View
35
Download
0
Category
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
Status of Test Beam. Analysis. Paul Nilsson, SPD General Meeting , May 21, 2003. Test Beam 2002 Analysis. Report on the status of the offline analysis. Results from threshold, delay and bias scans. Offline Analysis – Low Efficiency Problem?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
May 21, 2003 P. Nilsson, SPD General Meeting 1
Paul Nilsson, SPD General Meeting , May 21, 2003
Test Beam 2002 Analysis
Status of Test Beam
Report on the status of the offline analysis. Results from threshold, delay and bias scans.
Analysis
May 21, 2003 P. Nilsson, SPD General Meeting 2
Offline Analysis – Low Efficiency Problem?
The data desynchronization causing event shifts has been corrected for in software, yielding close to perfect results. The period of the apparent event shifts matched EXACTLY the scaler setting in the trigger card. The trigger card will be investigated as soon as possible.
May 21, 2003 P. Nilsson, SPD General Meeting 3
Offline Analysis – Current Status
• All necessary software/utilities developed
analyzeanalyze2htmlanalysis database
raw data to analyzed root treeroot tree to web pageprovides easy web access via test beam homepage
• Analyzed files include threshold, delay, bias and angle scans• Known problem with angle scans due to current alignment algorithm and big run sets (~2M events)• Only minor changes required for next test beam
http://alice1.web.cern.ch/alice1/testbeam2002/index.asp
May 21, 2003 P. Nilsson, SPD General Meeting 4
Offline Analysis – TB Analysis Webpage
Test Beam webcontains a subset of the analyzed files (more will be added as soon as they are processed)
May 21, 2003 P. Nilsson, SPD General Meeting 5
Offline Analysis – Sample Analysis Webpage
Efficiency vs. analysis parameter (e.g. delay)
X-Resolution vs. analysis parameter
Y-Resolution vs. analysis parameter
Residuals vs. event number
Average cluster size vs. analysis parameter
Cluster size distributions
Beam spots
Noisy pixel reports
File information
May 21, 2003 P. Nilsson, SPD General Meeting 6
Offline Analysis – Threshold ScansLadder chip (14/7, chip 1): Efficiency vs. PRE_VTH
May 21, 2003 P. Nilsson, SPD General Meeting 7
Offline Analysis – Threshold ScansLadder chip (14/7, chip 1): Resolutions vs. PRE_VTH
X-Resolution (long direction)Average resolution: 0.124973 ± 0.000470 mmResolution at max efficiency (98.766518%): 0.120588 ± 0.001438 mm (expected < 0.123 mm)
Y-Resolution (short direction)Average resolution = 0.014799 ± 0.000028 mm
Resolution at max efficiency (98.766518%): 0.013221 ± 0.000106 mm (expected < 0.0144 mm)
May 21, 2003 P. Nilsson, SPD General Meeting 8
Offline Analysis – Threshold Scans
Ladder chip (14/7, chip 1):Average cluster size vs. PRE_VTH
Ladder chip (14/7, chip 3):Average cluster size vs. PRE_VTH
May 21, 2003 P. Nilsson, SPD General Meeting 9
Offline Analysis – Delay ScansLadder chip (14/7): Efficiency vs. delay
~45 ns
May 21, 2003 P. Nilsson, SPD General Meeting 10
Offline Analysis – Delay ScansLadder chip (14/7): Resolutions vs. delay
X-Resolution (long direction)Average resolution: 0.108570 ± 0.000346Resolution at max efficiency (98.712952%): 0.107169 ± 0.001360 (expected < 0.123 mm)
Y-Resolution (short direction)Average resolution = 0.015157 ± 0.000036
Resolution at max efficiency (98.712952%): 0.014538 ± 0.000116 (expected < 0.0144 mm)
May 21, 2003 P. Nilsson, SPD General Meeting 11
Offline Analysis – Delay Scans
Ladder chip (14/7):Average cluster sizevs. delay
(Compare with efficiency vs. delay plot)
May 21, 2003 P. Nilsson, SPD General Meeting 12
Offline Analysis – Bias ScansLadder chip 3 (14/7): Efficiency vs. bias voltage
PRE_VTH = 185
PRE_VTH = 200
PRE_VTH = 220
May 21, 2003 P. Nilsson, SPD General Meeting 13
Offline Analysis – Bias ScansLadder chip (14/7, PRE_VTH = 220): Resolutions vs. bias
X-Resolution (long direction)Average resolution: 0.108831 ± 0.000473Resolution at max efficiency (98.998047%): 0.105374 ± 0.001371 (expected < 0.123 mm)
Y-Resolution (short direction)Average resolution = 0.014098 ± 0.000039
Resolution at max efficiency (98.998047%): 0.012712 ± 0.000094 (expected < 0.0144 mm)
May 21, 2003 P. Nilsson, SPD General Meeting 14
Offline Analysis – Bias Scans
PRE_VTH = 185
Ladder chip 3 (14/7): Average cluster size vs. bias voltage
PRE_VTH = 200
PRE_VTH = 220
Recommended