tests performance was evaluated by fitting the cumulative biogas production
data to the modified Gompertz equation. The Gompertz equation describes cumulative biogas
production assuming that, biogas production is a function of bacterial growth (Redzwan and
Banks, 2004). The modified Gompertz equation is presented below:
B = P {1-exp [-Rm (t-) / P]}
Where B is the cumulative biogas production (mL), Rm is the maximum biogas production rate,
P is the biogas yield potential (mL), and is the duration of lag phase, days. Using Matlab 7.0,
the unknown parameters were calculated in order to measure the difference between the
experimental measurement and the corresponding stimulated value.
2.4 Anaerobic digestion reactors
Two identical laboratory scale semi continuous reactors with a working volume of 4L were used
as anaerobic digesters at mesophilic temperature (35C). Among the two, one is designated as
Control Semi Continuous Anaerobic Reactor (CSCAR) which acts as control and another is
designated as Experimental Semi Continuous Anaerobic Reactor (ESCAR), where sludge
reduction was carried out. Sludge retention times (SRT) of 20, 15 and 12 days were sequentially
tried to investigate the performance of the anaerobic digestion of the pretreated sludge. A control
reactor fed with untreated sludge was operated at same SRTs. Feeding and withdrawals were
carried out each day by peristaltic pumps in a semi continuous mode. Biogas production was
measured by water moving in graduated test tubes linked to the reactors.
7/28/2019 Un Aerobic
7/21
2.5 Analytical parameters
The following parameters were analyzed before and after thermo-chemical treatment: Total
Solids (TS), Suspended Solids (SS), Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Carbohydrate
concentration, Protein concentration and pH as per Standard Methods for the Examination of
Water and Wastewater (American Public Health Association, 2005). The analyses were
performed on both the sludge and the supernatant to identify the total and soluble fractions of the
specific component. TS, VS and SS were measured in the whole sludge (Total TS, VS and SS)
and in the supernatant after centrifugation at 30,130 x g, for 15 min and subsequent filtration
through 0.45 m microfiber filter paper. VFA was analyzed by distillation-titration method, and
the result was expressed in acetic acid. The methane content in the biogas was analyzed using a
Baroda gas chromatograph equipped with a thermal conductivity detector and porapack Q
column with hydrogen as carrier gas at a flow rate of 40 mL/min.
Protein concentration was determined on total sludge and on the supernatant using the Lowry
method (Takahashi et al., 2009). After reactions with salts and Folin's phenol reagent,
absorbance of samples was determined at 620 nm, using a spectrophotometer. Folin's phenol
reagent is a mixture ofphosphomolybdate and phosphotungstate used for the
colorimetric assay of phenolic and polyphenolic antioxidants. It works by measuring the amount
of the substance being tested needed to inhibit the oxidation of the reagent. Carbohydrate
concentration was determined on total sludge and on the supernatant using the anthrone method
(Tapia et al., 2009). After reactions with anthrone and sulphuric acid, absorbance of samples was
determined at 625 nm, using a spectrophotometer. The increase in SCOD was calculated as given
below:
(SCOD after pretreatmentSCOD before pretreatment)
X 100SCOD (%) =
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phosphomolybdatehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phosphotungstatehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assayhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyphenolhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyphenol_antioxidanthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyphenol_antioxidanthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyphenolhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assayhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phosphotungstatehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phosphomolybdate7/28/2019 Un Aerobic
8/21
SCOD before pretreatment
3. Results and discussion
3.1 Thermo-chemical pretreatment
In this study, thermo-chemical pretreatment of waste activated sludge was performed to improve
the treatment efficiency. The control was performed using non-pretreated WAS. The treatment
was performed for different temperature and treatment time. The expected effect of the thermo-
chemical treatment of sludge was an increase in soluble materials, with interest focused on
SCOD solubilization, suspended solids reduction and biogas production, thus enhancing
hydrolysis.
3.1.1. COD solubilization and SCOD release
The pretreatment was done to improve the bioavailability of sludge particulate material. SCOD
calculations were considered the main parameter for evaluation of sludge particulate material,
and it enables an evaluation of the maximum level of sludge solubilization. Increased SCOD is
determined as the substance that can be readily used to produce methane during anaerobic
digestion (Wang et al., 2005). The SCOD of pretreated sludge increased with increasing
temperature. Fig.1a. shows the optimization of time and pH for COD solubilization during low
temperature thermo-chemical pretreatment. From the figure, it is evident that, as the treatment
time was increased from 6 to 24 h, an increase in COD solubilization was observed. This may be
due to the disruption of chemical bonds in cell walls and membranes by thermo-chemical
treatment. Therefore intracellular organic material is released to the liquid phase and increases
the SCOD (Appels et al., 2010, Banu et al., 2009). As reaction time increases from 24 to 48 h
SCOD was found to be decreased. The sludge is subjected to low temperature thermo-chemical
7/28/2019 Un Aerobic
9/21
treatment for a significantly prolonged time (24 h). Thermal treatments are prone to enhance the
formation of refractory substances. The fall in SCOD after 24 h might be due to the formation of
refractory substances. Thus, for the waste activated sludge sample, a treatment time of 24 h was
found to be the optimum. Similarly, a pH 10 seems to be too low for an effective COD
solubilization, since even after a treatment time for 24 h only a very limited amount was set free.
Thus, in order to achieve better solubilization, pH 12 was considered to be an optimum
condition. Likewise, at 50C for pH 12, the COD solubilization was found only 17%. However,
for 60, 70 and 80C irrespective of pH, the temperature plays a major role in enhancing COD
solubilization, and it was found to be 23, 24 and 25% respectively. From the above, it is clear
that temperature above 60C doesnt help in solubilizing the excess sludge. Thus, comparing cost
economics and considering energy generation, low temperature thermo-chemical treatment
(60C) was considered to be an optimum condition for rupturing cell membranes. The study is
carried out at low temperature range of 50 - 80C which are less intense when compared to high
temperatures. Thus, the solubilization doesnt show a rapid rise, but the overall solubilization for
the treatment is satisfactory.
3.1.2. SS Reduction
SS reduction is an indication of sludge stability, and it is used for assessing the effectiveness of a
process in stabilizing sludge (Gholamreza et al., 2008). Fig.1b. shows the optimization of time
and pH for SS reduction during low temperature thermo-chemical pretreatment. From the figure,
it is evident that, as the treatment time was increased from 6 to 24 h, an increase in SS reduction
was observed. The main reason for mass reduction of sludge during the thermo-chemical
pretreatment might be to rupture the cell wall and to release of extracellular and intracellular
matter. Thus, it is evident that at 60C with pH 12, COD solubilization and SS reduction was
7/28/2019 Un Aerobic
10/21
found to be 23 and 22% respectively, which might be regarded as a threshold for the pre-
digestion step. In contrast, pH was found to be decreased during thermo-chemical pretreatment,
and it may be explained by acidic compounds formation due to floc disintegration. Lipids were
hydrolyzed to volatile fatty acids, and these compounds led to be decreased pH (Bougrier et al.,
2005).
3.1.3. Soluble Carbohydrate and Protein release
Cell lysis releases protein content into the medium is the first stage of floc disintegration.
Proteins are the principal constituents of organisms, and they contain carbon, which is a common
organic substance as well as hydrogen, oxygen and nitrogen (Nah et al., 2000). For this reason, it
was considered that as the level of soluble protein increased, the efficiency of anaerobic
digestion would be improved. Due to thermo-chemical treatment, solids were solubilized,
especially organic solids. Fig.2. Presents the solubilization rate calculated for proteins and
carbohydrates for the samples. As given in figure, a higher pH value of 12 led to more
carbohydrate and protein releases than pH 10. Increase in the carbohydrate and protein releases
with the increase in pH was stated by Chen et al (2007). Furthermore, it was found that increase
in temperature doesnt play a major role, i.e., the solubilization rate increases linearly with
temperature only till 60C, after which the rise is nearly flat. Thus, 60 C with pH 12 is significant
for protein and carbohydrates release. According to Liu and Fang (2002), during the sludge
treatment with NaOH, protein is released more compared to carbohydrate and this result is
similar to that obtained in the present study. The protein releases presented in the figure are the
sums of protein released from EPS as well as the cell lysis. Hence protein concentration is more
than carbohydrate.
3.1.4. Biochemical methane potential assay
7/28/2019 Un Aerobic
11/21
Biodegradability batch assay was carried out to assess the feasibility of using thermo-chemical
pre-treatment to improve the anaerobic biological degradation of dairy sludge. Biodegradability
assays, in which cumulative biogas production was monitored, were assessed to both raw and
pre-treated substrates under mesophilic conditions. Cumulative biogas production in serum
bottles was maintained for 50 days, and the biogas production was monitored every day. Daily
biogas was measured by inserting the needle attached to a syringe (10 and 25 mL). The gas
pressure in the bottle displaces the syringe plunger, and the displaced volume was recorded. The
results showed that thermo-chemical pretreatment of dairy sludge improved anaerobic
degradation. Comparative analysis of biogas generation is depicted in Fig.3a. It was observed
that, initial biogas production up to day 5 was similar in all cases, and this may be due to the
acclimatization. The increase in biogas production was observed for 60, 70 and 80C pretreated
sludge and there is no significant difference between biogas productions. The accumulated
biogas production at the end of 50 days of the digestion period, was nearly 415 mL for raw
sample, and at 60C with pH 12 it was around 845 mL, nearly 51% higher biogas production was
obtained than the raw sludge. These results suggest that a low temperature thermo- chemical
pretreatment enhances the biogas production. After 50 days of the digestion period, the biogas
production ceased indicating that the digestate did not undergo any further degradation.
Fig.3b. shows the model fit with the experimental data (solid line), from each assay (circles) for
the samples. Table 1 presents the kinetic parameters obtained in the optimization process. From
the experiment conducted, it can be noted that biogas production is enhanced by an increase in
temperature from 50C (535 mg/L) to 60C (845 mg/L) by 57%. When further increase up to
80
C (890 mg/L) the increase in biogas production is only 5.3%. The trend of biogas production
(Rm and P values from Table 1) shows that the solubilization of sludge at 60C with pH 12
7/28/2019 Un Aerobic
12/21
attributes to the significant biogas production. Increasing the temperature has not influenced the
process to a larger extent other than power consumption. At 60C with pH 12 the lag time for
biogas production is decreased to 0.99 from 1.4 at 50C. The values were calculated for all
experimental conditions and are found to be fit (which are not shown).
3.2 Semi continuous anaerobic digestion reactors
During this part of the study, the dairy sludge was thermo-chemically pretreated at 60C with pH
12 was used as a feed. In a semi continuous anaerobic reactors, steady state is assessed by the
stability of daily gas production, TS, SS and VS concentrations digested sludge from each
reactor. With this assessment after 50 days, the fluctuations in these parameters were less than
10% and it was believed that steady state was achieved. Results obtained after reactor
stabilization is reported in Table 2.
3.2.1 SRT Variation
During the total period of 200 days, the performance evaluation of Semi continuous anaerobic
reactors was carried out at three different SRTs such as 20, 15 and 12 days. The particular SRT
was maintained constant by feeding the sludge at a constant rate by the peristaltic pump. The
feeding was initialized with low organic loading rate of 3.55 g VS/Ldfor maintaining a long SRT
of 20 days. The SRT was shifted to the next lower value and so on, once the reduction
efficiencies of TS, SS, and VS were found to be consistent with a particular SRT. At individual
SRTs, steady state of operations was retrieved and the results mentioned were average of five
consecutive consistent readings. It was observed that the overall performance efficiency in terms
of reduction in TS, SS and VS was lowering down as the SRT was lowered.
3.2.2 pH
7/28/2019 Un Aerobic
13/21
The digester performance was influenced by pH. The value and stability of the pH in an
anaerobic reactor are extremely important because methanogenesis only proceeds at a high rate,
when the pH is maintained in the neutral range. pH values in these experimental remained in the
range from 7.9 to 7.1 during anaerobic digestion. It was observed that during every shift to the
next lower SRT, the pH dropped rapidly. The dropping down of pH at shorter SRT is due to the
high organic loading rate, which results in high VFA concentration during the acidogenesis
phase. The results reveal that, digester could maintain their pH themselves though higher organic
loading was supplied.
3.2.3 Alkalinity
pH cannot be an effective measure of the stability of an anaerobic process when there is a high
buffering capacity (Bprnsson et al., 2000). Under this condition, alkalinity levels reveal a
potential anaerobic process performance directly. The alkalinity of a steady system is between
1000 and 5000 mg CaCO3 L-1
(Ren and Wang, 2004). Lower values of effluent alkalinity warn
about the impending reactor failure. The variation of pH and alkalinity with digestion time is
presented in Fig.4a. The alkalinity of feed sludge and digested sludge varied significantly as
pretreatments were used. The ESCAR digester had higher alkalinity compared to CSCAR due to
the addition of NaOH. At 20 and 15 days SRTs, the effluent alkalinity levels were 19% and 34%
more than the influent alkalinity. Manariotis and Grigoropoulos (2002) observed the increased
levels between 19 and 21%, while Bodkhe (2009) observed the range of 25 to 33%. Similar to
pH, the alkalinity reduced at shorter SRT is since a more organic matter was supplied, it
eventually increased with acid generation and subsequently neutralizes the alkalinity capacity.
3.2.4 Volatile Fatty Acids
7/28/2019 Un Aerobic
14/21
Volatile fatty acids are considered as a central parameter that governs the healthiness of the
anaerobic treatment (Pind et al., 2002). These are the most important intermediates, where they
are degraded by proton-reducing acetogens in association with hydrogen consuming
methanogenic bacteria (Mechichi and Sayadi., 2005). Thus, VFA determination in conjunction
with pH measurement is an essential prerequisite for maintainance of desired environmental
conditions in the anaerobic reactor. Fig.4b. presented the VFA Concentration of anaerobic
digester which followed the trend of increasing, firstly, and then decreasing. The VFA
concentration varied in a range of 227-790 mg/L and fell well within the recommended value for
healthy anaerobic digestion. As a result of increased concentrations of VFA, the acids
accumulate and the pH decreases to such a low value that the hydrolysis and acetogenesis can be
inhibited (Siegert and Banks, 2005). The average VFA concentration of ESCAR (363 mg/L)
was found to be lower than CSCAR (590 mg/L) indicating greater utilization of VFA by
methanogens and subsequent biogas production in ESCAR. According to Dearman and Bentham
(2006), when VFA concentration started to decrease, biogas production rate increase.
3.2.5 TS removal
Fig.5a. shows the variation of TS in digested sludge. For TS removal, CSCAR was in the range
of 6.1 to 9.6% and digester ESCAR 13 to 25.1%. TS analysis shows that there was an increase of
161% in TS reduction when compared with CSCAR, since TS reduction was 25.1% in ESCAR
at 15 days SRT. The results revealed that thermo-chemical is an effective technique for breaking
down the microbial cells or difficult hydrolyzed compounds to easy biodegradable compounds.
3.2.6 SS and VS removal
7/28/2019 Un Aerobic
15/21
The SS and VS reductions can be regarded as the reductions that are expected to be achieved in
total mass of sludge. The variation of SS and VS removal is graphically presented in Fig.5b. For
SS removal, CSCAR was in the range of 17 to 19.5% and digester ESCAR was in the range of
33 to 39.2%. The highest SS removal achieving from ESCAR digester at 15 days SRT was
39.2% with an increase of 101% over CSCAR. Thus, a pretreatment with thermo-chemical gave
a great advantage in SS removal improvement compared to non-pretreatment.
For VS removal, CSCAR was in the range of 14 to 17% and digester ESCAR 25 to 33%. The VS
removal of ESCAR at 20 and 15 days SRT was almost constant and slightly reduced at 12 days
SRT. However, it reduced for CSCAR from long to short SRT. This higher performance is due
to the combination effects of thermal and chemical, which help to break down the microbial cells
for faster subsequent degradation. It eventually facilitates the decomposition reaction which
leads to biodegrade more compounds in the digester.
3.2.7 Biogas production
Fig.6. shows the comparison of biogas production of the digesters at different SRTs. The first
SRT (20 days) was started at digestion run time of 55 days until 115 days, then second SRT (15
days) until 165 days, and finally, the third SRT (12 days) until 200 days. By comparing to
control, the methane production of thermo-chemically pretreated sludge increased by 90, 109 and
111% at 20, 15 and 12 days SRT, respectively. It clearly showed that the methane production
rate appreciably increased from 20 to 15 days SRT, while minor improvement was observed
from 15 to 12 days SRT. The methane content in the biogas varied from 65 to 70%. The higher
gas production in thermo-chemically pretreated sludge evidently indicated that it hydrolyzed
more organic material solution, which is immediate used by anaerobic bacteria and eventually
7/28/2019 Un Aerobic
16/21
facilitates the digestion processes. Furthermore, the biogas production rate was high at short SRT
and low at long SRT. Once the SRT was reduced, the organic loading rate automatically
increases, which eventually come to over loading phenomenon. It was clearly shown by
dropping pH at 12 days SRT. Therefore, by considering both biogas and methane production,
SRT of 15 days was found to be the suitable retention time for effective sludge degradation.
3.2.8 Selection of pertinent SRT
The minimum SRT at which the reactor yields the designed treatment efficiency highly
influences the reactor volume, its compactness and the economy of operation. The economic
viability of sludge management is not feasible when the reactor volume is larger. Therefore, the
selection of the most suitable minimum possible SRT is very important to ensure the cost-
effectiveness of the reactor operation. The results obtained at various SRTs identified, the SRT
of 15 days to be the most appropriate SRT for economic operation of the reactor.
4. Conclusions
The influence of low temperature thermo-chemical pretreatment of dairy sludge was studied. At
60C with pH 12, COD solubilization and suspended Solids reduction was 23% and 22% higher
than that of control. BMP assay results of pretreated sludge confirmed that the observed
solubilization led to an increase in sludge biodegradability, nearly 51% higher biogas production
than control. Thus, 60C with pH 12 was chosen for semi-continuous digesters and by
combining pretreatment with anaerobic digestion led to 80.5%, 117% and 90.4% of TS, SS and
VS reduction respectively, with an improvement of 103% in biogas production.
Acknowledgements
7/28/2019 Un Aerobic
17/21
Authors are thankful to Department of Biotechnology, India for partial financial assistant to this
project (BT/PR13124/GBD/27/192/2009) under their scheme Rapid Grant for Young
Investigator (RGYI).
References
Ahn, K.H., Park, K.Y., Maeng, S.K., Hwang, J.G., Lee, J.W., Song, K.G., Chai, S., 2002.
Ozonation of wastewater sludge for reduction and recycling. Water Sci. Technol. 46, 71 - 77.
American Public Health Association (APHA), 2005. Standard Methods for the Examination of
Water and Wastewater, 21st Edition, Washington DC.
Appels, L., Degrve, J., Van der Bruggen, B., Van Impe, J., Dewil, R., 2010. Influence of low
temperature thermal pre-treatment on sludge solubilization, heavy metal release and
anaerobic digestion. Bioresour. Technol.101, 5743 - 5748.
Ayol, A., Filibeli, A., Sir, D., Kuzyaka, E., 2008. Aerobic and anaerobic bioprocessing of
activated sludge: floc disintegration by enzymes. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A. Toxic /
Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng. 43(13), 1528 - 1535.
Banu, J.R., Kaliappan, S., Adishkumar, S., Uan D.K., Yeom, I.T., in press. A novel method of
sludge pretreatment using the combination of alkalis. J. Environ. Biol. 33.
Banu, J.R., Uan D.K., Yeom, I.T., 2009. Nutrient removal in an A2O - MBR reactor with sludge
reduction. Bioresour. Technol. 100, 3820 - 3824.
7/28/2019 Un Aerobic
18/21
Barjenbruch, M., Kopplow, O., 2003. Enzymatic, mechanical and thermal pre-treatment of
surplus sludge. Adv. Environ. Res. 7, 715 - 720.
Bodkhe. S.Y., 2009. A modified anaerobic baffled reactor for municipal wastewater treatment.
J. Environ. Manage. 90, 2488 - 2493.
Borja, R., Rincon, B., Roposo, F., Alba, J., Martin, A., 2003. Kinetics of mesophilic anaerobic
digestion of the two-phase olive mill solid waste. Biochem. Eng. J. 15, 139 -145.
Bougrier, C., Albasi, C., Delgens, J.P., 2005. Solubilization of waste activated sludge by
ultrasonic treatment. Chem. Eng. J. 106, 163 - 169.
Bprnsson, L., Murto, M., Mattiasson, B., 2000. Evaluation of parameters for monitoring an
aerobic co-digestion process. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 54, 844 - 849.
Chen, Y., Jiang, S., Yuan, H., Zhou, Q., Gu, G., 2007. Hydrolysis and acidification of waste
activated sludge at different pHs. Water Res. 41. 683 - 689.
Climent, M., Ferrer, I., Baeza, M.M., Artola, A., Vzquez, F., Font, X., 2007. Effects of
secondary sludge pre-treatment on biogas production under thermophilic conditions. Chem.
Eng. J. 133, 335 - 342.
Dearman, B., Bentham, R.H., 2006. Anaerobic Digestion of food waste: comparing leachate
exchange rates in sequential batch systems digesting food waste and biosolids. Waste
Manage. 8, 1 - 8.
Gholamreza, M., Hassan, A., Akram, J., 2008. Effect of ozonation on reduction of volume and
mass of waste activated sludge. J. Appl. Sci. Res. 4(2), 122 - 127.
7/28/2019 Un Aerobic
19/21
Ilgin, J., Dilek Sanin, F., 2009. Alkaline Solubilization and microwave irradiation as a combined
sludge disintegration and minimization method. Water Res. 43, 2139 - 2148.
Jin, Y., Li, H., Mahar, R.B., Wang, Z., Nie, Y., 2008. Combined alkaline and ultrasonic
pretreatment of sludge before aerobic digestion. J. Environ. Sci. 21, 279 - 284.
Kaynak, G.E., Filibeli, A., 2008. Assessment of Fenton process as a minimization technique for
biological sludge: Effects on anaerobic sludge bioprocessing. J. Appl. Sci. Res. 5, 151 - 160.
Kim, J., Park C., Kim, T.H., Lee, M., Kim, S., Kim, K., Lee, J., 2003. Effects of various
pretreatments for enhanced anaerobic digestion with waste activated sludge. J. Biosci.
Bioeng. 95 (3), 271 - 275.
Lin, J.G., Chang, C.N., Chang, S.C., 2007. Enhancement of anaerobic digestion of waste
activated sludge by alkaline solubilization. Bioresour. Technol. 62, 85 - 90.
Liu, H., Fang, H.P., 2002. Extraction of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) of sludges. J.
Biotechnol. 95, 249 - 256.
Manariotis, I.D., Grigoropoulos, S.G., 2002. Low strength wastewater treatment using an
anaerobic baffled reactor. Water Environ. Res. 74 (2), 170 - 176.
Mechichi, T., Sayadi, S., 2005. Evaluating process imbalance of anaerobic digestion of olive mill
wastewaters. Process Biochem. 2, 139 - 145.
Nah, I.W., Kang, Y.W., Hwang, K.Y., Song, W.K., 2000. Mechanical pre-treatment of waste
activated sludge for anaerobic digestion process. Water Res. 34, 2362 - 2368.
Neyens, E., Baeyens, J., 2003. A review of thermal sludge pre-treatment processes to improve
7/28/2019 Un Aerobic
20/21
dewaterability. J. Hazard. Mater. 98, 51- 67.
Pham, T.T.H., Brar, S.K., Tyagi, R.D., Surampalli, R.Y., 2009. Ultrasonication of wastewater
sludge consequences on biodegradability and flowability. J. Hazard. Mater. 163, 891 - 898.
Pind, F.P., Angelidaki, I., Ahring, B.K., 2002. Dynamics of the anaerobic process: effects of
volatile fatty acids. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 82 (7), 791 - 801.
Redzwan,G., Banks, C.H., 2004. The use of a specific function to estimate maximum methane
production in a batch-fed anaerobic reactor. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 79, 1174 -1178.
Ren, N.Q., Wang, A.J., 2004. The Method and Technology of Anaerobic Digestion. Chemical
industry Press. 30 - 31.
Siegert, I., Banks, C., 2005. The effect of volatile fatty acid additions on the anaerobic digestion
of cellulose and glucose in batch reactors. Process Biochem. 40, 3412 - 3418.
Takahashi, E., Ledauphin, J., Goux, D., Orvain, F., 2009. Optimizing Extraction of Extra cellular
Polymeric Substances (EPS) from Benthic Diatoms: Comparison of Efficiency of Six EPS
Extraction methods. Mar. Freshwater Res. 60 (12), 1201-1210.
Tapia, J.M., Munoz, J.A., Gonzalez, F., Blazquez, L.M., Malki, M., 2009. Extraction of Extra
cellular Polymeric Substances from the Acidophilic Bacterium Acidiphilium. Water Sci.
Technol. 59 (10), 1959 - 1967.
Wang, F., Wang, Y., Ji, M., 2005. Mechanisms and kinetic models for ultrasonic waste activated
sludge disintegration. J. Hazard. Mater. 123, 145 - 150.
7/28/2019 Un Aerobic
21/21
Wilson, C.A., Novak, J.T., 2009. Hydrolysis of macromolecular components of primary and
secondary wastewater sludge by thermal hydrolytic pretreatment. Water Res. 43, 4489 -
4498.
Zhang, P.Y., Zhang, G.M., Wang, W., 2007. Ultrasonic treatment of biological sludge: Floc
disintegration, cell lysis and inactivation. Bioresour. Technol. 98, 207- 210.
Recommended