View
215
Download
1
Category
Tags:
Preview:
Citation preview
Simulations with Simulations with event pile up in MVDevent pile up in MVD
1.1. Improvement of the MVD-digitiserImprovement of the MVD-digitiser
2.2. General simulations with pile upGeneral simulations with pile up
3.3. Open charm reconstructionOpen charm reconstruction
Christina Dritsa
Outline:
Accumulated charge: some termsAccumulated charge: some terms
RED RED : seed pixel : seed pixel (Highest charge)(Highest charge)
YellowYellow : 1 : 1stst crown + seed: 9 pixels crown + seed: 9 pixels GreenGreen : 2 : 2ndnd crown + seed: 25 pixels crown + seed: 25 pixels Blue Blue :: 3 3rdrd crown + seed: 49 pixels crown + seed: 49 pixels
Cluster Formation in digitiser: ReminderCluster Formation in digitiser: Reminder
Energy: Taken randomly from the accumulated charge distribution on 25 pixels (2nd crown)
Shape:From the “profile” of the real cluster.
Incident angle: 75°
Initial Version (currently in trunk)Initial Version (currently in trunk)
MPV are similar
But the widths (sigma)are not!
ImprovementImprovement
Initially:Initially: ““Gain” multiplies MPV and Sigma:Gain” multiplies MPV and Sigma: Charge = Charge = GainGain**LandauRandomLandauRandom((MPVMPV, , SigmaSigma))
Correction:Correction: ““Gain” multiplies only Gain” multiplies only MPVMPV:: Charge = Charge = LandauRandomLandauRandom((Gain*MPVGain*MPV, , SigmaSigma))
Result:Result: Only MPV is multiplied with Only MPV is multiplied with Gain Gain , not , not Sigma.Sigma.
75°
Improved VersionImproved Version
Intermediate summaryIntermediate summary
A bug in the digitiser has been fixedA bug in the digitiser has been fixed
(thanks Michael)(thanks Michael)
The tails of the charge deposition in a The tails of the charge deposition in a cluster are well reproduced for the higher cluster are well reproduced for the higher incident angles.incident angles.
General Pile Up simulationsGeneral Pile Up simulations
GOAL:GOAL:Study the behaviour of combinatorial Study the behaviour of combinatorial background with respect to pile up.background with respect to pile up.
Check the efficiency of cuts in different cases Check the efficiency of cuts in different cases before proceeding to a complete feasibility before proceeding to a complete feasibility study of open charm measurement.study of open charm measurement.
MIMOSA roadmap for CBM (by Marc Winter)
MimoSIS-1:• 2D-chip for SIS100 (D mesons in pA collisions)• Established AMS 0.35µm process• 3 prototypes (2010,2011,2012) final prototype by summer 2012• tInt < 40 µs, rad. tol. ~ 3 x 1012 neq/cm²
MimoSIS-2:• 2D-chip for SIS300 (D meson in AA collisions)• Novel process with small feature size, stitching?• tInt < 30 µs, rad. tol. <1014neq/cm²• final prototype by 2015
MimoSIS-3• 3D-chip for SIS300, phase 2• tInt < 10 µs, rad. tol. ~1014neq/cm²• Development start by 2009• final prototype > 2015 if 3D technology works
Motivation of the simulation modelMotivation of the simulation model
MIMOSIS2 is foreseen for CBM. MIMOSIS2 is foreseen for CBM. Key parameters of MIMOSIS2 are already Key parameters of MIMOSIS2 are already
visible in MIMOSA26 visible in MIMOSA26 Pixel pitch Pixel pitch : 18.4 : 18.4 ×× 18.4 18.4 µmµm22
Motivation of the simulation modelMotivation of the simulation model
Thickness of sensors - Geometry usedThickness of sensors - Geometry used11stst MAPS @ 5 cm is 300 MAPS @ 5 cm is 300 µm thickµm thick22ndnd MAPS @ 10 cm is 500 µm thick MAPS @ 10 cm is 500 µm thick
Station Z (cm) Rinner [mm]Router [mm]
1 5 5.5 25
2 10 5.5 50
Towards the MVD: HP-2 ULISI
Diamond 200-300 µm
~ 60(1) -150(2) µm Si
< 200 µm Si
~ 60(1) -150(2) µm Si
~ 320(1)-500(2) µm Si
Metal lines SensorPolyamide
Build an ultra thin ladder.Partners: IPHC, IKF, IMEC
(1) first MVD station(2) last MVD station M.Deveaux, DPG meeting 2010
Readout settingsReadout settings
Analogue readoutAnalogue readout ADC 12 bits ADC 12 bits
(4096 channels)(4096 channels) 1 electron / channel1 electron / channel Cut on charge: Cut on charge:
75 ADC units = 75 e75 ADC units = 75 e
Digital readoutDigital readout ADC 1 bit ADC 1 bit
(2 channels)(2 channels) 75 electrons / channel75 electrons / channel Cut on charge:Cut on charge:
1 ADC unit = 75 e1 ADC unit = 75 e
For each setting, three cases were studied:1. No pile up in MVD ( 1 central + 100 Ions )2. Pile up of 5 collisions ( 1central + 4 mbias + 500 Ions)3. Pile up of 10 collisions ( 1 central + 9 mbias + 1000 Ions )
Analogue readout: Occupancy Analogue readout: Occupancy Fired pixels / All pixelsFired pixels / All pixels
MVD @ 5 cmMVD @ 5 cm
[e-]
Merged Clusters in MVDMerged Clusters in MVD
5 10 15
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Mer
ged
clus
ters
/Tot
al c
lust
ers
[%]
MVD position [cm]
Pile Up 1 Pile Up 2 Pile Up 5 Pile Up 8 Pile Up 10
C.
Tra
gese
r
Analogue readout: PV sigmaAnalogue readout: PV sigma
Efficiency of cuts: an example Efficiency of cuts: an example PV > 3PV > 3··σσ
Momentum reconstructionMomentum reconstruction
The reconstruction efficiency of low momentum tracks (<1.5 GeV/c ) is slightly reduced with increasing pile up.
Tracking Performance (AllSet)Tracking Performance (AllSet)~85 % for trackswith P>1GeV/c
Taken from CbmL1Performance.cxx
Pile Up 5
Pile Up 10
Hit merging and track reconstructionHit merging and track reconstruction
1: High P track
2: Low P track
MVD STS
• The high P track will be reconstructed first and will “own” the hit.• The track parameters will be slightly modified.• Hit sharing is not allowed in the MVD: The low momentum track
does not “find” the hit. There is a probability to pick up a wrong neighbouring hit (?)
Secondary Vertex ResolutionSecondary Vertex Resolution
Only Bg!
Secondary vertex resolution for background tracks deteriorates significantly with pile up.
This effect might have an impact on the efficiency of the secondary vertex cut.
No pile upNo pile up 85 %85 %
Pile up 5Pile up 5 70 %70 %
Pile up 10Pile up 10 50 %50 %
Percentage of D0’s within [-200, 200] µm (shaded area)
>95% expected for a Gaussian
Secondary Vertex ResolutionSecondary Vertex Resolution
Primary Vertex ResolutionPrimary Vertex Resolution
Results for digital readoutResults for digital readoutNo pile up Pile up 10
In the case of digital readout, the distributions are the same as for the analogue readout.
The effect on the single point resolution, introduced by the digital readout, is dominated by the multiple scattering effects.
Intermediate summary & conclusionIntermediate summary & conclusion
The effect on the background rejection efficiency and the The effect on the background rejection efficiency and the vertex resolution for a pile up of 5 and 10 collisions in the vertex resolution for a pile up of 5 and 10 collisions in the MVD has been studied. MVD has been studied.
The impact parameter distribution (PVsigma) and the The impact parameter distribution (PVsigma) and the secondary vertex resolution suggest that the background secondary vertex resolution suggest that the background rejection with a pile up of 10 collisions is insufficient for rejection with a pile up of 10 collisions is insufficient for an open charm reconstruction with the current CBM an open charm reconstruction with the current CBM setup.setup.
Further studies are needed to demonstrate the Further studies are needed to demonstrate the feasibility measurement of open charm when 5 collisions feasibility measurement of open charm when 5 collisions are piled up in the MVD.are piled up in the MVD.
Open charm reconstructionOpen charm reconstruction
No collision pile up in MVD (only central coll.)No collision pile up in MVD (only central coll.) Pile Up of 5 collisions (1 central + 4 peripheral)Pile Up of 5 collisions (1 central + 4 peripheral)
MIMOSA roadmap for CBM (by Marc Winter)
MimoSIS-1:• 2D-chip for SIS100 (D mesons in pA collisions)• Established AMS 0.35µm process• 3 prototypes (2010,2011,2012) final prototype by summer 2012• tInt < 40 µs, rad. tol. ~ 3 x 1012 neq/cm²
MimoSIS-2:• 2D-chip for SIS300 (D meson in AA collisions)• Novel process with small feature size, stitching?• tInt < 30 µs, rad. tol. <1014neq/cm²• final prototype by 2015
MimoSIS-3• 3D-chip for SIS300, phase 2• tInt < 10 µs, rad. tol. ~1014neq/cm²• Development start by 2009• final prototype > 2015 if 3D technology works
Expected statistics in CBMExpected statistics in CBM
Collision ratesCollision rates Radiation dosesRadiation doses
Expected statisticsExpected statistics CBM year: CBM year: 55··10106 6 ss ≈ 2 months ≈ 2 months Assumed sensor time resolution: Assumed sensor time resolution: ttintint = 30 = 30 µsµs
* BR=0.038, Multipl. =1.2 ·10-4 D0 / centr Au-Au @ 25 AGeV 1 central / 10 mbias
Collision rateCollision rate(interactions/s)(interactions/s)
Collisions/yearCollisions/year(mbias)(mbias)
DD00 → →ππ++KK--
(generated) (generated) **
No pile upNo pile up 3 3 ··10 10 44 1.51.5·10·101111 68 00068 000
Pile up 5Pile up 5 1.5 1.5 ··10 10 55 7.57.5··10101111 340 000 340 000
Can we measure this statistics before the detector is “dead” from radiation?
Radiation doses in CBMRadiation doses in CBMSimulations by M.Deveaux:Old setup (Alligator Field)Delta electrons included
Simulations by D.Bertini:Current setup (Muon Field)Delta electrons NOT included
Fluence [nFluence [neqeq/cm/cm22]]
Collisions (mbias)Collisions (mbias) GEANT + GCALOR (2007)GEANT + GCALOR (2007) FLUKA (2009)FLUKA (2009)
5. 105. 101313 1.5 1.5 ··10 10 1515 2.5 2.5 ··10 10 1515
1 1 3030 5050
Nominal Intensity : AuAu: 109 p/s · 1% · 5 · 106 s = 5. 1013 coll/year
Collisions (mbias)Collisions (mbias)
Fluence [nFluence [neqeq/cm/cm22]]
MAPS lifetimeMAPS lifetime#GEANT + GCALOR (2007)GEANT + GCALOR (2007) FLUKA (2009)FLUKA (2009)
3·1013 10 10 1212 6 6 ··10 10 1111
# http://ulisi-wiki.gsi.de/pub/Meetings/ULISIWorkshop1/M.Winter-Status-P3.pdf
No pile upNo pile up 1.5 1.5 ·· 10 1011 11
pile up 5pile up 5 7.5 7.5 ·· 10 101111
In the studies shown next, normalisation is done according to the corresponding measured statistics for one run.
SetupSetup
CBMROOT Oct2009 (trunk)CBMROOT Oct2009 (trunk) Updated tracking performanceUpdated tracking performance
2 MAPS @ 5, 10 cm2 MAPS @ 5, 10 cm 8 STS, staggered strips.8 STS, staggered strips. Digitisers for MAPS, STSDigitisers for MAPS, STS Delta electrons includedDelta electrons included Realistic track finder, track fitter (KF)Realistic track finder, track fitter (KF) Au-Au @ 25 AGeVAu-Au @ 25 AGeV 1 D1 D00 → → ππ++ + K + K- - embedded per central collisionembedded per central collision
Station Z (cm) Rinner [mm] Router [mm]
1 5 5.5 25
2 10 5.5 50
Choice of parameters (MVD)Choice of parameters (MVD) ttintint = 30 = 30 µsµs Pixel pitch Pixel pitch : 18.4 : 18.4 ×× 18.4 18.4 µmµm22
11stst MAPS @ 5 cm is 300 MAPS @ 5 cm is 300 µm thickµm thick 22ndnd MAPS @ 10 cm is 500 µm thick MAPS @ 10 cm is 500 µm thick
~2 mm
0.7 mm
BS
S
Quantities studiedQuantities studied
BS
generatedmeasured SS
Signal-to-BackgroundSignal-to-Background
SignificanceSignificance
Detection efficiencyDetection efficiency
S and B calculationS and B calculation
max
min
)(~
m
m
mGaussS max
min
)(~
m
m
mExpoB
S
signalNorm bgNorm
B
No pile upNo pile up
• Signal in simulation = 7 000 D0
• Per central collision: 100 Ions (δe-), 1 D0→ π+ K-
• Background in simulation = 83 000 000 evts (SE)
• BR = 0.038• Multiplicity =1.2 ·10-4 D0 / centr Au-Au @ 25 AGeV• 1 central / 10 mbias
• Normalise to 1.5·1010 central collisions
• ANALOGUE READOUT: 12 bits ADC
No pile upNo pile up
S/B=2.5Eff=0,9%Signif=21
[1/1
50 M
eV/c
2]
No pile up: Rapidity coverageNo pile up: Rapidity coverage
Input Signal Pt-YOutput Signal Pt-Y
(after cuts)
Pile up 5Pile up 5
• Signal in simulation = 9 000 D0
• Per central collision: 100 Ions (δe-), 1 D0→ π+ K-
• Background in simulation = 676 000 000 evts (SE)
• BR = 0.038• Multiplicity =1.2 ·10-4 D0 / centr Au-Au @ 25 AGeV• 1 central / 10 mbias
• Normalise to 7.5·1010 central collisions
• BINARY READOUT: 1 bit ADC
Pile Up 5Pile Up 5
Pile Up 5: Fitting of Si & BgPile Up 5: Fitting of Si & Bg
S/B=0.6Sign=26Det.Eff=0.55%(1700 D0 expected)
Pile Up 5: Rapidity coveragePile Up 5: Rapidity coverage
SignificanceSignificance
Summary Summary The effect of pile up on the track reconstruction The effect of pile up on the track reconstruction
has been studied.has been studied.
The simulation setup was chosen according to The simulation setup was chosen according to the most updated estimations on the parameters the most updated estimations on the parameters of the MVD (pitch, tof the MVD (pitch, t int int , mat. budget), mat. budget)
The feasibility of open charm measurement has The feasibility of open charm measurement has been investigated for two scenarios: been investigated for two scenarios: No pile up and analogue readout Pile up 5 and digital readout
… … and Conclusion (1)and Conclusion (1)
Due to the relatively long tDue to the relatively long t intint ( = 30 ( = 30 µs µs ) of the ) of the MVD, it is important to operate with pile up and MVD, it is important to operate with pile up and measure higher statistics of Dmeasure higher statistics of D00 particles. particles.
The event pile up causes a high occupancy in the The event pile up causes a high occupancy in the MVD and introduces difficulties in the track MVD and introduces difficulties in the track reconstruction.reconstruction.
The loss in precision of the track reconstruction The loss in precision of the track reconstruction causes a drop in the efficiency of the selection causes a drop in the efficiency of the selection cuts with increasing pile up.cuts with increasing pile up.
… … and Conclusion (2)and Conclusion (2) The inefficiency of cuts suggests that open charm The inefficiency of cuts suggests that open charm
measurement with pile up of 10 collisions is very measurement with pile up of 10 collisions is very difficult with the current CBM setup.difficult with the current CBM setup.
Open charm reconstruction with a pile up of 5 Open charm reconstruction with a pile up of 5 collisions shows higher significance but very low collisions shows higher significance but very low S/B with respect to no pile up.S/B with respect to no pile up.
Further improvements in the CBM setup are Further improvements in the CBM setup are needed in order to increase the background needed in order to increase the background rejection efficiency with increasing pile up.rejection efficiency with increasing pile up.
Proposal for improvementsProposal for improvements Hardware::
Invest effort on R&D for developing a MIMOSIS2 with Invest effort on R&D for developing a MIMOSIS2 with shorter integration time.shorter integration time.
Explore different MVD geometries Explore different MVD geometries move the 1move the 1stst MVD a few cm more downstream to reduce MVD a few cm more downstream to reduce
occupanciesoccupancies vary detector shapes vary detector shapes
Magnetic FieldMagnetic Field
Software:: Use timestamp from STS to match tracks and hits from Use timestamp from STS to match tracks and hits from
pile uppile up Improve the MVD Hit reconstruction algorithm in order Improve the MVD Hit reconstruction algorithm in order
to disentangle close hits (pattern recognition)to disentangle close hits (pattern recognition) Adapt tracking to the input of pattern recognition.Adapt tracking to the input of pattern recognition.
BackupBackup
0°
Initial VersionInitial Version
15°
30°
45°
60°
L
BN sels
BS
S
s
s
1
zt pp
s
dd
d 2
sss LN
Luminosity
Process Cross Section
Detection Efficiency
SignificanceSignificance
Recommended