View
41
Download
1
Category
Tags:
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
Stillman Valley High School. 2005-2006 S chool I mprovement P lan. SIP Team/Process. 5 Facilitators and I meet once a month Each department sets their own goals Aligned to Illinois State Learning Standards SVHS data driven Pages 1-17. Review 04-05 Goals. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Stillman Valley High School
2005-2006School
Improvement
Plan
SIP Team/Process
5 Facilitators and I meet once a month
Each department sets their own goals
o Aligned to Illinois State Learning Standards
o SVHS data driven
o Pages 1-17
Review 04-05 Goals1. Make adequate yearly progress as
defined by NCLB.
All 3 subject area tests made AYP
2. Increase the average daily attendance rate to 93.8%.
93.68%
3. Decrease the number of tardies and tardy related referrals.
11% decrease in tardies
19% increase in tardy referralsAppendix C
Review Discipline Issues 2004-05
Incidents 03/04 04/05Alcohol/Tobacco/Drugs 18 22Bus Misconduct 7 10Cell Phone Violations 5 1Cheating 3 3Dentention Not Served 31 12Destruction of school property 6 2Dress Code Violation 1 4Driving Violations 2 12Failed to Serve Saturday 44 16Fighting 20 12Inappropriate Language 31 20Internet Violations 3 0Misconduct/insubordination 121 17Sexual Harassment 0 1Tardies 328 391Target Violations 28 4Theft 1 10Truancy 177 113
TOTAL 826 683Enrollment 540 557Incidents / Enrollment 1.55 1.22
Actions 03/04 04/05 DifferenceDetentions 244 379 55%Out of school 1 day 49 22 -55%Out of school 2 days 20 28 40%Out of school 3 days 2 10 400%Out of school 4 days 3 2 -33%Out of school 5 days 8 11 38%Out of school + 5 days 2 11 450%Days affected (ISS) 12 7 -42%
Days affected (OSS) 151 251 66%Saturday 2 hours 145 189 30%Saturday 4 hours 212 305 44%Target Violations 28 4 -86%Enrollment 540 557 3%
PRAIRIE STATE ACHIEVEMENT EXAMINATION
Purpose
Measure how well our students and school did in meeting the Illinois State Learning Standards
• Reading
• Math
• Science
ASSESSMENT
Day 1•ACT
Day 2•ACT Work Keys • ISBE Assessments
ACT
20.5
21.3
20.520.7
19.9 19.919.819.819.9
19.4
18
18.5
19
19.5
20
20.5
21
21.5
English Reading Science Math Composite
SVHS
State
ACT Composite ScoresCompared to the State
ACT Last 5 Years
18.5
19
19.5
20
20.5
21
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
SVHS
State
Composite Scores Compared to the State
Performance Levels
Academic WarningBelow StandardsMeets Standards
Exceeds Standards (Prairie State Designation)
3.4
7.9
26.7
32.6
57.8
46.4
12.1 13.1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Warning Below Meets Exceeds
SVHS
State
70%
PSAE Reading
PSAE Math
6.9 7.2
29.3
45.6
62.9
37.4
0.9
9.8
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Warning Below Meets Exceeds
SVHS
State
63%
3.4
11.1
31.9
41.4
57.8
37.3
6.910.2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Warning Below Meets Exceeds
SVHS
State
65%
PSAE Science
Additional PSAE Data
18 students recorded 23 exceeds designation (16%).
59 students scored in the meets or exceeds categories in all 3 subjects areas (52%).
19 students scored in the meets or exceeds categories in 2 out of 3 subjects areas (18%).
22 students scored in the below or warning categories in all 3 subject areas (16%).
15 students scored in the below or warning categories in 2 out of 3 subject areas (14%).
17 students were within 5 points of meeting in reading (would be an additional 15% in the meets category)
18 students were within 5 points of meeting in math (would be an additional 15% in the meets category)
12 students were within 5 points of meeting in science (would be an additional 10% in the meets category)
No Child Left Behind
Annual Yearly Progress2003 = 40%2004 = 40%2005 = 47.5%2006 = 47.5%2007 = 55%2008 = 62.5%
Plans immediately following high school
3947
3
14
12
6
5
0 10 20 30 40 50
4 Yr. College
Voc/Tech
Work PT
Military
Were the counselors helpful?
19%
81% Yes
No
75
25
0 20 40 60 80
Yes
No
Positive learning experience?
Department Preparation
16%3% 8%
32%
35% 32%
30% 46% 42%
19% 12% 18%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Math English Science
Excellent
Good
Average
Below Avg.
Needs Improve.
2
7
26
49
15
0 10 20 30 40 50
Needs Improve.
Below Avg.
Average
Good
Excellent
Did teachers demand quality work?
Did the staff care about you?
17%
32%28%
13%
10%Excellent
Good
Average
Below
NeedsImprove.
SVHS offer challenging courses?
0
10
20
30
40
50
Excellent Good Average Below Avg. NeedsImprove.
SVHS Goals for 2005-2006
Continue our quest in becoming a schoolin the top 10% in the State of Illinois
Keeping ahead of the AYP as it relates to NCLB
Prepare students for the next step in their lives
Recommended