Revised Data Collection Change Highlights

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

Revised Data Collection Change Highlights. Goals of Revision. Decrease data element confusion Increase data reporting consistency Eliminate duplicative data (AFP/Telework) Eliminate data elements not useful Not add any data elements Decrease paperwork burden. Cross Cutting Changes. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

1

Decrease data element confusion

Increase data reporting consistency

Eliminate duplicative data (AFP/Telework)

Eliminate data elements not useful

Not add any data elements

Decrease paperwork burden

2

Aligned document with MIS rather than NISATo Overview of Activities page in MIS

Revised Individuals/Entities Taxonomy ◦ Eliminated “other” – must use one of 7 categories –

Device Loan, Demo, Training, I&A

◦ Kept “unknown/unable to categorize” –Training, I&A

◦ Added friends & advocates to Family Member category

◦ Clarified IDEA Part C reported with lead agency

3

Clarified AT Taxonomy ◦ Eliminated “other” – must use one of 10 AT categories

(SFA, Reuse, Device Loan, Device Demo)

◦ Adapted toys – report in Recreation/Leisure

◦ All orthotics/prosthetics in Mobility

◦ Daily Living includes sleeping, breathing, life support, dentures

◦ Environmental includes adapted farm when not vehicle

◦ Vehicle includes farm vehicles, tractors, etc.

4

Report Title III AFP data EITHER as SFA OR AFP◦ Added check box to indicate AFP data (must do #7)o Added data element #7 to cover AFP elements missing

o Loan Amount Distribution, Highest/Lowest Loan Amount

o Classification of Consumers (Gender, Age, Disability Type)

o Added second anecdote (must report one for AFP)

Telework – ONLY in separate report (not SFA)

Performance Measures ◦ Restructured tables to emphasize legitimate exclusions

5

Applicant Income Table increments revised Deleted duplicate Loan Type Deleted “other” Loan Type Split Revolving into Low and Preferred

Interest◦ Agrees with AFP table

Clarified reporting of refinance loans

6

Revised terminology, deleted “recycling” Clarified recipients are unduplicated

◦ To the extent possible

Deleted column asking if device is “included” Revised Satisfaction to NOT include “sellers”

◦ MIS did not allow in validation rules

7

Purpose of Loans◦ Clarified Accommodation

◦ Added “Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity”

◦ Deleted “other”

Added clarification on length of loans and expertise available to support decision-making

Deleted column asking if device in inventory Clarified use midpoint if length of loan policy is range, do

not include extensions

8

Added clarification about demo vs. training Deleted column asking if device in inventory Required description of “other” in Referral

Entity Table

9

Deleted “other” in Training Topic Table. Clarified number must be provided in Topic

Table in transition, if narrative is provided Clarified transition data/narrative MUST be

provided either in Training or TA.

10

Clarified distinguishing between TA and I&A Clarified transition data/narrative MUST be

provided either in TA or Training. Deleted “tag lists”; replaced with table of %

by area and existing narrative description.

11

Program/Agency receiving TA %

Education

Employment

Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation

Community Living

Technology (IT, AT, Telecommunications)

Total 100%

Public Awareness Added blogs/social media to listservs category Added new category of “other electronic

media” Deleted “other” category Clarified OMB circular prohibits spending

federal dollars on “promotional items”

I&A Deleted “Related Disability Topics” as category

12

Entire section deleted.

Not required by law.

Data was not useful.

13

Limited to 2 MAJOR activities maximum. Clarified outcomes MUST result in policy,

practice or procedure improvement. Replaced “tag” data elements with one pick

list for primary area of impact -- ◦ Education

◦ Employment

◦ Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation

◦ Community Living

◦ Technology

14

Added pick list of Fund Sources◦ Federal

◦ Public/State Agency (contracts and similar)

◦ State Appropriations (directly to the AT Program)

◦ Private

◦ Added descriptions to Instruction Manual

Deleted “Non-AT Act” category◦ Out of scope for AT Act data reporting

15

Deleted entire optional data section◦ Not required.

◦ Data not useful.

Required Data Elements – Aligned with SFA Deleted “other” type of loan Deleted “other” AT type Applied same revisions to AT Taxonomy

16

Diane Cordry Golden, Ph.D.

Project Consultant

National Information System for Assistive Technology

816.616.7668

dianegolden@sbcglobal.net

NISAT is a project of the Association of Assistive Technology Act Programs (ATAP)NISAT is a project of the Association of

Assistive Technology Act Programs (ATAP)

17

Recommended