SEATA 63 rd Annual Southeastern Association of Tax Administrators Conference Hilton Head, South...

Sham, Due Process, & More – Trends in Sales Tax

SEATA63rdAnnual Southeastern Association of Tax Administrators Conference

Hilton Head, South Carolina July 28 – 31, 2013

Donald M. Griswold, Crowell & Moring LLP

23788317_2

2

Nexus Common Law Doctrines & Sales Tax Intrastate Transactions Statutory Discrimination SEC Actions

Trends in Sales Tax

3

Nexus

4

“Click-Through” Nexus Litigation Legislative Developments Attributional Nexus Due Process – PACT Act Due Process -- SCOTUS

Nexus

5

◦ Overstock.com, Inc. (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013)& Amazon.com, LLC

Facial challenge to the constitutionality of NY’s “click-through” nexus statute

Held: statute was not unconstitutional on its face

Taxpayers will petition the U.S. Supreme Court for review

Click-Through Nexus Litigation

6

Fifteen states have recently proposed or enacted nexus legislation:

Florida, Hawaii, Indiana, Kansas, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, New Jersey, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Utah, Virginia

Legislative Developments

7

Barnesandnoble.comLLC (N.M. 2013)

◦ Supreme Court of New Mexico affirmed: For GRT purposes, the in-state activities of an affiliate

could be imputed to a “dot com” out-of-state retailer

Attributional Nexus

8

Red Earth LLC (2d Cir. 2011 Gordon(DC Cir. 2013)

PACT Act’s requirement – retailers must prepay excise taxes on out-of-state sales – denies due process

Due Process Nexus – PACT Act

9

Goodyear (2011)

Due Process “minimum contacts” for tax may be tougher standard after all !

“. . . attenuated connections to the state fall far short of the ‘continuous & systematic general business contacts’ necessary to empower [the state] to entertain suit against them on claims unrelated to anything that connects them to the state.”

Due Process – US Supreme Ct

10

McIntyre (2011)

“The principal inquiry in cases of this sort is whether the defendant’s activities manifest an intention to submit to the power of the sovereign … and to have that … you must have purposeful availment … In this way, sovereignty prevails over metaphor as authority replaces fairness.”

Due Process – US Supreme Ct

11

Common Law Doctrines & Sales Tax

12

Sham, Economic Substance, Business Purpose

Policy

Sullivan Bros (WI Cir. Ct.) Dunk & Bright (NY TAT)

Common Law Doctrines &Sales Tax

13

Intrastate Transactions

14

Hartney Fuel Oil (Ill. App. Sept. 2012)

◦ Held: must follow statutory sourcing rule Source sales to jurisdiction where POs are received Rejected Department’s argument for sourcing

based on “totality of circumstances”

Intrastate Transactions

15

RTA v. United

◦ Regional Transportation Authority has accused United & American Airlines of operating small sham offices outside Chicago to avoid paying sales tax on fuel in Chicago.

Intrastate Transactions

16

California Enterprise Zone Credits

◦ DiCon Fiberoptics (Cal. S.Ct. 2012)

◦ Elimination of Enterprise Zone Program A.B. 93 signed by Gov. Brown (July 2013

Intrastate Transactions

17

Statutory Discrimination

18

CSX v. Ala. (11th Cir. July 2013)

◦ Sales tax on interstate rail carriers is discriminatory

◦ Alabama did not provide a sufficient justification for exempting interstate motor and water carriers

4-R Act

19

Chicago v. StubHub! (IL 2011)

Chicago overstepped its home rule authority by attempting to impose a tax obligation under Illinois law.

Internet Tax Freedom Act

20

Performance Marketing (Ill. Cir. Ct. May 2012)

Illinois’ “Amazon” law: violated the Commerce Clause because it

required retailers with no substantial nexus with the state to register and collect the state’s sales &use taxes

violated the ITFA as a “discriminatory tax” on e-commerce

Internet Tax Freedom Act

21

SEC Actions

22

Sprint Nextel

◦ SEC initiated an investigation following a suit attempting to collect taxes

SEC Actions

23

Hudson Highland

◦ SEC fined Hudson for failing to accurately reflect sales tax liabilities in its books

SEC Actions

24

Dell

◦ SEC charged two former Dell executives with fraud, alleging misconduct relating to the use of the company’s excess tax reserves

SEC Actions

25

Donald M. GriswoldCrowell & Moring LLP1001 Pennsylvania Ave., NWWashington, DC 20004(202) 624-2730dgriswold@crowell.com