View
220
Download
0
Category
Tags:
Preview:
Citation preview
Report of HLRF KOM
S. Fukuda
Project Management Structure
Area: Main Linac Technology (to be completed) Regional/Intsitutional Effort: - Director-US: Mike Harrison - Director-EU: B. Foster - Director-AS: M. Nozaki
Technical Effort (ML (SCRF) Technology): - Project Manager: A. Yamamoto - Associate Managers: T. Shidara, J. Kerby, * Group leader, ** Co-leader
Regions Institute Institute Leaders
Cavity(Process) L. Lilje*
Cavity(Prod./Int.)H. Hayano*
Cryomodule
N. Ohuchi*-H. Carter**
Cryogenics
T. Peterson
HLRF
S. Fukuda*
ML Integr.
C. Adolphsen
US CornellFermilabSLACANLJ-lab
H.PadamseeR. KephartT.Raubenhaimer
H.Padamsee
C.AdolphsenH.Carter T.Peterson O. Nezhevenko
R. Larsen/ C.A. C. Adolphsen
EU DESYCERNSaclayOrsayINFNSpain
R.BrinkmanJ. DelahayeO. NapolyA.VariolaC. Pagani
L.Lilje
C. Pagani
Parma
Franco Pal.
TavianS. Choroba
AS KEK
Korea Inst.
IHEP
India Inst.
K.Yokoya Noguchi, Saito
Hayano Tsuchiya/
Ohuchi
Hosoyama/Nakai
Fukuda
Technical Responsibilities :(from RDR Chapter 7)
• Green indicates a commitment:– institute will deliver
• MoUs facilitate connection:– Project Management (authority and responsibility) and institutions
(funding and resources).
• The ‘C’ coordinating role in a WP – Each WP has one coordinator.
WP 1.1 WP 1.2 WP 1.3 WP 1… WP 2.1 WP 2.2 WP 2.3 WP 2… WP 3.1 WP 3.2 WP 3.3 WP 3…Institute A CInstitute B C CInstitute C C CInstitute D C CInstitute E C C… CInstitute T CInstitute UInstitute V C
Level-3 System Manager 2 Level-3 System Manager 3
Project Managers
Agency I
Agency II
Agency III
Level-3 System Manager 1MoUs Resp
on
sibility &
Au
tho
rity
Funding & Resources
Technical responsibility
High Level RF Groups Organization
for EDR-tasksModulator Klystron PDS Control ,,,
US CornellFermilab
SLAC
ANLJ-lab
C. Jensen
R. Larsen
C. Burkhart
C. Adolphsen
E. Jongewaard
C. Nantista
O. Nezhevenko
B. Chase
R. Cassel
EU DESYCEA-Saclay -OlsayINFNSpainCERN
V. Vogel S. Choroba V. Katalev
AS KEK
Korea Inst.
IHEP
India Inst.
M. Akemoto
T. Shidara
S. Fukuda
M. Yoshida
H.S. Kim
S. Fukuda/S. Kazakov
HLRF– EDR Tasks and Discussions in KOM
• Base-line Design and interface parameters to be verified, – Functional design parameters and interface to be unified,
– What have to be achieved and what have to be maintained?,
– What can be plug-compatibly improved?,
– How the tasks can be shared among sub-groups?,
• Critical Goal: – Technology to achieve E-op = 31.5 MV/m, reliably
• Otherwise, need to reduce the gradient or adjust the machine design
• Need a vital program of both R&D and demonstrations
• Important Work at HLRF tasks– System optimization for the best “value engineering”
– R&D for Marx Generator, ACD-PDS, SBK,
Summary for Charges• Basic design parameters and Interfaces to be
verified, • EDR design work and R&D (goal)
– Basic R&D to be completed – Learning mass production
• Discussions towards – “unified design/specification” and/or “”plug-
compatible design/specification
• Task sharing and schedule– Work-package definition and assignment– Strategy for open discussions and information,
Overview talk• Choroba (DESY)• Recent status of DESY was reported MBK Klystron, H-MBK delivery, modulator from additional ven
dor, HV cable test with bouncer mod. At higher potential, New PDS with symmetrical shunt tee,
• Fukuda (KEK)• Recent status of STF 0.5-1.0 in KEK was reported.• STF 0.5 and 1.0 plan, 3 BCD modulators test• Nezhevenko (FNAL) • FNAL modulator Status was reported
• Addolphsen (SLAC)• US Activity for ILC-ML was reported. Imortant ke tech. were covere
d by individual talk.
•
Technical discussion• Jongewaard /SBK• Yoshida/Super MBK
• Katalev/DESY PDS• Nantista/SLAC PDS
• Burkhart/Marx Modulator in SLAC• Akemoto/Bouncer Modulator in KEK
• Cassel/HA Charging System
WP for HLRF
Technical highlight
Super-MBK KEK
Heat problem
• Emil Hueden showed the heat table with marked uncompleted (should be revised) parts
• .-- responsible person• Klystron-Fukuda
• PDS-C. Nantista
• Modulator- C. Jensen
• Charger – R. Cassel
• We’re ask to evaluate LCW water system delta T.• In order to evaluate this (and confirm cost savings), we need
more info on the water cooled component and we ask your help in updating or getting more information for each of those items.
Getting the table filled will be helpful, but as minimum, the following for each water cooled components are needed
• combination of either one of the following (Load/Flow, or Load/Delta T or Flow/Delta T)
• Maximum allowable temperature• Pressure drop (corresponding to a given flow)
• If possible, information to be given is agreed upon by the group
• We appreciate Shigeki-san’s help in getting the information started
Snapshot
Nov 27 2006
Shin’s Talk
Review existing EDR Engineering plans (specs, costing, vendors)
• STF Plan Engineering, Industrialization (Fukuda)
STF2&STF3, WP’s for them, Industrialization for Asian region
• US ART Work Package (Adolphsen)
US WP List, Related person list
• EDR Management Work Packages (Non R&D) (Larsen)
Concerning with this talk, there discussed the relation between the EDR and R&D.
• Two Task Categories for each WP1. EDR WP - Management:
• Subsystem Engineering leaders perform following tasks:1. R&D & Overall Project Plans2. Cost Analysis & Schedules3. Manufacturing & Installation Models4. Develop EDR Report5. Develop Bid Packages for all Regions (w/R&D)6. Build-to-print for first ACD’s7. Recommend down-selection (or not)
2. R&D WP – ACD Prototypes: • Organize collaboration, design, build, test prototypes• Documentation for Build-to-Print, Specifications• Develop Vendors via prototype procurement• Assist Bid Package development. Industry liaison
Definitions: Management & R&D WP’s
EDR Challenge
• EDR definition implies that interim 08-10 period must be sufficiently staffed, funded to achieve “EDR Readiness” by 2010.
• Requires leadership, strong contributions and collaboration from all Regions
• Requires active involvement of industrial partners• Building inter-regional and lab-industry
collaboration through Work Packages critical to meeting EDR goals.
V. EDR Work Packages
R&D WP Project
Management Team
Region 1Region 2
Sub Project 1Region 1
Sub Project 2Region 2
Example Collaboration ConceptEDR WP
Joint Management Team
Region 1Region 2
Region 1 EDR WP Support
Region 2 EDR WP Support
Management Model•Joint teams may require
co-location for some overlap period•Single lead managers optional also•Sub-projects in differentregions include low level or high-level projects(e.g. Design a controller; Build a klystron or modu-lator with Regional industryManagement
WP’s
R&D WP’s
R&D WP Summary Remarks
• Technical Challenges– ACD R&D vital to cost reduction, performance
improvements– Most modern technology available needed for
ILC in all areas for HA designs
• Collaboration Challenges– Forming effective inter-Regional R&D project
engineering teams essential– Transition from prototypes to industry essential
Technical efforts to EDR
• Complete the critical R&D – as identified by the (R & D Board and) , Prototype, DFM, Preproduction, and
..
• Establish the base-line design, – Verify the initial EDR base-line design parameters, – Technologies to be chosen and to be demonstrated through pre-mass-
production
– Learn industrialization• Obtain the maximum benefit from the realized project
• Proceed alternate design and development – As technology back-up to achieve the ILC design goal,
• with “Plug-compatible” concept, and • for maximizing performance/cost (value-engineering)
Recommended