The Science of Sales Force Deployment - TerrAlign · The Science of Sales Force Deployment. ......

Preview:

Citation preview

© Copyright 2011 The Sales Management Association

September 7, 2011September 7, 2011

Presented by:Presented by:Presented by:Presented by:

Jim BrownJim BrownJim BrownJim Brown

PresidentPresidentPresidentPresident

TerrAlignTerrAlignTerrAlignTerrAlign

The Science of Sales Force

Deployment

Experienced & FocusedFounded in 1987, majority of employees with 10+ years tenure

Focus on resource deployment & territory optimization

Complete software and services solutions

Experience across all industries and in 30 countries

Technology, Market & Thought LeadershipFirst desktop optimizer

First web-based interface

First to integrate with leading CRM & SPM solutions

First to underwrite SMA

2

About The TerrAlign Group

Agenda

Why is deployment optimization critical and strategic?

A tested framework for deploying sales organizations:

Sales Intelligence Metrics

Segmentation

Reach and Frequency

Sales Force Sizing

Territory Alignment and Optimization

Call Planning

Summary and Questions

Aligning Sales and Business Strategy

Channel Design and Selection

Sales Process Design

Organizational Design

Goal Setting

Incentive Design

Territory Sizing and Deployment

Quota Management

Territory Management

Compensation Administration

Strategy

Planning

Operations

Analytics

Productivity Improvement

Performace Reporting

Opportunity Information Management

Market/Customer Information Management

Sales Process Optimization

Knowledge Management

Training and Development

Sales Program Management

Sales Operation's ResponsibilitiesOPTIM

IZE

DESIGN

IMPLEMENT

Planned Sales Force Size Change

Framework for Sales Force Deployment

Framework for Sales Force Deployment

Sales Intelligence Metrics

Know where you are,

before deciding where to go.

Who are my customers and prospects?

What are their characteristics?

How productive are my salespeople?

What are their characteristics?

What have they been doing, when and where?

What have been the results?

Profiles of Customers and Prospects

Name

Address

Phone

Email

Type of account

Potential for your products

Your existing sales

Preferred vendors

Salespeople

Productivity

Selling hours per year

Sales calls per year

Average duration of a sales call

Characteristics

Home ZIP Code

Tenure

Performance rating

Product proficiencies

Call History

Salesperson

Account called-on

Date

Activities performed

Type

Product

Duration

Sales History

Account

Time period

Your sales

Product

Amount

Sources

Internal Systems

Accounting, order processing, and CRM systems

Internal Experts

Delphi sessions

Outside vendors

Nielsen, IMS, and Dun & Bradstreet

Surveys

Custom research

Framework for Sales Force Deployment

Segmentation and Targeting

Segmentation aids targeting

Which accounts receive sales calls

How many sales calls do they receive

How will sales effort affect customer behavior?

Products purchased

Quantity purchased

Factors

Type of account

Competitive position

Potential

Response Analysis

Segment

Relate

Effort expended (call history)

Results achieved (sales history)

17

-

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

80,000

90,000

100,000

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

An

nu

al

Sa

les

# of Calls

Response by Potential

Response Analysis

Framework for Sales Force Deployment

Optimization of Reach and Frequency

Maximize return on investment

Return in sales

From investment in sales calls

Response analysis estimates

Sales

Resulting from a given number of sales calls

Across a specific segment of accounts

19

20

-

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

80,000

90,000

100,000

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

An

nu

al

Sa

les

# of Calls

Response by Potential

A

B

Optimization of Reach and Frequency

21

-

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

80,000

90,000

100,000

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

An

nu

al

Sa

les

# of Calls

Response by Potential

A

B

Optimization of Reach and Frequency

22

-

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

80,000

90,000

100,000

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

An

nu

al

Sa

les

# of Calls

Response by Potential

A

B

Optimization of Reach and Frequency

23

-

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

80,000

90,000

100,000

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

An

nu

al

Sa

les

# of Calls

Response by Potential

A

B

Optimization of Reach and Frequency

24

-

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

80,000

90,000

100,000

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

An

nu

al

Sa

les

# of Calls

Response by Potential

A

B

Optimization of Reach and Frequency

Travel Time vs. Reach and Frequency

Sales effort is more than the number of calls

Effort = frequency x (duration + travel)

Within a segment, accounts with high travel time

Have a lower ROI

Must deliver more sales per call vs. average account

Might be less attractive than lower potential accounts

Might be better covered by inside sales

25

Average Travel Time per Account

Framework for Sales Force Deployment

Sales Force Sizing

Optimization of reach and frequency

Estimates maximum revenue

For a given amount of sales effort

…or…

For a given number of salespeople

Optimize sales force size by

Optimizing reach and frequency

For various sales force sizes

Finding the difference in revenue produced

Choosing an acceptable return on investment

Optimization of Reach and Frequency

29

-

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

80,000

90,000

100,000

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

An

nu

al

Sa

les

# of Calls

Response by Potential

A

B

Optimization of Reach and Frequency

Segment AccountsAverage

CallsAverage Revenue

Effort(Reps)

Revenue (000)

A 4,815 4 85,000 79 409,275

B 5,185 1 17,500 21 90,738

Overall 100 500,013

Sales Force Sizing

Sales Force Size Revenue (000)

Incremental Revenue per

Salesperson

80 455,000

90 480,000 2,500,000

100 500,000 2,000,000

110 515,000 1,500,000

120 525,000 1,000,000

130 530,000 500,000

32

$-

$500,000

$1,000,000

$1,500,000

$2,000,000

$2,500,000

$3,000,000

-10 +10 +20 +30

Change in Sales Force Size

Incremental Revenue per Salesperson

Sales Force Sizing

33

$-

$500,000

$1,000,000

$1,500,000

$2,000,000

$2,500,000

$3,000,000

-10 +10 +20 +30

Change in Sales Force Size

Incremental Revenue per Salesperson

Sales Force Sizing

Framework for Sales Force Deployment

Territory Alignment

You’ve determined

How many salespeople we need

On which accounts they will call

How often they will call on those accounts

How much time each of those calls will require, including travel time specific to the account

Now, we can create territories

Territory Alignment

A territory is a job description

It requires one salesperson

To call on a set of accounts

With a recommended call frequency

To produce an expected amount of revenue

Effort = frequency x (duration + travel)

Territory Alignment

A good territory:

Is balanced with respect to other territoriesIt requires the full effort of one salesperson, just like the other

territories

Doesn’t require less than one salesperson’s effortSalesperson’s effort is used on less effective calls or wasted

ROI is reduced

Doesn’t require more than one salesperson’s effortSalesperson can’t adequately cover his or her accounts

ROI is reduced

Respects roads and natural barriersMaximizes productivity by reducing travel time

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

% o

f A

ve

rag

e

Work by Territory

Underemployment Missed Calls Productive Work Work Required

Equivalent to 10% unassigned salespeople

Equivalent to 10% vacant territories

Territory Alignment

Territory Optimization

Optimize

Balance selling effort

Minimize travel size

Minimize disruption

Assess fit to existing salesperson locations

Expansions

Closures

Relocations

Fine-tune in consultation with field managers

Territory Optimization

Realignment Evolution

0.00%

50.00%

100.00%

150.00%

200.00%

250.00%

300.00%

Territories

Rela

tive V

alu

e Current

Optimized

Final

High

Low

Increases sales

and profits by 4%

to 12% by full

resource utilization

Reduces travel

costs on average

by 10%-15%

Territory Optimization

Framework for Sales Force Deployment

Assign calls to weeks or days

Meet call frequency requirements

Schedule calls at equal intervals

Cluster weekly and daily calls geographically

Balance effort by week and day

Two basic approaches

Zones

Calendars

43

Call Planning

Territory AA254

Territory AA254 (zoned)

Day 1 Day 2 Day 3

ID Name CallsWork (hrs) ID Name Calls Work ID Name Calls Work

11071 Customer 5 1 1.11 11040 Customer 3 1 1.12 10038 Customer 1 1 1.29

22339 Customer 13 1 1.11 17607 Customer 8 1 1.16 18014 Customer 9 1 1.25

25173 Customer 17 1 1.11 18202 Customer 10 1 1.12 30527 Customer 24 1 1.21

26101 Customer 19 1 1.11 26084 Customer 18 1 1.16 32269 Customer 25 1 1.13

26624 Customer 20 1 1.11 27565 Customer 21 1 1.12 34351 Customer 27 1 1.23

34877 Customer 30 1 1.11 28450 Customer 22 1 1.12 34403 Customer 28 1 1.13

38389 Customer 33 1 1.11 29791 Customer 23 1 1.15 38068 Customer 32 1 1.13

9576 Customer 36 1 1.11

8 8.91 7 7.95 7 8.36

Day 4 Day 5

ID Name Calls Work ID Name Calls Work

10895 Customer 2 1 1.15 14430 Customer 7 1 1.11

11042 Customer 4 1 1.15 18343 Customer 11 1 1.11

11441 Customer 6 1 1.23 20999 Customer 12 1 1.11

22733 Customer 14 1 1.12 23758 Customer 15 1 1.20

25166 Customer 16 1 1.12 34742 Customer 29 1 1.11

33825 Customer 26 1 1.15 36942 Customer 31 1 1.21

44468 Customer 35 1 1.12 41753 Customer 34 1 1.19

7 8.04 7 8.05

Sample 5-Day Call Schedule

Framework for Sales Force Deployment

Self-Audit Questions

What sales intelligence metrics do you need?

Is your sales force sized to maximize revenue?

Are your salespeople:

Reaching the most profitable accounts?

Delivering the optimal call frequency?

On an efficient and effective schedule?

Do your territories:

Maximize salesperson productivity?

Support your reach and frequency goals?

Q&A and Contact Information

Q&A

Contact

Jim Brown

brown@terralign.com

703-485-4562

TerrAlign

info@terralign.com

703-485-4560

Thank You.

Recommended