Service-Learning Engagement Benchmarking Tool Brochure 1… · that service-learning is highly eff...

Preview:

Citation preview

Offi ce of Provost & Senior Vice President

Agriculture, Cooperative Extension

Architecture, Planning & Design

Arts & Sciences

Business Administration

Education

Engineering

Human Ecology

Veterinary Medicine

Technology & Aviation

Engagement Benchmarking ToolREPORT ON CALENDAR YEAR 2013

EngagementThe collaboration between institutions of higher education and their

larger communities (local, regional/state, national, global) for the

mutually benefi cial exchange of knowledge and resources

in a context of partnership and reciprocity.

— Carnegie Foundation —

To track university engagement, an online survey of faculty

and academic staff regarding their scholarly outreach

and engagement was developed. Data collected through

the K-State EBT demonstrate the university’s collective

commitment of time, scholarly resources, and research

discoveries for the direct benefi t of citizens, communities,

and organizations in Kansas and communities worldwide.

The EBT is a tool that benchmarks the university’s progress

toward Theme 4 of K-State’s Vision 2025 plan, gathers data

for re-accreditation of Carnegie’s community engagement

classifi cation, and provides data used for reporting to

the Kansas Board of Regents and the Higher Learning

Commission.

EBT: K-STATE ENGAGEMENT BENCHMARKING TOOL

David E. Procter, DirectorCENTER FOR ENGAGEMENT & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

Kansas State University

(785) 532-6868

dprocter@ksu.edu

Service-Learning

An engaged pedagogy in which students learn from their direct experiences and their

refl ection on those experiences. Service-learning provides students with an opportunity

to use and apply what they are learning to a current community issue. It is a high-impact

educational practice in that an extensive body of research has been developed which indicates

that service-learning is highly eff ective and benefi cial to a range of students.

— K-State Service-Learning Task Force, 2012 —

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

$47,263,752Extramural funding generated by

K-State engaged projects.

226The number of faculty and staff reporting at least one

engaged project.

$4,816,787Value of salary investment by K-State faculty and academic staff in addressing issues of

public concern.

64.43University FTE dedicated to

engaged work.

265,578The number of Kansans and

citizens worldwide touched by K-State engaged work.

(Does not include KSRE outreach and engagement)

Engagement Benchmarking Tool

Engagement

2013HIGHLIGHTS

COLLEGE OR OFFICE

NU

MB

ER O

F P

RO

JEC

TS

SERVICE-LEARNING HIGHLIGHTS

65 Number of faculty reporting using service-learning pedagogy

101 Number of K-State classes reported as using service-learning pedagogy

4,101 Number of students enrolled in service-learning classes

TOP REPORTING SERVICE-LEARNING DEPARTMENTS BY NUMBER OF FACULTY

10 Landscape Arch/Reg & Comm Planning

5 Staley School of Leadership Studies

4 Family Studies & Human Services

Service-Learning Projects

ENGAGEMENT BENCHMARKING TOOL 2013

TOP REPORTING DEPARTMENTS BY NUMBER OF FACULTY RESPONDING

17 Family Studies & Human Services

12 Landscape Architecture/Regional & Community Planning

07 Agronomy

07 Animal Sciences & Industry

TOP REPORTING DEPARTMENTS BY ENGAGEMENT FTE

4.05 Family Studies & Human Services

3.65 Agronomy

3.55 Animal Sciences & Industry

Offi ce of Provost & Senior Vice President

VP Student Life

VP Research

Agriculture, Cooperative Extension

Architecture, Planning & Design

Arts & Sciences

Business Administration

Education

Engineering

Human Ecology

Veterinary Medicine

Technology & Aviation

14.1%

9.5%

9.3%11%

7.2%

7.2%

11.3%

13.2%

8.6%

8.6%Arts & Culture

Business & Economic Development

Children, Youth, & Family

Civic Engagement & Leadership

Community Development

Education,Pre-Kindergarten thru

12th Grade

Environmental Protection & Understanding

Food & Fiber Production

Public Health

Science, Engineering, & Technology

TOP AREAS OF PUBLIC CONCERN ADDRESSED

Children, Youth, & Family

Examples: “Project EXCELL,” Special Education

“Kansas Operation Military Kids,” Family Studies & Human Services, Extension

Science, Engineering, & Technology

Examples: “Kansas Wind Applications Center,” Electrical & Computer Engineering

“Konza Environmental Education Program,” Division of Biology

Public Health

Examples: “Advancing Child Nutrition Programs in Kansas,” Hospitality Management & Dietetics

“One Health Kansas,” Biosecurity

Research Institute

11.8%4.1%

8.8%

8.1%

13.8%

16.6%17.1%

10.9%

8.8%

Engaged Non-Formal Education

Experiential Learning

Service-Learning

Service on Boards, Committees, & Commissions

Clinical Service

Engaged Instruction: Credit Courses & Programs

Engaged Instruction:Non-Credit Courses & Programs

Engaged Instruction:Public Events & Understanding

Engaged Research &/or Creative Endeavor

Engagement is a form of

scholarship that cuts across

university mission areas of

teaching, research, and service.

Survey respondents classifi ed

their engaged work by selecting

the mode of engagement used.

THE TOP THREE MODES OF ENGAGEMENT IDENTIFIED BY THE EBT WERE:

1. Experiential Learning

2. Engaged Research and/or Creative Endeavor

3. Engaged Instruction through Public Events

COLOR KEY: Number of projects 1-5 6-10 11-25 More than 26

COLLEGE OR OFFICE

NU

MB

ER O

F P

RO

JEC

TS

Faculty Engagement by College or Offi ce

Engagement Projects by County

K-STATE IS WORKING ACROSS KANSAS TO ADDRESS THE STATE’S MOST IMPORTANT ISSUES.

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

Engagement Projects by Mode of Engagement

Engagement Projects by Area of Concern

COLOR KEY: Count FTE

ENGAGEMENT BENCHMARKING TOOL 2013

Recommended