Stillman Valley High School

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

Stillman Valley High School. 2005-2006 S chool I mprovement P lan. SIP Team/Process. 5 Facilitators and I meet once a month Each department sets their own goals Aligned to Illinois State Learning Standards SVHS data driven Pages 1-17. Review 04-05 Goals. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Stillman Valley High School

2005-2006School

Improvement

Plan

SIP Team/Process

5 Facilitators and I meet once a month

Each department sets their own goals

o Aligned to Illinois State Learning Standards

o SVHS data driven

o Pages 1-17

Review 04-05 Goals1. Make adequate yearly progress as

defined by NCLB.

All 3 subject area tests made AYP

2. Increase the average daily attendance rate to 93.8%.

93.68%

3. Decrease the number of tardies and tardy related referrals.

11% decrease in tardies

19% increase in tardy referralsAppendix C

Review Discipline Issues 2004-05

Incidents 03/04 04/05Alcohol/Tobacco/Drugs 18 22Bus Misconduct 7 10Cell Phone Violations 5 1Cheating 3 3Dentention Not Served 31 12Destruction of school property 6 2Dress Code Violation 1 4Driving Violations 2 12Failed to Serve Saturday 44 16Fighting 20 12Inappropriate Language 31 20Internet Violations 3 0Misconduct/insubordination 121 17Sexual Harassment 0 1Tardies 328 391Target Violations 28 4Theft 1 10Truancy 177 113

TOTAL 826 683Enrollment 540 557Incidents / Enrollment 1.55 1.22

Actions 03/04 04/05 DifferenceDetentions 244 379 55%Out of school 1 day 49 22 -55%Out of school 2 days 20 28 40%Out of school 3 days 2 10 400%Out of school 4 days 3 2 -33%Out of school 5 days 8 11 38%Out of school + 5 days 2 11 450%Days affected (ISS) 12 7 -42%

Days affected (OSS) 151 251 66%Saturday 2 hours 145 189 30%Saturday 4 hours 212 305 44%Target Violations 28 4 -86%Enrollment 540 557 3%

PRAIRIE STATE ACHIEVEMENT EXAMINATION

Purpose

Measure how well our students and school did in meeting the Illinois State Learning Standards

• Reading

• Math

• Science

ASSESSMENT

Day 1•ACT

Day 2•ACT Work Keys • ISBE Assessments

ACT

20.5

21.3

20.520.7

19.9 19.919.819.819.9

19.4

18

18.5

19

19.5

20

20.5

21

21.5

English Reading Science Math Composite

SVHS

State

ACT Composite ScoresCompared to the State

ACT Last 5 Years

18.5

19

19.5

20

20.5

21

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

SVHS

State

Composite Scores Compared to the State

Performance Levels

Academic WarningBelow StandardsMeets Standards

Exceeds Standards (Prairie State Designation)

3.4

7.9

26.7

32.6

57.8

46.4

12.1 13.1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Warning Below Meets Exceeds

SVHS

State

70%

PSAE Reading

PSAE Math

6.9 7.2

29.3

45.6

62.9

37.4

0.9

9.8

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Warning Below Meets Exceeds

SVHS

State

63%

3.4

11.1

31.9

41.4

57.8

37.3

6.910.2

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Warning Below Meets Exceeds

SVHS

State

65%

PSAE Science

Additional PSAE Data

18 students recorded 23 exceeds designation (16%).

59 students scored in the meets or exceeds categories in all 3 subjects areas (52%).

19 students scored in the meets or exceeds categories in 2 out of 3 subjects areas (18%).

22 students scored in the below or warning categories in all 3 subject areas (16%).

15 students scored in the below or warning categories in 2 out of 3 subject areas (14%).

17 students were within 5 points of meeting in reading (would be an additional 15% in the meets category)

18 students were within 5 points of meeting in math (would be an additional 15% in the meets category)

12 students were within 5 points of meeting in science (would be an additional 10% in the meets category)

No Child Left Behind

Annual Yearly Progress2003 = 40%2004 = 40%2005 = 47.5%2006 = 47.5%2007 = 55%2008 = 62.5%

Plans immediately following high school

3947

3

14

12

6

5

0 10 20 30 40 50

4 Yr. College

Voc/Tech

Work PT

Military

Were the counselors helpful?

19%

81% Yes

No

75

25

0 20 40 60 80

Yes

No

Positive learning experience?

Department Preparation

16%3% 8%

32%

35% 32%

30% 46% 42%

19% 12% 18%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Math English Science

Excellent

Good

Average

Below Avg.

Needs Improve.

2

7

26

49

15

0 10 20 30 40 50

Needs Improve.

Below Avg.

Average

Good

Excellent

Did teachers demand quality work?

Did the staff care about you?

17%

32%28%

13%

10%Excellent

Good

Average

Below

NeedsImprove.

SVHS offer challenging courses?

0

10

20

30

40

50

Excellent Good Average Below Avg. NeedsImprove.

SVHS Goals for 2005-2006

Continue our quest in becoming a schoolin the top 10% in the State of Illinois

Keeping ahead of the AYP as it relates to NCLB

Prepare students for the next step in their lives