STRATEGY AND PLANS FOR VALIDATION IN ADDRESS

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement n° 207643

STRATEGY AND PLANS FOR VALIDATION IN ADDRESS

proof

Pieter Kropman, KEMA

Paris, June 9th 2010

ADDRESS INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOPACTIVE DEMAND: THE FUTURE OF ELECTRICITY

Paris, June 9th 2010

ADDRESS INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP

Agenda

1. Objectives

2. Approach

3. Results

4. Next year plan

Paris, June 9th 2010

ADDRESS INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP

Main objectives of the Validations

• To check and validate the most promising solutions (prototypes) developed in ADDRESS

• To assess the project outcomes, quantify if, how and how well the ADDRESS objectives will have been met.

This might include a possible update and revision of the ADDRESS vision of active demand in electricity systems (initially defined in Deliverable D1.1)

Show that the “ADDRESS solution”is suitable to: 1.Enable Active Demand2.Bring value to the electricity system

3.Support the development of DG and RES4.Significantly increase network load factor

Paris, June 9th 2010

ADDRESS INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP

Approach

Test Objectives:

What do we want?

Validation Concept

Get the fingers of both hands to fit into each other

Field Test Platform:

What do we have?

Field Test Description: location, number of consumers, available equipment/prototypes, etc.

Paris, June 9th 2010

ADDRESS INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP

The first results: Highlights

The most important achievement: Validation Concept

Other achievements are:

- the criteria for test site selection

- a first description of the field test in Spain,

- The main steps/issues for the plan for the recruitment of the consumers

and also

- an overview of the available equipment needed for the field tests (E-

boxes, home-appliances and smart meters),

- a description of experiences from partners with similar tests.

Paris, June 9th 2010

ADDRESS INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP

Validation Concept Objectives

The Validation Concept:• shows the concrete steps necessary to implement AD• describes what is going to be validated to “proof” the ADDRESS solution• describes which tests will be done in the different WP’s of the project• gives an overview of the validation methods used for the tests• is an input for the actual testplan (script = how to test, where, equipment needed, etc)

Concepì Tested in WP Test Method 1 2 3 4 5 6 paper peer sim. lab field

1 CONCEPTUAL COMPLETENESS 1.1 Real-Time Price & Volume Signals X X X 1.2 Distributed Intelligence X X X 1.3 Market Based Approach X X X 2 FEASIBILITY OF THE TECHNICAL IMPLEMENTATION 2.1 Technical Implementation of Market Design and AD Integration 2.1.1 Formulation Of Needs By Regulated And Deregulated Players X X 2.1.2 Bid Formulation By Regulated And Deregulated Players X X 2.1.3 Offer Formulation By Aggregator X X 2.1.4 Demonstration of Market Clearing in Various Situations X X (X)

2.1.5 Settlement X 2.2 Integration in the Network: Planning, Operation, Control 2.2.1 Technical Feasibility of "Aggregator – Consumer" interaction X X X X

2.2.2 Network Operation & Planning X X (X) 2.2.3 Measurement & AD product and service verification X X X

2.3 Communication System X X X 3 ATTRACTIVENESSOF ACTIVE DEMAND 3.1 Feasibility of the ADDRESS solution X? X? 3.2 Consumer / AD-Buyer X 3.3 Removed Barriers X 3.4 Transition Path Viabilità X 4 VALUE FOR THE SYSTEM 4.1 Large Scale DG and RES Deployment X

4.2 Asset Utilization X 4.3 Economic Viability of Aggregator X 4.4 Competitiveness / Attractiveness X X 4.5 Social Welfare X

Paris, June 9th 2010

ADDRESS INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP

Validation Concept Objectives

The Validation Concept:• shows the concrete steps necessary to implement AD• describes what is going to be validated to “proof” the ADDRESS solution• describes which tests will be done in the different WP’s of the project• gives an overview of the validation methods used for the tests• is an input for the actual testplan (script = how to test, where, equipment needed, etc)

Concepì Tested in WP Test Method 1 2 3 4 5 6 paper peer sim. lab field

1 CONCEPTUAL COMPLETENESS 1.1 Real-Time Price & Volume Signals X X X 1.2 Distributed Intelligence X X X 1.3 Market Based Approach X X X 2 FEASIBILITY OF THE TECHNICAL IMPLEMENTATION 2.1 Technical Implementation of Market Design and AD Integration 2.1.1 Formulation Of Needs By Regulated And Deregulated Players X X 2.1.2 Bid Formulation By Regulated And Deregulated Players X X 2.1.3 Offer Formulation By Aggregator X X 2.1.4 Demonstration of Market Clearing in Various Situations X X (X)

2.1.5 Settlement X 2.2 Integration in the Network: Planning, Operation, Control 2.2.1 Technical Feasibility of "Aggregator – Consumer" interaction X X X X

2.2.2 Network Operation & Planning X X (X) 2.2.3 Measurement & AD product and service verification X X X

2.3 Communication System X X X 3 ATTRACTIVENESSOF ACTIVE DEMAND 3.1 Feasibility of the ADDRESS solution X? X? 3.2 Consumer / AD-Buyer X 3.3 Removed Barriers X 3.4 Transition Path Viabilità X 4 VALUE FOR THE SYSTEM 4.1 Large Scale DG and RES Deployment X

4.2 Asset Utilization X 4.3 Economic Viability of Aggregator X 4.4 Competitiveness / Attractiveness X X 4.5 Social Welfare X

Tested in WP

1 2 3 4 5 6

Paris, June 9th 2010

ADDRESS INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP

Validation Concept Objectives

The Validation Concept:• shows the concrete steps necessary to implement AD• describes what is going to be validated to “proof” the ADDRESS solution• describes which tests will be done in the different WP’s of the project• gives an overview of the validation methods used for the tests• is an input for the actual testplan (script = how to test, where, equipment needed, etc)

Concepì Tested in WP Test Method 1 2 3 4 5 6 paper peer sim. lab field

1 CONCEPTUAL COMPLETENESS 1.1 Real-Time Price & Volume Signals X X X 1.2 Distributed Intelligence X X X 1.3 Market Based Approach X X X 2 FEASIBILITY OF THE TECHNICAL IMPLEMENTATION 2.1 Technical Implementation of Market Design and AD Integration 2.1.1 Formulation Of Needs By Regulated And Deregulated Players X X 2.1.2 Bid Formulation By Regulated And Deregulated Players X X 2.1.3 Offer Formulation By Aggregator X X 2.1.4 Demonstration of Market Clearing in Various Situations X X (X)

2.1.5 Settlement X 2.2 Integration in the Network: Planning, Operation, Control 2.2.1 Technical Feasibility of "Aggregator – Consumer" interaction X X X X

2.2.2 Network Operation & Planning X X (X) 2.2.3 Measurement & AD product and service verification X X X

2.3 Communication System X X X 3 ATTRACTIVENESSOF ACTIVE DEMAND 3.1 Feasibility of the ADDRESS solution X? X? 3.2 Consumer / AD-Buyer X 3.3 Removed Barriers X 3.4 Transition Path Viabilità X 4 VALUE FOR THE SYSTEM 4.1 Large Scale DG and RES Deployment X

4.2 Asset Utilization X 4.3 Economic Viability of Aggregator X 4.4 Competitiveness / Attractiveness X X 4.5 Social Welfare X

Test Method paper peer sim. lab field

Paris, June 9th 2010

ADDRESS INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP

Validation Concept Concepì Tested in WP Test Method

1 2 3 4 5 6 paper peer sim. lab field

1 CONCEPTUAL COMPLETENESS 1.1 Real-Time Price & Volume Signals X X X 1.2 Distributed Intelligence X X X 1.3 Market Based Approach X X X 2 FEASIBILITY OF THE TECHNICAL IMPLEMENTATION 2.1 Technical Implementation of Market Design and AD Integration 2.1.1 Formulation Of Needs By Regulated And Deregulated Players X X 2.1.2 Bid Formulation By Regulated And Deregulated Players X X 2.1.3 Offer Formulation By Aggregator X X 2.1.4 Demonstration of Market Clearing in Various Situations X X (X)

2.1.5 Settlement X 2.2 Integration in the Network: Planning, Operation, Control 2.2.1 Technical Feasibility of "Aggregator – Consumer" interaction X X X X

2.2.2 Network Operation & Planning X X (X) 2.2.3 Measurement & AD product and service verification X X X

2.3 Communication System X X X 3 ATTRACTIVENESSOF ACTIVE DEMAND 3.1 Feasibility of the ADDRESS solution X? X? 3.2 Consumer / AD-Buyer X 3.3 Removed Barriers X 3.4 Transition Path Viabilità X 4 VALUE FOR THE SYSTEM 4.1 Large Scale DG and RES Deployment X

4.2 Asset Utilization X 4.3 Economic Viability of Aggregator X 4.4 Competitiveness / Attractiveness X X 4.5 Social Welfare X

Verify compliance with requirements:

1. Completeness: three key concepts

2. Feasibility: technical implementation

3. Attractiveness: for participants

4. Value: for the system (society)

1 CONCEPTUAL COMPLETENESS 1.1 Real-Time Price & Volume Signals 1.2 Distributed Intelligence 1.3 Market Based Approach

Paris, June 9th 2010

ADDRESS INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP

Validation Concept Concepì Tested in WP Test Method

1 2 3 4 5 6 paper peer sim. lab field

1 CONCEPTUAL COMPLETENESS 1.1 Real-Time Price & Volume Signals X X X 1.2 Distributed Intelligence X X X 1.3 Market Based Approach X X X 2 FEASIBILITY OF THE TECHNICAL IMPLEMENTATION 2.1 Technical Implementation of Market Design and AD Integration 2.1.1 Formulation Of Needs By Regulated And Deregulated Players X X 2.1.2 Bid Formulation By Regulated And Deregulated Players X X 2.1.3 Offer Formulation By Aggregator X X 2.1.4 Demonstration of Market Clearing in Various Situations X X (X)

2.1.5 Settlement X 2.2 Integration in the Network: Planning, Operation, Control 2.2.1 Technical Feasibility of "Aggregator – Consumer" interaction X X X X

2.2.2 Network Operation & Planning X X (X) 2.2.3 Measurement & AD product and service verification X X X

2.3 Communication System X X X 3 ATTRACTIVENESSOF ACTIVE DEMAND 3.1 Feasibility of the ADDRESS solution X? X? 3.2 Consumer / AD-Buyer X 3.3 Removed Barriers X 3.4 Transition Path Viabilità X 4 VALUE FOR THE SYSTEM 4.1 Large Scale DG and RES Deployment X

4.2 Asset Utilization X 4.3 Economic Viability of Aggregator X 4.4 Competitiveness / Attractiveness X X 4.5 Social Welfare X

Verify compliance with requirements:

1. Completeness: three key concepts

2. Feasibility: technical implementation

3. Attractiveness: for participants

4. Value: for the system (society)

2 FEASIBILITY OF THE TECHNICAL IMPLEMENTATION 2.1 Technical Implementation of Market Design and AD Integration

2.1.1 Formulation Of Needs By Regulated And Deregulated Players 2.1.2 Bid Formulation By Regulated And Deregulated Players 2.1.3 Offer Formulation By Aggregator 2.1.4 Demonstration of Market Clearing in Various Situations 2.1.5 Settlement

2.2 Integration in the Network: Planning, Operation, Control

2.2.1 Technical Feasibility of Aggregator - Consumer interaction 2.2.2 Network Operation & Planning 2.2.3 Measurement & AD product and service verification

2.3 Communication System

Paris, June 9th 2010

ADDRESS INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP

Validation Concept Concepì Tested in WP Test Method

1 2 3 4 5 6 paper peer sim. lab field

1 CONCEPTUAL COMPLETENESS 1.1 Real-Time Price & Volume Signals X X X 1.2 Distributed Intelligence X X X 1.3 Market Based Approach X X X 2 FEASIBILITY OF THE TECHNICAL IMPLEMENTATION 2.1 Technical Implementation of Market Design and AD Integration 2.1.1 Formulation Of Needs By Regulated And Deregulated Players X X 2.1.2 Bid Formulation By Regulated And Deregulated Players X X 2.1.3 Offer Formulation By Aggregator X X 2.1.4 Demonstration of Market Clearing in Various Situations X X (X)

2.1.5 Settlement X 2.2 Integration in the Network: Planning, Operation, Control 2.2.1 Technical Feasibility of "Aggregator – Consumer" interaction X X X X

2.2.2 Network Operation & Planning X X (X) 2.2.3 Measurement & AD product and service verification X X X

2.3 Communication System X X X 3 ATTRACTIVENESSOF ACTIVE DEMAND 3.1 Feasibility of the ADDRESS solution X? X? 3.2 Consumer / AD-Buyer X 3.3 Removed Barriers X 3.4 Transition Path Viabilità X 4 VALUE FOR THE SYSTEM 4.1 Large Scale DG and RES Deployment X

4.2 Asset Utilization X 4.3 Economic Viability of Aggregator X 4.4 Competitiveness / Attractiveness X X 4.5 Social Welfare X

Verify compliance with requirements:

1. Completeness: three key concepts

2. Feasibility: technical implementation

3. Attractiveness: for participants

4. Value: for the system (society)

3 ATTRACTIVENESS OF ACTIVE DEMAND 3.1 Feasibility of the ADDRESS solution 3.2 Consumer / AD-Buyer 3.3 Removed Barriers 3.4 Transition Path Viability

Paris, June 9th 2010

ADDRESS INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP

Validation Concept Concepì Tested in WP Test Method

1 2 3 4 5 6 paper peer sim. lab field

1 CONCEPTUAL COMPLETENESS 1.1 Real-Time Price & Volume Signals X X X 1.2 Distributed Intelligence X X X 1.3 Market Based Approach X X X 2 FEASIBILITY OF THE TECHNICAL IMPLEMENTATION 2.1 Technical Implementation of Market Design and AD Integration 2.1.1 Formulation Of Needs By Regulated And Deregulated Players X X 2.1.2 Bid Formulation By Regulated And Deregulated Players X X 2.1.3 Offer Formulation By Aggregator X X 2.1.4 Demonstration of Market Clearing in Various Situations X X (X)

2.1.5 Settlement X 2.2 Integration in the Network: Planning, Operation, Control 2.2.1 Technical Feasibility of "Aggregator – Consumer" interaction X X X X

2.2.2 Network Operation & Planning X X (X) 2.2.3 Measurement & AD product and service verification X X X

2.3 Communication System X X X 3 ATTRACTIVENESSOF ACTIVE DEMAND 3.1 Feasibility of the ADDRESS solution X? X? 3.2 Consumer / AD-Buyer X 3.3 Removed Barriers X 3.4 Transition Path Viabilità X 4 VALUE FOR THE SYSTEM 4.1 Large Scale DG and RES Deployment X

4.2 Asset Utilization X 4.3 Economic Viability of Aggregator X 4.4 Competitiveness / Attractiveness X X 4.5 Social Welfare X

Verify compliance with requirements:

1. Completeness: three key concepts

2. Feasibility: technical implementation

3. Attractiveness: for participants

4. Value: for the system (society)

4 VALUE FOR THE SYSTEM 4.1 Large Scale DG and RES Deployment 4.2 Asset Utilization 4.3 Economic Viability of Aggregator 4.4 Competitiveness / Attractiveness 4.5 Social Welfare

Paris, June 9th 2010

ADDRESS INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP

Criteria for Field test location selection

General criteria for Field Test selection:

• Applicable to many places in Europe

• Together overview of validation scope

• Renewables

• Different grid situations (scenario’s): urban, rural, geographic

Paris, June 9th 2010

ADDRESS INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP

Test 1: Iberdrola (LV-string)

Test 1 will be focussed on achieving AD from LV (domestic) consumers and their interaction with aggregators.

Main objective to check and validate:

– Relationships and equipment at LV-Home level within the ADDRESS architecture:

• Aggregator strategy and algorithms

• the Energy box, smart meter and home equipment

• interaction between (+ needed communication)

– Social acceptance and commitment:

• recruit and motivate consumers

• assessing consumers behavior (incentives/ user interface)

NB: Tests 2 and 3 are currently being defined

Paris, June 9th 2010

ADDRESS INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP

Consumer recruitment & (de-) installation

Recruiting process:- Communication channel(s), motivation of the users- helpline / hotline- appointments with the users- entity in charge of the recruiting process- evaluation of the budget needed

Installation and de-installation process:- audit process: conformity of the user's installation, compatibility with tests- specification of the installation: contracts, training, certification of the installers- implementation of the technical installation- coordination between the technical installation and the user relationship

management- organization of the de-installation

Paris, June 9th 2010

ADDRESS INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP

Next year plan

Technical objectives/ results expected :

1. Deliver Testplan (Deliverable D6.1, public) :

• Finalize validation concept

• Description (vision) of field tests in Italy, France and Spain

• Definition of the surveys to be conducted in the Field tests

• Plan for recruitment of consumers

• Plan for installation and de-installation process

2. Start-up with preparations for field tests and performing simulation validations

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement n° 207643

THANK YOU