View
2
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
Volu
me
6Lower Thames CrossingPost-Consultation Scheme Assessment Report
Volume 6: Environmental Appraisal
Section 10: Appendices
Lower Thames Crossing | 2017
POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES)
i POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED
Contents
Title
Appendix 6.1 Environmental Drawings
Appendix 6.2 Engagement with Environmental Bodies
Appendix 6.3 Air Quality Results
POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES)
i POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED
Appendix 6.1 - Environmental Drawings
Drawing reference Description
1 HA540039-HHJ-EGN-ZZZZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0001 Landscape/ Townscape Constraints
2 HA540039-HHJ-EGN-ZZZZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0002 Biodiversity, Historic Environment and Planning Constraints
3 HA540039-HHJ-EGN-ZZZZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0003 Internationally Designated Sites
4 HA540039-HHJ-EGN-ZZZZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0004 Air and Noise Constraints and Air Quality Modelling Receptor Locations
5 HA540039-HHJ-EGN-ZZZZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0005 Community Land Use Constraints
6 HA540039-HHJ-EGN-ZZZZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0006 Public Rights of Way and Cycle Routes
7 HA540039-HHJ-EGN-AD0ZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0003 Route 1 Bridge Land Take High Level Constraints
8 HA540039-HHJ-EGN-AD0ZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0004 Route 1 Bridge Land Take Water Constraints
9 HA540039-HHJ-EGN-CD3ZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0001 Route 3 Bored Tunnel Land Take High Level Constraints
10 HA540039-HHJ-EGN-CD3ZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0002 Route 3 Bored Tunnel Land Take Water Constraints
11 HA540039-HHJ-EGN-CD4ZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0001 Route 4 Bored Tunnel Land Take High Level Constraints
12 HA540039-HHJ-EGN-CD4ZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0002 Route 4 Bored Tunnel Land Take Water Constraints
Landscape / Townscape Constraints
08/08/161:75,000
L.HULME
Copyright
Pa
th:
C:\
Use
rs\lh
a7
68
46
\On
eD
rive
- A
RC
AD
IS\L
TC
\mxd
\SA
R\H
A5
40
03
9-H
HJ-E
GN
-ZZ
ZZ
ZZ
ZZ
EG
-MP
-EN
-00
01
.mxd
S.RIMELL
A.SAUNDERS
HHJ-EGN-ZZZZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0001
© Natural England copyright 2016.
Contains Ordnance Survey data
© Crown copyright and database
rights 2016 Ordnance Survey
100030649
RevisionStatus
Scale
Drawn By
Checked By
Approved By
Drawing Number
PINHA | Originator
Original Size A3 | | |
Project LOWER THAMES
CROSSINGDrawing Title
Project No.
Date -
Client
Rev Status Rev. Date Purpose of revision Drawn Chck'd Apprv'd
Halcrow Hyder Joint VentureBurderop Park
Swindon, SN4 0QDTel. +44(0)1793 812479
HA540039ILLUSTRATIVEDESIGN
The design shown on these drawings is illustrative
and may be subject to change in later stages of the
scheme development.
S5P01 18/01/16 SAR ISSUE LH SR AS
S5P02
HHJ
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
B2108
B1007
B1335
B258
B260
B2000
B1335
B2500
B188
B2174
B2175
B261
B256
B186
B149
B189
B2174
B255
B262
B1036
B1421 B1420
B148
B186
B1464
B187
B255
B3228
A228A227
A227
A225
A225
A12
A126
A226
A226
A2026
A226
A225
A1014
A226
A118
A126A126
A20
A2
A13(T)
A296
A176
A132
A124
A1235
A129
A1012
A206
A2(T)
A2(T)
A1089
A176
A128
A128
A228
A2(T)
A1014
A206
A13
A13
A2018
A1090
A127A1321
A126(T)
A12(T)
A2(T)
A226 A226
A1089(T)
A2260
A1306
A1306 A1013
A1013
A127
A127
A127
A289
A2(T)
A13(T)
A13(T)
A13
M2M20
M25
M25
M25
M25
Route 1
Route 3
Route 4
EasternSouthernLink
WesternSouthern
LinkK E N TC O U N T Y
E S S E XC O U N T Y
SEVENOAKSDISTRICT
THURROCK
BRENTWOODDISTRICT
MEDWAY
HAVERINGLONDON
BORO
BASILDONDISTRICT
GRAVESHAMDISTRICT
DARTFORDDISTRICT
0 1 2Kilometres
¯Constraints
Area of Outstanding Natural
Beauty (National value)
Green Belt (Regional value)
District Boundary
County Boundary
Route Alignments
!( Junction
S5P02 08/08/16 Post Consultation SAR Issue LH SR AS
Biodiversity, Historic Environment and Planning Constraints
08/08/161:75,000
L.HULME
Copyright
Pa
th:
K:\
UA
pro
jects
\UA
00
70
80
-Lo
we
r T
ha
me
s C
rossin
g\D
-Ca
lcs\G
IS\E
nvir
on
me
nta
l P
lan
nin
g\m
xd
\SA
R\H
A5
40
03
9-H
HJ-E
GN
-ZZ
ZZ
ZZ
ZZ
EG
-MP
-EN
-00
02
.mxd
S.RIMELL
A.SAUNDERS
HHJ-EGN-ZZZZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0002
© English Heritage 2016.
© Natural England 2016.
Contains Ordnance Survey data
© Crown copyright and database
rights 2016 Ordnance Survey
100030649
RevisionStatus
Scale
Drawn By
Checked By
Approved By
Drawing Number
PINHA | Originator
Original Size A3 | | |
Project LOWER THAMES
CROSSINGDrawing Title
Project No.
Date -
Client
Rev Status Rev. Date Purpose of revision Drawn Chck'd Apprv'd
Halcrow Hyder Joint VentureBurderop Park
Swindon, SN4 0QDTel. +44(0)1793 812479
HA540039ILLUSTRATIVEDESIGN
The design shown on these drawings is illustrative
and may be subject to change in later stages of the
scheme development.
S5P01 18/01/16 SAR ISSUE LH SR AS
S5P02
HHJ
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
Residential- Refused
Industrialuse -
Consented
Residential- Consented
Residential- Consented
Residential- Consented
Mixed use residential,retail and communityuse - Not determined
Residential withretail and leisure
- Consented
Residential- Consented
Residential- Consented
Residential withretail and communityhall - Consented
Solar PVsystem -
Consented
London GatewayLogistics Park electrical
infrastructure - Consented
Mixed use includingresidential, business,community and retailfacilities - Consented
Residential- Consented
Residential- Consented
Leisureresort - NotConsented
Residential- Consented
Demolition andresidential development
- ConsentedRedevelopmentfor residentialuse - Consented
Residentialand floorspacefor communityand health use -Status Unknown
Redevelopmentfor emploment
use - Consented
New secondaryschool -
Consented
Time limit extensionfor residential
development - Consented
Demolition and redevelopmentfor residential use- Consented
Residential- Consented
Solar farm- Consented
Windturbines -
Consented
Residential- Consented
Residential- Consented
Solar farm- Consented Solar
farm -Consented
Sand and gravelextraction -Consented
Sand and gravelextraction -Consented
Processingplant -Refused
Residentialwith commercialfloorspace andassociated works- Not Consented
Residentialwith commercialfloorspace andassociated works- Not Consented
Demolition andresidential, primaryschool, retail andassociated works
- Consented
Demolition andresidential, primaryschool, retailand associated works- Consented
Extension to clubhouse and newdriving range- Consented
Demolition andredevelopmentfo strategic rail
freight interchange -Not Determined
Redevelopmentfor storage and
distribution usesand associated
works - ConsentedDetails for
redevelopmentfor employmentand mixed uses
- Consented
Security ditch- ConsentedRemediation
works -Consented
Solar park- Refused
New countrypark - Not
determined
Duck farm andanaerobic digestion
plant - Not consented
Business /industrial, storageand distribution -
Consented
Mixed use includingresidential,
retail office use- Not determined
Hotel -Consented
Crematorium, cemeteryand memorial gardens -Consented
Residential- Consented
Residentialincluding doctor's
surgery - Consented
Recyclingcentre -
Consented
Import ofmaterials -Consented
Residential -Not consented
Mixed use residential,retail and communityuse - Not determined
Mixed use residential,retail and communityuse - Not determined
Solarfarm - Not
determinedSolar farm -
Not determined
Residential includingcommunity use and doctorssurgery - Consented
Ecologypark -
Consented
Residential, includinghealth centre and
commercial floorspace- Not determined
EIA ScreeningOpinion Solar Farm- Not determined
Woodland, recreationand amenity use- Not determined
Residential- Consented
Residentialand non-residentialfloorspace includingeducation and communityfacilities - Consented
Redevelopmentincluding new
academy buildingand sports centre
- Consented
Extension andalterations to shopping
centre - Not Determined
Residential- Consented
Materialimportation -
Not Consented
Leachatedisposal plant
- Not Consented
Residential- Consented
Shopping centreextension and associatedworks - Not Determined
Shopping centreextension and associatedworks - Not Determined
Residential- Consented
Residential- Not
Consented
Residential -Not Consented
Residential- Consented
Residential -EIA Screening
Residential -Not Consented
Expansion ofport facilities- EIA Scoping
New school building andassociated development
- Consented
Residential- Consented
Demolition andredevelopmentfor new office,warehouse and
shed - Consented
Memorial Park- Consented
Solar Farm- Not Consented
Church OfSt Mary
Causewayed enclosure and Anglo-Saxon
cemetery 500m ENE of Heath Place
Roman barrow 260mnorth east of South
Ockendon Hall
Bowl barrowin Ashenbank Wood
south of CobhamPark reservoir
Earthworks nearchurch, West
Tilbury
Gatehouse andmoat of South Ockenden
Old Hall
Second World Waranti-aircraft batteryat Bowaters Farm
Bishop Bonner'sPalace, Orsett
TilburyFort
Coalhouse Fortbattery and
artillery defences
EastTilburyBattery
Springfield styleenclosure and Iron
Age enclosuressouth of Hill House,
Baker Street.
Crop markcomplex, Orsett
CobhamHall
ThamesEstuary &Marshes
ThamesEstuary &Marshes
South ThamesEstuary and
Marshes
West ThurrockLagoon &Marshes
Route 4
Route 3
Eastern Southern Link
Western Southern Link
Route 1
Former Gateway at Groves Barns
THURROCK
BRENTWOODDISTRICT
HAVERINGLONDON
BORO BASILDONDISTRICT
GRAVESHAMDISTRICT
DARTFORDDISTRICT
ThamesEstuary
ThamesEstuary
ThamesEstuary
ThamesEstuary
B2108
B1007
B1335
B258
B260
B1335
B188
B2174
B2175
B261
B1464
B186
B189
B2174
B262
B1421
B149
B1420
B148
B186
B187
B255
B3228
A20
A227
A227
A127
A127
A127
A225
A225
A12
A226
A226
A2026
A225
A228
A1014
A118
A126
A2
A296
A176
A124
A129
A176 A1235
A1012
A206
A2(T)
A2(T)
A1089
A132
A1023
A176
A128
A128
A128
A2(T)A2(T)
A206
A13
A13
A2018
A1090
A1321
A126(T)
A226A226
A1089(T)
A2(T)
A1306
A1306A1013
A1013
A176
A289
A12(T)
A13(T)
A13(T)
A13
M2
M25
M20
M25
M25
M25
Residential- Not
Determined
Residential -Not Determined
SolarPark - EIAScreening
Residential -EIA Screening
Solar Park- Consented
0 1 2Kilometres
¯
Cultural Heritage ConstraintsGrade I Listed Building(National value)
Grade II* Listed Building(National value)
Grade II Listed Building(Regional value)
Scheduled Monument(National value)
Registered Parks and Garden(National value)
Conservation Area(National - Local value)
Local Historic Landscape(Local value)
Ecological ConstraintsRamsar (International value)
Special Area of Conservation(International value)
Special Protection Area(International value)
Ancient Woodland(National value)
Site of Special ScientificInterest (National value)
Recommended MarineConservation Zone (National value)
Local Nature Reserve (Local value)
Local Wildlife Site (Local value)
Public Open Space (Barking & Dagenham)
Major Planned DevelopmentBasildon
Bexley
Brentwood
Dartford
Gravesham
Havering
Maidstone
Medway
Thurrock
Tonbridge and Malling
Landscape and Visual AmenityConstraints
Area of Outstanding Natural
Beauty (National value)
!( Junction
Route Alignments
District Boundary
County Boundary
S5P02 08/08/16 Post Consultation SAR Issue LH SR ASS5P02 08/08/16 Post Consultation SAR Issue LH SR AS
InternationallyDesignated Sites
08/08/161:350,000
L.HULME
Copyright
Pa
th:
C:\
Use
rs\lh
a7
68
46
\On
eD
rive
- A
RC
AD
IS\L
TC
\mxd
\SA
R\H
A5
40
03
9-H
HJ-E
GN
-ZZ
ZZ
ZZ
ZZ
EG
-MP
-EN
-00
03
.mxd
S.RIMELL
A.SAUNDERS
HHJ-EGN-ZZZZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0003
© Natural England copyright 2016.
Contains Ordnance Survey data
© Crown copyright and database
rights 2016 Ordnance Survey
100030649
RevisionStatus
Scale
Drawn By
Checked By
Approved By
Drawing Number
PINHA | Originator
Original Size A3 | | |
Project LOWER THAMES
CROSSINGDrawing Title
Project No.
Date -
Client
Rev Status Rev. Date Purpose of revision Drawn Chck'd Apprv'd
Halcrow Hyder Joint VentureBurderop Park
Swindon, SN4 0QDTel. +44(0)1793 812479
HA540039ILLUSTRATIVEDESIGN
The design shown on these drawings is illustrative
and may be subject to change in later stages of the
scheme development.
S5P01 18/01/16 SAR ISSUE LH SR AS
S5P02
HHJ
!(
!(
!(
!( !(
!( !(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
LeeValley
(Ramsar)
LeeValley(SPA)
Route 4
Route 1
Route 3
Western Southern Link
Eastern Southern Link
Benfleet andSouthend Marshes
(Ramsar)
Blackwater Estuary(Mid-Essex Coast
Phase 4)(Ramsar)
Crouch & Roach Estuaries(Mid-Essex Coast Phase 3)
(Ramsar)
Foulness (Mid-EssexCoast Phase 5)
(Ramsar)
Lee Valley(Ramsar)
LeeValley(Ramsar)
Medway Estuary &Marshes(Ramsar)
The Swale(Ramsar)
Thames Estuary& Marshes(Ramsar)
Benfleet andSouthend Marshes(SPA)
Blackwater Estuary(Mid-Essex Coast
Phase 4)(SPA)
Crouch & Roach Estuaries(Mid-Essex Coast Phase 3)
(SPA)
Foulness (Mid-EssexCoast Phase 5)
(SPA)
LeeValley(SPA)
LeeValley(SPA)
Medway Estuary &Marshes
(SPA)
TheSwale(SPA)
Thames Estuary& Marshes
(SPA)
Outer ThamesEstuary
(SPA)
North DownsWoodlands
(SAC)
North DownsWoodlands
(SAC)
EssexEstuaries
(SAC)
Peters Pit(SAC) Queendown
Warren(SAC)
Epping Forest(SAC)
HolehavenCreek(pSPA)
0 4 8 12 16Kilometres
¯
Route Alignments
!( Junction
30km buffer around study area
Ramsar (International value)
Special Area of Conservation
(International value)
Special Protection Area
(International value)
Proposed Special Protection Area
(International value)
S5P02 08/08/16 Post Consultation SAR Issue LH SR ASS5P02 08/08/16 Post Consultation SAR Issue LH SR AS
Air a nd No ise Co nstra ints a nd Air Qua lity M o d elling Rec epto r Lo c a tio ns
08/08/161:75,000L.HU LM E
Co pyright
Path: K:\UAprojects\UA007080-Lower Thames Crossing\D-Calcs\GIS\Environmental Planning\mxd\SAR\HA540039-HHJ-EGN-ZZZZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0004.mxd
S.RIM ELLA.SAU NDERS
HHJ-EGN-ZZZZZZZZEG-M P-EN-0004
© Cro wn c o pyright a nd d a ta b a se rights lic ensedund er Defra 's Pub lic Secto r M a pping Agreem entwith Ord na nc e Survey (lic enc e No .100022861)a nd the La nd a nd Pro perty Servic es Depa rtm ent(No rthern Irela nd ) M OU 206. Co nta ins Ord na nc e Survey d a ta © Cro wnc o pyright a nd d a ta b a se rights 2016 Ord na nc eSurvey 100030649
Revisio nSta tus
Sc a le
Dra wn ByChec ked ByAppro ved By
Dra wing Num b er
PINHA | Origina to rOrigina l Size A3
| | |
Pro ject LOW ER T HAM ESCROSSING
Dra wing T itle
Pro ject No .
Da te -
Client
Rev Sta tus Rev. Da te Purpo se o f revisio n Dra wn Chc k'd Apprv'd
Halcrow Hyder Joint VentureBurd ero p Pa rk
Swind o n, SN4 0QDT el. +44(0)1793 812479 HA540039ILLUSTRATIVE
DESIGNT he d esign sho wn o n these d ra wings is illustra tive a nd m a y b e sub jec t to c ha nge in la ter sta ges o f the sc hem e d evelo pm ent.
S5P01 18/01/16 SAR ISSU E LH SR AS
S5 P02
HHJ
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
#*
#*
#*#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!( !(
!(
!(
!(
!( !(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!( !(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!( !(
!( !(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
XWXWXW XWXWXWXW
XWXWXWXWXWXWXWXW
XW
XWXW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW XWXW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW XW
XW XWXW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XWXW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW
")
")
")
")
")
")
")")
")
")
THURROCK
BRENTWOODDISTRICT
HAVERINGLONDON BORO
BASILDONDISTRICT
GRAVESHAMDISTRICT
DARTFORDDISTRICT
B2108
B1007
B1335
B258
B260
B1335
B188
B2174
B2175
B261
B1464
B186
B149
B2000
B189
B2174
B255
B262
B1036
B1421 B1420
B148
B186
B187
B255
B3228
A227
A227
A225
A225
A12
A126
A226
A226
A2
A2026
A129
A228
A225
A1014
A226
A118
A126A126
A20
A226
A296
A176
A124
A1235
A1012
A206
A2(T)
A2(T)
A1089
A176
A128
A128
A2(T)
A1014
A206
A13
A13
A2018
A1090
A127A1321
A2(T)
A226 A226
A132
A1089(T)
A2260
A1306
A1306A1013
A1013
A127
A127
A127
A289
A13(T)
A13(T)
A13
M2
M25
M20
M25
M25
M25
R1R2 R4
R16
R17
R18
R19
R20
R21
R22
R23
R24
R25 R26R27
R28
R29R30
R31
R32
R33
R34
R35
R36
R37 R38
R39 R40R42
R43
R45 R44
R46R47
R49
R51
R50
R52
R53R54
R55
R56
R61
R62
R63
R64
R67R68
R70
R73
R74
R75
R76
R81
R82
R83
R85
R48
R86
R89
R87
R88
Ro ute 1
Ro ute 3
Ro ute 4
Ea sternSo uthernLink
W esternSo uthern
Link
R103
R104
R108R107
R105
R106
R100R101
R102
R109
K E N TC O U N T Y
E S S E XC O U N T Y
0 1 2Kilo m etres
¯
Air Quality ConstraintsDefra 's Na tio na l Po llutio n Clim a teM a pping (PCM ) m o d el netwo rkBa sild o n Distric t Co unc il Air Qua lityM a na gem ent Area (AQM A)Da rtfo rd Bo ro ugh Co unc il AQM AGra vesha m Bo ro ugh Co unc il AQM ALo nd o n Bo ro ugh o f Bexley AQM ALo nd o n Bo ro ugh o f Ha vering AQM AM ed wa y Co unc il AQM ASeveno a ks Distric t Co unc il AQM AT hurro c k Co unc il AQM A
District Bo und a ryCo unty Bo und a ry
Air Quality FeaturesXW Air Qua lity M o d elling Rec epto rs ") Ad d itio na l Air Qua lity M o d elling Rec epto rs!(Nitro gen d io xid e d iffusio n tub ec o nc entra tio n less tha n 36 µg/m 3
!(Nitro gen d io xid e d iffusio n tub ec o nc entra tio n 36 – 40 µg/m 3
!(Nitro gen d io xid e d iffusio n tub ec o nc entra tio n grea ter tha n 40 µg/m 3
#*Nitro gen d io xid e a uto m a tic m o nito ringc o nc entra tio n grea ter tha n 40 µg/m 3
#*Nitro gen d io xid e a uto m a tic m o nito ringc o nc entra tio n less tha n 36 µg/m 3
Noise ConstraintsNo ise Im po rta nt Area
No te: All d iffusio n tub e a nd a uto m a tic m o nito ring d a tais fro m 2014 fo r a ll sites
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
XWXW
XWXW
XWXW
XW
XWXW
XWXW
XWXW
XWXW
XW
XW
XW
M25A282
WatlingStreet
CottonLane
R9
R11
R13
R15
R1R2
R3 R4R5
R6R7
R8
R10
R12R14
R41
R46
S5P02 08/08/16Po st Co nsulta tio n SAR Issue LH SR AS
Community Land Use Constraints
08/08/161:75,000
L.HULME
Copyright
Pa
th:
K:\
UA
pro
jects
\UA
00
70
80
-Lo
we
r T
ha
me
s C
rossin
g\D
-Ca
lcs\G
IS\E
nvir
on
me
nta
l P
lan
nin
g\m
xd
\SA
R\H
A5
40
03
9-H
HJ-E
GN
-ZZ
ZZ
ZZ
ZZ
EG
-MP
-EN
-00
05
.mxd
S.RIMELL
A.SAUNDERS
HHJ-EGN-ZZZZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0005
© Natural England copyright 2016.
Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright
and database rights 2016 Ordnance Survey
100030649.
Data reproduced with the permission of RSPB.
© Crown Copyright. Ordnance Survey licence
number 100021787 2016
RevisionStatus
Scale
Drawn By
Checked By
Approved By
Drawing Number
PINHA | Originator
Original Size A3 | | |
Project LOWER THAMES
CROSSINGDrawing Title
Project No.
Date -
Client
Rev Status Rev. Date Purpose of revision Drawn Chck'd Apprv'd
Halcrow Hyder Joint VentureBurderop Park
Swindon, SN4 0QDTel. +44(0)1793 812479
HA540039ILLUSTRATIVEDESIGN
The design shown on these drawings is illustrative
and may be subject to change in later stages of the
scheme development.
S5P01 18/01/16 SAR ISSUE LH SR AS
S5P02
HHJ
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
TilburyFootballGround
ThurrockFootballGround
Lakeside RetailPark
RidingSchool
WoodlandsPrep School
AveleyPrimarySchool
HolidayInn
DartfordAmbulance
Station
Winners ChapelInternational
St Peter'sChurch of
England
All SaintsChurch
TravelodgeHotel
TreetopsSchool
WoodsidePrimarySchool
Chadwell StMary Day Nursery Riverview
Methodist Church
St MarysCemetery
Manor Infantand NurserySchool
Tilbury ManorJunior School
Palmer'sCollege
ShorneMethodist
Church
Shorne C ofE Primary
School
Church of St Mary
Davy DownRiverside Park
Fieldsof Peace
MardykeGolfClub
Top MeadowGolf Club
Dunton HillsFamily Golf
Centre
South Essex GolfCourse
CranhamGolf Course
Thurrock ThamesideNature Park
OrsettGolf Course
St CleresHall Golf Club
KoalaPark
Mackenzie WayOpen
Space
ThamesValley GolfCentre Driving Range
Southern ValleyGolfClub
Rochester andCobham Park
Golf Club
Route 4
Route 3
Eastern Southern
Link
Western Southern
Link
Route 1
DuntonPlotlands
Littlebrook NaturePark
Memorial Park,Chalk
Condover's ScoutActivity Camp
DilkesPark
The GatewayAcademy
Claylane Wood
Langdon Hills Golfand Country Club Hotel
Residential includingpotential health facility
Residential includinghotel and retail uses
Residential including communityand health facilities
Residential includingpublic open space
Leisure resort
Mixed use including residential,community and health uses.
The LeighAcademy
Dartford BridgeCommunity
Primary School
Joyce GreenCemetery
St Michael's Church
Aveley Christian Centre
Secondary Schooland Learning Centre
Belhus ParkGolf Club
Premier InnChaffordGorgesNature Park
St Mary'sChurch
Park Inn atRadisson
WilliamEdwards Academy
School
Terrels HeathRecreation Ground
The Winning Child Nursery
St Mary Magdalene the ParishChurch of North Ockendon
Sports Club
Arena EssexRaceway
Lakeside Karting Caravan Park
Orsett Fen
ShorneMarshes
CliffePools
RainhamMarshes
SouthEssex
Marshes
SouthEssex
Marshes
BushyBit
Hangman's Wood
Mardyke Woods
Dilkes Wood
Oakwoodand Ash
Plantation
Brick Kiln Wood,Running Water Woodand Whitehall Wood
BroomHill Hangmans
Wood
LinfordWood
WarleyHall Wood
OldHouseWood
TheWarren
Starmore Wood
Cole Wood
GreatCrabbles
WoodPuckle
Hill
CodhamHall Wood
ThamesChaseForest
The OldPark
Gurnett'sFields
BelhusChase
AshenbankWood
B2108
B1007
B258
B260
B1335
B2500
B188
B2174
B2175
B261
B256
B1464
B185
B186
B2186
B149
B189
B2174
B255
B262
B1036
B1421
B1420
B148
B186
B2173
B187
B255
B3228
A2
A20
A227
A227
A225
A225
A12
A126
A226
A226
A129
A2026
A226
A1023
A225
A228
A1014
A118
A126
A126
A296
A176
A226
A124
A176 A1235
A176
A1012
A206
A176
A2(T)
A2(T)
A1089
A132
A128
A128
A2(T)
A1014
A2(T)
A2(T)
A206
A13
A13
A2018
A1090
A127
A1321
A126(T)
A2(T)
A226 A226
A2260
A1089(T)
A1306
A1306
A1013
A1013
A289
A12(T)
A127
A127
A127
A2(T)
A13(T)
A13(T)
A13(T)
A13
M2M25
M25
M20
M25
M25
Residential withretail and
leisure - Consented
Residential withretail and community
hall - Consented
New secondaryschool - Consented
Demolition andresidential, primary
school, retailand associated
works - Consented
Demolition andresidential, primary
school, retailand associated
works - Consented
Details forredevelopmentfor employmentand mixed uses
- Consented
New countrypark - Not
determined
Crematorium,cemetery and memorial
gardens - Not determined
Residential includingcommunity use and doctors
surgery - Consented
Residential, includinghealth centre and
commercial floorspace- Not determined
Woodland, recreationand amenity use- Not determined
Redevelopmentincluding new
academy buildingand sports centre
- Consented
Mixed use includingresidential, business,community and retailfacilities - Consented
Leisure resort- Not Consented
Residential -Consented
Mixed use residential,
retail and community
use - Not determined
K E N TC O U N T Y
E S S E XC O U N T Y
SEVENOAKSDISTRICT
THURROCK
BRENTWOODDISTRICT
MEDWAY
HAVERINGLONDON BORO
BASILDONDISTRICT
GRAVESHAMDISTRICT
DARTFORDDISTRICT
BEXLEYLONDON
BORO
0 1 2Kilometres
¯! Community Facilities Point
Community Land
Use Facilities
Country Park
Parks, Open Spaces
and Golf Courses
Woodland
Woodland Trust Site
RSPB Reserve
Open Access Land
District Boundary
County Boundary
Route Alignments
!( Junction
S5P02 08/08/16 Post Consultation SAR Issue LH SR AS
Belhus Park
NewTown
S ite of m oa ted m a nor house E of S t Micha el's Church, Aveley
Purfleet Chalk Pits
West ThurrockLagoon & Marshes
SheepfoldWood
Ca t’s Mede
Brickb a rn W oodHa ngm a n's W ood
W a tt’s W ood
Belhus Pa rk Ea st
Ma rdykeLW S
Oa k W ood
Low W ell W ood
W est T hurrockR eedb ed
Arena Essex
Little Dilkes W oodMilla rd's Ga rden/Bra nnett’s W ood
W a rren GorgeClockhouse Cliff
Mortua ry Cha pel in W a tling S treet Cem etery
S a int Micha el'sChurch
AveleyHa ll
Pa rk Corner House
South Ockendon Mardyke
Valley
West Thurrock GRAYS
DARTFORD Fleet Downs
River Thames
Queen Eliza b eth II Bridge
Purfleet
Lakeside Shopping
Centre
SWANSCOMBEStone
A282
Bluewater
A13
M25
Anglo-S a xon cem etery a t Da renth Pa rk
Aveley
Grays Thurrock Chalk Pit
ThamesEstuary
¯
Major Planned DevelopmentDevelopm ent Bounda ry
Ecological ConstraintsFunctiona l Ha b ita t (Interna tiona l va lue)Ancient W oodla nd(Na tiona l va lue)S ite of S pecia l S cientific Interest (Na tiona l va lue)R ecom m ended Ma rineConserva tion Z one (Na tiona l va lue)Loca l Na ture R eserve (Loca l va lue)Loca l W ildlife S ite (Loca l va lue)
Cultural Heritage ConstraintsGra de I Listed Building(Na tiona l va lue)Gra de II* Listed Building(Na tiona l va lue)Gra de II Listed Building(R egiona l va lue)S cheduled Monum ent(Na tiona l va lue)R egistered Pa rks a nd Ga rden(Na tiona l va lue)Conserva tion Area(Na tiona l - Loca l va lue)
Land TakePerm a nent
R oute 1 Bridge La nd T a ke
High Level Constra ints
08/08/161:35,000L.HU LME
Copyright
Path: K:\UAprojects\UA007080-Lower Thames Crossing\D-Calcs\GIS\Environmental Planning\mxd\SAR\HA540039-HHJ-EGN-AD0ZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0003.mxd
S .R IMELLA.S AU NDER S
HHJ-EGN-AD0Z Z Z Z Z EG-MP-EN-0003
© English Herita ge 2016. © Na tura l Engla nd 2016. Conta ins Ordna nce S urvey da ta © Crowncopyright a nd da ta b a se rights 2016Ordna nce S urvey 100030649
R evisionS ta tus
S ca le
Dra wn ByChecked ByApproved By
Dra wing Num b er
PINHA | Origina torOrigina l S ize A3
| | |
Project LOW ER T HAMESCR OS S ING
Dra wing T itle
Project No.
Da te -
Client
R ev S ta tus R ev. Da te Purpose of revision Dra wn Chck'd Apprv'd
Halcrow Hyder Joint VentureBurderop Pa rk
S windon, S N4 0QDTel. +44(0)1793 812479 HA540039ILLUSTRATIVE
DESIGNT he design shown on these dra wings is illustra tive a nd m a y b e sub ject to cha nge in la ter sta ges of the schem e developm ent.
S 5P01 18/01/16 S AR IS S U E LH S R AS
S 5 P02
HHJ
0 1 2K ilom etres
S 5P02 08/08/16Post Consulta tion S AR Issue LH S R AS
Route 1 Bridge Land Take
Water Constraints
08/08/161:30,000
L.HULME
Copyright
Pa
th:
K:\
UA
pro
jects
\UA
00
70
80
-Lo
we
r T
ha
me
s C
rossin
g\D
-Ca
lcs\G
IS\E
nvir
on
me
nta
l P
lan
nin
g\m
xd
\SA
R\H
A5
40
03
9-H
HJ-E
GN
-AD
0Z
ZZ
ZZ
EG
-MP
-EN
-00
04
.mxd
S.RIMELL
A.SAUNDERS
HHJ-EGN-AD0ZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0004
© Environment Agency copyright 2016. Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crowncopyright and database rights 2016Ordnance Survey 100030649
RevisionStatus
Scale
Drawn By
Checked By
Approved By
Drawing Number
PINHA | Originator
Original Size A3 | | |
Project LOWER THAMES
CROSSINGDrawing Title
Project No.
Date -
Client
Rev Status Rev. Date Purpose of revision Drawn Chck'd Apprv'd
Halcrow Hyder Joint VentureBurderop Park
Swindon, SN4 0QDTel. +44(0)1793 812479
HA540039ILLUSTRATIVEDESIGN
The design shown on these drawings is illustrative and may be subject to change in later stages of the scheme development.
S5P01 18/01/16 SAR ISSUE LH SR AS
S5P02
HHJ
0 1 2Kilometres
West Thurrock
Marshes
Stone
Marshes
West Thurrock
Main Sewer
Littlebrook
Nature Park
River Mardyke
Recommended Marine
Conservation Zone (rMCZ)
River Thames
0 1 2Kilometres
¯
Water ConstraintsDetailed river network
Flood defence
WFD river waterbodiesCycle2 (Draft)
Area benefitting fromflood defences
Authorised landfill site
Historic landfill site
WFD - Transitional waterbodies
Source Protection ZonesZone I - Inner protection zone
Zone II - Outer protection zone
Zone III - Total catchment
Land TakePermanent
S5P02 08/08/16 Post Consultation SAR Issue LH SR AS
East T ilburyW est T ilburyChadwell
Wood
Black shotsNature Area
TerrelsHeath
Muck ingHeath
R ainbowS haw
LinfordPit
Low S treet Pit
Goshems FarmTilbury Marshes
BishopBonnersPalace
NorthOckendon
T ilburyPower S tation
Poplars Farm
Moat Bridge andGatehouse at S outhOck endon Hall
Coalhouse Fort battery and artillery defences
Buck land
W hitecrofts Farm
Heath Place
Murrells Cottages
Lytag Brownfield
T hatched Cottage
1&2 Grays Corner Cottages
GRAVESEND
South ThamesEstuary and
Marshes
Shorneand Ashenbank
Woods
ThamesEstuary &Marshes
ThamesEstuary
T hong
ClaylaneWood
Canal and Grazing Marsh Higham
FilboroughFarmhouseGranary at LittleFilborough Farm
Church of S t Mary
East CourtFarmhouse
W hite HorseCottage
Kent DownsCobham Hall
S outhern LinkAlternatives cut line
W esternS outhern Link
EasternS outhernLink
ShorneS horne V illage
Cobham Woods
Great Crabbles Wood
Court W oodS horne Pasture
StarmoreWood Peartree
Wood
GreatWood
ThongShorne
Ridgeway
Little S t Katherine's
S t Katherine's HouseChapel of S t Katherine
Pipes Place
W ell CottageBushylees
Chestnut Green
Bulphan
Former Gateway at Groves Barns
Church of S t Nicholas
THURROCK
Orsett House
Linford
Marshall’s Cottages
Church of S t Mary, Chadwell
Chadwell St Mary
Church of S t J ames
EastTilbury
TILBURY
T ilbury Fort
Cliffe Fort
S hornemead Fort
Chalk
S outhern V alley Golf Course
Cascades Leisure Centre
Riverview Park
S horne W oods Country Park
Church of S t Mary Magdelene
Church of S t Peter and S t Paul
Lower Shorne
A13
A1089
A2
A289
M25
Crop markcomplex,Orsett
S econd W orld W aranti-aircraft batteryat Bowaters Farm
Gatehouse andmoat of S outh
Ock enden Old Hall
Earthwork snear church,W est T ilbury
Deneholes in
Hangman's W ood
R oman barrow 260mnorth east of S outhOck endon Hall
S pringfield styleenclosure and
Iron Age enclosuressouth of Hill House,Bak er S treet.
Causewayed enclosureand Anglo-S axon cemetery500m ENE of Heath Place
WestTilbury
GRAYS
OrsettSouth
Ockendon
MuckingFlats andMarshes
ThamesEstuary &Marshes
Major Planned DevelopmentDevelopment Boundary
Ecological ConstraintsFunctional Habitat (International value)R amsar (International value)S pecial Protection Area(International value)Ancient W oodland(National value)S ite of S pecial S cientific Interest (National value)R ecommended MarineConservation Z one (National value)Local Nature R eserve (Local value)Local W ildlife S ite (Local value)
Cultural Heritage ConstraintsGrade I Listed Building(National value)Grade II* Listed Building(National value)Grade II Listed Building(R egional value)S cheduled Monument(National value)R egistered Park s and Garden(National value)Conservation Area(National - Local value)
Land TakeNorthern Permanent Landtak eS ub-soil Landtak eES L Permanent Landtak eW S L Permanent Landtak e
Landscape and Visual AmenityConstraints
Area of Outstanding NaturalBeauty (National value)
¯
R oute 3 Bored Tunnel Land Tak e
High Level Constraints
08/08/161:55,000L.HULME
Copyright
Path: C:\Users\lha76846\OneDrive - ARCADIS\LTC\mxd\SAR\HA540039-HHJ-EGN-CD3ZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0001.mxd
S .R IMELLA.S AUNDER S
HHJ -EGN-CD3Z Z Z Z Z EG-MP-EN-0001
© English Heritage 2016. © Natural England 2016. Contains Ordnance S urvey data © Crowncopyright and database rights 2016Ordnance S urvey 100030649
R evisionS tatus
S cale
Drawn ByCheck ed ByApproved By
Drawing Number
PINHA | OriginatorOriginal S ize A3
| | |
Project LOW ER THAMESCR OS S ING
Drawing T itle
Project No.
Date -
Client
R ev S tatus R ev. Date Purpose of revision Drawn Chck 'd Apprv'd
Halcrow Hyder Joint VentureBurderop Park
S windon, S N4 0Q DTel. +44(0)1793 812479 HA540039ILLUSTRATIVE
DESIGNT he design shown on these drawings is illustrative and may be subject to change in later stages of the scheme development.
S 5P01 18/01/16 S AR IS S UE LH S R AS
S 5 P02
HHJ
0 1 2Kilometres
S 5P02 08/08/16Post Consultation S AR Issue LH S R AS
Route 3 Bored Tunnel Land Take
Water Constraints
08/08/161:55,000
L.HULME
Copyright
Pa
th:
K:\
UA
pro
jects
\UA
00
70
80
-Lo
we
r T
ha
me
s C
rossin
g\D
-Ca
lcs\G
IS\E
nvir
on
me
nta
l P
lan
nin
g\m
xd
\SA
R\H
A5
40
03
9-H
HJ-E
GN
-CD
3Z
ZZ
ZZ
EG
-MP
-EN
-00
02
.mxd
S.RIMELL
A.SAUNDERS
HHJ-EGN-CD3ZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0002
© Environment Agency copyright 2016.
Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown
copyright and database rights 2016
Ordnance Survey 100030649
RevisionStatus
Scale
Drawn By
Checked By
Approved By
Drawing Number
PINHA | Originator
Original Size A3 | | |
Project LOWER THAMES
CROSSINGDrawing Title
Project No.
Date -
Client
Rev Status Rev. Date Purpose of revision Drawn Chck'd Apprv'd
Halcrow Hyder Joint VentureBurderop Park
Swindon, SN4 0QDTel. +44(0)1793 812479
HA540039ILLUSTRATIVEDESIGN
The design shown on these drawings is illustrative
and may be subject to change in later stages of the
scheme development.
S5P01 18/01/16 SAR ISSUE LH SR AS
S5P02
HHJ
River Mardyke
West TilburyMarshes
East TilburyMarshes
ShorneMarshes
South Thames Estuary and
Marshes SSSI
FilboroughMarshes
WesternSouthern Link
EasternSouthernLink
West TilburyFlood Storage Area
Recommended MarineConservation Zone (rMCZ)
Southern LinkAlternatives cut line
Thames andMedway Canal
River Thames
Water ConstraintsDetailed river network
Flood defence
WFD river waterbodiescycle2 (Draft)
Area benefitting fromflood defences
Authorised landfill site
Historic landfill site
WFD - Transitional waterbodies
Source Protection ZonesZone I - Inner protection zone
Zone II - Outer protection zone
Zone III - Total catchment
Land TakeNorthern Permanent Land take
Sub-soil Land take
ESL Permanent Land take
WSL Permanent Land take
0 1 2Kilometres
¯
S5P02 08/08/16 Post Consultation SAR Issue LH SR AS
Pa
th:
K:\
UA
pro
jects
\UA
00
70
80
-Lo
we
r T
ha
me
s C
rossin
g\D
-Ca
lcs\G
IS\E
nvir
on
me
nta
l P
lan
nin
g\m
xd
\SA
R\H
A5
40
03
9-H
HJ-E
GN
-CD
4Z
ZZ
ZZ
EG
-MP
-EN
-00
01
.mxd
Route 4 Bored Tunnel Land Take
High Level Constraints
08/08/161:65,000
L.HULME
Copyright
S.RIMELL
A.SAUNDERS
HHJ-EGN-CD4ZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0001
© English Heritage 2016.
© Natural England 2016.
Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown
copyright and database rights 2016
Ordnance Survey 100030649
RevisionStatus
Scale
Drawn By
Checked By
Approved By
Drawing Number
PINHA | Originator
Original Size A3 | | |
Project LOWER THAMES
CROSSINGDrawing Title
Project No.
Date -
Client
Rev Status Rev. Date Purpose of revision Drawn Chck'd Apprv'd
Halcrow Hyder Joint VentureBurderop Park
Swindon, SN4 0QDTel. +44(0)1793 812479
HA540039ILLUSTRATIVEDESIGN
The design shown on these drawings is illustrative
and may be subject to change in later stages of the
scheme development.
S5P01 18/01/16 SAR ISSUE LH SR AS
S5P02
HHJ
Thong
East TilburyWest Tilbury
ClaylaneWood
Mucking
Heath
Rainbow
Shaw
Linford
Pit
Low Street
Pit
Goshems Farm
Canal and Grazing
Marsh Higham
Tilbury
Power Station
Filborough
Farmhouse
Granary at Little
Filborough Farm
Coalhouse Fort
battery and artillery
defences
Church of
St Mary
East Court
Farmhouse
White Horse
Cottage
Buckland
Kent DownsCobham Hall
Lytag Brownfield
Thorndon Park
Old Thorndon
Hall and gardens
Thorndon Park
Former parish church
and churchyard of St Nicholas
WestHorndon
on the Hill
ThorndonPark
Codham
Hall Wood
Hobbs Hole
Warley
Hall Wood
Thorndon Country
Park South
Straight Path Shaw
Round Shaw
Thick/Hollow
Bottom Shaws
Eastlands Spring
Orsett
Camp Quarry
Buckingham
Hill
Linford
Wood
All Saints Churchyard
and Keepers Cottage
Meadow
Ongar
Hall
Timber Framed Barn
at Ongar Hall
Barn to North of
Farmhouse
Farmhouse
Saffron Garden
Walls at
Saffron Garden
Linstead Farm
Cottages
Cholleys
Farmhouse
Bulphan WWII
bombing decoy
East
Horndon
Hall
Thong
Chalk
EastTilbury
Linford
Southfields
SHORNE
Southern Link
Alternatives cut line
WesternSouthern Link
EasternSouthern
Link
The
Kiln Hotel
Hulmers
Church of
St Peter
Little
Warley Hall
Church of
All Saints
Dunton
Hills Farm
Dunton Hills Family
Golf Centre
Dunton Hall
Old Plough House
Ongar Hall
Farm
THURROCK
Marshall's
Cottage
Church of
St James
TILBURY
Southern Valley
Golf Course
Cascades
Leisure Centre
Shorne
Village
Little
St Katherine's
Chestnut Green,
Shorne
Shorne Woods
Country Park
GRAVESHAM
Church of
St Mary Magdalene
Cliffe
Church of
St Peter and St Paul
Wyfields
Horndon
Bulphan
Shorne Ridgeway
Second World War
anti-aircraft battery
at Bowaters Farm
Earthworks
near church,
West Tilbury
GRAVESEND
WestTilbury
Shorneand Ashenbank
Woods
South ThamesEstuary and
Marshes
MuckingFlats andMarshes
ThamesEstuary &Marshes
ThamesEstuary &Marshes
ThamesEstuary
A13
A1089
A2 A289
Strood
A1014
STANFORD-LE-HOPE
M25
0 1 2Kilometres
¯
Major Planned DevelopmentDevelopment Boundary
Ecological ConstraintsFunctional Habitat (International value)
Ramsar (International value)
Special Protection Area
(International value)
Ancient Woodland
(National value)
Site of Special Scientific
Interest (National value)
Recommended Marine
Conservation Zone (National value)
Local Nature Reserve (Local value)
Local Wildlife Site (Local value)
Cultural Heritage ConstraintsGrade I Listed Building
(National value)
Grade II* Listed Building
(National value)
Grade II Listed Building
(Regional value)
Scheduled Monument
(National value)
Registered Parks and Garden
(National value)
Conservation Area
(National - Local value)
Land TakeNorthern Permanent Landtake
Sub-soil Landtake
ESL Permanent Landtake
WSL Permanent Landtake
Landscape and Visual AmenityConstraints
Area of Outstanding Natural
Beauty (National value)
S5P02 08/08/16 Post Consultation SAR Issue LH SR AS
Route 4 Bored Tunnel Land Take
Water Constraints
08/08/161:60,000
L.HULME
Copyright
Pa
th:
K:\
UA
pro
jects
\UA
00
70
80
-Lo
we
r T
ha
me
s C
rossin
g\D
-Ca
lcs\G
IS\E
nvir
on
me
nta
l P
lan
nin
g\m
xd
\SA
R\H
A5
40
03
9-H
HJ-E
GN
-CD
4Z
ZZ
ZZ
EG
-MP
-EN
-00
02
.mxd
S.RIMELL
A.SAUNDERS
HHJ-EGN-CD4ZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0002
© Environment Agency copyright 2016.
Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown
copyright and database rights 2016
Ordnance Survey 100030649
RevisionStatus
Scale
Drawn By
Checked By
Approved By
Drawing Number
PINHA | Originator
Original Size A3 | | |
Project LOWER THAMES
CROSSINGDrawing Title
Project No.
Date -
Client
Rev Status Rev. Date Purpose of revision Drawn Chck'd Apprv'd
Halcrow Hyder Joint VentureBurderop Park
Swindon, SN4 0QDTel. +44(0)1793 812479
HA540039ILLUSTRATIVEDESIGN
The design shown on these drawings is illustrative
and may be subject to change in later stages of the
scheme development.
S5P01 18/01/16 SAR ISSUE LH SR AS
S5P02
HHJ
River Mardyke
West Tilbury
Marshes
East Tilbury
Marshes
Shorne
Marshes
South Thames
Estuary andMarshes SSSI
Filborough
Marshes
Southern LinkAlternatives cut
line
WesternSouthern
Link
EasternSouthern
Link
Critical Drainage
Area CDA_011
Critical Drainage
Area CDA_010a
Critical Drainage
Area CDA_010B
West Tilbury
Flood Storage Area
Recommended Marine
Conservation Zone (rMCZ)
Thames and
Medway Canal
River Thames
Water ConstraintsDetailed river network
Flood defence
WFD river waterbodiescycle2 (Draft)
Authorised landfill site
Historic landfill site
WFD - Transitional waterbodies
Source Protection Zones
Zone I - Inner protection zone
Zone II - Outer protection zone
Zone III - Total catchment
Land TakeWSL Permanent Landtake
ESL Permanent Landtake
0 1 2Kilometres
¯
Water ConstraintsDetailed river network
Flood defence
WFD river waterbodiescycle2 (Draft)
Authorised landfill site
Historic landfill site
WFD - Transitional waterbodies
Area benefitting from flood defences
Source Protection ZonesZone I - Inner protection zone
Zone II - Outer protection zone
Zone III - Total catchment
Zone of Special Interest
Land TakeNorthern Permanent Landtake
Sub-soil Landtake
ESL Permanent Landtake
WSL Permanent Landtake
S5P02 08/08/16 Post Consultation SAR Issue LH SR AS
POST CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 – SECTION 10 APPENDICES)
ii POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED
Appendix 6.2 - Engagement with Environmental Bodies
Engagement with Environmental Bodies
Meeting Date Purpose of Meeting Attendees Key Findings
22/01/2015 Workshop
Update on project and options development, share draft approach to environmental appraisal and reporting, seek feedback on key environmental issues and opportunities.
Environment Agency (EA), Natural England, Marine Management Organisation (MMO), Historic England and Kent Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB).
Attendees provided feedback on approach and data sources for the purposes of the appraisal.
Agreed future lines of communication with the attendees and confirmed key points of contact.
04/03/2015 Bilateral Meeting
To share the methodology and updated environmental constraints mapping
Historic England Provided details about sensitivity of the Scheduled Monuments along the River Thames.
Recommended engaging with the county archaeologists (Kent and Essex) and Greater London Archaeology Advisory Service to present the scheme details to them and to obtain baseline data.
Potential for significant archaeological remains across study area based on crop mark information. This will require thorough assessment and mitigation at the next development phase of the project.
Provided information about a number of the designated assets and the linkages between them e.g. East and West Tilbury.
24/04/2015 Bilateral Meeting
To provide project update and present scheme options, provide an overview of the appraisal process, review constraints and understand potential option effects
Essex County Council Archaeology
Advised review of the Historic Environment Record and collation of the Historic Environment Characterisation Data.
Provided cropmark data during the meeting and highlighted the high potential for there to be non-designated archaeological remains that could be affected.
05/05/2015 Bilateral Meeting
To provide project update and present scheme options, provide an overview of the appraisal process, review constraints and understand potential option effects
Greater London Archaeology Advisory Service
Advised that information would be provided on potential heritage constraints.
Highlighted that archaeological assets were previously identified at a construction compound for the M25 works.
POST CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 – SECTION 10 APPENDICES)
iii POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED
Meeting Date Purpose of Meeting Attendees Key Findings
07/05/2015 Bilateral Meeting
To provide project update and present scheme options, provide an overview of the appraisal process, review constraints and understand potential option effects
Kent Downs AONB Highlighted the importance of considering the Kent Downs AONB Management Plan.
Kent Downs AONB is keen to examine any potential opportunities from LTC to enhance the AONB.
Highlighted the need for the costs associated with mitigation to be incorporated into scheme costs and this should inform the decision-making process.
Consideration should be given to the impact of Options at A and C on the A2 at Canterbury and on the M20 at Roundhill.
11/05/2015 Bilateral Meeting To provide project update and present scheme options, provide an overview of the appraisal process, review constraints and understand potential option effects
Kent County Council – Archaeology
Kent CC highlighted the sensitivity of the Scheduled Monuments along the River Thames to setting impacts; they are an integral part of the military landscape.
Advised review of the Historic Environment Record and collation of the Historic Environment Characterisation Data.
03/06/2015 Bilateral Meeting
To provide project update and present scheme options, provide an overview of the appraisal process, review constraints and understand potential option effects
Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB)
RSPB welcomed the approach and also the completion of a Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) Screening Report for the options.
RSPB advised that a GIS layer of their reserves can be presented on the constraints maps.
POST CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 – SECTION 10 APPENDICES)
iv POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED
Meeting Date Purpose of Meeting Attendees Key Findings
17/06/2015 Workshop
To seek feedback on the draft shortlist and the rejected options, to explore and seek feedback on the detailed appraisal of the short list, to provide further details on the crossing types
Environment Agency, Natural England, MMO and Historic England.
Natural England requested a more detailed bilateral meeting to discuss HRA issues further – highlighted concerns and risks associated with an immersed tunnel and bridge options at Location C and the impact on European Sites.
EA highlighted the need to consider potential contamination risks when considering the options, for example, locations of casting basins for an immersed tunnel.
Contact DP World to discuss the ecological data that they hold as this may inform the next development stage of the project.
EA highlighted that a new Thames Barrier is a major future development that could have implications for selection of the proposed solution.
EA highlighted works undertaken as part of the TE2100 Plan and issues associated with HRA and habitat creation/compensation. Recommended that a further meeting be held to discuss the likely potential to recreate habitat in the event of it being affected by the Scheme (relating to loss of habitat associated with European Sites).
POST CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 – SECTION 10 APPENDICES)
v POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED
Meeting Date Purpose of Meeting Attendees Key Findings
01/07/2015 Bilateral Meeting
To seek detailed feedback on elements of the water environment appraisal, to discuss contaminated land constraints and to understand the Environment Agency (EA) future plans with regards to TE2100
Environment Agency There is a Flood Storage Area located between Tilbury and Chadwell St Mary that could be affected by Route 2. This is potentially a significant issue for this option as there would be a need to create compensatory storage in the event of this area being affected.
Groundwater conditions are very complex and constantly changing, the need for early monitoring data to inform the design of the proposed solution should be considered.
There are limited opportunities to create compensatory habitat within the LTC area owing to coastal squeeze and managed realignments.
Engage with the London Gateway Partnership to discuss compensatory land and how they have approached the issue.
Highlighted the need for the scheme to also consider opportunities e.g. road embankments could provide a flood defence function that may support proposals in TE2100, there is potential for enhancement measures at Mardyke.
Must consider presence of historic landfills as there may be asbestos present and there are associated high costs associated with disposal.
Should a tunnel at location A be progressed it will be important to consider the impacts of any dewatering on Dartford Marshes. Dewatering at location C could have a significant impact on habitats.
POST CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 – SECTION 10 APPENDICES)
vi POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED
Meeting Date Purpose of Meeting Attendees Key Findings
28/07/2015 Bilateral Meeting
To seek feedback on the proposed approach to the HRA of the short list
Natural England Advised that a Part One Appropriate Assessment Report should be completed as there is a likelihood of significant effects as a result of the options.
Approach to the Part One Appropriate Assessment was discussed including the fact that there would be a lot of uncertainty at this stage and that a traffic light system should be considered in the reporting.
Highlighted the need for the assessment of a Ramsar site to cover more than just the bird interest.
Natural England stated that the wider project team must be made aware of the risks associated with options and the potential effects on European Sites. Project costings also need to consider ‘whole life costs’ and compensation requirements (securing management of compensatory habitat in perpetuity). Natural England stated that assessment of alternatives is a key consideration and that discounting of an option with a higher cost but with a lesser impact on a European Site would not be a reason to discount an option.
Natural England advised that the Part One Appropriate Assessment should consider other schemes and the potential for cumulative effects.
POST CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 – SECTION 10 APPENDICES)
vii POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED
Meeting Date Purpose of Meeting Attendees Key Findings
28/07/2015 Bilateral Meeting
To discuss the approach to identifying mitigation/ compensation land.
Natural England and the Environment Agency
Highlighted that it would be difficult to create fresh water habitat and tidal habitats and that there would be long lead in times associated with this and the time it would take for the habitat to be viewed as functional.
For each option where there may be a loss of habitat within a European Site it will be necessary to quantify the area affected (e.g. construction, operation and sterilisation due to other effects) before addressing the issues of availability and re-create ability.
EA/Natural England advised that the scheme should aim to work within the bounds of presumption to compensate ahead of any impact on a Natura 2000 site (or its qualifying species) at a minimum ratio of 1:1. However, the ratio of compensatory habitat to be provided needs to be considered on a case by case basis. The challenge will be identifying a suitable ratio of compensatory habitat related to the time taken before the compensatory habitat becomes ‘functional’ and the stability of that habitat once it has become established (i.e. loss of intertidal habitat over time as saltmarsh develops). There is also a risk that compensatory habitat does not work, i.e. freshwater habitat creation much more difficult to achieve than intertidal habitats.
There are no ‘fixed’ timescales for assessing when the condition of the compensatory habitat would be of comparable (or higher) value to that of the habitat which has been lost. Instead, it would be compared to the wider Natura 2000 network of adjacent habitats. Ultimately, the requirement would be for the compensatory habitat to form part of the surrounding Natura 2000 network of sites.
All meeting attendees highlighted that the HRA process cannot be ‘short-cut’ and that each stage must be followed and that consideration of the least damaging alternative will be essential.
Some potential areas for compensatory habitat were discussed within the LTC area.
POST CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 – SECTION 10 APPENDICES)
viii POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED
Meeting Date Purpose of Meeting Attendees Key Findings
14/08/2015 Bilateral Meeting
To provide an update on the proposed HRA methodology
RSPB RSPB advised the inclusion of Holehaven Creek pSPA (potential Special Protection Area) and Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) within the HRA.
Advised that hydrology impacts on wetland habitats should be considered.
RSPB will provide information received from Rainham Marshes regarding bird movements and effects from the existing Dartford Crossing.
Recommended looking at Kent Wildlife Trust’s biodiversity area mapping which identified existing ecological networks.
24/09/2015 Bilateral Meeting
To provide an update on the environmental appraisal and crossings and to discuss opportunities and risks.
Environment Agency Advised that the Water Framework Directive (WFD) assessment guidance may be available in January 2016 and it would be advisable to use the new guidance at the next development phase of the project.
The Tilbury Flood Storage Area and the potential constraints for Route 2 was highlighted. A route through the Flood Storage Area is feasible so long as mitigation is put in place but cautioned it may be difficult to find a feasible option because of lack of capacity.
Mardyke is an important area for water vole population. Opportunities for ecological enhancement should be considered.
WFD salt marsh survey is likely to be undertaken in 2016 and the results of this survey may be useful for the next development stage of the project.
5/10/2015 Bilateral Meeting
To discuss the draft Part 1 Appropriate Assessment
Natural England Natural England highlighted the importance of the ditch network in the Ramsar site and its sensitive hydrology.
Natural England reiterated the points raised in previous meetings about HRA and the need for the results of this to inform the selection of the proposed solution.
POST CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 – SECTION 10 APPENDICES)
ix POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED
Meeting Date Purpose of Meeting Attendees Key Findings
30/11/2015 Bilateral Meeting
To provide a project update and initial results of the appraisal
Natural England, MMO and Historic England.
Further meeting during the consultation would be beneficial with the Statutory Environmental Bodies (SEBs) to enable discussion of the appraisal results.
Natural England raised concern about the loss of wildlife sites and severance of ancient woodland for the ESL although they are pleased regarding the selection of a bored tunnel.
Natural England stated that mitigation such as a green bridge for the ESL is potentially something that Highways England could consider.
Historic England stated that whilst there may be some heritage concerns it will be easier for them to understand the impacts once more detail of the road alignment is made available and in particular how close the road will be to heritage assets. It was acknowledged that there is a greater concentration of heritage assets around the ESL compared to the WSL.
30/11/2015 Bilateral Meeting
To provide a project update
Kent Downs AONB The AONB requested the opportunity to be involved in the methodology for a future Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment for the proposed solution.
The AONB welcomed the discounting of certain options that would have had a greater impact on the AONB.
POST CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 – SECTION 10 APPENDICES)
x POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED
Meetings Post Launch of the 2016 Consultation
Meeting Date Purpose of Meeting Attendees Key Findings
08/02/2016 Consultation Meeting
To provide a project update and to outline the materials that were available during the consultation process.
Natural England
Historic England
Environment Agency
Meeting was primarily to advise on information available during consultation rather than to discuss scheme details.
Clarification was provided by the LTC team about where specific scheme information could be obtained from the consultation documents.
14/03/2016 Bilateral Meeting
To provide a project update
RSPB Meeting was primarily to advise on information available during consultation rather than to discuss scheme details.
Various data sources were identified that would provide useful information to inform the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for the preferred route.
21/07/2016 SEB Meeting
To discuss the main comments raised by the consultees in response to the consultation
Natural England
Historic England
Environment Agency
Environment Agency highlighted the importance of ensuring that issues associated with landfills potentially crossed by options are taken into account early enough in the design process.
Historic England stated that they would like to be engaged in setting the scope of the cultural heritage assessment and that discussions will be required regarding mitigation options particularly where features are directly affect (Listed Buildings and Scheduled Monuments).
Natural England stated that they would provide advice to inform the development of ecological survey methodologies for the future EIA.
All parties acknowledged that the consultation process to date had been very helpful.
08/08/2016 Bilateral Meeting
To provide a project update and to discuss their response to the consultation
Kent Downs AONB AONB provided advice regarding their draft position statement on setting and advised that setting is very important and must be considered as part of the future Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment.
AONB stated that they would like to be involved in establishing the scope of the LVIA for the preferred route.
AONB commented that in terms of mitigation the AONB would expect exceptional effort particularly with regards to impacts as a result of the Eastern Southern Link. They highlighted the importance of learning from best practice in other countries. The AONB’s Management Plan is very clear about mitigation and compensation.
POST CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 – SECTION 10 APPENDICES)
xi POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED
Meeting Date Purpose of Meeting Attendees Key Findings
04/08/2016 Bilateral Meeting
To provide details of the project and to discuss their response to the consultation
Kent Wildlife Trust Noted that ecological mitigation may be significant and should be considered as part of overall project costs. Recommended that LTC establish environmental stakeholder groups for Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) so that any conflict of interest and joint initiatives can be considered more easily. One for Essex and one for Kent. May wish to include Natural England as over-arching authority for natural environment. North Kent Environmental Planning Group cited as effective example, which has developed a plan to reduce recreational impacts on Natura 2000 sites in Kent; care to be taken to avoid impacts (from LTC) on delivery of this plan.
All Kent WLT biological records held by the Kent and Medway Biological Records Centre. Data requests can also be made via Buglife.
11/08/2016 Bilateral meeting
To provide details of the project and to discuss their response to the consultation
The Woodland Trust Advised of NPPF, NPS and current Standing Advice from Forestry Commission and Natural England with regard to irreplaceable nature of ancient woodland. Confirmed that loss of ancient woodland remains a significant concern. Currently 633 cases where ancient woodland under threat in UK from development. Noted that cannot mitigate loss, but compensation (as final resort) should be significant and ideally consist of reinstatement of Planted Ancient Woodland Sites or native tree planting to link remaining remnants of ancient woodland to improve ecological function. Concern that Route 2 and, particularly, Route 4 affect ancient woodland, whilst Route 3 north of river more favourable, but should consider potential for impact on veteran/ ancient trees.
11/08/2016 Bilateral meeting
To provide details of the project and to discuss their response to the consultation
Buglife Advised the Thames Terrace Grasslands in Essex support 2 of the top 5 invertebrate sites in the UK. This area of Essex has highest levels of invertebrate diversity in England. This network of important invertebrates sites should be considered as a whole, not on individual site basis.
POST CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 – SECTION 10 APPENDICES)
i POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED
Appendix 6.3 - Air Quality Results
PREDICTED ANNUAL MEAN NO2 CONCENTRATIONS AT SELECTED RECEPTORS WITHIN 200 METRES OF AFFECTED ROAD NETWORK
Receptor ID
Do Minimum (µg/m³) [1]
Route 1 (µg/m³)[1]
Route 1 Change µg/m³)
Route 3 WSL
(µg/m³)[1]
Route 3 WSL
Change (µg/m³)
Route 3 ESL
(µg/m³)[1]
Route3 ESL
Change (µg/m³)
Route 4 WSL
(µg/m³)[1]
Route 4 WSL
Change (µg/m³)
Route 4 ESL
(µg/m³)[1]
Route 4 ESL
Change (µg/m³)
Approximate Number of Potentially Influenced
Receptors [2]
R1 34.3 39.5 5.2 34.4 0.1 34.5 0.2 34.5 0.2 34.5 0.2 <10
R2 27.5 32.5 5.0 27.9 0.4 27.9 0.4 27.9 0.4 27.9 0.4 <50
R3 40.0 39.5 -0.5 40.0 0.0 40.1 0.1 40.1 0.1 40.1 0.1 <50
R4 50.5 47.7 -2.8 46.6 -3.9 46.7 -3.8 46.7 -3.8 46.8 -3.7 <10
R5 41.4 42.6 1.2 40.7 -0.7 40.7 -0.7 40.8 -0.6 40.8 -0.6 <50
R6 34.8 36.8 2.0 34.3 -0.5 34.3 -0.5 34.4 -0.4 34.4 -0.4 <50
R7 33.5 35.3 1.8 32.9 -0.6 32.9 -0.6 33.0 -0.5 33.0 -0.5 <50
R8 47.7 51.2 3.5 47.4 -0.3 47.5 -0.2 47.6 -0.1 47.6 -0.1 <50
R9 47.9 51.9 4.0 44.1 -3.8 44.1 -3.8 44.2 -3.7 44.2 -3.7 <50
R10 42.1 45.1 3.0 39.1 -3.0 39.2 -2.9 39.2 -2.9 39.3 -2.8 <50
R11 41.7 44.4 2.7 37.2 -4.5 37.2 -4.5 37.3 -4.4 37.3 -4.4 <100
R12 52.0 55.6 3.6 45.0 -7.0 45.0 -7.0 45.2 -6.8 45.2 -6.8 <50
R13 41.9 44.0 2.1 39.4 -2.5 39.4 -2.5 39.5 -2.4 39.5 -2.4 <50
R14 34.7 36.6 1.9 33.8 -0.9 33.8 -0.9 33.9 -0.8 33.9 -0.8 <50
R15 35.2 37.3 2.1 34.6 -0.6 34.6 -0.6 34.7 -0.5 34.7 -0.5 <50
R16 20.2 20.2 0.0 20.1 -0.1 20.1 -0.1 20.1 -0.1 20.1 -0.1 <10
R17 21.7 21.7 0.0 21.7 0.0 21.7 0.0 21.7 0.0 21.7 0.0 <50
R18 23.5 23.5 0.0 23.3 -0.2 23.4 -0.1 23.3 -0.2 23.4 -0.1 <50
R19 20.1 20.2 0.1 20.1 0.0 20.1 0.0 20.1 0.0 20.1 0.0 <50
R20 25.8 26.1 0.3 25.3 -0.5 25.3 -0.5 25.4 -0.4 25.3 -0.5 <10
R21 23.6 23.5 -0.1 23.0 -0.6 23.7 0.1 23.0 -0.6 23.7 0.1 <100
POST CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 – SECTION 10 APPENDICES)
ii POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED
Receptor ID
Do Minimum (µg/m³) [1]
Route 1 (µg/m³)[1]
Route 1 Change µg/m³)
Route 3 WSL
(µg/m³)[1]
Route 3 WSL
Change (µg/m³)
Route 3 ESL
(µg/m³)[1]
Route3 ESL
Change (µg/m³)
Route 4 WSL
(µg/m³)[1]
Route 4 WSL
Change (µg/m³)
Route 4 ESL
(µg/m³)[1]
Route 4 ESL
Change (µg/m³)
Approximate Number of Potentially Influenced
Receptors [2]
R22 27.5 27.6 0.1 26.9 -0.6 27 -0.5 26.9 -0.6 27.0 -0.5 <50
R23 21.8 21.8 0.0 21.9 0.1 21.9 0.1 21.9 0.1 21.9 0.1 <50
R24 26.9 26.7 -0.2 26.8 -0.1 26.8 -0.1 26.8 -0.1 26.8 -0.1 <10
R25 23.8 23.8 0.0 23.9 0.1 23.9 0.1 23.9 0.1 23.9 0.1 <50
R26 33.1 33.1 0.0 33.1 0.0 33.1 0.0 33.0 -0.1 33.0 -0.1 <100
R27 37.3 37.0 -0.3 37.2 -0.1 37.2 -0.1 37.1 -0.2 37.1 -0.2 <100
R28 38.1 37.5 -0.6 37.6 -0.5 37.7 -0.4 37.5 -0.6 37.6 -0.5 <100
R29 24.5 25.0 0.5 24.8 0.3 24.9 0.4 25.0 0.5 25.0 0.5 <50
R30 17.8 18.3 0.5 17.6 -0.2 17.6 -0.2 17.6 -0.2 17.6 -0.2 <10
R31 21.5 21.7 0.2 20.9 -0.6 20.9 -0.6 21.1 -0.4 21.1 -0.4 <50
R32 25.4 25.8 0.4 24.2 -1.2 24.2 -1.2 24.6 -0.8 24.6 -0.8 <10
R33 30.2 30.8 0.6 34.8 4.6 34.9 4.7 28.9 -1.3 28.9 -1.3 <10
R34 24.7 24.8 0.1 25.9 1.2 25.9 1.2 24.0 -0.7 24.0 -0.7 <10
R35 17.4 17.4 0.0 17.1 -0.3 17.1 -0.3 18.5 1.1 18.6 1.2 <10
R36 22.3 22.4 0.1 23.0 0.7 22.4 0.1 23.0 0.7 22.5 0.2 <100
R37 20.5 20.6 0.1 20.1 -0.4 20.1 -0.4 20.4 -0.1 20.5 0.0 <10
R38 20.9 20.9 0.0 20.6 -0.3 20.6 -0.3 21.5 0.6 21.6 0.7 <50
R39 17.1 17.1 0.0 17.1 0.0 17.1 0.0 17.1 0.0 17.1 0.0 <100
R40 12.4 12.4 0.0 11.9 -0.5 13.8 1.4 11.9 -0.5 13.7 1.3 <50
R41 36.9 40.3 3.4 36.0 -0.9 36.0 -0.9 36.1 -0.8 36.1 -0.8 <50
R42 27.3 27.6 0.3 26.9 -0.4 26.9 -0.4 27.0 -0.3 27.0 -0.3 <10
R43 22.2 22.3 0.1 22.0 -0.2 22 -0.2 22.0 -0.2 22.0 -0.2 <50
R44 12.1 12.1 0.0 13.7 1.6 13.3 1.2 13.6 1.5 13.2 1.1 <10
R45 24.9 25.5 0.6 24.6 -0.3 24.6 -0.3 24.6 -0.3 24.6 -0.3 <10
R46 28.4 28.5 0.1 28.6 0.2 28.6 0.2 28.6 0.2 28.6 0.2 <50
POST CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 – SECTION 10 APPENDICES)
iii POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED
Receptor ID
Do Minimum (µg/m³) [1]
Route 1 (µg/m³)[1]
Route 1 Change µg/m³)
Route 3 WSL
(µg/m³)[1]
Route 3 WSL
Change (µg/m³)
Route 3 ESL
(µg/m³)[1]
Route3 ESL
Change (µg/m³)
Route 4 WSL
(µg/m³)[1]
Route 4 WSL
Change (µg/m³)
Route 4 ESL
(µg/m³)[1]
Route 4 ESL
Change (µg/m³)
Approximate Number of Potentially Influenced
Receptors [2]
R47 28.5 28.5 0.0 28.7 0.2 28.7 0.2 28.7 0.2 28.7 0.2 <50
R48 22.9 22.8 -0.1 21.4 -1.5 21.4 -1.5 21.4 -1.5 21.4 -1.5 <10
R49 31.4 33.0 1.6 30.5 -0.9 30.5 -0.9 30.7 -0.7 30.6 -0.8 <10
R50 16.8 16.9 0.1 17.0 0.2 17.0 0.2 17.0 0.2 17.0 0.2 <10
R51 19.5 19.5 0.0 19.6 0.1 19.6 0.1 19.6 0.1 19.6 0.1 <50
R52 20.7 20.5 -0.2 20.7 0.0 20.7 0.0 20.7 0.0 20.8 0.1 <100
R53 35.4 38.9 3.5 35.6 0.2 35.5 0.1 35.7 0.3 35.6 0.2 <10
R54 24.1 24.4 0.3 24.3 0.2 24.2 0.1 24.3 0.2 24.2 0.1 <10
R55 21.4 21.8 0.4 21.5 0.1 21.5 0.1 21.5 0.1 21.5 0.1 <10
R56 19.0 19.2 0.2 19.0 0.0 19.0 0.0 19.0 0.0 19.0 0.0 <10
R57 19.4 19.6 0.2 19.6 0.2 19.6 0.2 19.7 0.3 19.6 0.2 <10
R58 18.3 18.6 0.3 18.6 0.3 18.6 0.3 18.6 0.3 18.6 0.3 <10
R59 19.1 19.0 -0.1 18.9 -0.2 18.8 -0.3 18.9 -0.2 18.8 -0.3 <50
R60 14.9 14.9 0.0 14.9 0.0 14.9 0.0 14.9 0.0 14.9 0.0 <10
R61 17.6 17.8 0.2 17.4 -0.2 17.3 -0.3 17.4 -0.2 17.4 -0.2 <10
R62 23.0 23.1 0.1 22.8 -0.2 22.6 -0.4 22.9 -0.1 22.6 -0.4 <100
R63 19.6 19.9 0.3 19.3 -0.3 19.2 -0.4 19.3 -0.3 19.2 -0.4 <10
R64 15.4 15.6 0.2 15.1 -0.3 15.0 -0.4 15.2 -0.2 15.1 -0.3 <10
R65 13.0 13.2 0.2 12.9 -0.1 12.8 -0.2 12.9 -0.1 12.9 -0.1 <10
R66 16.0 16.0 0.0 15.9 -0.1 15.9 -0.1 16.0 0.0 15.9 -0.1 <50
R67 22.6 22.7 0.1 22.9 0.3 21.8 -0.8 22.2 -0.4 21.9 -0.7 <100
R68 25.0 25.1 0.1 26.8 1.8 35.1 10.1 26.7 1.7 34.9 9.9 <50
R69 12.2 12.2 0.0 12.4 0.2 12.5 0.3 12.4 0.2 12.5 0.3 <50
R70 22.2 22.2 0.0 23.2 1.0 23.6 1.4 23.2 1.0 23.6 1.4 <50
R71 22.9 22.9 0.0 25.1 2.2 25.5 2.6 25.0 2.1 25.5 2.6 <50
POST CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 – SECTION 10 APPENDICES)
iv POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED
Receptor ID
Do Minimum (µg/m³) [1]
Route 1 (µg/m³)[1]
Route 1 Change µg/m³)
Route 3 WSL
(µg/m³)[1]
Route 3 WSL
Change (µg/m³)
Route 3 ESL
(µg/m³)[1]
Route3 ESL
Change (µg/m³)
Route 4 WSL
(µg/m³)[1]
Route 4 WSL
Change (µg/m³)
Route 4 ESL
(µg/m³)[1]
Route 4 ESL
Change (µg/m³)
Approximate Number of Potentially Influenced
Receptors [2]
R72 18.5 18.5 0.0 18.7 0.2 18.8 0.3 18.7 0.2 18.8 0.3 <10
R73 15.8 15.8 0.0 15.9 0.1 15.9 0.1 15.9 0.1 15.9 0.1 <100
R74 21.8 21.9 0.1 22.2 0.4 22.2 0.4 21.3 -0.5 21.3 -0.5 <50
R75 22.9 23.0 0.1 25.2 2.3 25.2 2.3 23.1 0.2 23.1 0.2 <10
R76 29.9 30.3 0.4 32.6 2.7 32.7 2.8 32.7 2.8 32.8 2.9 <10
R77 21.1 21.2 0.1 21.4 0.3 21.4 0.3 21.4 0.3 21.4 0.3 <10
R78 18.7 18.8 0.1 18.4 -0.3 18.3 -0.4 18.4 -0.3 18.3 -0.4 <50
R79 25.4 25.6 0.2 25.1 -0.3 25 -0.4 25.1 -0.3 25.1 -0.3 <100
R80 22.1 22.2 0.1 22.2 0.1 23.3 1.2 22.2 0.1 23.3 1.2 <10
R81 25.5 25.5 0.0 25.5 0.0 25.5 0.0 25.5 0.0 25.5 0.0 <10
R82 19.6 19.6 0.0 20.0 0.4 20 0.4 19.7 0.1 19.7 0.1 <50
R83 12.4 12.4 0.0 14.1 1.7 12.1 -0.3 14.0 1.6 12.1 -0.3 <10
R84 20.2 20.2 0.0 19.0 -1.2 19.0 -1.2 19.2 -1.0 19.2 -1.0 <10
R85 19.2 19.1 -0.1 18.6 -0.6 18.6 -0.6 20.1 0.9 20.2 1.0 <10
R86 16.7 16.6 -0.1 16.9 0.2 16.9 0.2 16.4 -0.3 16.4 -0.3 <50
R87 18.4 18.5 0.1 18.7 0.3 18.7 0.3 18.6 0.2 18.6 0.2 <10
R88 17.5 17.5 0.0 17.4 -0.1 17.4 -0.1 17.8 0.3 17.8 0.3 <50
R89 12.5 12.5 0.0 12.5 0.0 14.5 2.0 12.5 0.0 14.3 1.8 <50
R93 15.7 15.7 0.0 16.1 0.4 17.7 2.0 16.1 0.4 17.6 1.9 <10
R94 15.6 15.7 0.1 15.8 0.2 15.8 0.2 15.6 0.0 15.6 0.0 <10
R95 13.7 13.7 0.0 13.7 0.0 13.7 0.0 14.6 0.9 14.7 1.0 <10
R100 14.5 14.5 0.0 14.6 0.1 14.6 0.1 14.6 0.1 14.6 0.1 <10
R101 14.9 14.9 0.0 14.9 0.0 14.9 0.0 14.9 0.0 14.9 0.0 <100
R102 13.9 13.9 0.0 13.9 0.0 13.9 0.0 13.8 -0.1 13.8 -0.1 <10
R103 31.3 31.6 0.3 31.5 0.2 31.5 0.2 31.5 0.2 31.5 0.2 <100
POST CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 – SECTION 10 APPENDICES)
v POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED
Receptor ID
Do Minimum (µg/m³) [1]
Route 1 (µg/m³)[1]
Route 1 Change µg/m³)
Route 3 WSL
(µg/m³)[1]
Route 3 WSL
Change (µg/m³)
Route 3 ESL
(µg/m³)[1]
Route3 ESL
Change (µg/m³)
Route 4 WSL
(µg/m³)[1]
Route 4 WSL
Change (µg/m³)
Route 4 ESL
(µg/m³)[1]
Route 4 ESL
Change (µg/m³)
Approximate Number of Potentially Influenced
Receptors [2]
R104 29.1 29.2 0.1 28.4 -0.7 28.4 -0.7 28.7 -0.4 28.8 -0.3 <100
R105 18.3 18.3 0.0 18.4 0.1 18.4 0.1 18.4 0.1 18.3 0.0 <100
R106 20.6 20.7 0.1 21.4 0.8 21.7 1.1 21.4 0.8 21.6 1.0 <100
R107 14.1 14.1 0.0 13.0 -1.1 15.1 1.0 13.0 -1.1 15.0 0.9 <50
R108 11.8 11.8 0.0 11.7 -0.1 11.8 0.0 11.7 -0.1 11.8 0.0 <50
R109 14.1 14.1 0.0 15.2 1.1 14.9 0.8 15.1 1.0 14.8 0.7 <50
[1] LTT=Long Term Trend. Predicted NO2 concentrations were adjusted using a Gap Factor based on the long term adjustment factor calculated by Highways England’s Interim Alternative Long Term Gap Analysis Calculator v1.1. All values reflect predicted concentrations for the future year 2025.
[2] Value reflects an approximated number of receptors which occur in the vicinity (and thereby may experience a similar effect of the scheme) as the modelled receptor.
If you need help accessing this or any other Highways England information,please call 0300 123 5000 and we will help you.
© Crown copyright 2017.You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence: visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk.
This document is also available on our website at www.gov.uk/highways
If you have any enquiries about this publication email info@highwaysengland.co.uk or call 0300 123 5000*. Please quote the Highways England publications code PR167/15
Highways England creative job number S160683
Report No HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012
Recommended