View
222
Download
2
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
Low-frequency observations
Robert Laing (ESO)
Outline
A little history
Low-frequency science – emphasising the future
Technical problems: wide fields, interference, ionosphere
Current arrays: VLA, WSRT, GMRT
Overview of low-frequency data reduction
Future arrays: LOFAR
Low-frequency radio astronomy
Low frequency, somewhat arbitrarily defined as ν < 300MHz (or long wavelength, λ > 1m)
Cheap (uncooled) receivers and collecting elements (e.g. arrays of dipoles), but complex signal and data-processing
Very wide fields of view
Ionosphere
Interference
History
Reber(1937)
160 MHz
Jansky (1933) 20.5 MHz
Radio astronomy beganat low frequencies
History (2)
Earliest observations (Reber, Jansky) were at low frequency
Much early work at low frequencies (e.g. 3C 159 / 178MHz); pulsar discovery 81.5 MHz
Most aperture synthesis observations made at higher frequencies, for technical reasons and to achieve high resolution
Significant (and still useful) work on strong source spectra in 1970’s. ν down to 10 MHz – see MNRAS 190, 903 (1980) for references and flux-density scales.
Surveys: Clark Lake (26 MHz) and CLFST (38/151 MHz)
MERLIN 151 MHz
Modern era began with the 74-MHz system on the VLA
History (3)
Cygnus A MERLIN 151 MHz6C/7C151 MHz
8C38 MHz
www.mrao.cam.ac.uk/surveys
The sky at 150 MHz Landecker and Wielebinski (1970)
Low-frequency scienceEpoch of reionization, observed via redshifted neutral hydrogen. Entirely new field – a main science driver for LOFAR.Steep-spectrum synchrotron emission from low-energy (aged) electrons
Dying radio sources, cluster halos and relicsEnergy input into the intracluster mediumDistant radio galaxies with highly redshifted spectra
Surveys, selection by isotropic emissionParticle acceleration, propagation effects and turbulence in theISMAbsorption processes: free-free, synchrotron self-absorption, Razin-TsytovichCoherent emissionCosmic rays
The end of the “dark ages”
Epoch of reionization: ~halfof hydrogen neutral
When (20 > z > 6.5)?How rapid? Multiple events?Sources of ionization?
Observe redshifted HI line (z = 6 – 13 corresponds to 100 – 200 MHz)
HI and the epoch of reionization
Simulation (Furlanetto et al.): bright = neutral; dark = ionized)
Three stages: global signal (what is the redshift?)power spectrum (what is the structure?)imaging reionization
High brightness sensitivity on arcmin scales; foreground subtraction
Low-frequency synchrotron radiationCritical frequency of synchrotron radiation νc / Hz = 4.199 x 1010 γ2 (B/T)
where γ = E/mec2 is the Lorentz factor of an individual electron of energy E
Hence low-frequency implies low energy, given B
The rate of energy loss from synchrotron radiation-dE/dt = 1.058 x 10-14 (B/T)2 γ2 (v/c)2
Hence more energetic particles lose energy more rapidly and the spectrum is steeper at high frequency
The spectrum steepens with time, so steep spectrum often means older
S(ν) ∝ ν-α typically a power law with α ≥ 0.5; α > 1 - 1.5 “steep spectrum”
N(E)dE ∝ E-(2α+1) dE
Steep-spectrum synchrotron emission
Powerful radio galaxies have steep high-frequency spectra. At large distances, these are redshifted to low frequencies. Locate massive structures at high redshift.
Halo and relic sources in clusters of galaxies have steep spectra: probe very dense environments
Interaction of radio galaxies with environment dumps energy into the ICM. Important source of energy in clusters; may halt rapid cooling.
Knowledge of particle energy spectrum at lower (but still relativistic) energies is crucial to understanding jet physics, particularly composition.
Don’t forget the magnetic field.
High-redshift galaxies
HST image of the field of a radio galaxy at z= 2.2 identified by its steep spectrum radio Emission (Pentericci et al. 1999)
Probably a massive protocluster
Spectrum of a starburst galaxy at z = 4.4blueshifted to z = 0 and superimposed on that of M82
Superposition of synchrotron emission and dust emission. At very high redshifts, synchrotron emission at ν > 1 GHz may be suppressed by inverse Compton losses requiring low-frequency observations to detect this component and estimate z.
Cluster radio halos and relics
Relics in A3667 X-ray colourRadio contours
Radio relics
A cluster radio halo
Environmental impact
Perseus cluster, 74 MHz Higher-resolution imagescontours + X-ray grey-scale showing inner bubbles
Radio-source plasma forms bubbles in ICM: but (how) doesheating take place?
Low-energy electrons in radio galaxies
M87 at 74 MHz
Majority of relativistic particle energyis at low energies if the energyspectrum is steeper than E-2
(spectral index α > 0.5)
Constraints on radio-source composition depend on the measurement of the spectrum at low frequencies.
Supernova remnants and the ISM
Crab nebula
Thermal absorption by interveningHII region in W49B
Measure Galactic cosmic ray distributionby observing absorption and foreground emission for HII regions at known distances
Cas A
Some other applicationsPolarization at low frequencies: measure small Faraday rotations
Transient sources. Enormous instantaneous field of view allows efficient monitoring:
Supernova, gamma-ray burst and soft gamma-ray repeater prompt emission; afterglows
MicroquasarsGiant pulses……………..
Imaging/radar of coronal mass ejections from the Sun
Detection of coherent radio emission from secondary particle cascades generated in the atmosphere by ultra-high-energy cosmic rays – estimate direction.
The problems of low-frequency observing
Imaging wide fields
Large primary beams: the sky is full of sources
The ionosphere
Interference
Problem 1: non-coplanar baselines
Standard 2D Fourier transform relation between visibilities and image breaks down (the “w term” becomes significant)
Maximum 2πw[(1-l2-m2)1/2 -1] ≈ Bλ/D2 (B = max baseline; D = antenna diameter) – bad for long baselines and wavelengths
Possible solutions:
3D transform (impossibly slow)
Image the curved field using a number of flat facets (standard method, implemented in IMAGR)
w-projection (potentially faster and more accurate)
V (u,v,w) = I(l,m)∫ ej2π ul+vm+w 1− l2 −m2 −1( )( )dldm
Non coplanar baselines (2)
An example of image distortion caused by imaginga large field with a 2D Fouriertransform
The essence of W projection
The problem: for regular grid in (l,m) and irregularly spaced samples in (u,v)
V (u,v,w) = I(l,m)∫ ej2π ul+vm+w 1− l2 −m2 −1( )( )dldm
Image space computation
V (u,v,w) = G(l,m,w)I(l,m)∫ e j2π ul+vm( )dldm
V (u,v,w) = G(u,v,w)⊗V (u,v,w = 0)
Fourier space computation
Optics
If we had measured on planeAB then the visibility would be the 2D Fourier transform of the
sky brightness
Since we measured on AB’,we have to propagate back to plane AB, requiring the use ofFresnel diffraction theory since
the antennas are in eachothers near field
The convolution functionImage plane phase screen Fourier plane convolution function
ej2πw 1− l2 −m2 −1( ) ≈ e− jπw(u2 +v2 )
w projection in practice
Gridding kernel is a function of w.
Image to gridded visibilities.Taper image by spheroidal functionFourier transformConvolve gridded visibilities with w-dependent kernel
Ungridded visibilities to imageConvolve visibilities onto grid using w-dependent kernelInverse Fourier transformCorrect for spheroidal function
DeconvolutionMinor cycle use field-centre PSFReconcile with visibilities in major cycle
A synthetic example
Simulation of ~ typical 74MHz field
Sources from WENSS
Long integration with VLA
Single 2D Fourier transform Faceted Fourier transforms W projection
Problem 2: ionospheric phase fluctuations
Phase changes of >1 rad/minute typical on 35 km baselines at 74 MHz. Sources may be too weak and/or confused to allow self-calibration
Short integration times required, especially for arrays with long baselines (6.667s used for VLA A configuration)
Dual-frequency observing can potentially correct the phase; GPS observations useful for phase and Faraday rotation
74 MHz phase
330 MHz phase(scaled and offset)
Residual 74MHz-scaled 330 MHz
Anisoplanatism
Ionospheric isoplanatic patch = region over which signals passing through the ionosphere maintain a constant phase relation
Typically 3o – 4o at 74 MHz VLA A configuration (cf. 17o for primary beam)
Larger for more compact arrays
Analogous to the problem of adaptive optics for optical/IR telescopes
Standard phase transfer from a calibrator will not work
Dealing with anisoplanatism
Two different approaches
“Peeling” (best suited to long-baseline arrays)Separate complex gain solutions for individual bright confusing sourcesImage and subtract from uv data, then discard solutionDeal with sources in sequence
“Adaptive optics” (better for more compact arrays)Model the ionospheric wavefront error over the array as a function of
direction using orthogonal polynomials (low-order Zernikes aka – tilt, focus, astigmatism, coma)
Fit this to shifts in position of known sourcesDerive a correction as a continuous function of direction and time
No general solution combining the two approaches has yet been found.
Problem 3: interference
Natural (lightning; static discharges)
Few protected bands; FM transmission, mobile phones, ….
Sometimes local: most of the interference in the 74 MHz band at the VLA is self-generated.
Narrow spectral channels are required to identify and remove interference (hence no problem with bandwidth smearing)
Automatic recognition and removal is difficult, but absolutely required for the next generation of low-frequency arrays.
WSRT at 150 MHz (1 kHz resolution)
VLA 74 MHz
Angular resolution ≈ 24, 80, 260, 850 arcsec (A, B, C, D configurations); better with Pie Town
Low bandwidth (780 kHz) and aperture efficiency (0.15)
Noise 10-20 mJy/beam in 12 hours; depends on Galactic latitude
All-sky survey (VLSS) in progressB and BnA arrays, 80 arcsec FWHM
100 mJy/beam rms.
Entire sky N of -30o
Images + catalogue
High-resolution VLA images
Cygnus A Cas AVLA A configuration + Pie Town antenna
WSRT
Low-frequency front ends (LFFE) 115 – 180 MHz
8 x 2.5 MHz bands, each 64 channels
Maximum baseline 3 km (≈2 arcmin resolution)
Full polarization
Thermal noise 1 mJy/beam in 12 hours (higher in Galactic plane), but confusion noise higher (2-5 mJy/beam)
May be able to calibrate ionospheric Faraday rotation at these frequencies and therefore make observations in linear polarization
Some low-frequency results from WSRT
Field of 3C14710o x 10o
Single phase Solution
Average of 2 x 2.5MHzbands
Low-frequency polarization at WSRT
Polarization position angleof pulsar PSR1937+21
Off-axis polarization
Off-axis polarization (2)
GMRT
Band (MHz) 50 153 233Primary beam (deg) 3.8 1.8Beam FWHM (arcsec) total 20 13
(arcmin) compact 7 4.5
RMS thermal noise (µJy/beam) 46 1716 MHz bandwidth, 10 hours
N.B. RMS noise will always be limited by confusion,interference etc.
Some GMRT results
Abell 3562
235 MHz, 5 hours16 MHz bandwidth
18 x 12 arcsec
rms noise 0.8 mJy/beam
Tiziana Venturi
Low-frequency data reduction
PlanningInclude very bright calibrator (e.g. Cyg A) to calibrate instrumental gain
and bandpass without serious impact from RFI. Observe once/hour.
Calibrator will be resolved, so need one with a model
Avoid the Sun (scattering from solar wind)
Avoid sunrise and sunset (ionospheric ionization/recombination); prefer night-time
Consider simultaneous observations at another frequency (4P mode at the VLA) to solve for ionospheric phase
Use a short integration time (6.667s for VLA)
Initial check for RFI
Calibrate bandpass
Initial RFI check
Output fromPOSSM beforecalibration, showing “comb”of interference
Bandpass calibration
Gain calibration and RFI removal
Basic approach to gain calibration is to use a very bright source with an accurate model over a range of channels with little interference (CALIB/CLCAL).
No attempt to deal with ionospheric phase variations at this stage, as essentially all fields have enough flux to self-calibrate.
Display interference with SPFLG to set parameters for automatic flagging using a representative sample of data.
Flag on level and rms (FLGIT)
If all else fails, look at data by baseline and channel and flaginteractively (very, very boring)
Examples
time
Before AfterInteractive clip optionchannel
Example display for 3 baselines
Imaging and self-calibrationDecide whether you need to image the whole of the primary beam or just a limited area
Select facets to cover the selected area (SETFC)
Identify confusing sources from WENSS or NVSS and set small fields to cover them (also SETFC)
Image and CLEAN the selected fields (IMAGR)
Initial (phase) self-calibration options:Use model from IMAGRUse point-source models generated from WENSS/NVSS (FACES)
Iterate self-calibration in the usual way
Interpolate individual facets onto a common plane (FLATN). Beware that brightness is not conserved, although flux density is.
Peeling
If a common phase solution does not apply over the whole field, then:
Identify the brightest confusing source
Use FACES to make a point source model and scale the flux density to the correct value (usually known for these bright sources)
Run CALIB with this model
Subtract the source from the uv data (point or CLEAN model)
Discard the gain solution and move on to the next confusing source
Straightforward with multi-source files; requires CLINV to reverse the solution for single-source.
Same sources must be subtracted if combining arrays
Adaptive optics imaging
Not part of standard AIPS (Bill Cotton, VLAFM) but freely available
Filter phase solutions to derive instrumental terms (SNFLT) and apply these
Identify a grid of sources of known position around the target
Image a time-range; fit position shifts and derive form of ionospheric phase screen
Interpolate and apply to data
Image and CLEAN
VLAFM also does RFI removal
3C 31
3C31 VLSS 3C31 VLA A+BVLAFM 3C48 peeled off
(16 mJy/beam noise)
LOFAR
Under construction in the Netherlands (Phase 1 funded)
LOFAR (2)Phased array stations capable of producing one or more beams
Large collecting area – designed for EoR science
Two types of antenna, optimized for low and high frequency bands, excluding FM
Phase 1 has compact core and 45 remote stations; baselines to 100km; Phase 2 baselines to 400km
IBM BlueGene supercomputer + PC cluster + WAN
First fringes to test LOFAR stations have been obtained
Operations starting 2007
Exciting prospects for low-frequency radio astronomy in Europe
Recommended